 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly. C2 M! X; L4 Q. M
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove% e6 J2 m: [: i
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
- c0 Y5 i. @% }! v Lprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
0 t' Z/ _, {/ [; y! @; u3 @fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
0 a( q. \! s1 h" u. h' c6 foverpricing compelled a level of residential construction8 |* M5 R6 S9 h, Y7 u' x
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
" t9 H, e; t. x12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past! E0 O- D. V O
three years.
: D' i5 w4 R! W/ U1 O0 {9 n8 yBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from$ p9 `* ~$ s: I( I
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of/ K: o1 [7 U: d# ^
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
2 Q- \. w$ R+ v1 a2 J; A) W' x$ @both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices4 `" }4 I8 f- q8 H( D, i1 @/ L
to fundamentally justified levels.: Z) P% q7 R0 }
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
+ P) }7 R! T z' D; i Dwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
" E- r, R( n$ mthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”9 E7 v" o* B6 R, [/ M5 z4 C+ _. v
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
7 M/ p2 S) q! d+ I0 fthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s- g: \) u" n* Y; p7 q
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
8 ]4 H* R( e9 P1 Fhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
) k0 Y8 E6 p- hthat is now being rapidly reined in.
& x& x1 \3 K" h, X$ c. FWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,# r: W5 l6 {( g; }8 k- l( s
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
# ^5 p3 ~! G# i5 q% D$ s7 kmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
: I1 ~& q$ v8 ^3 h# X8 }. ron markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
" j. {/ Z( ] c! J/ D) M, nfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
6 N2 k; v3 b9 g6 xremain choppy and new residential construction will be
/ O! ?( y8 {; a/ _" ldampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction* K+ z3 g. K% l5 b* g9 x6 V4 D
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this3 W) G$ E: z2 u6 r) n$ R4 o4 q
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
% \9 R9 ]& A/ E% G! ?3 i# m& |residential construction will fall further to around
$ ^* k8 Z+ G! ^8 ~125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
" {6 q/ D3 }) C. A5 ~8 [' Y% G5 ~in the fourth quarter.5 K0 Q& V& W5 c9 P* G9 }& Z
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,: C/ F% s; b5 P" |5 X3 x, m* v0 C: U
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
/ p% y" y/ U. ?3 e, g! w) U* x8 u7 Cfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each6 `& R3 n+ ^' I4 J
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
7 s b" ^4 P" _; M+ [" mvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
5 o4 \( S5 A9 Xlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we5 C3 D5 l# }& p& B3 Y6 H
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
# U& n5 w9 @! gof residential construction.7 H: l q; d$ p) R- N
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
9 D1 v/ b" C( x. @% k$ a! @6 E# e& n“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction) W% q% X& D. j" W) I- s+ p; X9 p
would have occurred if housing had been priced
, z3 g3 [) k+ l$ Poptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
5 `' r( \2 b" z! pfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
: r% i' k/ V2 U# A- g, y6 Vunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too$ X7 v& O, o+ E
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.* J4 T8 F$ W; v( r, `, O
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,! H9 N$ N" R( j2 J
where housing demand will further contract under waning
1 \7 K9 W- Z- [) v& ^2 {population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are3 s: ^5 S; K1 J; S
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
4 o9 w& w9 q* s" ivery time that the resale market has swung into strong
k9 R; r' V8 D/ W0 `5 O, `# Xbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
. [4 m+ E/ W6 `8 X( O" ghas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural* m& b8 T8 x- H' v
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
, c. E. a) `, B8 @Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
# p" V* {6 C+ l8 s" h* Ustrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de% s6 p7 J1 A6 A/ v
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
$ v1 X9 m/ G! l( \given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
8 i; b' i; X- U; d6 f+ Srates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a$ M" Z) C# j% z w( `; \8 k8 n. V* R- ]) ~
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears) y; ?5 F' D. M+ F7 t, Z
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
: w/ j0 C! k% T$ g- y! ]4 ^4 Fcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically5 N+ |4 O1 J& x& q( @
high levels of apartment-style units presently under, ?1 D! |* g7 ?& d
construction mean that record numbers of condos will% [. \( N+ `, T( p
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
+ V* X: ^3 a1 \4 v# P: Ccyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
r! \# D' N- g: l( i6 }spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while+ B ` C [1 ~% E3 o" b. R+ G
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
# c9 i" ^: B4 V3 t/ L3 danticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
8 Z1 }9 ]8 n: y y- `4 cinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
( T/ k8 M$ R7 Z& r- \) W/ w7 _years, which, along with improvements in affordability,4 L3 o! |$ V4 x* s- R/ o
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.8 ?0 k- J! j$ \' o
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING5 O' p2 ^5 Z3 b0 \
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS& l8 w8 h, u3 ~" S, Y
Grant Bishop, Economist
" T% L( F) f& C! W' D$ P+ T416-982-8063
; b! T; a2 l! t/ ]Pascal Gauthier, Economist" l9 y8 i% L; k( P; [- A1 d* q
416-944-5730
1 G4 t# t" ]7 W5 v8 Y
( Q' C. m# X3 d P/ ehttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|