 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly* a5 r9 D- w# O- F! T0 ~5 ?& S1 S
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
2 r8 _2 E9 Y1 Y; S) S4 Uunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
( Q% l$ b7 p: o3 b+ R: X2 g# Q: p3 Wprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by8 @8 E: B5 z, I! k/ v& E! W8 E
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
N+ I: C, K* Y$ i2 b* toverpricing compelled a level of residential construction/ n# E' I, n: [/ e _; E
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
C; o1 A. h! y: z- Z& R* s6 t12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
# c$ Z4 c, J+ A0 rthree years.0 z) @ |* U1 M5 i7 ?; L' h
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from' T) x. k3 O# n% g' r
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of/ v" E. r2 Q) C, ~7 B
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
# Z* K8 ?' B1 J" R% N6 Hboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
. S/ ^' Y; i/ y& M- D5 u& P* Zto fundamentally justified levels.* Q2 ?0 y5 ~: T/ z+ r3 ?0 I
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
0 [% n u- I& \9 y4 O8 Rwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
" Y+ N1 d1 [8 Z- Pthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
x& k% V: k/ H' S2 `, O* o$ Kwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
8 G# {, k( H! _# pthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s! Q) e5 q0 F; d0 {+ p) \
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where/ N# Y+ N) c* e1 M2 i( _$ e; L
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
+ F; K' T' z" x1 ?3 D2 _; f4 pthat is now being rapidly reined in.) ]# p: A; w+ D0 w: q" @ I
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,8 i. ~2 R R9 {3 T
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
% h6 @8 w7 a1 z% Lmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
' X" ^ A. m0 G! [on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers# Z6 a! \; a0 Y
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will# w. g, i7 ]* B ]' X8 [
remain choppy and new residential construction will be& ]3 M- K. N# |$ k, w
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction( P A/ g' t4 D, ?
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
& N! ]' ` c6 ]" rto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ q1 G# d# }& \
residential construction will fall further to around
4 p" `2 V) c9 L125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units3 ?$ F# T/ K& n O% V% ]; g, X
in the fourth quarter.
( z, G8 b7 s) m( h; S1 aTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,+ q% U1 [! A' {: V |
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run3 m- M% l) L F
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each- O5 K8 X$ v. i
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
# o1 t4 D8 o* q. xvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
* ~- f6 K: E/ W+ plong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we+ M/ G2 t( h0 t7 Y* l% R
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
% y$ I% ?2 S6 N! r, Z* |: yof residential construction.+ A. F D: J7 Q3 y$ L5 g
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
4 i4 C1 V& f0 q6 S: A5 H8 V2 N“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
1 J# e* N$ F( R* F9 n: Uwould have occurred if housing had been priced
9 Q, i+ q1 `6 K1 X0 a8 D+ q( ?optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
1 p. E4 ]2 I: ffundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new! g2 q% x ~9 d0 i7 k
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
/ i% M- f1 p3 y' R9 r7 Umany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
& ^0 u6 g$ Z9 h2 bRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,2 {( O: \* ?+ `0 M; T+ ? k! R
where housing demand will further contract under waning8 L5 H8 E* u& |' X8 U/ @: f- t2 \
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
6 [( C3 ~7 k: U# n) N" H' @! balready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
; k" J) i& V/ X7 j E% Ivery time that the resale market has swung into strong6 M9 U4 x, @1 r8 h" G
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
9 h! _4 b$ s9 [1 [has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural& r. n/ Y1 `% v q2 u, y7 o6 B
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.. J8 Z/ a5 c4 O9 G1 X# g
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the: L1 y0 _0 W0 a' T
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
9 o& ^' c; ^" [Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
1 }1 I0 h. A* l( d4 E! k& Igiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership# |* O; P- F9 ^
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
% B& z* o9 F8 Z$ Y4 rcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears4 v: F; L: v" P: {8 x9 N" ^, C' A
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto$ x& ^. d$ ?, X/ J5 M* B: q
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
2 ]3 {6 W% J, ?( _0 `$ jhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under% M& Q& Q% n( q7 q
construction mean that record numbers of condos will7 Z9 P$ Z. J. e
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
0 b, Y6 R8 o7 f, |0 J" {; q, _cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could1 a# ^1 y7 i/ U u1 Y) `5 M
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while$ K" E8 {" t9 A. ^8 j8 T9 J' A t
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
: [; N% A( ]3 C' C8 k$ ]+ E" tanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
% i% p! i; R; ]6 binter-provincial and international migration over the coming
- s+ g1 |# i: I2 u4 H1 Pyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,* o0 q; S- H& C' S7 h
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.6 u' e. n' S) u2 ]% r
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING- y6 N- U0 i0 `8 s" \
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS4 }$ m% F4 C u: Q
Grant Bishop, Economist
2 m( k2 q- `8 Z6 X* A* Y+ u6 F416-982-80636 s) d" l, _* S1 Q9 n3 [
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
& \; K( \5 H1 h8 G a* A, Z416-944-5730
( v6 w H% T; \4 D
6 d- X0 j& m, o2 y$ i$ xhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|