埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1818|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
1 {2 K& v7 M' W8 o1 \from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
& S( U0 Q4 j( Y% junsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house/ H/ k/ M% c9 \$ B8 s( R; W3 B; x
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by* h3 L2 x/ G, W% a
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
% i6 d5 {- M3 X8 F0 u" voverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
& H+ |0 L; y8 j' hthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately7 U" X: ]! }- h2 L
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past' W" V* I/ O9 _' _
three years.- b" ?- i2 D5 p5 T
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
3 d2 B! h& f( S7 E! y: d5 Ttheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
  Y  A6 }! c. E$ g: eaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects* q, T* i2 ?& B* }, q/ d
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices" z$ l1 ]; E3 G* V5 T: ~; \$ Q
to fundamentally justified levels.* g! Q* t, b# g
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
/ m3 r8 n* p  d- i1 H% mwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
/ D8 Z. X5 |) ]* y$ M4 |" |: J$ fthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
" d0 a" A: H1 C- N9 E+ Bwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
: Z  \7 V5 m! ]3 o5 M( H. qthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
. `# @/ z, d* D% |  z' `9 F“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
& Q/ e$ g- H8 u! x9 K8 u: ^homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
: X, ?+ g3 @& h( kthat is now being rapidly reined in.  |+ p9 D- R, P6 g7 @, M7 W2 o1 ~
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,* x/ m$ i. l( S/ z6 z8 T  X) L
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
+ d, I! Z; T. K( K) Zmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
! O4 K" c% Y) M, F9 jon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers  Q) E1 V" I% J0 G( D  r
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will! A1 s2 e3 W; h* O" R7 v
remain choppy and new residential construction will be0 m6 S. W) V  ~
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
1 y7 J* [" i8 V  z& S- B. q. I% \is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this% l" h  K4 w8 z* U- G8 H/ w
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
2 A  S  [. U2 X& E. Y6 z# ?residential construction will fall further to around% O- v+ ^! o' u# U" U
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
, R# m  t. M& a9 w0 h! f7 ~in the fourth quarter.) C- W: f& w8 q
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
6 C0 R! ^) h) T( X! v9 fwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
7 m& V; u8 ~+ M1 T" T+ x* cfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
( ]' ?* l( k$ M, Fprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
, _" W* \0 A# Z' A, [) k4 _values since house prices should track incomes over the
* ~4 e! m' }1 w+ Hlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we: d" `' F- q& o- a0 ^) l0 X! c
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
; j2 Y" |, V% o# |of residential construction.
: e+ J1 P- C6 j1 \$ S& B9 K( @: |To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
! M5 o# X6 v3 [7 F2 M“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
& f- c" Q0 R  g  l0 d. x$ nwould have occurred if housing had been priced8 G* v) V0 o$ m6 R5 u) b) ]
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this- M6 X! o* Y" g  _. u; Y& ~& e
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new8 j# h1 x' H$ z6 W7 t) X( h1 ^; b
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
) K. x3 u, ^1 G7 amany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
  D2 f8 w9 w! h) |$ r- ]+ Y. Q0 s9 KRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,8 {5 v8 G2 U/ T$ r6 ]3 z/ N% f
where housing demand will further contract under waning( w! T% ~8 p+ j8 X
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are3 j' @4 ?+ E" M" m
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the1 J# D5 I+ G5 l3 y: C0 T/ k
very time that the resale market has swung into strong/ i6 H5 E% ]% Q5 p# t2 c9 a
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
6 D: F2 }  X4 Bhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural$ L# D) `3 e" b; ?7 L: H" F
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
7 V3 ?$ \' c) [( b  SQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the3 [; c$ u& Z/ D7 U) w+ c" V
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
0 }9 Z/ G$ T1 J! E5 ~! tMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
0 p6 \$ K( E0 v2 [given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
% T0 l1 f3 N2 O3 l+ hrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
: m& ^* e. |8 S, Wcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears7 w  ]3 @) l- r- I: J5 D
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
# q% b6 w8 o" l! econdo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
- g( [# x. ?$ N1 @0 Rhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
( J( x8 B. q) r8 V: ~6 l/ aconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will1 }+ a( g7 V- @( u
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as7 t) J0 L3 C, P1 q: _) v% J
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could& o1 o4 r& X- {6 z4 R* o/ l9 v
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
7 L$ p* f5 E$ f5 Cresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
7 ?) c5 [. d( a) p* Qanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from! f( V# B6 r# \; x9 \7 V' K! J  r
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming1 k7 f( R( h7 D0 {/ |
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,8 S! b: [! O  i4 c6 c( y
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.3 S3 z8 j( t& V) \+ Z; u2 ]
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING- N4 G7 Y2 H8 _1 O% L% @( Q0 I
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS% f- x" f( l' F9 T: r# p! N
Grant Bishop, Economist! P( v6 h1 j  g: F3 r
416-982-8063
  E# `) q/ `  A0 H, H  H& q( bPascal Gauthier, Economist" h& p- l1 y% e7 Y: M
416-944-5730
* c$ o% `# r- g. r0 _# ~1 T) p7 g% L3 @1 W. A4 h
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
大型搬家
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-17 09:59 , Processed in 0.123402 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表