 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly& |* w4 K1 `1 b4 {3 E7 \8 |
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
x1 }8 \$ k" N5 @2 Q4 [unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
/ s) C( f: U6 eprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by; H6 n' R2 n; l6 @
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
( r8 H% n$ B$ e8 O# G+ aoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
9 S) b% S8 A2 X7 E1 othat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately8 s* s ]) Q1 \; W8 R
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past `) p! n3 t6 ^1 u
three years.$ y. h9 V8 _4 b% B
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from+ k5 F8 @2 U' K
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of, d0 C* k l& ^" X: E% d
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
% I1 M% i: {& p) l- C& S; gboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
; R; e- I& t0 c/ L t& vto fundamentally justified levels.; t. j% Z& W* M# }
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
+ p5 v0 z9 a! T+ d- h! t7 Bwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
# r) R/ g+ V& z/ `that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”" U0 K8 g6 [" d5 j' l1 g
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although0 T3 g% N0 K0 p
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s/ T, l! J- E- H& n/ n( q
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where3 ?5 j. l, A9 E" Q1 a
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
! @' m. O" Z: [! h5 V% c, tthat is now being rapidly reined in.2 B9 z' U& x2 H. {
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,, l- H* K5 F8 u2 e0 p# i
the construction of too many new homes over the boom1 @" U4 W% R4 m
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh. h8 P% l2 x" A9 P$ Q
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
& Z( p/ J. |. n' rfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
' r* @' _0 d% I1 s# {' rremain choppy and new residential construction will be+ |' a* B' q4 c6 @( X" k5 |
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
. c7 N# g6 m% [; e: C9 Mis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this" O! F# T% `5 i* p" ^; y- z' D
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide2 ~7 }: i/ U, H( s% }
residential construction will fall further to around* m8 i& @& O$ c+ j- F+ n6 _
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units& j1 F' a7 r' i( l. k1 R
in the fourth quarter.
7 u: x5 }, Z0 t: g ^To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
8 i. ]# L% J6 I/ j0 r1 rwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run6 T$ N! r( o) t5 p0 T w( a: B# s. r
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each0 r$ A& ~+ C6 `0 G+ d# @" f: b
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home5 J6 G6 b1 @2 h
values since house prices should track incomes over the# |# t/ {8 I6 J4 ^
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we2 Z3 U) O) G# T! u
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers& n/ p& a& X/ N; L0 {1 D( q
of residential construction.: N1 ]! A& c; t0 r! j- @
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
8 s4 i, j% K2 {/ X4 b“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction- U' k$ F1 |* M y7 |+ |
would have occurred if housing had been priced
3 e. f6 t: ?. x% T7 p* boptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
$ Y4 u4 U; Q( X ?( A; q" Y; ~+ vfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new; V% g3 S1 \( M+ l' b3 x$ v
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
) r3 M2 P% n1 j( W+ wmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
- i3 ]6 D( B: ^' l1 URegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,# c) c9 H, h" p3 S7 ?6 Y
where housing demand will further contract under waning* p1 V! d# V' N: `, F
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are) S4 u& p3 l7 _0 e4 r
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
; c- U- Q# o' R' s3 Kvery time that the resale market has swung into strong% D" S$ |, H- O
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces% v' }' `8 j, ~0 H
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural4 X* }5 g9 I; Z, B6 W/ y8 V
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
* v! p4 T3 l! t: v- ~) _Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
& L; B( g1 H1 E7 @strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de- R. p6 E) S/ i- t
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,1 v- C9 Y' d2 |$ Q- H
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership3 a7 X1 l* i4 \; Z" E
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a0 g! I/ s2 n8 V" k* O. @6 u
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears" k3 e- G. o \, Y) c) ^
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
4 `8 R* G( ~$ ]/ Kcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically) a+ J: V6 F- P n+ l: v" L
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
; B8 \- l7 V/ j2 k. V6 H/ Uconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
' q0 j: |6 R7 t8 Y* {! Oreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
6 Z) H8 K Y( J0 n6 P# Acyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could! e" {" \, K4 f2 s% _8 q
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
; o' W; Q2 l1 P1 Cresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
8 O; c; {$ C& b* tanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from' k1 J+ V" o9 W% l; M
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
- b$ d0 A; ^6 U1 k8 @6 kyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,% j* G$ J& x+ Y% q: l$ L% u( W/ f9 h
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.$ n! G% M$ ]( Z4 J2 W+ ]* K* O
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING% [9 I( R+ p9 Y9 |* i z
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS4 p8 v y- Y' K% k% Y
Grant Bishop, Economist
1 T" ]" H9 J6 x Y4 L) B y416-982-80632 C7 V- {9 R" ^. x: \: p5 s) @9 Q
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
1 t+ b6 h/ ^# O4 t+ P8 s416-944-5730
! z: h0 K1 x! k! I
1 I- c( F2 J: ?' b8 ~2 ]http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|