 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
$ {4 f9 p) V$ N9 ~from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove( f3 {7 W+ X |9 X: Q9 Y& w
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house+ }7 n4 x! z2 d+ n8 o
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
, L$ ^7 s3 ?5 {: j/ {& Zfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This: ]: j4 I, ?* V* _: [) l1 ~
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
9 r6 S" O; X! ^6 O ~that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
m r" {1 ]4 d- q12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past( L' j9 r3 Y; P4 b/ n6 Y
three years.6 W4 S1 B" p+ `% X, n* S1 T
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
0 ^ P8 M, x; L, V- Z$ Rtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of; d7 {, n# V( a! {
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects/ v) ?. |4 F% [, w# i0 C
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
! D4 J Q/ g4 {( H, {/ Kto fundamentally justified levels.
3 J1 }2 E$ F0 J* cWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”% f7 P! h7 W& N2 k2 w3 I c
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
' y, k/ ]9 ~5 j8 athat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
6 E) H8 U/ b! ]4 rwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although4 v6 n5 v- b% p* o8 i
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
+ R3 \% v2 f/ J“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
& b) X& r7 S$ t6 L2 Y/ M8 ^homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch) D1 j8 ]% x. _# q# i7 T
that is now being rapidly reined in.
' q" v8 w& H! U8 o9 KWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,, A) {0 T% @7 v2 L3 L( K
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
! S3 t7 K6 D4 ]means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh& A, R- k; A8 z% l2 u
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
) z, N% M# y6 K" \+ cfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will; u8 ?7 t1 d& Z
remain choppy and new residential construction will be4 ?+ ~5 F+ c. ]+ P7 x! _
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
4 F( o- v9 G5 B$ h9 @is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
& x' R% O; F( ^5 R8 X g) oto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide5 w1 F( U# b; v! m
residential construction will fall further to around) w0 c- C& X, C- e+ N0 y
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units* q0 Y9 l3 Y! k
in the fourth quarter.
$ h E3 d: B" O3 S" B, K. y/ kTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,5 z: x: b' d3 y% Q$ O
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run. |& D8 [& r6 N; l3 A
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
' e8 w! A' h6 y- _( d7 N, zprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home- K8 _8 E! Q$ L1 V
values since house prices should track incomes over the- X' E1 R2 @ J6 k' a
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we1 V4 p- @+ i5 s7 m9 N5 Z/ P1 w5 i
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
3 w- F, }9 u) ]" Hof residential construction.
( H+ @8 h+ c# \To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
0 d, t6 n4 A A* k“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
, k* g8 i* m1 G5 Owould have occurred if housing had been priced
+ g6 u1 ~4 |, X- B! n5 O' C* ooptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
$ J* D) l" g! D) O# z2 U' ]; u; D3 ?fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
) L2 V; r% u0 y$ D7 funits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too5 ?( p: y o( n: g9 {
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.4 d& p6 q1 T' f! L, `; w
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,# s) K2 G" C2 x: Y- d% ]# Z8 `
where housing demand will further contract under waning) L3 X# A3 a- I2 H
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
/ z7 I7 D. c, Y+ talready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the, q2 A; q- m) {% M, b
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
- U, h4 }6 L9 P K, g3 j! zbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces0 E& `! P& j- _# V6 }% J
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural+ s4 l- v* J: Z" N- c
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
# h/ p" M5 C: ]# k2 T7 yQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
1 Z! \0 a2 V& W: \" P9 j, k3 vstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de: [" Z8 s% W# E
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,' d0 c9 O6 U- P1 b3 W0 h
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
: v( Q! }/ K" V Lrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
, L ]# p0 f K- I# I' x" o# Ucyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears: `7 N2 z2 ~! D) M+ S
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto( a* u0 U3 c V4 s# |
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
% X3 `; d, |/ _$ x9 O6 x8 Mhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under9 v; q( Z$ o! t+ m/ T7 m' B% R
construction mean that record numbers of condos will1 o" F* Z1 R0 T8 R+ F7 [6 |
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as' }1 J% Z T( ^2 }
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
5 x9 _+ T# `$ L) r# e! sspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while% k# x6 E, u. I9 s2 a
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we) E6 L0 ?% S9 }" d
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
, ]/ ]4 {& l: k& f% B/ I6 tinter-provincial and international migration over the coming9 W; j O7 c$ E9 u' e0 a
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,3 s: v2 o7 W [6 s
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
- v7 Y% j9 S6 MOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
3 V0 ] J5 Q2 G8 RMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
: J' h4 S8 M9 _- _% iGrant Bishop, Economist
( D4 k& P3 T5 `# V1 {, d) U/ I4 ]416-982-80632 h: v; P3 a% |; e2 p
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
" j+ f0 F. e5 J( s4 p416-944-5730
( P) p, C8 p/ T! |* G( l q1 s; f! J8 n+ U5 [/ G+ G. R2 B5 g
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|