 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly9 }( t0 Q. Y8 F" h: f& Y
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
9 Z2 B8 t" ]) wunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house$ I, d; Q# R- N/ Q: D3 d' n
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
9 W' i( a% B4 e6 u% Xfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This$ P+ G5 a+ \7 [+ l
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction/ U# x3 ~0 M% ]
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
2 d5 j) G$ e. \& e12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past" k) X$ E) b; G- U0 s
three years.
, X3 O* l( J: Y3 D9 BBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
+ m) P. U( P2 V3 d1 Etheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
# ]4 D' o3 c+ }- \1 kaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects. T ^8 r R# ?1 J O3 e
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices; S" n) g* e6 b* t/ D: E' V
to fundamentally justified levels.- F5 ^( x( Z: a) c8 C* l
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”8 q: \* E5 R; x( X) J! ^3 h4 U0 d
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
) ]5 `; z* m" z* L& B4 k4 n- Kthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”% x, f) @" i, ?$ Z
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although/ {5 [4 H$ Z: {
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s7 X: C3 k4 {. ^* n0 Q6 B
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where$ \# l7 a: x/ Z! L6 }
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
: J7 @4 K6 R6 S# d/ s9 l6 A/ ?0 Athat is now being rapidly reined in.
r+ H& P7 u1 v3 h! u% |While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,) U, o5 B, l- G
the construction of too many new homes over the boom& Q ]5 w6 p6 h' U) A+ c, H- z8 V. w5 V
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh; s! a& g' o; u3 n# e! l& r) j& R
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
$ G) X% m6 B" ofrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
3 n$ L5 Y8 F: V$ @) Iremain choppy and new residential construction will be
# Z9 o. `$ l |; l Jdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
: d: Z3 K9 y% I+ Q; K _8 d% E0 l1 iis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this, ]" N/ H( W9 T; |" Q
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide/ [) B7 Y3 x- C
residential construction will fall further to around, S) ~6 m4 H6 [2 g
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
: E' G: K$ X9 ^' _% Zin the fourth quarter.* F7 G# u5 _# @: U+ v# J \
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
7 n4 M" P. ~: n% z. Dwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run' ]# e8 X* y2 h0 b7 K! v4 @& e
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each1 q& P, w- X$ W. E
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
! X' m; x6 ~5 \, T1 [values since house prices should track incomes over the
7 B, w. P p5 T5 l9 {- zlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we/ [0 ^* N$ t5 y- F/ l. l
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers3 @/ F# u$ H' G* p1 D
of residential construction.
3 f+ E4 `8 a# s" ]To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a! s( }) t( t7 y- W, q
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction! }# a# A7 o. W5 n: E) Y. y8 z
would have occurred if housing had been priced. O O* h ~ N2 n, k" }
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this: n! G V& a9 r3 j3 c( Y3 A
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
' n0 C0 Q/ z# g1 y ?# Funits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
. ?. S* z5 {+ f) Tmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
' R$ `$ A7 g, ?2 ~; U, z. XRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
% Z6 D0 ^0 r) n1 d$ W8 Fwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
d' q# o! w$ Q7 _! q2 ?population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are5 F# a0 O( l* Y) A
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the0 g1 Y; G$ W& n1 n$ E+ b8 q
very time that the resale market has swung into strong- N8 X& p/ Q& R
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
, Y/ J# @* V) F8 khas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
5 _! e& j7 B% Dweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.4 [2 a ~' u& S/ e0 b% X5 L
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the" c8 b/ t& C& {3 c( v
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
2 P8 v/ d0 w6 x) ?Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
9 z4 t4 J' W L. j, f; Xgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership& B% g1 S! }, ?0 g) c
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
. i% w( e$ F# j6 @cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
" [4 ^$ d* s2 `' d' Llimited – with the important exception of the Toronto% ]( Q1 f4 R" } D
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
+ h" d3 `) B+ S: u5 w1 Y& Ahigh levels of apartment-style units presently under. \9 f3 U' B- [
construction mean that record numbers of condos will6 W h4 c& C( E. x) A
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
/ V; Y3 d* o/ S: u5 l- ?4 c6 |cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could: G8 e+ R- h0 `: e
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while$ K" M- X4 E9 R! Z. i# I& H9 t
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
; f: W$ |$ T" X* V' Panticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
* B" X; z/ j7 M; H- yinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
5 X6 O) P# C7 _# Lyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
& I6 W8 u0 D$ Q7 r4 q/ twill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.# z2 ]- a6 K) \! h0 o& |
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
: e1 n% W5 J/ [3 F, y4 wMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
5 B2 p: M* Q6 vGrant Bishop, Economist
) {& T; W+ ~$ H* b2 J416-982-8063
: s) D! P2 Q7 q% ?+ U H8 ^1 OPascal Gauthier, Economist
' K; Z+ t, K- V1 Q! m( U416-944-5730! G* N3 m* m, _
5 \ C Q: t6 h
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|