埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2086|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
9 `! L% ?5 R0 w4 X/ Vfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove" ~5 f* t' h& s7 t- q2 q7 K
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house3 M4 B: ~4 c* f" n
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
$ y) `/ n8 I# ^' yfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This1 U+ Y7 G5 Z7 t) e8 s' q
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction2 W8 L3 F7 F- v% F6 u8 l, S5 R$ \3 ?
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
% s' x$ q$ Y2 [; F( F8 Z12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
' r; u; W+ r' O! Ethree years.9 ^6 C2 o( P8 F+ L0 n
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from7 n, A8 B  ]1 H/ Z9 a) w9 l, e
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of; T9 _( C( C7 N! n9 k
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects( Q/ W7 V, _8 U# @! k0 s# N
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices4 T3 }6 D4 ~  X* _" h( d
to fundamentally justified levels.
! v; ^% U4 r2 H; c# kWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”! p0 Y* m7 A& S. |. G
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and6 x4 A% B% x! P* g
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”7 N0 L/ @& R; e5 l
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
% a/ Z/ t" n8 j! }) M, z4 x/ nthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s' [* B3 K$ Z9 T
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
$ o0 x( Y' q  ~8 H; M4 F5 |homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
: E  K* D* c5 e/ d' Ethat is now being rapidly reined in./ g9 ]% K4 T. T
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,* A3 j) m" m! c0 j5 A! L# ]; w
the construction of too many new homes over the boom9 m1 b) x& Q; ~1 P2 |1 ^" T% v
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
8 {6 [( M/ q( ]+ N% I! ron markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
9 e' B! n1 ~; A: h& h7 N7 `from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
2 I- d2 C. r. ]6 F! y+ i7 f, i% gremain choppy and new residential construction will be' L" N% E- ^9 T$ k' o
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
. L0 |; J5 z' j2 U5 A% L8 E  I/ Bis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
0 `% Z% V( f+ _& b: n  dto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide7 ^! f/ B; _9 T0 G# I/ l, j% s5 ]
residential construction will fall further to around" C) z+ P* m8 q) ^+ S) x. Z/ f
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
5 w3 Y  ^6 v8 q2 n( _2 iin the fourth quarter.- \9 W+ h, Y+ |7 u( `* \
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,/ h- l" J, }1 x9 q* v7 b+ c1 O
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run- k8 J& B( G6 ~  b# U
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each" r" l" m4 I: b1 b& s
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
: c$ }- H2 C3 G% y+ S2 j7 Cvalues since house prices should track incomes over the( T  f9 y" a1 k; ~8 ?
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we: Y' }9 q3 }$ O$ l' A( D" U
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers  R$ H: I; n# F) D  l! x2 h7 Z
of residential construction.
3 Y0 h( W" i' T2 Q$ a7 pTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a; d3 T* U$ P: u% Q: ^! \
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction. H6 y( K, M$ Y/ Q2 {
would have occurred if housing had been priced- t6 d) Z% @: E* l2 e+ E2 }
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this7 r% c: L# Y/ B. B4 W1 ^
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new" Y0 Z, p3 ~3 T2 h
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
6 U  P- z/ V: H& k3 ^many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
  ?% ^+ h5 `, A' oRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,  {) M+ K; X: I
where housing demand will further contract under waning
- ]" |$ d% L# D" `population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are3 l- [7 `4 i* y5 p; Q
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the* G6 r9 ]+ B) M
very time that the resale market has swung into strong* }+ Q4 Q1 g  N3 [- a" {
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces! `0 ?1 V/ a7 M: E7 J# f( T7 a
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
$ v2 Q: i  L. i* Tweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.$ _$ W* {8 M: }
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the# q" `/ {1 v7 z  ]+ P4 ]
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de( i, Y) o- T4 s+ e) @0 Q; h5 ]8 U, t
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
) j; z% B$ Q6 a/ ?' e/ L$ [given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership3 y) ?3 r3 {9 _' W6 q( }
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a$ L; V: i$ l7 v  H. }; }, E, O
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears6 {4 E. }# q  x/ z! J1 I7 k
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
. ~/ t" q0 Z; l) e2 d# scondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically/ J/ L) N4 ~; F
high levels of apartment-style units presently under" y; q  x2 \  T5 y+ \- B! N
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
% D) F+ j1 V1 K3 n) p/ ereach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as" y( k( F, a/ u: t) T7 b7 i$ g9 V, K
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could* X9 T. c  `8 P
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
5 N" a1 M" x7 a' _residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
* I& q: E0 B8 K$ z5 z3 l3 [anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
4 [) I9 R! o* ]" _/ L9 X7 W# e5 Rinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
& T% r- W5 |# f: U& y# Fyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,( K5 ?4 o3 L$ r" t9 q3 l( X$ d, ^
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
: w3 i6 y: B0 |% z3 OOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
' U' ^3 O; W+ i6 G/ QMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS) B$ p0 ]5 I: Z- e
Grant Bishop, Economist
: m" D4 Y1 p' \416-982-8063
( d4 M; |; z) J* w: L7 y7 Z" APascal Gauthier, Economist
% K# X# x0 \5 ?+ O. x/ X7 P2 V0 K, v416-944-5730
. z/ I, M( a: V- Z% s7 Q; s2 c  s0 N5 _7 W/ Z* Y
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-4 01:52 , Processed in 0.067616 second(s), 13 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表