埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1982|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly3 E$ M6 ^5 A% D! A0 L- s) s
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove/ I8 V) X4 i8 Q; g1 P
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house, a0 E4 T, g3 q& P7 ^7 p
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
3 K8 i) F. O. E0 F! H8 Lfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This* m: ^; s4 l1 j
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
7 r9 S8 U. A4 `1 m. |  B6 Bthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
6 M) h6 x0 L+ l7 G* D/ T12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past: V% Q* H3 b" ~& i
three years.& f% e+ a; p. e7 N0 \
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from" K+ n/ Z& p+ i( C" ^0 v3 ], X1 b% _
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
% Z  W2 u1 R& n( N# |# s$ @affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
4 s* u0 h5 \1 K6 R: x5 ~both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices6 M7 ^" v6 f" |: O, ]
to fundamentally justified levels.
7 @2 y% ]- i2 G- o9 l& tWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”- T$ S# {  J2 T: x+ O) @
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and7 a; _6 V, R# Y+ ^
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”4 g! W% ^8 w5 `) Z) E
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
% S1 y" j/ |  c; B% ?9 vthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s4 N, B" Q- e) }) D4 m
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
  K" [- @/ R5 e# Vhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
1 ?, z( U& r; I( \+ U. Ithat is now being rapidly reined in.4 k7 k2 R4 w0 ?; a: P
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
* @& ~" n8 F4 N2 R' B7 W% X. mthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
2 Z0 W7 r: l; Vmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh( W# e' e6 |9 w. s0 s; p
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers* s$ s6 f0 C. X8 M* S2 c# B
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will; _3 @/ O* c6 A, W) L$ p1 m% G
remain choppy and new residential construction will be  `# ~' J% V( x* n# C
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction9 t& G4 C$ P9 [  T# U
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
( ~- k! h5 j/ J9 s* t' D4 Tto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
& V: j; g4 I9 k) ^: \residential construction will fall further to around
; h. J. F6 o+ b: D5 `) u) e+ O1 i125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
7 L# ?& i. d. ^( G  b( R5 n% ]) ?7 Ain the fourth quarter.
$ I2 w5 ~1 J0 LTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,/ l% L1 F2 F0 ]  H5 m3 J
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
6 o1 [6 [" M1 c: ^+ Kfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
! D$ w4 o# Q+ q) d0 G5 J  T) nprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home5 M4 _& S  b. `4 m( f+ h2 n1 D
values since house prices should track incomes over the
  r' j- R' c! b' z* h9 j1 f$ {* t9 glong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
( }6 W3 T% s! L5 w: X$ y5 Z+ ?6 wregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
9 L: _( \3 d. }4 f$ ^; k0 Pof residential construction.
0 M: b. C  J* ]0 P1 X/ DTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a4 L! [3 g: P: E8 X
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction5 ]/ h" d- K/ D6 g& c* g/ X7 z" ]3 l
would have occurred if housing had been priced7 {* c* S# E% c! Z
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this( ?" |) \4 N9 }" {; b! ^
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
: T7 t( J# Q1 J+ ?! @" nunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too8 Y8 ]- F2 C/ q. A, F9 N3 Q' W, _
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
4 Q( |' e, S. I( a8 T* i- DRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,% p! h0 q! m6 u
where housing demand will further contract under waning; O1 G; E: ^: f3 _0 m/ O8 d/ n
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
. w# q& _0 n3 J3 r0 m& zalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
9 Y% ~6 B7 U# V7 tvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
, f( |! J$ P; Cbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
, k8 E* c4 a& ]* q- y- e; k6 ]5 `has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural$ J' J' v, O' u) k
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
* b4 t5 a) `3 F0 zQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
7 |- m; B" M$ u9 [6 s  Estrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
6 b7 ~( `$ V8 m  sMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
+ x. Y4 T6 W6 Jgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
. [9 y, ?! ~  a, h, t3 g3 f7 [6 jrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a/ F0 ?- z$ H( S" k6 E! g
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
! F4 g' t" y3 K% |6 Glimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
$ B& y! D3 \/ Y& O5 ~condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically3 l' _1 l# b9 [7 \
high levels of apartment-style units presently under. {- L5 y$ Z$ l/ d8 w
construction mean that record numbers of condos will' g" V) S, R. Z- r% U! J
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as# P* B3 J; r- n* r5 e6 _2 K7 Q: S
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
1 `; U3 y4 R* i$ e, Cspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
1 ~- X) f# F  p3 n  aresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we. i, [. |9 W( Z* A$ t+ l% ?3 L' c
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
2 y+ h1 O/ E3 f. [* l/ s- k! F2 _inter-provincial and international migration over the coming+ {, O4 e2 F7 y/ q$ `" M: g
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,, t/ s- ]5 k! U; _) g
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.# q! C% G; g5 _. ?! k* Z+ ^1 L
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING! {4 ?0 N$ A5 y/ i' p0 g8 m% v" z
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
, r. j4 N# `, |! o" t9 bGrant Bishop, Economist. [* p6 u; e& A& ]/ W
416-982-8063
: E0 o. A% u) }7 r) J6 ^+ vPascal Gauthier, Economist
/ \2 O! N% }, @& R) g: J416-944-5730
8 A4 X- D* B# ^  M' ]
) U- X5 z0 e8 E: V' _. }http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-2 03:29 , Processed in 0.161398 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表