 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly0 @1 J" ^. F; e: c3 ?2 `; `. f
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
# x9 h% p O' N: l0 |unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
6 `' n4 h. a/ d9 x/ w! hprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by8 O. v& p8 @; M" \
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* m' P* ]- N9 g. ^- I9 Uoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction& i% D( Y0 k; Z# F; k
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately% V5 E) ^( Z- i4 L" c- G
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past- `) S( q D, P/ h& I6 _
three years.
2 u V* [6 Q W/ L5 g. ABy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from+ f" F5 O E1 t/ e) z0 ]
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
. o# ?/ ]( S" {- [( Naffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects) l. O( R9 Q2 n9 a, R
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices7 v! @3 Z2 {' j' f V' M, e5 B
to fundamentally justified levels.8 Y: E5 R# |8 s! t# i0 ?
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
7 y8 v f2 D' g* iwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
1 C! @( a( @# D+ |# U- e) s W0 Ithat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”5 @. B3 E* ?: F7 j
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
1 K) T: `/ h6 z' m* Uthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s9 ?3 d; g. a1 p$ w- t* H$ p
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where+ F2 _ c* n; j$ t. r8 S
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
5 d2 r- B3 V) X0 ]* i4 z% r6 f% Gthat is now being rapidly reined in.
N( s0 r2 a% T5 K2 H0 kWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
) t2 u& [( j* V$ Zthe construction of too many new homes over the boom, t: }' }2 U6 g, L3 \' k
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh: {( F( k, L9 p- c* x' M) }- T! m
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers* l% `; z& E0 u, o: S+ x* r
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will' o+ u' K! q; p! [: B' ~" q9 T
remain choppy and new residential construction will be9 ~4 |2 U* V. y' C
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction5 i" `$ w. s% V$ n0 p$ ^7 p/ I
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
6 X7 O0 w; P3 Pto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
- X& V9 V" [, y+ z7 B$ r* nresidential construction will fall further to around" [, R( g% O: t( j
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units$ z2 U9 m0 O# \4 B9 n: W
in the fourth quarter.
1 z# R" A* i. K+ X0 N6 J, iTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
' z' L2 w' W8 i5 u( }0 Ywe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
. v/ v/ \ e2 mfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
& B1 F8 f+ ^6 p9 U) qprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home& l$ w# N8 S, A* V2 \) |
values since house prices should track incomes over the
2 \/ c0 R4 y i% [long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we& O `7 [9 p" B0 Z1 `
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
C: K0 C) p, ~9 n5 v, z% ~9 ^of residential construction.8 x- X# f4 ^! s, U' y4 q8 V$ z& [
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
3 K, ~3 G2 G: w5 S9 ]% Y8 L* F“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction9 |6 O5 P0 _; }, V, I$ x/ p* I
would have occurred if housing had been priced/ E: l4 L4 u1 B% q2 ~* X
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this) j7 y i( \9 Q X
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
" }+ ~7 n J( n+ ]( L& _units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too$ _4 z, g- [: P# c
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals. F5 T/ ^/ A @2 l: W2 \
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,1 b) Y( ^% W5 |% R; O& x- G
where housing demand will further contract under waning
, `7 S! n t+ a/ h3 jpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
# G* S' ^* `1 n7 q& o( ]already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the# }4 z+ ~1 y. M. W
very time that the resale market has swung into strong0 m( y5 A8 y! R y
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces- X+ P: s( C8 A) t5 {( H
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural) h u! V1 Y! c( u/ r, I
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.* I; P' ~: h- [& e# f
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
. M. v2 J; f( Mstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de( G, u+ u* a8 X: i, M8 Q
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,3 e* [6 Y) d8 p* c# S; |
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
% U' h$ M% {2 I4 r$ Trates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
. G* l6 N8 D# b, lcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
. \. W) s7 t3 ^; D4 llimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
4 j9 z7 J% ~ n9 a( tcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
& x) }0 `; B# S4 T9 b, _; Ghigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
$ w: L5 a. g& uconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will8 @' y6 C- [( H. G! O3 O0 S/ Y
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as: u0 u9 f' v/ Y
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
! @! B. {6 F7 ^' d! T dspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while1 ^) _6 \' p& @- g+ m
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we h) E0 t* j* B4 @9 W7 W+ t
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
- f2 D7 P3 v% d1 R, e' Ninter-provincial and international migration over the coming; \9 Z- W' k2 w, j" N! A
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,6 K7 ?7 q8 m. l1 y4 g
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
w" ~. c q! WOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING7 E, f& Z6 q" ^
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
/ R H1 Z8 z& ?: ~8 rGrant Bishop, Economist! N/ [6 K* D! {) q6 a; F, b7 h) M! |
416-982-8063
% B) ^4 s# w1 s. |" S hPascal Gauthier, Economist' f. }- G {; ? ^! b
416-944-5730
+ t& H1 Y, y- I9 p
8 d" Y! l' h0 ^5 i" Lhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|