 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
- E) H' p1 Z: J" u$ i# tfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
( U1 i- E/ | i- S. munsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
. i8 ^: H( \/ F# I+ ^+ G) Nprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by; Y7 {" _, o& ?3 r" \+ S
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* i2 W! ^" y4 b+ r; z7 G$ ~: Z) Goverpricing compelled a level of residential construction) x: @5 K" q9 a
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately' u9 V" t" B/ t3 n( ?
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past$ I7 w* E# s, I4 j
three years.9 }/ {/ O( s( Y9 e0 e' z, ^( |! I5 Z
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
; O/ W# m$ j1 X5 d- t2 Z: dtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of: }$ J4 d3 P# i! b! \
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects3 q" `( I4 n' N- p3 E0 ?" R
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
+ x5 M: v1 l6 M! a4 [. B: c2 Oto fundamentally justified levels.
" P- u: V# Q% |8 `$ Q1 iWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”; s3 X' r/ [+ z' L( \# \
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and7 P' s4 {) h4 d8 Z& q6 ^0 r9 i
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
. u% h6 C7 h1 Q. @where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although t% ^/ x# T5 x" v- B. n" ~0 K3 p
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
/ ]6 f2 a$ p( B% z“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where) X/ @! j5 G2 l
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
1 \' A% Q% X8 }8 w! Y$ S Tthat is now being rapidly reined in., {( t( S- d L$ J, O' p! R
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,) a+ d1 y0 s: ?. v( F v2 U
the construction of too many new homes over the boom, t/ c/ O Z' p3 ]& Y: F
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh( t3 G* n8 m2 x% r/ q, w# ]+ ]3 q4 i
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers0 }: I2 o' b4 A' Z l1 w( \
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
/ c) H/ B, Z! Z z7 a6 X+ r. T/ z: rremain choppy and new residential construction will be
! P0 Q. |% w4 f6 \( ?dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
3 S4 S. m$ k; F8 |3 H; ~is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this- ]: x: `; F. e/ \
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
/ H" O1 t) u, p( c! [5 ?. aresidential construction will fall further to around
% ~5 Q- Y7 n7 S: s' l# Y125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
6 X/ w& f4 H' [' Q, q H, Ain the fourth quarter.1 j3 {4 h; G* ^- d( R
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,% n7 `# o, U) i& p
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
0 h9 v) B3 _) x0 a9 \fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each1 a2 m& ?3 r" U2 R, L. g
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
! X$ u9 J- ^0 _values since house prices should track incomes over the# I- }( z0 q" e* C
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
' \. u. I) e7 B: b5 sregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers+ L7 F* f _" p" z4 f" `2 D: |
of residential construction.# n" @8 ]/ N# l
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a& A7 n' e8 J) I1 i+ r7 \
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction5 a8 r* F" u. }) E
would have occurred if housing had been priced
) m( c1 \, Y) \3 roptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
9 [# R. i% q+ sfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new5 w8 I. T# V" g4 X& O* H1 e- W
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
6 Z# }2 Z% f* tmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.3 T2 J* A$ m+ D( B
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
3 j5 v5 }( ]* W' c/ ?) L4 Zwhere housing demand will further contract under waning) q6 b: X) K- h- H- h& g
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are! @5 H: N. d- j; T3 q/ d% F; g! R
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
6 v0 E$ Y: I0 b8 ~: yvery time that the resale market has swung into strong& H2 O+ p7 p4 [, F! s. w( V
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces* W9 x$ \) u0 a2 s) d1 Y+ `8 L
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural/ x5 j8 o/ \9 K( J5 M& K- N/ I: g
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
! m7 G- i3 |8 }Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the4 [. p+ ~( C+ V# N3 G
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
( b( E0 j8 n( ^Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,4 L! G* z5 q% j# v2 X4 I0 n4 a
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
) L6 f* x- V' p% N0 brates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
+ K" n# E+ l2 }8 o Y+ ccyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
# c5 U5 z" t8 ^! z: c5 _limited – with the important exception of the Toronto2 [6 P4 s" M; t! ^) T
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically) c, i4 o I7 @! n p
high levels of apartment-style units presently under5 N7 E, f9 y5 m& B
construction mean that record numbers of condos will3 s. i& k; ~. |& B
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
! n3 v7 l k* X" n1 O1 gcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could! @7 V( _+ E. d8 Q( [& z: {
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
g7 @/ _' c# i1 \5 e3 N" mresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we$ j8 [7 L! X+ H. ~& }3 g& M% }5 p2 i
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from2 q# z3 M( l5 ?2 g( ~8 [5 [ L0 |
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming7 i6 b% z" Q. s3 T
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,/ r" q1 h, `) I
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
) E1 L1 X1 [2 F) qOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
$ F/ \3 @& y7 D. v( l' @, @" m8 F/ jMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS4 _+ _7 r9 _9 a( x! \
Grant Bishop, Economist2 p& P0 F! E5 I1 v
416-982-80631 b2 f! {5 x* e/ a5 @& k$ c# c* y
Pascal Gauthier, Economist u- T+ E2 X2 x+ l
416-944-57306 d4 r' z3 u8 u0 Y& h
8 A: {2 I t9 Z) @, Shttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|