 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly9 ^; B8 p/ J- c
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove' D; A5 q5 u+ _, b) T) C
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
( v8 M+ S* m4 E4 ^, ~( kprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
( @* z3 t* Q8 l( K* y b2 n/ ]- lfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This; v& y# d7 \: [) x. d
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
! c! x2 o' q' B" C& Tthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately: r6 Y. K. W+ Z. ^
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
7 q8 X- g) S% R$ {three years.
' @2 e! m, J* z; O" Q2 c" \# c4 qBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
$ y! t0 {5 d8 E$ a4 Y, Ntheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of- I( b0 y/ w/ V, O
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects: U+ }3 P. j2 I" O' I X" c
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
( S$ k; x% P' y( vto fundamentally justified levels.1 A9 e2 E. ^* W+ h/ o" v: v% E
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”$ [6 a" F3 @# D5 I$ ]7 F
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
$ n1 O; n5 \8 Vthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”# g/ _) I9 J0 K! ?: p, L: u
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although' w1 V8 o7 _4 T/ k6 L& n
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s; u2 }: U" t5 M6 E: k3 B
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
8 T8 @. ^+ w3 ^% e8 @homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch! T, ~3 h9 {( q# A1 N5 X6 |
that is now being rapidly reined in.8 U* e- H& ^& ^: D. y. @' U
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
3 \$ H6 ~! S1 J# S8 V" H' u% ]the construction of too many new homes over the boom& `8 o* c! Q! d& _' \; v, Y5 i9 x
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
- ]* u7 h/ E. D: V" Lon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
4 s, ~& k, z3 ?$ @+ rfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will6 I1 p8 x) {9 h% z
remain choppy and new residential construction will be( B$ d/ a; L! Y, ~( b9 D
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
7 {2 T. N# j8 P5 m. x/ iis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this5 j% s6 B: o! F5 R& @6 X
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide$ C3 [7 ?& R4 J0 c4 f
residential construction will fall further to around9 c4 c: R9 x8 S
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units! p5 v% J$ F# E' S1 U8 U/ @$ D R& g- z
in the fourth quarter.2 N; m; J2 |* }3 t
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding, V8 k* s8 w) Y$ v @2 r
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run3 N+ G* m0 u5 Y8 i; L8 m2 b3 A- H
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each# ]! a7 ^9 _" e( e6 Z: V
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home- F2 O. W# d8 b# `! n) ?8 ~: d
values since house prices should track incomes over the
/ U9 Y3 T" Z5 D6 Z/ Ulong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
1 k5 Y4 J! b' s2 G- p. {; @! yregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
* N2 h' s, a Y' Qof residential construction.' l8 y9 I- ~9 m# F
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a1 a; I+ q3 Q" y7 S3 d7 G
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction" E( ~) Z0 {( ?& C, E+ ?* i
would have occurred if housing had been priced3 \6 W! ?8 S. e& ?' L" B
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this T4 r' ?" i2 O# G
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
# Z! F- T# J1 [8 Uunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too# Z% `6 Z% _/ f7 |
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.4 ?- [/ D, N/ g; M5 ^
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies, r4 |$ r, B/ W. P( a3 R
where housing demand will further contract under waning( E& M. a; j; q+ \7 x1 A
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
# L* i: Y0 ^4 k9 J, `already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
8 R4 A/ r! b( x4 R; x) V" |) fvery time that the resale market has swung into strong4 O& @# G' ?0 ?5 J! t
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
* |* O, ]; E: j! Ehas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural) {9 d$ D1 t8 Y b
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.8 i4 e) B* u' v" ^7 R$ b
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the% v, ?1 K! q: p* E% n, m1 U7 Z! z
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
0 X9 ^2 M9 x! H" D% Q8 NMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,; B; B/ w! W, C( O2 Q
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership+ e! D: C& c7 r# C* P; v
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
2 u9 q/ J* g, Hcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears5 y* Q6 q9 w5 _1 o [
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
# y; R Q* j. Z# O6 T) M' D8 I, econdo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically" n2 C- i- n) [+ L( [
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
, k+ E" J) b% o+ i, Rconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will* Q1 Z, h) G% ?1 R9 `
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
- o, X7 q1 m. q6 Icyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
* K' y" o* u5 |1 [# X* \$ ospike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
' `3 W2 q6 z( T2 B: `residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
# Q1 M; c6 I# _) C+ ]7 Z8 Zanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from2 x* l; Z% h7 k* }) c" x" f/ c8 N
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
/ s8 d& ?' A- w$ \2 H, hyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,+ I& B& s4 t9 A
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
1 v+ S; C3 X6 A* `: M, {5 @+ ?OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING0 J. x5 I, @1 J% k
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS/ J4 @, ]( ~5 w' ?
Grant Bishop, Economist7 H; L. @% j9 V0 Q% ]
416-982-8063' E4 f5 S5 M- c8 G }( T( a1 \) ?- ~
Pascal Gauthier, Economist, U& E h2 F' V; Q" H, d( V6 f- s6 J
416-944-5730, X+ k% h# n+ G, T7 E, l4 h
1 ^4 o4 d% k- E( G/ V! bhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|