 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
5 `) c2 m5 e* _- V& W! d! q+ yfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove, R M/ P4 D1 z6 W% M) J
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house; a) g! {/ ]7 c4 h
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
7 @9 A- X% T2 n/ F9 x. _fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
, n. S& g0 v( i8 Ooverpricing compelled a level of residential construction* n" M" y( G- n- Y5 F
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately' J/ c; `9 K, Z* A6 }' Z @5 g
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past% T, r* V. v2 ]: V. c
three years.
7 A- _8 A2 Y* d+ A: wBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from8 g! C" m/ F/ b e: K1 q+ S# M
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of7 q" |7 U, ~7 y, w2 _9 _0 B
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
( l& S" x0 [: P" {both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices6 b3 T$ _4 r/ ?, P) e& B
to fundamentally justified levels.& D6 M6 h# B! h) `" l
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”* |3 A2 k( Y; f
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and. m+ O/ o: a2 t6 X& Q3 Q1 V e" T* l
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
5 Z4 i+ Q$ M6 G6 u* g6 kwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although% R# C5 F# L7 q7 K) N- H- E
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
& t! r. C$ M+ w5 L" [“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
Z' V; d+ {9 m, F; ~homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
2 J- K: G. D9 U0 `that is now being rapidly reined in.' a* h- F/ r* N- o7 m# l' [" T
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,# U4 V2 R2 ^) [* | V% z9 S( R
the construction of too many new homes over the boom) U9 M1 G5 W C1 [8 k0 q3 s& a8 G
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
( k6 c+ Q6 E) l( P- r6 |/ Z$ Mon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers9 h9 ]! r8 c7 r" B% B
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will) q9 b; f \( D
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
5 X8 q# @' ~' mdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
1 w3 [9 E! a! y9 ]9 _* I6 tis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
" @3 L8 _, z; \to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide$ ]3 C8 l5 r* {; B7 O9 F
residential construction will fall further to around
% D9 Q. H* q8 y1 C, _) j- G0 Z1 ^125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
# K2 m$ t# h/ Z7 O1 d# rin the fourth quarter.
% W2 J& e% `& \. f, Z0 PTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
/ u5 p4 t& |! k7 Gwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
4 X6 o0 }( S: W* y2 _: ]fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
6 M% D9 _" B8 G* c5 K5 zprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
2 ]2 C l0 Y; U: u% F0 ~values since house prices should track incomes over the
z& @. s: ~ `3 C5 ]long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
! x# o4 W/ D8 x8 O2 Zregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
# V* t2 o0 j H6 l- E- [: Hof residential construction.3 c9 H* R5 n7 ?+ u
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
# d* K2 b6 Y3 \9 Z& `; ?“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction' Z2 O3 i9 p$ p6 |& i4 \
would have occurred if housing had been priced' {2 P/ G# Y- v. g4 x+ R
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
% J+ K& Y# P# n. E' v8 tfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new9 }3 l6 E) r# M" D7 V" g+ P
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
: B. p5 [( i6 y k& g; r( y% kmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.% @* ~( \6 }* r) s
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,/ M" C& I# H3 m% o( Q+ [9 H6 f
where housing demand will further contract under waning
O/ Z% h ^3 m4 Hpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are" u& u7 |; o. T& C8 x' g0 m
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the* `* O; U' C% o, W- Z' D2 @
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
4 [) ]9 Q) l: n0 [% p" W% kbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces; W; K( N! a; q/ _) m
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural3 I* B8 `9 q( O* `+ P! O1 O! a
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
2 N, E" j3 k9 X- ?3 t0 fQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
) C, r" p# g2 O2 F% A; X5 f8 A9 estrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
) m$ f* h. {' Z; WMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
* Y5 i3 y, p0 r9 T% ggiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
5 J; f; G0 q: v6 h& X& v; {. T1 Zrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a' P3 @; b! p8 f8 n# o
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears' m3 q' w: F6 P3 z2 U8 k! {6 d( s0 x
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
" l% U# P5 r& y+ ?8 G: T* I! mcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically) r9 H/ d0 H+ h9 ~
high levels of apartment-style units presently under, o& L5 M4 M0 X- f8 P/ V' e
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
7 B6 _: D& m2 I3 H# {reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as1 A( K& R# L8 C+ p. |
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could6 F8 Y: X$ s4 j7 `6 o; e7 i
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while# n3 Q6 ^9 z( U
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we/ T: u. X; h# R' q; b
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
4 c' l/ N9 A9 V4 minter-provincial and international migration over the coming" d H. ]# J! c2 r! k5 z
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
) l3 I: ~! A. \( H3 ]& W7 hwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
J6 V/ @5 `2 q6 I. jOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
: H! a/ P' X7 Q7 HMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
9 k+ _2 \2 r/ U: W/ d/ GGrant Bishop, Economist
) I1 M% j1 I$ F, I416-982-8063- d) u8 x B. l" o4 T) r3 z0 j; |
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
6 C1 M$ i3 p7 v! r2 r416-944-5730& z# [; U" ]! G0 X9 e
/ w3 `* g( _; c4 X
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|