 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly" Z8 p3 Q+ \# e9 {
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove( s9 [+ S h1 u, p" D
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
" Q T5 a0 c- l# lprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
1 } B! \: m/ e) F/ e9 cfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
# {1 @2 `9 h/ I; [. O& [) c% Ooverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
+ @9 d. M( r2 P5 T% ]that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
1 H# ~0 J& `6 w12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
; Y% j8 ^8 t c. t' X1 _three years.) u/ T$ ]& p0 N% _! b4 u
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
) v1 W% o" f1 Y+ s5 Gtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
& G; j, J1 l0 x. a: F9 K/ H. ~2 o5 qaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects5 v2 q2 V7 f( _% f
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
) o2 S- U. Z/ V2 \& L5 P( @8 j. [to fundamentally justified levels.
; {+ g- c" t( U @7 _8 KWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”# ^2 t7 @) m& U
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
' {) e! V+ M! o* [ E' Lthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”0 X1 h* n! t1 N3 K" e: A
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although( v1 \7 B7 J! D ?- [
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
% E5 s/ L3 b3 |" r. ]! q, Y“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where: _, g% p4 B1 T, p5 Z
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
g, B2 B: c" { f# fthat is now being rapidly reined in.
2 R: _8 D) I" l3 e; T: i0 \0 bWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,& Q( C' r7 n; G1 u. z# U
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
& I; S: j8 n5 L3 ^+ {" i6 rmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
/ B- R. ~- w# n3 d5 Mon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers$ D- Y8 J' d2 v8 }0 q& d
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will7 G' G4 ?, l) p% S: n
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
; T8 I+ O% T4 l4 ^, m) a2 o4 `6 ^, udampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
. h% O0 {/ m! z3 V- h7 u; }# ]is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
: k# q' k. C, y1 Y3 v+ h. a( M) u& @to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide8 h5 ~$ i z8 S) W( q- C+ b
residential construction will fall further to around7 t6 @2 n- S* \/ m* g! _" I$ m% K1 a
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units+ R6 `0 @: V3 j0 r8 O" O
in the fourth quarter.) k8 |) Q$ e' G) N6 C2 J/ M
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,- } ?% S! f/ K$ \9 M4 Q
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
/ L+ G& G2 g. ]8 Ffundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
. `- D' W2 H$ k; A! @# _ {province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
% |" ?0 f/ R6 N+ Rvalues since house prices should track incomes over the! A1 |& {9 r9 |% p3 M
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we) V) c4 W& E5 N% p; ^
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers1 }; s8 z- g4 n' ~5 k
of residential construction.
* @. Z1 U/ c5 i/ v' eTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
B- w7 _- R: ]) X5 y/ M( m“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction8 S* w5 Y# O" h' E) E3 O
would have occurred if housing had been priced& ?4 d: |7 F/ a. N' s- L
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this/ [( ]$ N* t1 l; J* o+ h" g
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new' P3 \9 E# c, o I, i9 ^
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
- a: e8 G2 {" K% @4 Umany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
* e# J. p5 a: B' Z0 N b9 S; a: aRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,0 k' u( x: A4 {* H' A
where housing demand will further contract under waning
# N4 V/ M# s" H- Y8 t0 ?population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are% ?9 {, j( J. {$ i' S" _& y: R
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
% b9 j: d2 a6 vvery time that the resale market has swung into strong V7 z) D$ [) A9 Q7 y- O* \
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces) r1 v& ?/ ]% d5 v; ?# J X
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural5 |; a% R; U4 A* E9 K4 x; ^3 ~- [6 ^
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.8 H' @5 m, z$ J# x, l4 \
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
: {2 F8 v# [ k- Tstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
" h) S- m' e) f' e4 \/ ~Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
7 e; q% J ~9 ^given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
+ L: _# n+ O; U2 [rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a3 O5 `+ N- c2 c6 z1 s
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears0 f) \/ p/ b# G" t! F. l
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
( P1 o7 f3 _7 G. `( Zcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically( d1 [. u8 C! U& T9 }" r" D
high levels of apartment-style units presently under( h8 g9 d/ J( s) O& m- ?& V' J
construction mean that record numbers of condos will* L9 y, h0 t. U/ F) H3 Z& H- d* p
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as( g; S3 }* S; o; ]2 \! J& _( j) ^9 _1 U; R
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could1 a" y$ N! ~* K S& B/ }
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while8 f8 j; e% z8 n/ f# g5 g' C
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
: C; F: }+ V8 s$ Zanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from% d( P8 t7 M6 U6 @; W( k
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming9 V |4 F. b( n( k4 v, E
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
) W9 T$ r; |; j: twill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.1 C( ?/ n2 K4 @. h1 r1 @& i/ G! z7 P
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING' t% O: Z1 H* K2 [- y3 ]
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
' { x: S/ L% T8 R% P# K$ ZGrant Bishop, Economist' C. f! E% D" {6 a- B h; P
416-982-8063
- L0 `; \1 }- r- \( h- f! GPascal Gauthier, Economist
d. R+ |- @% B$ B6 Q" w0 E416-944-5730
# e" c/ g5 T6 D2 C& u m. M. Z3 U' \/ a2 |+ l1 e$ F( e; `# |9 Q7 S
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|