埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2243|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly& g$ E, k0 m( J# X1 m
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove- @0 s5 J# n4 x9 R1 X5 I* v
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
! ?# h3 G- [- q$ u/ W- p& aprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
6 E) n% Z0 q* z( o- z6 r: afundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* P  N' s% i7 d) Boverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
- U; Z* h* e4 n/ Y: vthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately& K7 O1 U6 d! }, s/ r
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past9 J/ J! w) ?) j1 ]) F$ g
three years.$ N, G! ?& V4 J, A( l
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
& ?; X2 _7 ^$ B# Q# Rtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of8 f, T  K0 y: E0 W
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
1 Z8 k$ r+ f7 o" f2 |: lboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
  l3 P% x8 q6 g7 Q& Kto fundamentally justified levels.0 U& v5 V9 ~! I; |
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”9 e- N1 f& t/ l8 R/ `% W
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and) M1 C9 N7 `2 ?5 k. n' ?/ y1 Q9 ]
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”1 b; z8 f: p& v, m. x  M0 r5 h
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
8 p0 G& b! n2 ]2 X: f& m6 Fthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
( b! H3 n9 J' N5 a8 ?/ x) P“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where) K! `! V. r# p) N) o; Y
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch( Y# V5 {7 H. h; X  [
that is now being rapidly reined in.1 X$ X' f# X! a( s
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,, O) I; o0 ?" i5 j* v$ b
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
+ G- j' |$ v7 L# I5 b, ?1 _2 hmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh1 a7 [. k* X+ Z2 X
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers9 A8 K3 z) q* ~0 ]
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
9 I2 D9 r$ D! d9 L1 O2 J' Lremain choppy and new residential construction will be) D5 Q# s. m& Z6 N7 |7 B0 S& C4 M
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
( V4 J2 W6 S9 u, ois now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this% R( D6 I6 I8 f
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide( B3 _( l2 c$ f! e3 q( F- l
residential construction will fall further to around3 A, m! M+ a' ~7 @3 f2 U
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units+ ^1 Y- q. q$ u# Q
in the fourth quarter.5 K( R9 i/ e$ i1 M; e
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
* t8 \# ]( V4 ?* O0 R# F! l" Uwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run4 Y& x/ U9 Z& c( m* W# |1 R) Y
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
4 ?3 F8 j0 k  G2 Y0 B8 m  Xprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home% ~9 p& m0 @5 @' n
values since house prices should track incomes over the" g+ q6 H2 O1 a, A: x9 W
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
, g: V/ ]' J1 A% z5 y$ T- rregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers* I9 M( G2 S- t1 p. _& |( K3 l1 b8 [
of residential construction.
: S5 [2 p" `. U9 a  B; c9 r8 qTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
. o8 k, g- [# t# c6 O4 k6 y“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction# @2 l$ A/ @, F6 {. l
would have occurred if housing had been priced3 _; g& o# d$ l% v9 |# J( r
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
$ t0 H) o7 z" N: s  S& Lfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new0 _: J( d3 }) l% I$ Z
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
$ l+ S0 q5 T3 U9 J# hmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
; v( l$ I( f" }: Q( q, l7 N) [Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
( V: r7 u5 |) [' a! U; S4 ]where housing demand will further contract under waning: U$ e" D% q9 c) m0 q. d
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
: |) P3 `9 D9 [. \2 jalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the8 R3 T: `* t. t5 n" o" ?3 }9 q
very time that the resale market has swung into strong/ j8 k$ l% A4 b. R  S# a
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
$ y) X1 b; `! I, A4 _/ H2 i8 rhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
1 ^% s+ D, z, r5 Wweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
  u) u  B! M/ AQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the2 I8 {2 c. p% o1 i  _+ [$ V
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de1 c' O% h) {) G6 ^# R
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,2 B) {1 W3 [% u. ]
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
1 `! M1 b% q% x' K- K0 M- `. I2 k; `4 prates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
& ^/ @9 P2 C' m. q0 Dcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
8 e4 Q& r7 x, G* [- Plimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
# z; C7 u3 A' W# s& `6 n! acondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
3 X! l" B/ d' ~6 yhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under4 m) L1 l- ?( l$ R' f( Q
construction mean that record numbers of condos will  ^4 e2 E; ]  ?; e' y0 t4 \% H: q7 j: d
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
" ^' P, w( J) ~; A3 m. {( f% Jcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could# T2 P- @# L$ a2 @6 @3 c/ z
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
0 e8 `* M' }7 @& c1 Y' Fresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we# u, `" z$ T- K
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from( u/ I  c. e& J; V1 L( j# D; Q% I
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming! x+ J: K; ~* M
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,. n  [) L, G$ l  z  i. i7 `
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.8 o! U0 _  J: ~) A% u( m
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING  w4 B2 M1 n0 p+ N
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
! T. u  T8 I7 F! s$ @. y7 wGrant Bishop, Economist# ~7 R) b# D+ I  s
416-982-8063
" D- l, f3 ?, y# `Pascal Gauthier, Economist& t$ l' X; |( u9 X& o" Y/ x& x/ z
416-944-57301 {* G( ]1 E0 Q- o0 i4 G

# p1 D) ~- V. d$ Yhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-31 03:42 , Processed in 0.206807 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表