埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2094|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
, R  K+ I2 b0 hfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
) _) P- f) T. O! g' C3 w0 _6 P- Tunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house0 j7 V$ U# T' ?! `4 p7 k
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
  C" o0 N8 L3 N$ N1 R8 T% Wfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
% R; D3 L' N' Roverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
1 ^4 a! q$ H/ j/ {that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
. X; J7 E. f* `; u5 I) R12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
$ ]! V7 S3 D* w7 p. I, Uthree years.
  D. A2 n/ y9 HBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
( ~; |7 _; R1 F& n3 h1 V: A- W7 ^7 g# dtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of1 I+ S- d  B2 H6 W* x
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects! U) n  Z$ [: }* c3 L
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
" K! d+ F% V8 @! V3 fto fundamentally justified levels.2 @0 ]3 c# k# b! M+ j9 W/ p5 r* q
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
. Z; B9 Z& q, A& w* `where homebuyers buy up too many houses and/ e# O) w& K. `+ p2 P0 h5 S7 |0 ~
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”( W! D/ a6 E& \& k8 q/ P. k
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
% z, e; O# i' `' W3 V; U3 G7 q. kthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
8 S: {7 @$ L  Z/ G, g“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
& h* y- N- n7 R4 K# W+ Z, Rhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch! [. w2 ?) c! p$ L' p: b# K6 [3 N* Y
that is now being rapidly reined in.4 t0 f3 n) S$ ^
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,9 x" S. n; `% N  r; E
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
2 y0 D9 a, Q1 G9 G! wmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh8 ~7 F, C) V. v3 w% R# V5 T" H) L8 y/ ]
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers1 w! j; V, T5 t8 O; T' D( [5 @
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will' ^( w$ Y8 Q8 r% W- ]( H
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
  s& f/ l: \) F  z& P5 d2 _6 cdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction. `0 h- {/ b: B) A' S5 w
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
0 G# t9 n4 P6 V, S/ k; [to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide- o, j- f9 \7 f1 Q2 j3 z5 V0 u
residential construction will fall further to around
. I$ X8 @, {. Y125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units: G0 \* }2 \* L+ t$ a
in the fourth quarter.  y* V7 d  {& ^# @7 Z0 [
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
& s0 g3 {$ i" ^8 g8 q/ M( Awe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
+ t4 X7 H/ u- _: y/ k5 n/ W7 S5 M8 Ufundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
! U7 R0 l/ I1 m/ dprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
6 u1 _  c2 c4 H2 D) [7 T8 wvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
/ y# S3 z8 m2 w" zlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
/ A, n  w4 M+ @# a4 mregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
& ?: Z$ R  e) P6 X9 @of residential construction.
$ ]* g  J' m# Q" r2 c; Z0 u2 V$ h. YTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
0 G/ ]! ]+ P9 `/ G, p% {“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction" G5 S- B$ x7 U( I2 a- _9 W
would have occurred if housing had been priced+ \: q) d% D6 l" E! b9 H
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this* e4 B/ W4 L4 l( L
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
* m) I+ [5 w5 u* f+ Y+ }units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
9 k- j7 a3 u& u  `! m# n7 smany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.  C: a4 ~5 Q  u# e3 `( o) J( f0 G
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
. a7 l9 s; ^$ t/ V" Zwhere housing demand will further contract under waning) V$ a8 w1 o: \
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
8 b* b) ]- F9 `- g2 v# i6 Z# q5 n/ Ialready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
  [, j2 i- U3 v4 Dvery time that the resale market has swung into strong8 Y. }8 b+ ^% ~4 ^; |0 R
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
  v6 i, w$ i0 x1 m5 Jhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
. o# s# u& `  Vweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.- D4 l" Y0 E* u7 z  o" h/ s# C( ?
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the8 V; T/ i) A1 I& F9 h. j0 c5 D# _% V
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
1 O: S. E# E3 p4 |( X# E- yMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
4 b6 p- g8 V; q; ?given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership* V# V) Q9 ]. G" e& B
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
* U, h$ c# Y6 Q8 r% v, tcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears4 t- S+ E. V) H% R7 q
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto7 [' M7 o9 J1 m- f& F' P- B
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
& U' T3 z6 D; e7 u5 o; U% Lhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under' R8 b2 D$ [$ u7 q6 M
construction mean that record numbers of condos will8 k: @9 q4 g6 W4 w% }# m
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as7 P: p) R2 I# Y& o
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could$ }2 k4 u. ?& _- d' Q) ^
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while4 W+ J! i7 }- j! u6 \9 P
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we- n9 Z- {9 V) F- \6 P" q6 S
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from  |/ Z! l8 K( j3 F
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming% r/ ?( u9 R# f# A4 m
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,$ T- F+ d. x" i1 ]% g
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
- f$ X+ J3 }2 h7 K. BOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING: u. i" {( U. v# Y
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS$ p8 v. H7 |; p3 ~3 y' p. S3 L
Grant Bishop, Economist
$ E( ?' z9 A) w* X6 O0 T9 F* X& S$ y416-982-8063! u+ L8 r! m: f8 k4 r3 ~, V# }
Pascal Gauthier, Economist/ r. Z3 L' }6 d& D7 r. R$ G1 B
416-944-5730
2 e6 A. t2 N* d
. T, h, t1 X  A* bhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-8 09:45 , Processed in 0.144796 second(s), 13 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表