 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly1 C- I! M* ]- I
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove8 F6 q# t' T7 B" g, E
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house$ G4 i+ L9 u2 q2 [% z
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by6 s8 r7 x! D2 b8 |- f% Y: v
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
2 g# F) e: z- q$ q+ woverpricing compelled a level of residential construction8 \) b5 V( i& |: J
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately* ~# H3 }8 `/ s
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
l8 P5 [6 t/ l5 ~1 F% D' {$ b Tthree years." Z+ {! ]8 n. W# t3 U
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from. o8 K3 h, }$ J ~; C9 F9 K
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of6 L/ M3 q+ G, i: @( y
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects5 t# R3 i! {& d) D: ?) l
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
& l9 E6 ]1 L( Ato fundamentally justified levels.
- d }+ y/ Z) n. d# g4 EWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”* d3 j' { q2 }
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
; _7 k3 K# V0 P) ^that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
) p, b) ~; u* o( S' O, F2 xwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
& R& G0 m k+ Jthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s0 j2 k. B' G/ d
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where9 ]* J! c& a5 V) r! G1 j
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch! g+ ^$ Y6 ^1 b, l
that is now being rapidly reined in.
9 Y ?3 A, t& KWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
! ]/ @* ], d0 e0 z; k7 c( G& qthe construction of too many new homes over the boom) u5 k( q2 W! x i1 h: E3 `6 t
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh1 f; b& y7 K! b1 c! F
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
+ f' y& a) F0 Q7 H' t7 p4 {- vfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will) ~) F7 l4 o! i( H. w
remain choppy and new residential construction will be6 _- R1 p& B2 X5 q# ]6 r* C& I5 |
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
& z- G6 a! w2 m+ c" _% S4 P8 F$ r bis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
0 K) E' r! q8 p% |0 _- [& X4 Hto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 f/ @" A$ R- q
residential construction will fall further to around
* ~, x4 {7 m O: P. }9 _125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units: K9 n$ v) B% ~- i, |
in the fourth quarter.
n4 G# D, d, r+ s9 p+ sTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
* y0 w/ c! z/ ~6 C9 T( Owe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run9 q$ W9 U/ }6 ?% S: L5 C# U
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
S- m$ d- I6 {0 `( s4 Rprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
A9 ~5 d) |' B2 b5 Xvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
c: v3 g `( ^( G( Clong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
( W/ Q" f& a, n6 V# o6 p3 X1 {regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
$ u4 r# v1 Z, T# h# T9 [$ }of residential construction.) m$ E# E3 W/ u/ F9 B1 l1 J
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a s; ^" B) ?9 b9 b- P
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
7 Q, O; Z$ _) @would have occurred if housing had been priced e( O) t6 i w. V6 n
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this1 @& r* W: J @- }, x s6 a, J
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new* u) H& I) O k( d
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too% g+ C4 r3 L9 G" I0 h
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
* [- {5 U; f7 M, oRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,8 I3 O4 y9 e4 }2 }
where housing demand will further contract under waning
8 `! n) S/ h8 _( }$ k6 _4 Ppopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
9 v4 ?* G# M4 e$ ^" M" Balready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the+ J9 v8 \0 R$ k% M4 E. v
very time that the resale market has swung into strong; j% r+ f0 |9 ]0 q' d
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces1 S5 b& T% j2 ~5 d V
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
6 x7 _ @4 E1 u, [weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.1 {1 M, o" @" P- r% m
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the/ j3 O% u. O6 U8 \: x
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
- ^% A z' f! H6 IMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,7 z: J) o4 `) Z( L. ]# d, v' B
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
: A0 t2 `* ?9 \' g# G" D5 t" u9 ^) Orates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
4 h) I% x- ^. H' x8 |$ Z1 z) Dcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears, F) l+ `! n2 N
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto) G# X3 l; X o1 @
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically) f" F3 r* N5 O0 @: f9 p' k
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
- o" j: L7 ^# t& h9 A$ F" n3 `( Yconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will/ A- E9 H: `! @) y3 o) u! @
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as) @: {" ?9 ]9 {8 |& @
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could' g9 A, C8 ?- G: A7 _5 y. ^. N5 ^2 [
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
. g, j. M3 E# {, b, }residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we& `0 t B$ Z' x0 {
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from+ `$ t* o6 }* D' m9 L) J0 L
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming; z6 i o; {, H* _& t
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,4 v/ a% b8 [- M& a8 W1 `
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
8 G3 O) s" f! g5 N `" P; q2 cOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING3 y! n, ?2 Q8 n3 w6 {
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS T7 N! K5 I+ j) I
Grant Bishop, Economist
& P; a4 u: s# J, Z" E3 S1 }416-982-8063
$ I e5 e9 _3 l- a' aPascal Gauthier, Economist: `. [% S p! T! c
416-944-5730
; W+ L8 \ N+ w, s D; b" P; x: Z# B! o4 |$ p6 I; S2 G
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|