 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
" e1 c: H' F4 p1 A4 c0 Ufrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
e9 ~( N7 l) x; Y3 Y, l6 |) zunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
* q6 u/ ^* A' ^prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
; f4 K2 W: n7 n6 b7 J7 ofundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This: a. G @, G% V/ E0 T# [
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
8 X- U: Z, X! x# C& d+ f& y: [# T* Zthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately6 E( F e6 e8 g7 C5 {9 @8 P) z
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past* z) A. F+ o$ i/ I
three years.0 V0 [1 B; o+ l+ _8 v1 f! z
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from" K/ k2 X- K3 X+ J T
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of! q9 o# p; v$ l8 L
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects3 j5 c, M# \, T2 E1 j
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices8 e O$ _2 c, h: [6 B+ C' f3 H
to fundamentally justified levels.
1 v( s& Z; y7 PWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
. ?0 C) q; _& a& Zwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
% E0 b" T8 y0 e! a+ ^4 jthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
7 D" w0 @$ }2 k4 Bwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although0 E" Q9 c$ [$ U, R
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s8 ]* `1 P2 T) L
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where: @% j1 S/ i5 [) c+ e9 _ g' \! O2 j; N
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch; ?8 F) i2 _/ c) w. N& K
that is now being rapidly reined in.: M. S( z8 |! Q3 n, o7 B4 ^
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,2 E3 |# Q; E& `
the construction of too many new homes over the boom) _6 m1 ~4 e$ C
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
$ |6 Z, _1 ~+ b( D4 V5 Uon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers: R+ c- |8 X5 n) |
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
; Y; i6 u+ \% P! N1 _$ Tremain choppy and new residential construction will be/ x# t0 _6 y7 Z
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction8 S7 G0 C! \; G$ I# T q1 H
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this; B; x, C+ g7 e1 H
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
, K$ H# T5 M7 {! i7 gresidential construction will fall further to around* c$ G5 M* Q8 f" Z
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units U! W$ H; N6 @+ J1 U
in the fourth quarter.
. ?$ g$ ~5 T: l I8 |( GTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
7 W. Y0 v. ]4 y- L2 H( Vwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run1 C1 \+ Q( A/ J% I
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each3 d7 L* L, B- a! @8 Y1 V6 s7 I
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home/ Z$ Y+ E3 s. l- q# Q
values since house prices should track incomes over the
2 Q; D8 f. Q# Y6 J) h$ Ilong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
+ W8 ]* d- X/ M2 wregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
8 Z$ M1 o) m( h4 W$ Qof residential construction.
& \3 ^2 P7 @2 l" Q8 LTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a4 \( s: L$ k# n) F- M3 t
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
4 u; A+ s% F/ {: Pwould have occurred if housing had been priced
$ l1 N) I) ]7 E% l7 l% Z ]optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
. G. \2 W" Y7 l% {) @fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
8 P& {4 k) |5 Q5 D; \8 ?& `units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too3 Z4 _3 o. x6 {
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
0 `. W' u* x- h3 V- bRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
2 e, ?2 e4 e3 z5 wwhere housing demand will further contract under waning* F, t* _$ }- }3 J1 C7 k* j
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are) a. p4 X6 T/ f* e% }
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
3 v- A+ M9 ]* p" @very time that the resale market has swung into strong
! D1 Y5 P" |7 J8 ?& wbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces/ l% S3 s0 `0 }) ~( N! y
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural) a# ]6 f/ B7 c! j t# S d/ P+ x
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.0 x. g9 b. t' j7 O; ?
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
: b( o# Y* C z) m" A% Qstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de+ n, e2 F, a. c" l$ o
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,6 a i- Q2 z# x, ?9 n4 X( j. H5 C3 B
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership f5 R Z4 f( _
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a7 ^3 }# J, _2 T; O) ]7 H4 j
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears9 P& B$ [5 k$ N* R
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
% x" u' M9 d1 M/ R" P+ ycondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
+ ?3 Y/ I- d J4 Yhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under1 O8 X0 Z3 _+ N
construction mean that record numbers of condos will0 n- j# v3 Z( M5 b
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
, [* l2 {% @3 U3 N2 Qcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
) J/ _3 j. [$ y" k* Q) y2 Ispike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while4 w- W# X/ y$ O0 }. a
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we$ ^6 ]4 w$ c% N; c3 A
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from1 ]+ p1 J+ ]" b8 h: E
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
" `7 v+ k: e6 a/ v, Dyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
# m. r% }# i [0 R" twill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.% t: y; c2 Z1 M+ y( J# Z
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING1 i$ B j( v6 S$ P4 S |
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS: v* A2 e2 q2 s: S9 N
Grant Bishop, Economist, R, m0 k% i( L
416-982-8063
6 U6 _3 h; c1 g9 A' q6 a* WPascal Gauthier, Economist. A$ Z) ~3 {" `) r! z2 ^. ?
416-944-5730
* }5 D: {2 T+ s% N) L
, |% ]8 l; x8 n; H% h' rhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|