 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly8 U5 ]% Z# Y. J- z
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove1 C; D1 A* h, K& S: J$ j- z
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house( U! I& M2 n& Q) h3 ~9 M. b
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by$ C6 I# b+ E! S6 }/ n
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
0 ~1 s$ ]& B3 ^0 u* W) S+ p/ Noverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
' `( m# G+ h% i* k6 _/ @, Athat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
0 a+ e( d8 l/ ?1 z; g) j* z12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
! X+ i4 o7 v0 z2 dthree years.
; H* ~" z' i) n! x _By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
$ p4 \ R0 q- Z0 t& y5 I$ vtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
/ c" [5 s7 ^2 e* s5 H' Caffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects {9 p) }, x3 Z( f
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices" e/ E- A8 z, B d+ \6 [
to fundamentally justified levels.
5 _8 n. a) r( |$ E2 w# f; mWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”& \2 a/ e0 M( V" J$ y M, L/ ^' K% I
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and _% d2 W- B. S5 F
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”7 G( P8 P; _- E2 i. c5 U' \3 G
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although! N& O: X: s b, i( D/ `1 O+ M
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s" e# ^# ^) C+ d1 O* j% H
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
2 D8 `; `3 L" M: D; f1 g4 Ehomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
e0 C) v( y0 X; s4 V! ]4 Uthat is now being rapidly reined in.4 z$ m3 B1 l- y: W$ f+ o( W
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
+ P: f: ]2 X5 Q+ J8 y& tthe construction of too many new homes over the boom* v6 q$ A+ B5 _+ _3 C
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh) S+ {6 C+ [# m# I+ D$ |0 @; A% j
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
2 Y) _, W; D' {3 U& Yfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will& a7 K) ^, P9 g0 |: R/ c5 p
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
W0 e) G2 h1 I. U( odampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
! A/ k$ |( b/ ~" `# Y3 Ois now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
+ J v1 F- ?$ f# j$ X: R# Ato persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide" _ M# @7 ~9 V2 N6 K4 d' ?2 }
residential construction will fall further to around
' H' @! _+ p7 E125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
2 [5 d0 A- [3 Y( d: oin the fourth quarter.4 f0 v5 q6 g2 k: R1 s. N
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,5 H2 j2 ~' p* y+ a% q7 }2 e
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run% r- {- u/ E6 o% g
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each- Y" S' ^* t& F v: l8 K2 i4 x2 p
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home7 L6 R% b1 [! P1 V/ Y- r. C& A
values since house prices should track incomes over the4 @5 F4 V5 t* T3 @8 h
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
7 q7 C% t9 X6 o, [* ?regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
8 E$ a7 B$ h& k7 x3 I: c) b- tof residential construction.
) |% N1 y* o* E3 `5 oTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a* p, R; K5 c" O, }( Q* e, v
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction. B) g! }4 U& Q- @& y+ |) R: Z
would have occurred if housing had been priced- J& ? e Q* U! j
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this* N# B" _7 \3 `1 ]
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
: Q- \$ I' u4 h' ^. ?: x* ?: Funits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too( u* H0 n9 g# A0 C; y( N
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
0 E+ `, o( l, r. z; {' i5 uRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,3 q! w" \6 _' I, }9 S. n* V
where housing demand will further contract under waning
. U$ m$ ?% M: E: _/ e, \7 c7 Bpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are! ^' I* Z+ n/ e
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the. _; D! M9 Z* b% o" o
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
! G$ V" F* P |# t( [. Y6 [buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
3 m. ~; c* `) N6 D; J7 phas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural: T6 U1 x; i5 _9 O0 d' _
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.- M( g: S9 P5 @, \6 f" E# M3 b
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
) ~+ B f: L% I% r3 X5 Bstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
1 q) Y! t3 y* k# hMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,$ n: V# I( z# J7 t: j
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
! P; t+ l3 i8 Y9 v/ x" erates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a( Y9 m5 E+ T2 i5 o5 M2 u0 k
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
# h9 \, ^' @9 H% g; H8 y7 {limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
1 @% A1 v8 N! R! |( q/ _1 _# Ocondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
! f. K* L) W% `0 vhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under& j, f. u1 R+ Q
construction mean that record numbers of condos will1 p6 o& J Z* k$ ~, B. z' b
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
" _& N6 J+ E- hcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could9 J/ G, Q5 l3 W% F* L
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while4 n( o3 B3 F" k. O3 L5 \
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we2 h/ E* j5 C8 F9 t0 k3 q; c
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from: W) A7 b$ U' u( l. R, L
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming; s: [1 x/ ?! a! B5 j6 H
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,4 \! X. W b6 O9 P; n
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.- ]2 J% D: Q! \6 d7 B- o6 U3 c
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING. l, V. F" N, s" E4 X
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS9 f6 U2 a: H: k$ Y
Grant Bishop, Economist" J7 K. S a& A6 m% s9 T2 Q
416-982-8063/ _. b& `- d: ]5 f- J5 y! K
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
9 O, i% N3 o/ Q2 R$ r: v: D416-944-5730
0 R1 J1 Z C1 i5 b; {; c4 O- c; S2 u$ H7 B
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|