 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly5 D8 \! Z0 b, p! e( Z
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove+ W, z2 O$ ^& X! [: u
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
6 j6 I$ |: S1 a4 M0 Yprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
5 Z( U0 T- w" L, q4 z3 \+ A0 y7 Ffundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
$ R* D. f9 k7 G- L! _overpricing compelled a level of residential construction3 j l1 H6 t# c" _0 S5 l3 _' R1 d7 P' t
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately; M0 w c) X3 [6 a& b8 O! A- J
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past% Q$ W" T$ G$ \# E0 Y, p
three years.6 e2 }! U+ B c) j: s$ a) p! a
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from H$ V# B. G0 {6 n5 x) h
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of% d# ^0 N2 a$ W8 h$ Q! i6 ?0 j% z5 S
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects$ B# K; P2 }* w
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
2 _* ~2 P T5 @" u3 K7 ?to fundamentally justified levels.% A& m. m( U5 x3 \
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”4 i$ H& ^: C( V# ], \8 F1 T; P& G
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
" R) d4 l3 h: a% Gthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”1 T8 ?* ?" ]" [5 }/ A! M. ?
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although: b$ Q9 p% A% f' ]: X$ z& `
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s. @& _. I4 Z. X$ k
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
7 }2 ?- f1 W# e+ a4 [+ M; H; Z: ghomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch! k5 [1 o3 r0 x; {1 x" i
that is now being rapidly reined in./ t7 f9 M& b" z& w4 ]% ~
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
6 H9 J& D" B& N( M9 w- H1 uthe construction of too many new homes over the boom7 p$ g7 S7 l: x8 v; A3 z, `
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh- [8 i* ^( L/ Q* L
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
/ w& Y0 u2 r6 O) q0 Z/ t6 j/ Dfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will0 K$ l5 L& w; S
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
3 h2 o7 o, c! R* G) k* bdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
2 v) c8 O* M4 V1 ^7 u+ {2 Bis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this z6 M0 O* J! ~& _) g
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide- O% c$ i+ ]1 P# O3 \, k/ |/ j
residential construction will fall further to around
1 {& ^( T. `9 g0 D8 o125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
7 G! ]; k: B8 F7 a( A3 Rin the fourth quarter.( W6 Y3 A1 t* t5 {' O: M ?
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
/ O- L. A) f$ r( ]we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
$ B' b% c- j; \% i4 R$ i6 ffundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
% Q, ]! R+ I, Q4 ?+ s8 b8 oprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
0 ?$ Z# ~- j# C! I4 cvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
- P6 l2 T& r( Ulong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we0 H: F# _3 F( d( X* f0 K
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
* Y e5 {; m; @2 z1 a0 V7 R2 z! U6 Uof residential construction.$ D* t1 O9 F1 i% w
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
* T* L, q- G- E4 e2 r3 U- w- G9 }“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
' T& f( }( N% L, @! {would have occurred if housing had been priced- j, P* A: t- p4 G
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this6 ~0 c. J% X( S. o5 V; h
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
% J8 F. l5 {7 G( w1 Eunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
) t7 f5 Q3 x2 i. T4 @: Umany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.- x5 h$ n( N3 U- G
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,% ?- r6 {) d9 y! c1 B* g) v
where housing demand will further contract under waning1 z* ^& k" j0 a8 X; v0 e
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
2 T1 n* P" f3 w* U Zalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
/ J% Q4 R( y) y' s: _very time that the resale market has swung into strong4 n/ c0 u1 [1 i; H2 g+ n# O1 t
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
3 R. @) ^- }: _0 w; \has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural) A% [; _0 D+ p) U
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.' h. K3 `/ Y! h6 E3 @( H
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the. T) D; b, H3 J/ n
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
+ b* }% ?$ U4 L0 e+ lMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
0 ~1 }( B( H) {. w# i- Wgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
; O+ S9 }7 H$ f* m/ y( nrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
% i( T [9 k; Y: lcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
, b2 s! h" p* flimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
# p& K; i1 E! B0 s" scondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically/ V$ L7 m: }' Y
high levels of apartment-style units presently under$ J4 q9 w4 y$ M$ i
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
- d! ^7 e& ~/ c0 A5 treach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as, B. E) N$ @0 }; ?
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could( E6 y, n/ q: G6 b+ `6 K
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
( _# {8 r4 J5 g- i( S; L5 T5 g% @0 F3 aresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
) n A) k, Y% V; |, _anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
2 R- }" |4 s3 B" V" q) @inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
3 |; s1 [) r6 N3 Myears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
: @ d0 H# Y1 f1 J- A0 \8 swill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.( I" k2 N6 Z2 w$ y0 U1 _
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING* N8 [/ Y( C4 z& [: J' p
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS5 X4 u m2 a' u# _# Q
Grant Bishop, Economist! y. ^1 X6 r# e( m$ ~0 ]0 N
416-982-8063
( Z) Y& j* }* c5 FPascal Gauthier, Economist
9 @* c( x. ^* C& v8 D! O8 g" f9 X9 F416-944-57300 ~; H* Q0 D3 |8 _9 T
: m/ c g: E! T E* o1 @+ n; s( l& ghttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|