 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
, b4 K& q) x/ w) Qfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
3 N, z" q9 `4 e* x5 {unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
0 j/ P3 W+ t& h( t" u6 zprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by. k! [4 A6 {! p, \4 Q
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
# K$ `% C+ h; ]7 s* `& Y7 Ioverpricing compelled a level of residential construction( O# O% n. i2 K+ I
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately! S) L* W7 p/ E% \
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past1 k1 Q& {* m! Q1 ~
three years.
! b7 l q$ y. o2 WBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
- k" |. S8 L* U7 Y# W. Utheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
+ n3 t) u7 H' X% I: G/ zaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
" P- {- B1 A r. e2 R W/ ]5 ^ jboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices" p I4 B+ g/ d! E# ], z1 c7 a
to fundamentally justified levels./ M4 Z( f$ C* g. n- b) u7 t
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
' v5 Z8 U" W0 e; S# zwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
* g2 k! `6 e+ hthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”2 H# \/ X" _0 \
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
~: g( w" o! Pthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
/ a! Q5 u5 r3 Q: O( }! f“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
' z9 M" ~. N, v7 b$ Shomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch) Q4 B* E1 U, B- K) _
that is now being rapidly reined in.
% x' Y; q* p" p% g5 [While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
# o$ E1 c/ L1 X( w5 b4 cthe construction of too many new homes over the boom+ x( @7 f/ B m) H. E
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh+ B" ^) ~- R1 \- c1 c# E/ h
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers% w! {4 _- S- M0 g
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will# d: L* ~0 L& }6 Q( m
remain choppy and new residential construction will be0 y8 h8 ?0 n, Z0 l- T: \
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
4 D) {( J! c8 p2 v4 A9 uis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this& {; Q+ w4 t* u0 L9 h6 l- z
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
% K M Y% C, ]residential construction will fall further to around
4 ^* ]. x1 V: L/ `8 c, }/ t125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
' f/ d. L# F6 I* Y; gin the fourth quarter.
( d3 c* ~! v) C& X4 T4 kTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,+ y; e+ }4 Q! P- M* u* v, P
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
; \2 s( T% ]: [, hfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
5 g& H" v h% U( N3 R2 c5 zprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home: r' G/ K6 v3 R% o
values since house prices should track incomes over the
9 ^& R+ p L+ ^) I1 v% nlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
8 L: A3 T: E8 {/ d! Hregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers' j: @* M `' a0 `3 m! n
of residential construction.* C- c c( ~5 o! C ?+ O( Q: u
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
: s; D. X( D5 I8 j4 q, p! R. X“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction, [; ^ K7 ]0 S6 P% \' I
would have occurred if housing had been priced% |; q4 F9 V! M
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
1 D( {5 }4 C8 ~3 b) z. D6 G( Hfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
( l' S* R( x! L% g- g2 Zunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
3 s% j [+ ^9 h! y, qmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.( s8 @, Z6 @4 B6 ~0 U
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,0 L5 u* Q6 E% j& J( U, T
where housing demand will further contract under waning* \; F: w+ m" M4 w# n' F1 ^- f
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are( U- [1 _: s% s& X" w( Q
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the, q$ C7 R* a9 A- I% \( M8 T1 E
very time that the resale market has swung into strong) O/ y4 U( q. I; A4 ~* I
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces( N- |9 f( |1 K" h Z! I# a, A' M
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
) z& N7 V& L. xweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
% W- L" N# r/ b& w4 g* y, c, ^Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
6 [$ K, y2 J9 J- M2 z( T- kstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
/ R# I# k/ H' e; y* }$ H) j% y, jMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,- a" W: x3 c/ R
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
" Y2 n; a* F3 b4 C# Y0 q, Nrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a8 V Z7 c) j9 {5 ~3 [+ `% _
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
' `8 O0 i1 }( s7 J W3 K& \+ D/ t- rlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto0 D! f' c8 y8 C! |/ {* p
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically3 p8 h# `, v. D- r R( Q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
+ }) W( ^* a5 w+ J- cconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will9 Z. Y9 I" z, v- x
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as8 ?! X! F# o: y5 {& }3 H
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
/ w( w' Z4 o$ B( d! M0 Nspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while7 I* l7 w& n! z) D' f
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
# }9 h' l3 i. E( O5 u8 ?5 f' oanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from. d' @ V' _- f1 X5 e4 ~
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
6 X* C3 d; ]& S1 }1 vyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
5 U1 Y" O+ e& i, [0 t3 zwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.! Y% D( u1 z* H. n8 U# Y
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING- @2 G6 N( B9 {" s/ v5 r- [
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS" }8 P4 \: I0 Y1 l0 ]; ?* |2 S9 [
Grant Bishop, Economist6 ]( ~5 U' [+ I0 m; Z* d4 k
416-982-8063
4 [! o6 z9 {3 @: v" d: ^9 APascal Gauthier, Economist( c9 }, x" v& X. w6 K
416-944-5730+ y5 n. S) g! ^* r8 h& r) F
4 v0 S1 s+ s# s2 S0 o
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|