 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly8 R0 L* h) M2 |
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove5 e2 x0 V" U2 ?) b6 W$ y
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
% [, H3 ?9 b8 w3 `prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by) u; I. t: L4 G" K
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* `$ j# V1 u+ D3 O7 W+ foverpricing compelled a level of residential construction1 C, ?. L& L3 M; b! G2 I4 c
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately( y2 N3 J- \" o6 M% O6 x
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past9 ?* \/ I5 A# E1 E6 d8 P
three years.
6 k; d- N" G4 R- o1 mBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from% l' f6 ]9 w3 T
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
, T6 v! v7 E, l9 h2 c ~( Taffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects. }- g* r+ U2 N; I% c" }9 b' K
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices9 ]5 g% M) t) ]3 T b
to fundamentally justified levels.
9 ]& p, o( O5 x: w" ^We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”8 }( E( P9 O, v$ M
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and5 d5 X% Y- i C
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”. C, l( ?: W) A3 }; A: C' y& G/ ?
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although) K0 W- q4 u' ~! z4 D
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
; w. r3 p( J9 m* M1 ~3 _“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where9 x0 |3 C/ \3 I5 S2 n2 d1 P! m
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch: E8 ^4 n3 y9 p3 G1 ?" |
that is now being rapidly reined in.% W3 D1 w, a6 v& E6 T
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,, ]6 \5 p/ n# i6 B# ~ z6 ?' z+ d' X6 b- p
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
6 _, ]5 a1 L4 u' v8 G: Wmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh0 p' w5 A# V: v/ l1 t0 F
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
2 t( G( L+ g( o, xfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
+ Z; U" P% g" a- b1 w7 N( @& }remain choppy and new residential construction will be
" \6 F4 l; k* g1 @dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
: w" G7 K9 T1 t$ l: S i0 F/ R xis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this8 B$ Z7 w2 s# b3 W
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide! w% \/ o I5 i- l3 [
residential construction will fall further to around, [0 {$ c' {6 f+ ?. b; o$ Z5 r6 c! J
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units) k. `! E5 Q9 z
in the fourth quarter./ _. w2 H* p1 W' n. [
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
* Z( a# X& N. F7 zwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
6 ]5 ]" V+ c! M: x9 k1 J" qfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each* f8 ^1 j% N* ^3 [$ L
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home2 m* ]9 t- D" g; k% b. z# h$ b
values since house prices should track incomes over the
% u; T0 h* s7 i( l6 S. ulong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
% [" o/ G- S$ ^regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers0 n7 D: r+ r6 \/ j- S+ ~; q$ w
of residential construction.6 p3 g; {8 K% q0 @
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
" F% L( _, {: Y$ @: N! u“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
8 |2 N1 p! {+ Z1 x" k" i9 Fwould have occurred if housing had been priced- N, e& |$ a. p3 m
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
" R$ [1 M P$ S- |, O! ?& z E6 efundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
0 i, F- M, X; w5 g1 P0 \& qunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too7 ?0 {4 X9 c$ I7 _, k
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.6 u3 ?6 s. @" @, Q- l M+ C
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
0 q6 ^3 r8 Y! c8 {. Wwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
: ^! w% c' J! {* y' Jpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are$ ~. u6 X1 X: I- e, J1 O L0 @1 w. k6 M
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the! l7 Y, G* G. R. J
very time that the resale market has swung into strong9 ?- [' \9 r# H7 \
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces2 @" w4 u4 l7 v* {/ p
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
- ?8 R: v; c2 D8 V% x- L ^9 J. w* G/ Gweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.2 K- C' n" g* r7 \5 S1 H" |
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
: o/ s( K4 m* w: T2 Q* e9 ~# J3 `strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
% U# ]" m4 d0 ]" I/ g$ `; Z/ QMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,# c- o! b& N8 y* ~* E d4 F
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
8 L! {2 g+ C1 x: Trates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a4 q0 u% y/ z; `
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
3 T) H: Y& A! |+ c# }limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
' ]8 j l+ C( _condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically* J! }: U9 V/ y- }2 {
high levels of apartment-style units presently under* o, p: v6 q! L/ r
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
% S2 v1 n& T; `( S6 ereach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as9 X; c. M! Y/ `4 D: d& V) z& ?
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
4 t" Y- ?* Z0 X" Ospike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while* a+ G* r7 A: V i) e2 k
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we4 x# Z9 d2 T: B, X/ Y2 e8 M
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
$ x! x, S" u, `8 l) linter-provincial and international migration over the coming5 K& f7 D& V' b( q. T4 g7 Y
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
* V3 ? P- L0 l! dwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding. O7 y( a7 z" ?: ~+ ?2 @: n; e
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
) a n1 a# i3 i! A+ ^+ `; R! iMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS. p" Y7 r% E. S; O0 @% |' b
Grant Bishop, Economist( F+ H8 O4 A$ f5 Q. M4 Q% X
416-982-8063
( y& G* a0 ]+ p/ N% D7 \2 a5 F: GPascal Gauthier, Economist
4 R+ H& J9 z3 c2 l6 ~416-944-57301 }# U6 f( ~" E6 p/ q% V: t
3 {3 q( A. M2 k Y7 W0 u3 e
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|