埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1567|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
- n0 q$ N, s& z8 i- L. Ffrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove" o4 V$ Y4 g& I8 k$ W% H
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house1 V) a  O4 I" u
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
1 P; {! F7 x* ~fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
4 [6 M5 {* s" T( V) doverpricing compelled a level of residential construction; p; I+ A- p+ H+ }: K2 k6 Z. D
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately- B. N! J( c, ?7 ^; U* s0 o* G
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past2 m5 L# j. S! K( @
three years.' j* |* P# g6 d( P' A7 V/ \, U% G
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
! x1 z. v& }0 j6 a! utheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of/ A5 X1 }3 z8 v$ I: w
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
/ e) s$ @3 L: Qboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
3 ^' M+ i" U( uto fundamentally justified levels.
$ U! Y" J, D$ o9 k4 o- I7 j% D) T' U  rWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
5 {, l# i- H* H# d$ |where homebuyers buy up too many houses and% B9 k* v5 C$ `5 S* s3 e
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
/ f2 c0 I* p5 p+ jwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
/ m, n9 x' Q2 Y1 [$ tthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s3 r' Z  v' }+ [# i" R  Y
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
, w2 o3 H9 `. X7 B7 q; E; [homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch2 Z0 F" {8 c. H; J; o  h
that is now being rapidly reined in.
% }- O  F) Z( Z  X* Q9 w/ ]While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,% w' b4 L5 w( c/ x' g. C. E
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
% p  S6 ?  A& O9 nmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh8 I9 W( n+ Y' `
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
* }* ~! b) X, i9 V! y8 j* Jfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
3 a3 Y) z/ p; y; Nremain choppy and new residential construction will be2 A. o7 C9 }9 S! {* ]$ F  M4 i
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
0 L4 v; b, q( R, d1 J4 @+ P3 Z( ris now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
. Z$ p# T; m1 q$ ]5 U3 Oto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
2 N1 ^5 u- d7 k  M0 d( ~residential construction will fall further to around  ~" C; n1 U  Y/ r$ G* W' `
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units! j* ^# l8 J& Z# Q0 P" f+ G
in the fourth quarter.* J. c8 \  i2 i1 x' G/ a
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
& U- J/ J5 @1 @/ F  q1 x2 Awe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run( P: W2 H9 z2 [" C7 @
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
% c7 e( o- I* c1 u- m% D4 {province. Affordability is the key concept behind home2 P3 F6 S2 b: E; ]
values since house prices should track incomes over the
1 Y; X- m1 k5 O1 F' E% t" Slong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
( j$ T1 [& V( {$ ^& E2 c, Lregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers9 {3 l& a* N' @5 o% A& Q& }8 q
of residential construction.
+ r3 g' X1 M7 a6 t; s' x% ZTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a4 j4 q/ Y$ Y0 `5 a% t$ n
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
4 N7 k; R0 q  U: g7 S9 Qwould have occurred if housing had been priced, e. b1 g8 g6 d! v0 H' Y
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this( m" l" Q$ V9 `
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new. q2 S$ i6 {% m
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
- q. ]2 o4 f8 c# Jmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.! b/ m/ K* y+ H! B$ a$ N, }$ \& B
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
3 ^  `& K: P; |8 k  Swhere housing demand will further contract under waning5 A& V# u$ }' B4 r1 g
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are+ l: y, U" Q* P3 {. ^: p3 V  G
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the0 D- G6 e  i- @5 x7 ^% }
very time that the resale market has swung into strong) T1 T% T/ R  ]% Q
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
% A, S) C) K' n$ {& phas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
: J& `. m' s! G$ wweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
& j# q5 d% N/ v( @8 A6 qQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
5 H2 ^  B4 b! u* pstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
" ]& f$ R: T9 Q. L6 x0 V' Y1 x; pMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
9 K; _: D, h$ hgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
8 @, R) E2 ?+ R8 G4 f& Yrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a. s2 E! s) k3 u6 A
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
3 O8 [6 b5 I% p& y0 ^, z+ _2 @; Llimited – with the important exception of the Toronto* G8 e. R  y  z; _" P/ g
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
- @6 l! @$ ]! V7 \& {high levels of apartment-style units presently under0 r+ X2 k# K$ `
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
) i: m0 u1 I7 B' R; K- qreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as% }; d0 W: z& N( i; S
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could7 T( `/ O0 F1 }! z' V3 [9 }. }
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while! Y; T" ?, ]! @4 K; w! e
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
  W3 w$ k$ C' S) q: a; yanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
! u1 v- M$ e. E5 D7 b0 kinter-provincial and international migration over the coming) Q( [& a$ f1 B
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,& q- z. b7 {4 Z3 S
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.' w4 i$ G0 C. h/ s. Q2 R6 }
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING/ t9 O/ [. K: e3 k
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS8 `( |: \( j& V
Grant Bishop, Economist
  I! {% t! \6 {416-982-8063
9 g# _* t! d0 [+ S3 ?Pascal Gauthier, Economist' q1 n# b* P: _/ E4 S# t
416-944-5730
% w# T+ y8 j) s" L
4 y& r7 N( E7 t- l; _1 k( thttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-20 01:23 , Processed in 0.139133 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表