 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
2 s3 l2 t# q1 f* E. z3 hfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
- S6 w' v+ l9 ~% W! Xunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house& U, ]2 k+ n9 _2 ~7 r
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
" w5 W3 F3 S+ \% W' K9 B jfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This6 Y0 u* o, j+ R0 K: Q
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
3 p9 ^ x) g2 r7 n+ v+ Ythat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately; q" r( P9 b6 [5 |/ [, ] D
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past5 o1 ~9 k6 {8 F1 G& `0 `) o+ Q* x
three years.0 U, \- E1 z9 }& X8 L0 q. U
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from, S0 J- W2 J' W; k1 |8 c
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of; e( H5 c; A$ J/ [# O
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
$ g/ T: ^2 ^ b% I1 k6 X0 D3 oboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices& |8 N8 ]" V8 g j+ G
to fundamentally justified levels.
7 Y _8 @& U- a! F" J: p: u X6 dWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”) C; V/ V H) \; L8 A# v
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and" x1 q0 ^/ _! r+ @& q) S+ d
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”% }* F4 q8 B/ Q# y6 }5 @) |, c) b
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although8 H( x3 \) I; k# A' M. m/ g% @1 _) G
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s, U( x/ [- f" l' q6 T' A
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where A0 j% n4 A. _, W9 P
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
6 y) i! m( H. a* m# xthat is now being rapidly reined in.
1 h5 p8 P* c2 S3 PWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,, K @0 I0 R2 E9 q6 d
the construction of too many new homes over the boom) K3 P6 ^& Z2 U# W C
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
, Q& m' F2 v+ U8 l! V I' }on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
, f2 \4 ^, U2 T/ Y& o, {from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
2 L6 w( x$ O$ U- F% Sremain choppy and new residential construction will be+ A2 V4 b/ I# M& R b9 D! I) }5 L
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
/ @3 c, ~6 y. h9 N3 Z) ris now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this. G0 I- o4 T9 m3 X: Y7 a! v
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
; _& W J# R0 s, ^residential construction will fall further to around8 j4 A/ X7 T; K- K& A, k2 j0 Q
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
9 I. q0 ]' n: ~: b( |9 E5 ]* Fin the fourth quarter.
4 P& L0 j2 x$ t8 h6 h$ iTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
% |! _/ v* |8 R# ^, D' ?1 @* u! Z: mwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
9 ~% l) O* p' G; g: ?( Bfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
2 P' J" m# A. n3 B% q2 ]9 O) Z' A" Uprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home! U7 w; G2 g6 ^9 [& D1 H
values since house prices should track incomes over the
& R% M- l: j$ e8 ^long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we# o) [. P; \) D5 @* g; d$ ]4 ?6 p9 B
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
8 Q7 u" o$ d" W+ nof residential construction.
& G! D6 G6 w0 eTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
: @& i9 M" F& _! _4 z1 i/ b“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
% ?2 T J+ M4 C0 N2 a5 _& a3 w! Gwould have occurred if housing had been priced6 I1 m0 s/ g& J6 a
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
. X$ g+ e; y3 |fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new5 _: G2 H) G: Q3 V* _
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
4 w2 S: Q1 ^9 i' c5 X# Tmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
) }+ J* N2 W' u+ iRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies," |; q/ S: D0 s3 z' _
where housing demand will further contract under waning) f, O8 r. ]2 |( z7 W* S6 {& p
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
& y- \1 \( [. u5 P% j- h0 V' n; T; Halready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
6 q2 H) C6 V; J! Lvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
4 u4 t U, @& t/ U3 qbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
g4 Q1 P) v+ K$ s5 Z2 zhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
' L) b7 G( e) s( Rweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
" ?; }0 I3 Z' C) X6 L% g' @Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the ~7 u; L/ o, g7 q& s, y
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
e z' i. R/ [7 YMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,- v8 i( N" d T% d; a
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership: |: y7 l- p* x! X; [
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a' u2 a5 d7 i& d8 |
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears9 |) j- e- _, V) i; d, w0 h9 O7 q
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto$ Q# r, I* D% b$ [+ r" h8 T
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically ]' p I, W, g. `! I
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
# N- ]" u1 P7 |' {construction mean that record numbers of condos will
* _6 ~: i$ U6 z! e m5 preach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
5 u% M1 o5 \5 K+ Q5 q3 tcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could8 H& L3 p6 p; p- @8 [; ~
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while( t0 d1 H2 [! F
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
. E; b' \3 F& z% I. r. J2 r' aanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from# u1 d( q% l9 Z$ U" @- L
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming- g" j8 E( @+ A- L# S* g
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,* N2 s' ^! O5 C6 Y2 c8 z& ~
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding. e2 ^# s5 g) ~9 n+ n* r' @
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING7 I1 ]% H1 x) @7 ]8 Y
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
( d4 M+ D/ H6 SGrant Bishop, Economist3 G+ M; T3 M+ U% L
416-982-8063" r. v% ^/ o3 M3 @0 H8 O
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
' q' @4 R. F# h4 e5 C( n& k- Q6 {416-944-5730
" \: V) R( P# C9 U2 n( ]4 y3 s% e* y) U. Q
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|