埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1647|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
  y0 {: y0 `; B+ b: `' m5 B# G' Gfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove8 C9 h3 K; e, {* Q8 Y
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
  `$ @! {' M, W2 r7 Mprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by/ g0 j& Q. E7 V9 L) D
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
% d, s: {! z$ i: i# R0 qoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction0 l2 f! Z+ L5 P' u4 \$ \! G
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately, D% V# @( g5 E% d
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past$ N" z  x1 H, I% z, i. Z$ f# T! U% o$ m
three years.7 ^) y4 _+ p' [( A  ~# g
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
; Y4 j( L/ E. N% Itheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
' Q, I1 y" q3 o% Oaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects$ w0 K) r' S# o0 d7 ?; i
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
  ?3 y9 [: q- R' f8 Wto fundamentally justified levels.
- W1 c* u4 R4 @* aWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
7 i0 z# ]1 j7 l6 Q1 X! C& q1 qwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
; q3 L: C& P2 S, c- r0 W7 Dthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”4 u1 {: g# z# }1 [% j, [4 |! ^
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
; W& y1 m) d( H. J3 M, G  `there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s: i$ H6 e; h6 E9 T2 ^# E5 @
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
: j2 @; h6 q% ]) q! J  uhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
( C& O+ y4 Q$ y) H7 l: ]7 L# sthat is now being rapidly reined in.$ v* M0 ]/ d- ^
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,2 G1 t% s8 I7 u' p/ x2 J1 A( h+ q
the construction of too many new homes over the boom0 ?% \7 q3 q2 ]' a: Y
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh' e0 E" N7 K7 f
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
9 F6 b, C: `4 T& R4 @8 nfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will- @: a( G) g: j3 U
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
* H" i; b' A1 R% W3 T0 C. cdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction, @6 j/ c9 A( O" \/ {
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
7 u8 P& s" B8 c0 M0 |/ yto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide2 r; B9 h( @* o  }
residential construction will fall further to around% f5 Y8 l6 P0 }
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units+ f! \0 o9 ^) O* b) D6 A7 T% `$ J% M7 p
in the fourth quarter.4 \6 }$ i( @0 g6 g0 p' h
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
- N0 ?9 T5 A5 d: Q. @we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run  Y3 w& s" }2 g; [, G
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
$ S" L  {. L: Q8 }, ~; n) w' hprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
/ F/ p4 l' K% U& J0 g! F8 U. uvalues since house prices should track incomes over the9 O8 E; H3 [% b( O) n. `3 x8 z7 [
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we/ \$ _9 N0 D5 b. k" T& D. D3 m
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers! S0 k3 C. `: z' ?' q
of residential construction.
; b5 \* I& f( f+ {To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a. G: ^) Z$ ?6 e; s& I8 M
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction' N  e5 z5 I* h) g# N% N
would have occurred if housing had been priced
& n& D/ [1 o/ D1 s4 N. ]2 poptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
  X8 F. w$ z; N% O+ g1 s; c7 t8 @& rfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
0 r( S/ Z5 L5 y9 munits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too% t4 S% b- a; s# U8 S
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
- F" x2 ^- w* p( bRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
$ u: w' N5 Q% }! H$ ?6 V0 b5 swhere housing demand will further contract under waning
, a* C8 q+ @$ Spopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
- }3 Q: U; {" H! ^/ ]already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the5 g; F4 W. L. d1 _1 x3 W$ k
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
( G  l% e' K! ~0 I& p  b6 ubuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
$ l6 @, z$ O8 |1 r: T: J6 q4 q0 Zhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural. i! S4 C, R. o5 a" O" p7 C7 P$ h
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
7 X: p( X& o: S, tQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the! F% h, `/ J+ u) ^
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
) v9 u& N' z9 R2 a3 r  R2 HMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,' H% A2 N/ _$ b7 a. U; ?1 @
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
4 @% K1 i7 y7 N2 g, `4 Y1 a  {( Nrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
' z, l* W& j  g' i" _cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears" X+ B. a6 {6 ?' v+ F: M" |
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto0 l  R8 t  S2 P; O9 d
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically7 k  @/ o% P* q" w5 F% j
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
) A, l( |: [: m$ i4 _( D  M- Mconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
+ W) E1 B& I6 b5 v* Creach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as8 C0 z3 d' j* x9 K, P& z
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could, l% H& v  e7 B
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
8 Q, Q$ s( i3 r  {residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we2 U( m0 y8 v% J& }4 ~; B
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
2 F' @  L* x) p! T: {inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
: j7 l" j4 E0 m6 v( ?years, which, along with improvements in affordability," N5 }7 b& {" ~/ i/ n9 |6 |
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
  U2 `; n* X2 E0 rOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING% a  Z+ j) }% }) A( B
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS- Q8 `4 O4 S9 t, f
Grant Bishop, Economist
# ^; `0 ]1 N8 G" j5 y4 x3 {416-982-8063' E( ?6 R) J$ f5 |
Pascal Gauthier, Economist+ z1 E" g; A7 w3 k
416-944-5730% V0 `& b9 v3 N! W
* ^$ K3 m1 X) U$ v4 N% e; h: i3 v4 k
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-16 11:46 , Processed in 0.174514 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表