 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
$ H( N6 s. k+ @7 D4 _ ifrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove- Z& A4 Y, F V' a: z; F Q* ?- U
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house) X1 w, V& T6 ~9 D. K
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by/ e0 e- A/ `. ~! ]4 E) c+ u
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This3 I- Q3 m& N- e9 d9 m
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
! `3 q5 o& D6 N" o' w8 U4 gthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
2 S2 F5 X; X) F6 K1 V6 Q9 F12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past! r& U, A$ w0 ^) P% i |; |# V# ?- ^
three years.& p" t, J7 N$ C* ?
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from3 h2 P- T/ ?) A' D
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
# _& W: a. s7 t8 Taffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects0 _6 R- P7 k- J: r: B, [# v
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
9 K4 N' ?( ^5 j0 Y, ~, Nto fundamentally justified levels.
- w: f) I: c# u, z ~& MWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”: V+ m* z* O* o8 _
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
# C- M1 Q3 `* R2 {' fthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”7 B6 \- l5 Q0 T
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
0 i$ s5 W& o$ h/ i8 q( d. cthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
1 m% q& ~2 _$ H8 u“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where7 p1 U8 [% ]. m$ B9 x' j8 {: A3 l
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
1 N6 E6 I( a' b3 nthat is now being rapidly reined in., F6 o2 d+ b, Q
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
4 A' d3 Z) w% P4 _- V3 dthe construction of too many new homes over the boom+ t( {# V) L0 I3 i9 P! ?/ D0 }( R
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
- Z7 {$ ?; G2 ]on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
2 X1 k" I: j; S" _+ v, b6 H% sfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will" a" ^' E3 @0 t: u
remain choppy and new residential construction will be2 A# Q4 H! w" c# F: M4 U: Y5 V
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction4 A+ m& u; N z1 ~) K" l
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this# A: o3 i* w- o g, ^9 E
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide# O6 s' X# ]8 x
residential construction will fall further to around- R; z, }7 n9 t. \* J0 W$ k: _
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units: {7 c9 A# s( G# m, M l
in the fourth quarter.
# l6 O1 ^/ |- x2 G- oTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,! a' f& U# C4 g; Z5 [
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
& ]" V% b& Z2 e6 efundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
) M$ U4 f8 E) Y' N' N( O: zprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
9 c$ A# M! l. W# J6 V' {values since house prices should track incomes over the
3 t, |1 M" W" K% F1 H4 n' along-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we1 d4 V. h8 V2 s, {9 o5 ~ o
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers1 Q* s6 e& B' v. l u; o
of residential construction.5 a! X# m+ a3 D+ k
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a& Y9 i# `2 y( B
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction* M: O# y: [, @" @! Y6 O: G8 E
would have occurred if housing had been priced
/ n3 u8 Y8 t# D/ Qoptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this1 W# z5 l1 W" \, U1 y0 X2 N l4 Y
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
- `' f; [0 c% f% h2 f @units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
, l* q! G% j2 Kmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
: U$ b7 l* U4 }1 Q5 MRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,; g( b' U# _$ x5 ?* f
where housing demand will further contract under waning; `, D! t- A; H- W& a4 `
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
$ W m( b5 |# e4 \8 S6 @0 halready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
- W& _- E2 z6 S6 U( L* Vvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
; X% ?/ M! `- ?* bbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
. @( t" W, Y9 v# Chas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural; e5 r: G- c' H) l' |
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
1 c$ d ^# Y( L: t' GQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
6 K% O6 M- J* L4 f& mstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
+ O" O+ Q' S2 I XMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,& H; c! H u, n3 B
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership. |* e- Q5 X! O3 C' t
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a! W$ ]8 @$ O, K, ^2 J0 o2 N
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
, F' H9 }: ?/ G1 j* Rlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto" i+ r! Y& i% b4 X" b! Q
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically/ v; s& U: a" M; g, S4 ~
high levels of apartment-style units presently under7 z, x" i) ^1 D+ r x/ k; c9 u+ A2 T
construction mean that record numbers of condos will& x- B) }4 G' E$ @: O
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
2 S; M: H# ^7 P I% ^1 Tcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could+ G2 R# e" B! I/ \. l
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while9 R! l1 u% H0 ~: b2 z$ _# |
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
3 z, G( r: J. w( G1 k& x3 Y8 N* Tanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
: M _$ f- A7 E; P" i3 {inter-provincial and international migration over the coming5 q& y/ |: D( L# z! ^0 [2 }
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
: [. X6 }, @" e" y5 C# a8 Fwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.; P. s, }7 w8 T
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING$ Z# t) k8 j9 W" N
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS1 B7 A8 j# P- T+ Q8 b7 a/ V3 H' ~
Grant Bishop, Economist
7 T" ?# g7 t# y7 V6 ?416-982-8063
6 B" ]3 U7 G3 Z: ZPascal Gauthier, Economist: v* f) W! @( J8 L3 [2 S2 a6 H
416-944-5730( n' ~: n& Q% O* }8 y0 t) d
/ o# Q) J, k% X( S; @http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|