 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly* d2 q3 I! X' C6 y5 I4 E! ?: F
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
) d* W" s" b9 _. t3 tunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
! N) x' j) A8 Dprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by& |1 S$ e5 I5 q1 m9 g% w
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This/ g1 i3 | r5 i5 p" ^
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
8 D" a# m; E2 I0 mthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately4 v8 I( ?# C) S7 r( g! o2 z
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
* Z5 G+ q& A* Kthree years.9 }0 g* g4 K2 q7 w, L% I$ Q% b
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from7 l" i( L) _: d- C3 \
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of, t) [/ L# O( _5 k: k1 {
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects R6 l9 `" Y. M3 @ K% o$ {6 j4 i
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices8 C1 W" _: F1 _0 F$ l& M- f. y
to fundamentally justified levels.- p. L+ S8 H2 P: `8 N# |
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”6 g/ ]5 M- g) t* \# ?: y% [
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
9 U# Y; s: f6 L; Ethat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
3 X5 e- \. y6 e+ @1 V* V% w) s. n* _where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although" c+ X o n! Q" ?
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s* i* r3 |% R# N% [4 [0 ]) M0 b
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
# \5 q2 S* U2 V+ x- W6 K8 l/ Ohomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
' e1 s. d4 o- E l5 a- jthat is now being rapidly reined in.
# I8 k9 j! r, r( v2 Y2 B z' [; aWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,0 i) E% f; v" R
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
# X5 B$ l* ~- M/ Ameans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
+ h8 f( Z3 s% K* t3 h* bon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers% N6 Q! r! C1 v
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
J5 \4 q3 ^1 y/ V- n+ ?9 C1 Vremain choppy and new residential construction will be7 ]' Y6 C0 b' e; c3 I
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
U/ y5 m$ i d+ Qis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
* X( x6 A5 x m+ |9 ^3 O' Qto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
" m; M( k1 a& }! z# dresidential construction will fall further to around9 P- D) V4 ?( Y) S+ x
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units& w- f. _+ V# I% L) v
in the fourth quarter.
1 c4 w0 ?1 O" C ~( H0 w: zTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
5 n# v" F0 w$ W" P; A1 }# jwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
0 Y4 C: o4 w* a' efundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
3 q% M" k6 e% ?0 B5 xprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
5 K. p& a% d" {8 Svalues since house prices should track incomes over the- b6 q% a5 ~ N& c+ c$ ?3 _1 }
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
8 U9 C3 F Y) @1 G1 a& _regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
* Y) o1 G: X5 w& Uof residential construction.# j7 c! Y( v6 P
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
' w* j& A1 Z5 O! R7 T1 w“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction/ v0 N5 o7 {3 Y+ S* c3 N2 r; `6 Z% O ]
would have occurred if housing had been priced
' X' o1 M) o( o3 B( p4 doptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
1 _) o7 M) D! kfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
* n( m T9 O0 O g! funits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
+ D5 I2 x( W4 d4 pmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.1 [( W/ `0 @" f7 S' J- G
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
! I' ^/ Q( |0 t7 X& d* Nwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
3 u* ^/ G0 E, f# s& {population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
6 g* [# J) Q0 m% {+ b; q9 d2 kalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
, G3 V5 A8 S9 w. rvery time that the resale market has swung into strong/ o: a. x9 e1 X! k2 W
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
9 u {( W. N- Fhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural. E: D: ^1 d! J1 ~+ {1 [
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
' L! E! d. E& C( |' R+ cQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
0 Y% ^: h9 ?8 y' @5 Rstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de" h1 O. _# m' E8 ^9 U
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,3 @& O: p) o; A! g' z2 g2 }6 W
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership7 X# q! n7 x; ^+ [+ v- G
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a# Z* Q# E6 F! }, I% o; R3 {
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
6 U* d% @: ~& I0 O* k9 |+ mlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
* K" f0 ], K# ~- O d+ wcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically* I& s. a- \% w1 q1 f6 c* w. p
high levels of apartment-style units presently under3 z& u, u' [2 |) D/ y
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
) o. j" S- C7 z5 i( H7 dreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
* t6 F9 y' [( R ]/ h$ J1 Kcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
, p( a5 q' M% a' I2 X4 Pspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
6 M; ?% N$ i: k8 M$ S8 @* hresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
3 Y& k) x; H" `( Xanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from) b5 j/ D- x: Y/ g! C
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming2 a$ w7 w; {$ Y. K8 o# r3 p' G
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,6 q* n/ A/ X4 o) J& b8 X3 R: y! D
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
9 ^$ R& X! O! q& ]OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING+ Y% N* j: t( \7 n$ a( G
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
3 ]# }- v/ Q6 j9 E* s9 f/ P6 uGrant Bishop, Economist
8 e. K$ W3 A4 c416-982-8063- Q( |2 |* F) f% `: @
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
4 l0 {. o5 d( [+ e416-944-5730 t- `/ y* I1 I/ M+ Y! y
0 W' B- T' J6 C- k' X
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|