 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
2 }" I( d1 W( J7 d/ K1 h! F) jfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
) W Y4 w- Q) Aunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
4 M) k8 H! @3 a- G5 Y- M/ zprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
6 p1 m) q& \. G3 Wfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This; W( F/ k& M+ O: s' K9 G
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction! d2 k3 w. @2 H9 P' @3 F3 @8 n
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
: L4 U5 B9 T: \12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
: O' M4 A7 c2 Hthree years.! b( f0 B* ^( S) _
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from, H- @0 S4 n8 B
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of! g& `1 c0 p! ?; i0 q
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
' W/ s o9 |6 }2 ? [/ oboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices5 M9 `' ]2 x* Q
to fundamentally justified levels.
3 `3 z' F- }% f4 |' {. OWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”6 d7 y q& h* [4 \! k; P# S
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
( n5 J; i0 Z9 {, w! rthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”/ u! s+ X, d Q& n4 j
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although9 c0 A1 O0 c! l3 @8 Z2 w. \- E. j% Q
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
0 S1 F, J/ H+ d1 N“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where' v' x- Y" R& }( y. J/ N0 d
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch) ?/ t! x# ^: |8 z+ }
that is now being rapidly reined in.
# @7 q4 Z% n# j" TWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,& M1 J, M8 [* l q! ~! k
the construction of too many new homes over the boom. ]+ C8 }5 Y" d0 h/ l
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
" E. v" w5 T2 I" M* x# `9 Yon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
) N' u7 Q- u/ k3 x9 a% Yfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will) E D% U6 Y; S. M- \
remain choppy and new residential construction will be" x% @" }7 |! p; W1 P0 H8 w
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
) N+ m1 m% g* `is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this' U' h/ v7 K Q L, ]
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 ]: r& }0 \% p% t7 w8 ^
residential construction will fall further to around7 h5 V9 L. i# T1 `! W% N# L
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
; R% @ j3 Q$ L& ?( Y' ain the fourth quarter.
& Q$ ]0 j( I O; T# b5 t( jTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,, G; q4 q- t, \! C! W T
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run6 V7 d% V# b+ ]
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each4 x/ k/ u- H8 B: R# S. Y# u
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home5 w+ [$ y5 e2 [0 Q @9 F% D
values since house prices should track incomes over the) L& v* H Q. t+ B" O, p5 j
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we+ `# r: S: V: k0 ?) d- u& n/ Y$ z% ?$ J
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers) }; I f! d& L% J) W
of residential construction. C& K) Z6 n5 z4 {2 h
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a: |6 F( q3 d# Y
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction" C) d; P+ z' l
would have occurred if housing had been priced
0 q" `( a. q& b9 A# M3 W4 Goptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
4 G* ?! Y6 A: jfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new( g, a! x1 z4 U1 }# ]! p
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too0 T( C* K8 l. t/ j
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
G0 s: N* P3 G- }) V; y1 wRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,* N2 u$ L+ i. x5 {
where housing demand will further contract under waning0 s4 T! R! g3 u6 F1 ?
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are2 J$ l5 Z, Z7 L Z
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
+ S+ p7 H* @7 y4 y# k V& ?very time that the resale market has swung into strong* J. E. X6 c) ^2 f9 Y, |
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
# @9 J) a1 S- ?) _# s6 w7 |% J1 khas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
9 u( @3 R I' @0 Hweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
- K% f5 I6 d6 [3 r, zQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the/ `: J( G* ^" G" K8 E: u
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
+ ~( c/ n( W3 O, r. PMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
' w+ i; k6 [1 }+ L9 lgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership% H8 E" _/ D4 f) z/ r
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a; U2 M' s( i6 m& n1 v
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
6 o* ]0 n: x) ?$ O8 dlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
7 O* b2 B6 W: Q( M& G& o/ E- [condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
0 v) y0 F) Q, F" Vhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
; a9 |! u) f5 t& R* a6 Tconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will$ E! Y" Q/ X) t, m
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as) c/ b8 x4 p A, ^. }$ e
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
2 H8 b* x4 E) [. h! k. v) gspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while6 ]# @% f# k9 Q: t% m
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we; s- q# S. {5 g2 X& e3 e' |
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
# O. H, n$ v; ^inter-provincial and international migration over the coming0 G; q8 D$ W# H
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,+ y3 ~: s* j4 S/ o# k a% l
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
0 T4 x' z3 q; R2 R8 DOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING- U8 P/ ?4 g4 V( Y3 u! ^( G
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS, z: [ k- [+ b! K; y& x8 }$ X
Grant Bishop, Economist( K2 Z, O+ k3 {7 c2 b& x0 g+ i
416-982-8063
' Q- D6 o& \) h% cPascal Gauthier, Economist
- u4 X/ G% e! A. f* g! e( a0 |416-944-5730/ l! d9 `7 L* S+ X3 g+ s
8 G6 z! d' c. p
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|