埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2242|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
. B# H) ?# T, n! F: ifrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove, R. C4 i# }5 o# D% U$ _
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house: X# T0 ?# B" S0 E7 s. c3 [
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
& f/ L- P- \8 Y) N1 Mfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This& y  s& p$ H( M$ E2 d: Z! k
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction8 }1 s9 p9 c9 w% E
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately% s7 P" w2 K2 j4 A$ [, ]' W
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past/ L7 C  B( Y" F! P0 t: D2 K
three years.2 i5 `1 }* N3 s0 f  H: G
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
2 \6 r  F' P) r+ u' C, r. s1 Htheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
0 v; f) G4 S; P, `2 q/ Qaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
% a9 {) Z, a' j; Oboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices2 _* P: J- P; X5 L% b" K
to fundamentally justified levels.+ O" e- s/ @; n
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”% k' f# B  o2 q- [# T
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and1 U  S3 p' N' ?& p# A6 x, {
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”& [. Y4 K* a( Q1 ~! I
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
3 u4 n" g* X" t) c! m2 r& _there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s* t9 k. J5 h' w* d
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where  P6 Y: G- t9 [" x' D% ?/ V
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
( r% g8 Z' J8 ~6 m! H: ?' ethat is now being rapidly reined in.
: K+ ]( u5 D5 q# h# f; o7 BWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
4 n' s* Z1 S1 zthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
/ u8 D3 ]) x4 {: ~means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
: m, Z( i" f  t) W) h2 u9 q4 b% Fon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers+ R+ f' Y. n9 Q! m; s. ?! z+ `
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will, c+ i; y$ G& g% J. O
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
; m9 g: i/ j+ Y, G, q+ rdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction/ d( r- c  J' [  [7 K
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
; H: ]8 |6 Y) Wto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
( y) H* e! l# |% v9 fresidential construction will fall further to around
" R# |7 }! y# @+ V125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
4 q% d! U. ~9 P* G2 O1 ein the fourth quarter.
8 ~8 f- j9 p$ [. }3 HTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
3 n- W5 a- B1 f7 Z3 a- w5 ^1 swe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
5 @: h" {( q* L& v  W* s1 Afundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
& k' [; }3 q' I% V' y2 q9 pprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
( {3 ^4 q  h: i% ?) Uvalues since house prices should track incomes over the0 c  R* p. R7 b# C; B7 X
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we; v1 c4 v* @$ {7 S7 S
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers7 s& }  s$ x# `0 R
of residential construction.
& [0 z$ b! G& Y9 d- M3 wTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
- j$ Y% X" N" r; L! p' Z“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction1 Z- Y# @& y6 Y% X( u" {& J) i
would have occurred if housing had been priced2 d2 n2 ~' m4 [- c- ?9 I& |6 H7 C- a
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this2 w2 a* a3 L" M+ b( q" D4 h
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new' p: @& t' ~* g4 Q
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
9 S* u- @# l# @# P  k+ Y% g5 hmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
6 E! n$ ?1 Q1 i) y5 \Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,0 s7 S3 Y1 f) }8 U' z
where housing demand will further contract under waning
4 ?% e, a+ e: g' T# U9 F) Q( j. i8 {population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are( h' o' B7 t: P, |6 Z
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the& g9 k# h( `: R# S
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
* ?! W2 o& y. hbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces$ z, p, w$ G. W0 L: V8 `
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural! T3 f* P  h9 y4 |1 e3 g1 O
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
% h  }0 X! M9 K$ `Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
% d5 L4 M9 q& ~1 I/ Fstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de' ~& [0 m% h: k/ _4 q" x
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,  ?+ I. D8 Z! E0 ]
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership2 N4 t+ P  k$ a3 t) w: l
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a. p6 [! ?2 L; Y5 }+ ^+ H
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears& B  n, c& ^/ \6 k! i2 F, n
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
" o, M) l" N4 scondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically: Z# h* }0 Q7 }! s4 C+ ]* i
high levels of apartment-style units presently under( D9 @# S8 f) R* y( [4 v* ~' q1 O
construction mean that record numbers of condos will/ G# C+ V- z1 p6 ^
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
% J) O6 q1 x! T; |$ w7 m% J4 M4 \cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
0 v% V6 F6 C- ~9 u6 _- D4 F( ^spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while+ n9 f! y) I2 K
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
# _3 c' ^, j' O. Aanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
  O+ i7 o- s- G9 g9 ]+ \inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
& c2 o: v% ~, z, N% o6 s6 Z" \+ z" Syears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
( y) P$ {; J7 q4 \1 X, w; z' Dwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.5 f% r. j5 \$ u& R7 T: A
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
5 e. H' g. m7 ^& \MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS; p; n+ j& X# P+ L0 u; |# i7 D
Grant Bishop, Economist
7 T) U/ M  ^! e416-982-80633 R. U& ?3 z6 G3 H" W) ~
Pascal Gauthier, Economist4 s; [/ E+ ]4 A7 E! y1 ], ]: \
416-944-5730' b% y& f8 `! b

: {' @1 M; k  e1 x" z5 vhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-30 15:45 , Processed in 0.104432 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表