埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2193|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly- o: {) z* W- `+ D! e
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove1 Y2 _1 ~& T+ y$ x! r
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
6 l2 B; v& A: u6 [prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
% R  g8 O2 ^7 \% e; efundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This6 ~* W) R1 H1 s+ e( Q1 v) w
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
0 _* ~* N$ k) z& L* t/ E- kthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
  P' \& x5 V, u2 W" C9 w2 l12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
+ k$ P3 B% y3 o  l) zthree years.3 z6 m* P! Y& m0 \4 F- e4 W
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
& E) L7 Z9 v' L' [8 Jtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of( y/ |2 v( \. X3 }1 E
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects& l+ O3 I  e, V# z/ E
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
, a1 O& d7 T* D8 m% M8 Wto fundamentally justified levels.
( j% \! v/ j0 w% o! B$ I$ z/ JWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”% ]2 \- |5 m1 F6 l9 U9 u% K
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
5 o- b9 N. H8 W& L# c, V7 hthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
$ F; p, x$ H! dwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although1 a) b; g: u* f. p! W" x$ m4 `. Q
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
/ B$ e+ b2 b+ v% F8 G8 }+ w' z7 f“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where5 D0 n+ Z3 @# ?( U0 R( ~: q
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch4 |: v& M0 Q( C# @9 h, k0 L
that is now being rapidly reined in.1 Z$ G3 k0 A- C
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
$ s9 H* Y. f2 @the construction of too many new homes over the boom. f/ b. h; T  r$ s4 p* t8 ]. L
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
) X, J0 D! d0 V* H; i; s3 \on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers  T0 g/ f' X9 M8 Q3 e8 K" {4 p
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will" Q" E/ R! q3 ~% Y
remain choppy and new residential construction will be* `0 _" ~+ }1 {, r# y
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction6 c! x. d& h, W4 R! U3 s/ Z! |
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this& R2 J, I% K& G( u
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ A9 S8 i% C( o6 w1 j& X2 Q  s
residential construction will fall further to around
. E1 w8 ?+ q( N& S' d. L125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units) j; z# M. R1 U# |+ b% p. r
in the fourth quarter.
. Q% t$ K/ V) o4 v9 r# {To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding," H/ I; y( ~+ b+ C
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run& ]% T) P, M5 p" t/ `
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each7 K& {. K" S8 j% m: u: j1 B' f
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home. c* F+ n4 v% ?# S/ g! r! L3 V- [
values since house prices should track incomes over the9 b0 \2 D9 H, K+ }! ?! X* t( r
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
; o! y7 u/ u2 M" S: Zregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers5 C, ^; o3 p. d6 p
of residential construction.
0 N$ x7 L. G0 v+ iTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
* x4 s( M3 I% i! N: T2 }“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction+ e* w  R3 d: f- ]
would have occurred if housing had been priced( [& Y1 x. U4 i' u' s
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this( ]) ~7 v, r5 M. K8 x; O
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new' z! h5 _5 M) F% J: I4 d
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
3 a6 T: _( W6 W$ {many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.4 ^4 Z9 Y! s0 ^7 i
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
7 {9 |0 ^- z9 U8 z2 s- x; i" Mwhere housing demand will further contract under waning2 Z/ f* G, t5 L' t! f) ^
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
; G: G/ [( m6 f: T+ _already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
, b# E$ ^$ T1 w7 E9 ivery time that the resale market has swung into strong4 C& ~1 M; F4 e
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces5 w$ g8 }& o! t6 @
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural4 @: I7 l3 X2 \* g
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
+ P( c1 x) ~0 }% zQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the. w/ [2 q: Y! I2 x8 }
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
& [& ?* e; k4 PMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,2 H  f" J" A0 n/ `4 Y
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership( g3 V" B' k# |- I$ v
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
! m% }* Y' Z. B. W( G" z+ ?cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears8 d) {" g/ k1 e; P
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto1 t( r& b( Q" n) W6 D* Q
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
' I" u7 Z: ?5 u& F- P, l4 f, G' Jhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
( [8 ]; G* W9 a' {( D$ D# Fconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will9 s6 d- H$ S/ K
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
- E' [6 W, h' h. w) p! M$ }cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
+ B) [8 |' ~# }# l. Uspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while7 J. M4 }) H: \
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we. }6 e' |! s  Q) u
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from/ d# u9 i3 c, w" ?' a" f
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
/ r/ {5 M8 G$ P8 {years, which, along with improvements in affordability,$ l* l7 p# m( X9 _: |' D! d( _
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
$ c8 ~8 Y$ H& @: O: r4 S4 |8 ^OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING, V# V  y1 a3 D6 E0 b
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
9 X7 Z- o6 w2 `8 G2 e4 O2 x& ]Grant Bishop, Economist
7 P; {/ C/ g2 e416-982-8063
; {8 m: y7 y: j3 l3 KPascal Gauthier, Economist
9 c9 a! _! `3 X5 i' }1 x' z416-944-57309 f7 B: v. M0 O& m8 q$ I& h: I

/ v) k; \; u. yhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-15 14:53 , Processed in 0.111513 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表