埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1868|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly3 V5 N# L$ x1 I' q
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
9 s& R# o( P7 v" c2 Sunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
& j6 W/ ~1 S  S  n8 e, o$ A8 W( [9 }prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by3 W) u5 V* ~3 v. n9 B- c
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This/ c  e( c9 o% w
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
4 C7 X# u6 s' w$ bthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately1 b6 ~4 A7 I+ D7 e7 r
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past1 ]8 R$ V7 f. a0 |. k/ I9 F; I
three years.+ d1 _$ V2 i6 u  f& Q6 q
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
( n' {1 J( J) r" A4 I+ D; ^their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of, s' J1 W3 [: y; z$ K' \
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects5 U4 _' q$ {! e* Z+ m( N& K. Y
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
9 c, C3 |5 C6 k$ M* }to fundamentally justified levels.( E3 @3 M  f: I( M3 A
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
/ E* a9 Z/ @/ d/ B% }where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
  o/ {! j3 N/ J# j- ~that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”! Y& L3 x% k* b' E
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although* |( a1 q& w; u, L6 N' s; [
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s6 y  r: W) @9 ^* X, j
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
; H( s% ]5 L! K& ?* qhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch" N" p& m) v  g( y
that is now being rapidly reined in.$ T) ^2 }, }7 u. Z, n
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
4 e/ n; K$ w% bthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
( ?& c+ E8 e# J; w' L9 W' _means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
4 r! V) r' D' ?7 v# Q( _on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
& O5 q& r6 L' ~/ X& G1 ifrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will" t; I% ~9 ]9 P. F* _5 f( K
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
+ s0 L3 |6 E, H0 g1 v3 Cdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction& H" G" E: ]/ B6 o5 ~; i
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this3 [/ J* N8 n# n' g
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
" U: B$ G4 S3 J# A. wresidential construction will fall further to around
: v% m9 g' q0 X9 }( W125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
! p9 I7 [5 c4 U" \! h8 P$ H) ]1 zin the fourth quarter.
) x0 r9 v- O4 J5 _To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
. E  ]0 T6 ^; O4 q. |we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run7 A; q4 O# n9 O
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
  l* T  }. l: k) X/ Dprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home! O; {- {& L+ \+ [# |; m. H
values since house prices should track incomes over the
9 X4 i9 J7 b; ?9 d) V& A; Dlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we' S5 d" i/ x. z* v/ k7 ?, F
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers" t. o2 U" {6 L8 X( t+ W0 o
of residential construction.
' g/ |# h6 j1 o, qTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
1 O0 z" _: W3 \' |3 {, W0 u$ i“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction7 y& }. o8 G/ W
would have occurred if housing had been priced
  x  a2 X$ G! @optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this* e+ [% ~6 f) R% n2 H8 h+ v6 W
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new+ e5 M& b( T8 U; F& r# m
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too  G( C6 o  V/ [. e+ e$ C) U% d3 w7 z$ C8 v
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
0 z. F6 J) h4 \" I% t) zRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,! K2 F. b! s0 A% W0 ?0 A
where housing demand will further contract under waning) W8 S) @1 ?: e  x5 {
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are- \' f2 t9 E: L( u  ?
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the/ x; }1 {# ?0 I( K' I. Y2 ~
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
. m# b' L) B6 z7 P' Gbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces2 U  {/ w7 Y8 G  Z2 B
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural* R. E, }2 T2 H( P2 }
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
: z4 M" q4 U8 i% o) W9 {' w3 I5 QQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
6 J% R3 x$ g2 j/ C3 _& t! sstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de% ]4 ^1 i! d- j1 T
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,! w7 O4 s" h; z: Z
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
( `  J) V, \3 R6 p5 orates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
' y' S, a5 s' w# x6 K9 ?& B! Mcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
  H; j6 R8 K" Y/ Y6 w- j5 V- p9 k) Qlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto: \8 B1 W6 W3 D4 ^4 T
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
% x% w) T! }- K( b2 q  \high levels of apartment-style units presently under6 f8 n+ y* ~& Q' y4 Q
construction mean that record numbers of condos will& V6 B) K/ }7 q( U: v0 D. D
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
6 o" F, P0 j# f) C3 J& Scyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
+ l) B! i3 H3 M5 @; n. _' _spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while, K% V8 y) S+ I; S$ \3 r
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we) Z3 p. q/ r; ]! p2 U% p: }
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from" v8 Q( m# u) ]2 @
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming+ V8 V: _" k3 x( ~7 `+ B# s3 T1 r/ q
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,% |' J/ ], \* |2 @+ l& N
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.6 C7 S# y" ~, h, _0 i
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
. k/ k; r2 f" j8 ^& M! a3 AMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS' c2 a$ O/ g  X$ G( a3 Z
Grant Bishop, Economist
+ T, X" T$ L( v6 [: t416-982-8063
( [% G7 s. E0 f6 {- a9 A- lPascal Gauthier, Economist
1 H4 ^. N$ h) d  s2 e9 l% s+ ?, |416-944-5730
% S% L' i) p; T. _
: ^7 F0 p, S0 S5 c( o: F$ ihttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-30 03:35 , Processed in 0.309499 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表