埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1855|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly2 @2 A9 O7 d. N7 k3 [
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove5 d; D* C6 g6 A+ U# `2 k5 {1 c
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house8 h* Y. K: B. x% k, ^
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
* W/ C& c( R9 Ofundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This& o& ~2 k( j% g$ u; j- B
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
; W6 ]" ~( A( o  O" z1 E9 _+ Athat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
, {. [/ \/ R- _2 S5 n) s: V4 W& q* i12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past9 s+ o) O( |9 y/ |/ P& q5 ~+ l
three years.& {( e* s1 I* }: ?  F
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
/ Q+ ^; I; W1 W& |- c, gtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of' I* z5 q4 G1 K* ?9 S2 }7 m
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects% |4 M8 A+ F0 y- a3 A- E
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices: F# g' Q( @" w6 E! z
to fundamentally justified levels." G! l# N) {% t( x  G8 y" M) @
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
& W/ b* y7 ~9 S: l6 jwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and+ s+ P- y: a6 G1 M0 U0 [& p0 r+ J3 l
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”, ?4 v/ {* X+ F. z5 b# z) O
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although) r( a5 t9 V: J, H, I8 V; _5 x
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s  L  `0 j5 p/ _1 O( L5 d9 q
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
8 b  k8 y8 M& \& x9 U+ bhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch7 B& @! K- e" q- G9 C9 l' \
that is now being rapidly reined in.
6 G% `& @! w8 A: m1 KWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
" `  \4 W1 _1 C9 ]/ x$ r+ f5 u- ]the construction of too many new homes over the boom) n) K2 u* ~( E, Q+ R1 [
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
* b. H+ ?. C4 p* Q, O2 ion markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers& P) B( g# c) b4 n) Y9 c* x
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will3 \+ w- e& n% x% \0 S7 b. j
remain choppy and new residential construction will be* U$ I5 y( Q4 K2 |
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
% p0 k, N$ c' ]is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this; ?2 m, W( Z) T8 z7 h' W* w* {
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide6 H; m  F& F1 ]" C' z
residential construction will fall further to around6 `' c# g) Q2 \" b0 ^7 I0 V1 J
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
  c: b4 k% f. @, ^5 i2 u$ min the fourth quarter.% j9 k( n  G. Q% Z
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,$ N+ p+ d/ L' }5 O0 }- H. O
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run0 Q3 V" u3 k7 a3 y+ F2 e# z& K
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
' V" o. d. V0 M9 Q. ^$ D; aprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
  Z' r) {% V, \/ r' uvalues since house prices should track incomes over the3 E& E: q* Y" o5 b
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
; J: x# r& ]+ V* L0 oregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
# c, a9 Y$ ]) s' lof residential construction.& a4 `9 d7 Y2 ^
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a  \: G, r! W$ o  Z
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction; Z0 W) \9 a# A% [* d5 x
would have occurred if housing had been priced
; `9 o6 ?3 r4 C3 Z* ]0 Eoptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this+ B; J6 E4 v% T' s
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new) A/ ]4 J+ L1 G& _7 V( D
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too/ ~' {' O9 P2 @1 U! L" M
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
0 C0 Z3 A, ]: X* K, CRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
, b' A8 \* \: y9 `where housing demand will further contract under waning/ J" _7 q" _: o
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are" G- [9 ^( d0 S$ h
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
9 r! K* ^6 s6 ]. i( g( s5 [9 fvery time that the resale market has swung into strong$ H9 |' u( q" A5 [+ g4 p% @
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces6 K% e! L8 X9 ^" A7 X0 e$ X! }
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
% c) }3 \- M/ d& }. pweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
1 f/ }7 G# {/ a1 Q) p! nQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the/ T, k) Z& Q+ J% {) J# R
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de( L$ ^9 U' C. {8 L4 a& n5 r" @
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,' Q! F( h) p) D8 X  q
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership- ]4 Y5 z1 K, \8 h1 `+ Z
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a* I: R( x& u; ?1 H; B# j# N
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
! u" f: C0 N5 \! N' |limited – with the important exception of the Toronto( ~. A" r8 }8 V( R0 j8 B
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically  H$ n% h4 x) g) q3 Q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
' D3 n" P8 }5 N5 Kconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
' P+ z& N' B. ^reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
: g+ {; o7 y0 w6 ucyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could6 ?+ Q/ `  G  ~' u% q2 s9 i
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
! B  R6 _: y. o3 w7 Lresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
0 \" S* ^8 H$ h- t# Z! _' x- danticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from2 I' [3 x* z/ b+ d8 _* v, ]
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming2 ~+ M) \' H# n! d
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,4 v6 R2 P; E5 ?& @
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.% F' H( j# C3 G( s- d( y' h, D
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
! |: d$ j( n  F* c3 `MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS6 E. B* e4 ~$ B4 K% ?- Q
Grant Bishop, Economist3 u7 T3 t; A8 k9 T' _7 t9 o$ V
416-982-8063( H7 f. R1 @+ E6 `
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
* \* @! p: N1 g9 I% \: o416-944-5730& `" r! ^* E$ }; U+ I' B
( o7 _- b, E9 B4 U
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
理袁律师事务所
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-24 23:54 , Processed in 0.139761 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表