 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
6 F# b6 c# a: a" Dfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove, Q7 T1 r7 @& K8 S) n" I
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house7 F5 w* |8 i$ A6 S9 H
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
1 C# c6 N" k* |+ b+ @fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
0 [& @; y! ~* x% boverpricing compelled a level of residential construction: B/ J) z4 b5 T
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately7 Q5 {$ y; q8 L: g& V9 o
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past5 y5 p: U" O* C* y' d( i+ o3 C) M
three years." [, K" D% X' E: d. F9 D& Z
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
5 I7 Z6 z; m, Ltheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
& R: i+ J, b6 Aaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
+ `3 x, N8 [2 I/ _both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices# {, ]1 Q9 Z3 v8 A* C
to fundamentally justified levels.' L4 V' p5 Q* F( L# I
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
8 o3 k3 G# u$ d3 C2 qwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and6 `4 m) k, t K
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”8 r8 p8 O/ B W* W
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although) C& Y" s1 {) {, V) R+ S) q
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s5 y! b# | W! N! {% v
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
/ M/ I! Q" o. W; r4 p# p3 khomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
! b; D. V2 ~* R Q6 Ethat is now being rapidly reined in.0 `) F) [1 \3 [8 j- q6 z& E' ~
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
1 }5 t7 D4 w tthe construction of too many new homes over the boom. ]: F' o* v. ?
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh0 [: [5 v% Q7 u/ ~
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
3 ^3 j& S2 Q. b$ n5 zfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will$ ]2 @( B3 a# d9 b- z8 I! e
remain choppy and new residential construction will be9 S# Q; n6 I, R' G9 s
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
: l4 s7 G* t5 P7 V. kis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this0 Q- q/ S4 `+ m9 E( d
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide0 }" h& ~4 v9 _' g
residential construction will fall further to around3 p) f4 O$ t1 G+ g5 n
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units# M# c1 e) C; s" |+ e) u2 D, Z
in the fourth quarter.1 F- Q9 w' Q1 A# |7 W: @
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,; U! Q0 ?, H5 j3 _
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run U+ E: G: o4 m' \5 \/ V6 M! @
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
5 ?1 @ G7 U# a$ Lprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
' ?0 z; A1 B. P# evalues since house prices should track incomes over the
4 s" L% X3 b+ qlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
* {# Q! r5 l) ?3 aregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
+ N! W4 k8 r: K3 Z0 pof residential construction." `1 l7 L1 t4 M1 x
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
8 T+ H4 C: R8 a/ N+ [“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction+ T$ F9 v: f; m' h
would have occurred if housing had been priced
5 t0 X0 @1 n# z% L6 o+ J/ uoptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this7 P) \$ D' k# {! S- X
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new0 l: P" ^2 r" q0 V
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
/ G, l$ o0 }# G- {% T% Wmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
9 f0 t" {! z, _+ sRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,* T0 i- @6 q. V
where housing demand will further contract under waning; p, k: o. ]! _3 f; r) C0 v
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are: D# Q- s, S) g/ i' \
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
) c2 Z6 ]- R0 X* Gvery time that the resale market has swung into strong3 E) Y# X( n _& v+ X! `
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
7 T. D* W+ |/ e8 K! B+ Thas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural8 |- f; B- k2 W
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.+ d$ p) Y* Y: Z8 D
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
7 q) \2 {" g% b. w% ?. r( |" ~, Fstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
3 {' o0 G0 P7 r+ r e \Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
& G' L6 B5 o8 {0 x: o4 e/ k, Ngiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership, C3 H# `& b& }3 o k: e% \
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
M. E b# _! @cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears3 G: Z. @, T( n1 f( v3 Y- e4 a! r
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
& L$ W+ \/ A* z9 r+ tcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically7 T3 O1 V& P1 M' Y( C
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
5 R7 R* d3 ^3 M! sconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
4 m) q: y" h5 c% G7 g- hreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
, ^. z2 }7 y! ~& Wcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could" X/ P7 n( R2 M6 q1 e; @
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
7 s7 l+ j& b" c4 e& }/ z( Yresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
' ^2 v8 B) W0 M# `: P& C- l+ ganticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
* r( z0 k: k: ?+ y/ J. pinter-provincial and international migration over the coming! N; ?5 v) M" [) i
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
, i$ m) R: U0 N3 r/ fwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.* U8 S2 R- D, I) o* ]5 Y1 D8 i! j0 y: }
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING5 I5 i2 p' d" M3 U8 ^
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS8 |" Q) b `1 j( y
Grant Bishop, Economist; ^: Q+ X1 c: d4 o* O. z
416-982-8063
) U0 J; F. ?$ U& s$ q& nPascal Gauthier, Economist. p8 d. P7 X$ O5 o& o- h% |: [( l7 w
416-944-5730
7 J$ _ \2 A3 a' C5 g" w" Y9 n3 E2 f. r$ C9 T7 {3 F( k* `+ Z
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|