 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
7 ?, Q7 D' L: i, sfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
. n, P7 T+ o! H7 v4 |' Q2 G" M* \unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
; @! Q i. {, ]9 Z) }4 ]prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
+ A! j! @! k6 L Sfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
8 C* I7 G! @6 k% coverpricing compelled a level of residential construction; `2 t x' D. K; P5 o& e
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately/ T6 _2 f6 w8 K5 r' u: p
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past" S) X& y* [, N2 t$ q8 C
three years.
2 F$ U& r7 H( }/ I! ]) t jBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
% B, D2 z: ~( q9 J K: T. }: htheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of; s# a. Y. V- D
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects: ?6 T4 e: s% G* L1 C. a
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices9 }0 b4 s+ @- Y+ q u% ^) ^
to fundamentally justified levels.; x; V: ~' k2 b2 N4 Z0 f( `( @$ }6 g
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”; \6 X) Z. t6 U5 w3 |3 ^3 @
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and/ K* A$ @* f8 N5 K
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
" _9 a: |+ ^2 _% }' m) Zwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
. V8 k$ m! z5 j* ]6 d5 Sthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s/ j2 f. j n# `" z% a3 e) y& t
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where. y3 J- q( R0 @+ E5 T
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch1 Y/ }2 v; l) m4 Q) |! L) {! {# g+ d
that is now being rapidly reined in.4 O: ]5 k+ n- P7 a; F
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,6 G* W2 A1 L% B+ P
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
' Q) A1 Z% W' }# p0 Rmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh+ p) m! Y0 O) i2 v# q9 I
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers0 B* m1 h0 S' K$ @& A
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will: v3 M' ~( u& M2 _0 V: X& S: C
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
3 _9 M* `* H$ F( N- ^dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
# K! ?& ~2 s! n7 |5 zis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
" a) v7 _3 v0 `to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
4 e0 \( e l, N$ n7 sresidential construction will fall further to around- ?5 k" _8 G9 d; D* D
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units' G: P6 {' f' S( | N5 ^* v) @* I
in the fourth quarter.
' v [2 u) `' K. x/ h) BTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,$ j" d& `1 D! Y/ d0 D
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run! {9 r! n4 L3 L2 x6 @' {; x
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
& J2 g4 i: p4 F) z2 sprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
5 l9 X9 r8 g/ j- N# vvalues since house prices should track incomes over the. Z( w7 i7 c# I' g$ t7 ~, t
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
3 D k; B( f; m5 ?! q" C/ Wregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers/ j+ |- O8 v1 W* \
of residential construction.8 m# f7 A$ g9 z1 J2 D3 N: t
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a. j- p$ z: J; k. t/ M9 F
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction, P9 d y9 C: v/ J( I
would have occurred if housing had been priced
% [8 N5 Z- R. e* \; w3 x6 Ioptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
# \1 y2 S. T% g5 X/ B" S/ `fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new7 O% F5 ]6 j/ N
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
8 A9 V- d: z( p/ |' f% Q4 q2 mmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
& ?% r9 a1 u" U5 ~% ?Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,# i. a' f9 h: ?- V* n+ }
where housing demand will further contract under waning
" X7 u! n! j0 e' Ppopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
' v: x" K* Y, m/ x9 |already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
/ ^; o8 Q3 n V/ Xvery time that the resale market has swung into strong: K: f2 A b0 e
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces# j% R2 R! Z$ x+ c% X _3 D
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural7 f- V3 Q& e+ W3 b" @; _
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
8 R7 u j* `* Z7 }4 i& D* aQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the$ y. z; ? T7 `/ ~ p6 Z
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de, F) \# v9 M5 c. B& m
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,. @0 k- P. y+ ~& }
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership! w6 [5 R: b S0 F2 S0 K
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
8 {8 _9 g" ?' l. j5 R3 x4 l& Ucyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears! ]' N0 Y; c5 J; \! l, A3 ^* v' u
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto" X" y" J% s# z: `4 H9 {, |( r( Q
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically& K( ?9 @6 B% [+ b( M5 g2 O3 L
high levels of apartment-style units presently under, r. l( T8 }5 }! g0 _
construction mean that record numbers of condos will2 D4 H/ X& W0 }
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as1 W. }2 H3 t1 i' D4 V1 U' J
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
) z6 B0 G* R5 d5 [% P( Z7 ^6 cspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while) F$ u6 o% H8 H7 Z
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
$ `2 o+ c4 W8 m% K7 hanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from( k+ c( y5 D+ H9 P8 ]+ {
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
4 G$ ~+ D4 R3 {years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
, l8 f3 C. y# g) M7 y7 J. s! d5 [7 X, d" Bwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.( _1 @! L* }5 q& ~. P
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING. I4 W q3 p& [- n0 T
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
! V% L0 G; N, _/ L, y8 g$ E7 JGrant Bishop, Economist3 M$ U8 t2 u( T$ V! M$ n$ E
416-982-8063
9 ?" P0 d* p; _ S9 w3 RPascal Gauthier, Economist2 e' l9 R. q" A( X9 h
416-944-5730
A* w' J1 x; Z% h6 P6 s# ^0 R* y: @' Q; J9 F! i# Z
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|