 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly# G0 _/ D9 A; H2 {& F
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
2 L1 j/ y f/ Xunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
. ?# t9 K! d E" o$ Tprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
7 O- Y/ u& Q$ Z1 K5 Z1 N( pfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This& M. I1 M- s8 h4 h3 T5 i0 S
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction' _ \* d, V1 K4 N: a, \
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
4 O) Q d& C$ x4 o9 L! N12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past. P3 Z1 i6 I) S0 A/ e p! k: I( |
three years.# W9 R! ?" i# ?% L2 K9 N4 l
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
; R; U; F7 p+ z: Q" k* u, T6 [their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
2 r/ x) s5 G/ H2 x# ?affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects$ B$ L8 G8 C5 ?2 X; s6 A7 \- m
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices2 @- [, l2 r+ V7 J- J6 `/ r
to fundamentally justified levels.
! F* F( a- T( I+ {We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”% M8 k; O6 v' ^5 x. ` ?
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
8 z6 n8 ~$ W2 v6 m' y5 ?that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
9 \3 j5 E+ A" d; ]5 L3 Cwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
f. k( s& k, |there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
* t* f) ]2 k4 P7 B% i) b“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
( y; `) h9 j# b/ bhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch: s$ y, \9 U, ~# `& _
that is now being rapidly reined in.
5 j3 v0 a; `, }1 o5 [While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
: [8 Y0 u0 F0 }6 l+ d- Z E* Jthe construction of too many new homes over the boom0 v# C# g" c6 t3 a* k! d7 q
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
5 j a( ^9 a5 Q4 O2 m* h+ o8 j* W7 Bon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers- S" w: I4 z% q( T3 K/ h# t( ~
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will- ? ]" q; q" w8 y4 [
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
1 t4 ^/ z I/ q+ X. Q7 {0 n8 edampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction9 I! b0 Y$ T! O+ S$ @0 L* k
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this8 }0 w9 q1 _8 S; e, v
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 X% L- W1 Q2 a* ~5 {- }
residential construction will fall further to around) H) f$ i6 N3 r6 `7 q$ r
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units" p. n5 K( A' V3 ?# `* L
in the fourth quarter.
+ k$ U. D/ u" @, ~" L8 a5 x& ?To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,* h8 i( Y3 N' Q$ W- k5 g0 z
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run# B/ ^5 t& e9 l) E9 a" |* M& N
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each% [3 N# }# @) C+ P: @2 Q
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
* J3 [8 d0 D8 Mvalues since house prices should track incomes over the' G1 a5 p8 Q8 O) i# w8 W
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we3 Z) e* ]( l8 Z
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers& S$ l6 H; g* k* H
of residential construction.0 j! `! a( W6 C7 o+ w5 U
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a8 Y3 X$ x8 _! \. N0 ]
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
6 F/ i3 K5 p2 d- j) u8 T0 Fwould have occurred if housing had been priced
- F/ \8 x) I1 T+ _optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this$ r$ H# y( u* E
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
) h% q3 U, t3 h8 nunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
$ i% I6 ]8 z/ s% G. |. Qmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
9 w3 L' l8 p4 k( N2 R/ DRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
6 Q x: Q) Q, N; F# e8 Owhere housing demand will further contract under waning
' i! [! p; `( d! Z- t# n- o5 [population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are: A: H7 }+ e7 m" V+ r+ q7 l$ x! `
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the6 Z4 @9 k5 i$ ?( |+ F
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
C$ L- y$ `" Tbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
% f% x) i: A, y n, Ahas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural U9 i( m3 x- f" y+ }( [1 m) R
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.* Y+ D- G% w$ q% j' t% u
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the! W6 S( u; g* I' L4 I) J
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
# g' i% @) g- L j( O* a8 l) H$ RMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
- ]7 s9 W! ?: X$ X! W3 E/ b% ]given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
$ W9 G7 M% D% ]* @4 X; i3 [# Prates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
8 b5 i9 m, U7 fcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears4 U% n& z- s* P2 f- I" S1 y
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto$ V* O& z- F) \+ @1 N
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically: u0 B- }2 Q! p* |$ D
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
/ {# { g) ]; y h$ d8 nconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will- S0 c( y3 l) U6 \
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as9 M p4 w0 v' A/ |
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could% @- [+ a. J# `3 f
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while2 K) T4 Q! Z5 w9 i2 p
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
. {8 |7 Q; W# y+ a7 |4 Nanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from1 D% y% U- L* }! ?/ c5 h5 Z9 N8 y" b
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming% F2 A# t: r9 u! `* A
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
! ]3 t3 W( X. l8 }/ j" _. Z9 l# Vwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.* B B' B4 M7 \* D6 c; M
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING1 x$ V2 Y6 O9 Y: Y! {) t+ @
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS- X' O- B& x. r# o6 S4 d% f1 T
Grant Bishop, Economist: ]/ G! V1 \! ]9 S1 f& }
416-982-8063! I/ N- a, p9 ?6 h7 V. U
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
. ]3 S& S) Y5 M& f4 S416-944-57300 @$ P/ A6 |, |( c! u4 G% i
4 T) _% w; r" Z" t: A& m6 ]0 Mhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|