 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly; s2 k8 E3 a# v
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
* h: ^; C# I, ?* t5 Z5 Lunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
( X7 k0 u' W4 n) @) w) ~# y& Mprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by u$ C: b. l) i! |/ `/ z+ X. h V
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This% f+ ], Y4 L% _; P% i
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
( K- f% J7 J6 g' m+ O0 Xthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately' i1 e+ A+ H+ S% w
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past( [6 q; W7 ^" K! V
three years.
+ \' J1 X% T4 a& N1 D, nBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from9 A* G' o, A. C9 H
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of4 I0 @! e' t/ E& r0 J
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects* K; p" b7 h9 l- l7 U4 [
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices w1 q# E% H. n- t0 E) X
to fundamentally justified levels.
- [- E% W+ B; G6 e8 g: v( ^7 YWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
N5 r" M: Y" F. uwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
: m6 n- C. `2 f5 s/ }# a8 Ithat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
& P6 L3 V( R. q! {where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
* x$ B6 b% F) a$ E: mthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
# _3 m, M# G3 q“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
: V/ m y* g1 ^$ w/ E Ihomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch! m" Q0 y: H) g e) B) i& w
that is now being rapidly reined in.' H# D) z+ O5 ?) J) g3 g
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,4 U( Y( C, d$ f8 `; m/ y+ X
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
u7 S) `1 C- }7 B. E* a; ]5 n: r9 D2 Fmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh- f# w5 o; O: V/ Z
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers. L# A2 j. b6 ^1 S2 k/ n
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
8 v' N: G' f, c+ Z& u, uremain choppy and new residential construction will be ]. ` k& j8 a
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
& d6 O3 {; s4 G' m3 U- f9 n1 nis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
1 {& g8 G+ ], E3 w& eto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide$ v7 A) M; ]8 b: t7 \
residential construction will fall further to around+ g5 @ \# v" m: r: k6 J1 x
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units- a/ G, W) M& B! \
in the fourth quarter.+ \3 I. d/ u* V$ p& E. T( Y
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
$ b# @7 E/ c" J3 T8 M+ e0 }we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run2 K, f4 \7 P! L0 `
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
8 E: R0 B! X2 ]+ vprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
, G# P6 p& D6 K9 Vvalues since house prices should track incomes over the8 I% ^( e& F4 N
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
& X" E6 e* t0 o7 y/ Lregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers0 @# i+ j) p# x- P/ f8 c: ?
of residential construction.
5 C/ m* ~. M% Y kTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a5 e& m9 d: q4 o5 R) o5 G7 `- K
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction, t8 n! I5 `- D
would have occurred if housing had been priced3 V0 R( c( a- \; t. j, c9 [* z) L9 |
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this; |- B- g% d1 i. ^8 V1 Z6 ]6 k
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
4 |5 l) S, T; G; ]9 punits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too# P' y# _# w7 G: c1 H, L0 y2 w
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
' W2 s9 F, U/ _8 j8 y7 mRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
0 B6 a$ h* n6 Rwhere housing demand will further contract under waning, I! j1 I9 p3 L5 @
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
3 ]0 a' h# a& R1 _# I, r! Ialready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
) W6 E& G) [5 H, cvery time that the resale market has swung into strong& `+ i* V# {4 Z2 T$ K
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces8 X& y* `9 |1 p6 s. F1 ?
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
% ]6 o& U& R) I b( Zweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.( a- r, S8 j( Z Q1 K2 @ X
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the# p! s4 b7 p3 U2 w$ R
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
4 M& q1 Q- h+ r& H6 sMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,- @ @7 A( U. J! g4 S
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership \. a* R: ]) `5 p! }( z& R
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a, [7 ~* x1 ]3 B7 P
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears( Z0 z3 @# K3 x" J! x
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
5 g- {! c4 s/ dcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically6 Q) [% J( a9 M/ D8 M; _: t; h Q/ r
high levels of apartment-style units presently under R& x- ~/ B! A# i5 {" h- `2 i) K
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
+ Z" N1 h( P0 g7 i8 Lreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as% w) D% ^, k1 g' }3 P
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could; v3 p# q' O! s d6 q3 T
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
5 d% [8 C- d9 Y; {7 q# w* lresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we# o4 ], C O% C
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from M1 `% ^5 O$ |& U6 T5 {
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
- E9 q6 X4 u3 ^+ U |8 d- j* ^, iyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,: q0 y: x$ w7 r3 H3 `
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.7 f' f7 @" U; w7 ~6 j# v
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING! Q* z, s5 z& y3 ^ R
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
5 w# o8 h- l, M6 _" yGrant Bishop, Economist
3 ]) M! a S: F8 P! L416-982-8063. K- U. Y% ~" o4 K& E- ]8 S8 g
Pascal Gauthier, Economist3 \' ~0 F6 ^. B' d4 C
416-944-5730
; H2 \' Q# D- L8 l7 w# R1 _6 Y, S$ Z5 ^% L4 n( X& D- S; V
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|