 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
0 b$ A1 F5 `0 {/ @. b5 M8 dfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
8 @/ o( v! s* c* M* sunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house+ f* K% D- a/ l9 S3 A+ j
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by4 p$ W1 K& q' X/ y
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This1 Y% Z: z8 h% E* x$ B
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction: P6 Q; ^) j' X* \/ {
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately$ D7 v: @' q) s8 s) H% H2 N3 x9 q
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
2 [+ |; N/ A9 k# q0 X2 \2 P. Y; Wthree years.
# }6 {' l+ I# s6 }4 ?By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
6 u2 W. \+ f# e8 B, V; ]their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of% ~7 N( G3 W" Z. N0 m$ S' O
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
0 U1 i. Z* K% v, wboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices0 f$ g2 Z; f9 s) B* K6 Y4 t
to fundamentally justified levels.
5 h6 Z$ n8 H6 g5 X M+ T3 {- VWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”% \: z, t" S+ ?6 j) m; `
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
2 J" F$ H( {* Qthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”% U# U! N( @9 m0 B( x1 w8 p
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
/ v6 p' K& i8 x: b Tthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
" _/ O* t: p6 d“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
% @: n- w T8 E- U! Phomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch+ \1 c* W% B6 h! e+ n
that is now being rapidly reined in.( d; o! ^; d$ n7 u
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,* D* K* h* k, r8 a3 ?0 U# E7 ^3 Z* l
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
1 s. U* w0 Q, Mmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh2 b& i( R; A3 v* A. c& d
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
0 _: M" z8 v3 z- efrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will! I" Q" f5 Z! E b; m
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
) H. f6 c0 E5 _# _5 r+ Odampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
, z: [# [ U3 |3 G% z, Dis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
4 Q, W9 C1 n: R, u" tto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
" \+ B9 \( k0 c/ eresidential construction will fall further to around, C3 N% H8 \! J6 ]) A
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units6 \0 H0 M9 e. v
in the fourth quarter.
% N7 i& w8 [( r: k" h+ r" uTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,0 E c' x( [- m) u
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
% F* N9 A/ `& K! D+ `6 z, ufundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
+ p3 T) Q" c3 J2 L, w( ^' C2 M Xprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
+ t$ D2 A* ]2 e- Dvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
/ {% }! [) r( l- `6 F4 p3 glong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
8 f) o& w8 u8 H: Z4 k, Q) Dregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
+ s- u2 z3 W6 j; N' A9 @" Y" b% Wof residential construction.& n% |! O( ~2 O* p% P+ h) n8 y
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a5 U- O4 E- k5 V1 G& a% l3 d
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
4 d, y/ D6 c+ V) [- xwould have occurred if housing had been priced
+ Y+ m# ^ n$ r* L: Joptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this9 L8 c! G9 Z- Q
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
9 W% c% N- _% F7 J! hunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too6 {7 I* l1 N0 [" N2 H* h B: O
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.3 x9 E# u+ a s- N+ S
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,5 O! n1 d+ K) ]$ ~
where housing demand will further contract under waning; ]! u! S5 E1 u* T( R
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
& W4 A: |% V+ }: Salready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the$ O& o4 o2 q5 j5 b+ [3 ]1 z
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
$ a* S3 J0 g; J/ ~buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces T9 s; i0 O. `/ J) o
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
( \* @% c& y' _( g kweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.3 G6 h+ {/ a3 t& B. b# c
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
$ R: O$ l9 {' e- H! e i1 astrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
% a9 C' B4 V5 {" I% e8 Q' oMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
5 V' d5 Y5 |, i2 C/ r1 d8 j, b5 Dgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
* }/ N$ i* P( O; F! |rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
) S u2 |8 {& g$ f) o' ~- f! F* b: |cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears& z* p3 e6 z& |0 W
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto3 o" N$ `; k9 f
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
( v+ ^% E, B% b" `0 ?; Hhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under7 ?7 h; G4 \7 @# ?3 G8 p6 b# l
construction mean that record numbers of condos will$ w- I3 W+ |+ @/ @. C9 p
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
1 N6 _+ W0 E# a, B! g" Ncyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could- J% u6 s2 Y( I# V" k
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
7 U# G, _' c+ jresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we( n5 Y- r" s( L4 l8 `, c, q
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
0 h3 {' _' l/ g' n2 ginter-provincial and international migration over the coming: D4 u8 M, a8 z0 J% ~
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,( F( \+ l3 T3 |( w
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.2 S$ }& g8 Z: r
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
( z/ G1 j( ]" |/ jMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS0 V! Z! T8 q% i
Grant Bishop, Economist" h+ x% J2 z" p, z
416-982-80632 p# ]- R- J& {6 G* u
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
3 R5 B1 t4 q6 G416-944-5730+ ]4 r4 x' s2 _- F1 U) W
" D& L# V$ W* ^9 o( {3 ahttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|