 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
# G2 \6 T. `2 {" i1 z( Lfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
4 X& U0 w, Z/ E! |" z( Gunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
) d2 i2 c" n- g, N+ V ?prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
, i5 z; | o9 U# i5 f8 v" |fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
) s' l* i7 A: n2 `9 |" n' Joverpricing compelled a level of residential construction. ]1 X" I+ o. f. h2 N: ?& g& s
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately3 x3 J! n! r9 v% Q
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
% A( T3 ]: k+ Bthree years.
x/ N! @' O, |* VBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from+ ^( U# O% G, Y! C
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of+ T) e% J3 C) L* g0 V/ l
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects) u" @6 ]- u& [! e: y# _
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
}0 W* s1 Y6 E/ M0 bto fundamentally justified levels.1 x/ {, g7 M) s* d# d
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”6 L! u6 _9 p( C6 c- E& ?
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and9 Z! Z D1 d# q, `$ j) T
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”; Q9 M+ a1 h6 x f- C
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
/ b. r- V4 J+ A/ o& ^9 A( jthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
5 `" j$ G4 t2 s& S“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where+ ]. `1 Z: {8 ^) H
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
7 Z; q. [4 a# O5 E' O: C& B" s; `that is now being rapidly reined in." \' ~+ o9 l2 B& v
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,! T7 o$ T! M) F/ g* r' d1 {
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
! X n( s Y( ?+ x Wmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
- D1 l0 A: \0 }, q; y0 t$ Ton markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
- D) e R" y6 }; I' U: t1 v- A/ tfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
, V! W" ^" O6 r, Iremain choppy and new residential construction will be! g) d8 S& F u! j* L
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
0 J! X5 s0 Q+ t: K( q6 k- Bis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
3 l% k' M# j4 p! A9 L3 `" i! bto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 z' K1 @/ L5 k+ D4 }/ V; T
residential construction will fall further to around1 u4 c! M8 d& V
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units; G9 M7 ^' N% T, a# w& ~, j; F3 b8 U
in the fourth quarter.
+ B* Z U# U* M2 @5 VTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,; M0 w( D! n1 w# K4 ^& ^
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run I+ r4 ?' i+ ^8 L, k
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each* ], `/ p _9 |
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
- U; D7 ]/ ^; B5 uvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
6 N5 g/ R2 g' i7 \7 R- K- s% u2 Flong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
+ n8 l% `; P& h7 q) [regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers- F# X# d) k' D8 a9 Q9 l
of residential construction.: S5 k. B* C$ b
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
. Y9 w: M- Y! G- Z2 v4 Z: y- u {' `“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction- O9 g2 t; i1 y$ W$ q. R3 m' }
would have occurred if housing had been priced' v* r) y) W) J+ N+ v+ o
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this5 \6 r: o z; h8 d
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new0 ~6 U( E; ^, [. d# x
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too& Z+ \0 {, q5 @# F3 N. O" R
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
$ T6 }. x. C, BRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
( z# h1 e. y. n/ G9 L% bwhere housing demand will further contract under waning& Z2 S+ x0 D6 {
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
7 P2 W) P" _& m# P$ \# M; salready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the; Q/ g3 j5 y2 _' J& _$ D
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
/ K$ e# U3 d5 wbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces8 K9 Y( B: b, w+ |; k& b
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural# ]( \/ C" |2 j% i+ I0 C! f6 X3 b, r# |
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless., c ~& z6 W' N1 Y4 k# n1 B2 U
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
1 e) U: p2 t; u: Hstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
& y" V6 }! g1 j/ T/ mMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,* E, Q( q0 a* M. l. _1 a Y( @
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership* r, Z9 M# d0 H+ p$ n1 ]1 M
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
9 G$ v" ?: O) X3 I4 ~cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
' P7 c+ v {3 R" y- _% alimited – with the important exception of the Toronto" W9 V8 s1 h8 }
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically ^+ L1 m1 L$ Q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
% {: _ B6 ]) b* f( F, oconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
4 f5 h6 G% x% w; ^9 B1 D+ d5 K: ~reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
; ^8 S! B. |4 k: G4 Qcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could |$ \- A+ R5 h) a; J
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
/ ]. f' b& S- Oresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we0 l; F! v$ g$ X- H
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
; c% V) b O9 ~8 a5 h4 A- K* yinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
& P: H; |; M* c, x7 iyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
2 K" l4 Z& [. E* O; cwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.& [. G) U3 r9 R5 W' K
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING$ @! r7 p( x' U
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS9 v- T2 O4 F$ Z7 ^8 E& G) K
Grant Bishop, Economist; T4 e7 x, `2 k. D/ p
416-982-80634 X: g8 }- E! C. F8 M
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
. A9 c' A% y0 s416-944-5730- |! e% k- {: d& \3 X, I5 M
" l. N1 Q, Y/ I' r# i( H
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|