埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2056|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
1 u4 D& m( J( s# R% Z1 P  afrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove* n/ o7 |. X  x* `8 a0 E3 q% D
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house) A2 N! M$ E: b; F
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
! Y. ~5 g0 o- @$ h! yfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
3 g/ g# G! E2 K; v7 M. ioverpricing compelled a level of residential construction( {+ n$ _  n! s3 ]8 t. D# a
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately0 G' l- z' {6 w, A
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past: ^" o/ n* Z* K! y
three years.
7 H: l) [  u& N6 ?& sBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
( p' U5 e. T- F, utheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
  l$ D: h! D) v( b; ?affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
& K7 `" k* Z1 r( l9 zboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices& b- {- N& x8 y. V3 T5 r, {( r3 q6 B
to fundamentally justified levels.) m% U+ o& \3 [! Q+ O1 n
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
7 a4 ^* K% S! }/ j9 mwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
0 I9 [4 o/ @' p' @& z; G$ ~4 Xthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”  U8 r0 F  L. V0 E
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
1 _- }8 P' ?' Nthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
6 P1 t) _3 u# s, X  e& Y4 f  w“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where" D7 T$ z* _+ o1 l  `/ k. z
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch$ U; R  T4 y) C% w( n/ ^/ {6 w& o. \
that is now being rapidly reined in.
' e) w( G- m( h6 r8 UWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
# M  L: x! ?$ Xthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
7 u( k5 q# G# Z7 `means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
2 Z( p  _2 Z9 _on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
& ~0 E$ h9 {, y+ @) Bfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will1 q0 y7 x# |4 n# C+ E" X; l) n' e: f
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
. M1 ?9 H* P% v) K" g" x" Jdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction5 H: ^0 X! u: C5 u5 Q5 W
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this, F3 p, S* [- H' s+ C" V
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide/ e; l3 Y1 S" ^
residential construction will fall further to around/ J4 L/ q, l4 K; _# ]1 `
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
7 f, O; Z) B8 Z# ?4 ~% c4 V2 p8 }in the fourth quarter.
' _5 ]3 F" B2 C1 x& [4 X, J1 hTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,. U0 {" W0 ~& m$ V: K
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
( ?7 _& e- ~/ L# A7 w( Wfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each7 D4 R, f& Z7 P) r- T
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home1 B; F' j- Y+ J# ^
values since house prices should track incomes over the9 w+ W7 {- }9 |2 E" J
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we* a. @* ^2 O$ V2 n
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
+ Z* J9 ?3 ^8 _- L& |of residential construction.
+ e) S9 C2 ?* D0 P+ j- {To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a9 s% \& e# y4 T; B# n' G
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction+ w* W" a% L2 H) C6 {( ^, @% }. {6 P; ]
would have occurred if housing had been priced5 `! C$ w/ ?. K' h
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this2 L$ v/ ?0 u4 S. Q  O
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new+ x* R2 I2 S  t' e3 H; q9 K8 p
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
6 t1 g1 t. d1 y1 omany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.# {9 B: w. {! {. F/ e
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,. S; ^8 A, Y9 R( x) T
where housing demand will further contract under waning
, M! _, W1 v: P9 @, Xpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are  u, T0 T3 r4 K6 d+ I/ W$ q/ E
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the. _4 x# I& u- t2 ~
very time that the resale market has swung into strong2 W0 U0 |7 h6 j* _$ i/ M
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces9 T% p2 a/ s) n3 b
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
' W2 Z! }! R# a  a3 q# ?weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
1 B, {$ o$ T3 C% f1 q' R$ ?; Z+ F4 aQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
  z0 v& N. }; i6 e4 Q: y% d( B! |strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
1 u7 u. F/ H  d+ M3 jMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
2 o5 _- S5 [6 |0 @8 Q- bgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership4 }  a/ L! A3 j& X' t# U
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a  D# R) X# p% _0 B0 U
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears" V$ o# T: I9 N: Y7 i5 ~
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto& k1 y& t- i: Y! D/ Y: E9 W9 o4 m8 C
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
, W1 M3 T5 i" T0 _  R+ Shigh levels of apartment-style units presently under1 d  m$ H- d  [
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
  y3 G* x6 Z1 q1 e8 F3 t% Z' a; |reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
4 g% X9 Z! j# Kcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could! l( P* {& }& i' F. T2 Z9 n
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
% ~1 I: K' H3 }residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we3 K( F+ C6 S" v- d
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from6 `: y( N$ q# k* ^! D) b
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming. M* u2 C/ h5 t- J7 H  U( C. g
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
+ B  a- a/ y3 h& A; V5 M/ S& Iwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.3 l6 v- J3 |2 e* P, y9 P5 Q& d
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING2 ^% F2 b7 H+ [' Y& s% Z7 \
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
: o$ A' X( B) q. d! S- A7 OGrant Bishop, Economist
+ z+ h4 G0 `6 C: E416-982-8063
  I* Z/ C# }" `4 D3 R6 t$ jPascal Gauthier, Economist2 U, a+ ^8 d) f) v5 {  g
416-944-5730: E- o+ i* W  @7 F. Q% C
, ^. \' E+ _5 [$ w
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-27 14:13 , Processed in 0.094111 second(s), 13 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表