 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
% S/ @. S1 l* i) k3 \* zfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove! @5 ]+ f/ r( h! A8 {# C- G$ \
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house$ P% F0 G) [0 A2 |; ~# K* A8 Q
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by) a+ G: v) c M3 ?' N
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
1 S: y. X$ G5 S& R' _" e! Hoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction% K2 I0 y+ K' [3 i# i% k4 N' q% W/ e
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
! v* j1 Y) _6 Y% a" n12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past' k7 q; s& F. d
three years.$ g, d) S+ \1 a# {
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from4 I2 e1 Y5 m+ |
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
' B& |' [# t( H0 {. T( m9 ^. M$ Raffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
1 h2 a3 U# G- b8 E5 xboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices' M: L; |* x; U/ M4 O/ |
to fundamentally justified levels.
7 ^; N6 |, m6 O! v% V; xWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”( J9 Z9 y! R# ]) Q8 h, Q/ N' T
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and" q2 I$ `: z! b; t* g+ L
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
) Q' o+ |) k0 J3 Nwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
6 p) M3 N B4 L& Othere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
1 W; |; ^0 f& |+ x“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
1 m4 G6 m8 b K8 x+ k2 Lhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
) O$ T/ V; t$ C$ q7 p6 pthat is now being rapidly reined in.
1 k' C+ N2 u* w9 dWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
; L) M% q9 j8 G9 Uthe construction of too many new homes over the boom- D/ Q, |) X$ R/ P& I2 I
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
; f0 ]3 V( z3 w% v5 Von markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers+ r1 A" J; ?- J9 z) Z
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
1 n" B) a* m2 [3 O, _9 kremain choppy and new residential construction will be
8 [( H! z" i# L$ Edampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction+ z$ O6 G8 L: w, K* b/ g
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this0 q" e% |8 ~' A$ Y, T8 ]
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 g6 a% E+ o8 G% h3 J* h
residential construction will fall further to around
0 k7 R$ j0 S* Y+ ]/ E3 d0 h; U125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units' K) a( I- ^0 z; @: I
in the fourth quarter.- |2 }6 K- ~) t1 g0 {- R0 @' _6 f( U
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,3 Q. R. F" x* p4 v d$ x, z) F: [
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run6 i% L# a( ?3 B% r( W6 S9 M# G
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each P# o3 h- N7 i+ \1 T8 o3 u( y
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
# w8 t7 z) J1 b' P. N# |7 c8 ivalues since house prices should track incomes over the
. S4 `1 h5 ~' L; t7 qlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
; S# Q5 }1 u( o5 yregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers3 {+ x4 c$ [* I% K
of residential construction." ?. Q# R; V6 ^' g
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
* F! G& J- G0 l/ d3 Y3 ?1 X“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction# C3 e/ ?3 h9 Q) g5 l- s+ X5 K
would have occurred if housing had been priced0 \9 R* g5 U' ?! w
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
' V p$ V% c, Sfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
; P7 y5 f1 p0 M0 F' runits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too+ L; X4 X1 ` y* ?
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
* L0 G* Z/ _* ]3 Y5 URegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,, M. r4 |8 C4 N- M
where housing demand will further contract under waning
/ S# ?4 N) o) R z- N# G& npopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
3 h- e7 Q/ o/ ]1 `% B0 p5 @already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the6 Z& \' x( c3 O' X6 M$ u+ g
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
6 S3 `2 x6 g# Rbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces) v: j0 ^& e/ |9 ?9 }% _, i2 o
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural+ m! Y; A: K' G! }/ y
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
8 ?/ U2 y1 |( T' G5 z% U6 AQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
# |; p! K) ~* w( h; Ustrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
2 p9 t" M0 O0 v; ]; \; ~Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,% c6 F0 y( L* r6 Y$ G. z+ P
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership+ u7 ]) k$ B+ \+ P8 m: r' K$ X0 a
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a$ l* C( l+ P/ [6 q$ B: W
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears }: `6 {0 h5 I: Q9 g
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
$ I9 M+ _* G" ^" o: K g0 L9 R* dcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically8 U6 m7 L- E+ `0 I8 V# }
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
, C- c% }+ V7 M$ \4 Lconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will) P8 J O! @5 o$ c' y
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as8 y) k$ \; u6 C* i& F
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
9 h' R/ o0 _6 S1 X/ J0 t4 Ispike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while% y- ?3 @0 w/ x8 y# d: l0 Q
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we+ O- e" j% K" Y6 X! F8 `- W1 E
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from; ^( Q8 r: d) o% V" s/ L
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
; ~9 C" g- n' h m0 qyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,' ~$ D: g6 Z8 y7 A2 ^7 _4 C" \8 \
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.3 C8 q; ~& z6 c' l2 Z$ _. N
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
@7 D, }. I1 B$ FMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS. D3 ~4 K+ K" r9 N/ K- y" S- x
Grant Bishop, Economist+ w" s8 G! ]% M% w$ h
416-982-8063
% K0 g$ H! C G% xPascal Gauthier, Economist6 ^* q/ E2 f- f
416-944-5730
, w0 e* [- Y; R! L4 O# e2 c Q# c9 D( A' @, X5 O. v& o5 Z" L
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|