 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly% E7 W6 t9 I$ }' d% l! v; i
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove: v3 ^% V- @& z6 Y- ^ ]" h
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house+ O# g4 `: e9 R) G9 f
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
- a6 x' Q3 N. [' e. wfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This5 r, g! b, I& o% I6 ]5 `
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
6 O, u% ~6 x2 h7 C0 X; t M; ~4 hthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
/ H& }! _: a% y12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
5 _# b# {. q- x. ythree years., |- ]8 y8 \* Z/ t! I7 [
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
; A' u; D$ Z) p6 Jtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of8 M* U3 G8 D, Y; V2 D0 o# ^
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects3 k6 |9 y' I1 v4 M6 X+ _
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices6 b( f) G, r5 \. i
to fundamentally justified levels.
4 p& v6 F( d# p8 XWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
2 A5 _4 b' `0 a) e2 |9 `where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
5 P3 Q- }1 e6 O$ s" q. z, Tthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
& L: v P X4 [3 q% ~ m7 N4 _, }where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although* Z2 u# {. Q! \
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s1 l8 E6 B2 O# m* H+ C$ D
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where$ z3 o& z& }- ^: y% ~, O8 Y
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
c' x& W; v8 W$ Zthat is now being rapidly reined in.
; b2 ?: N( W- p( O; S4 DWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
; K& I9 }: [: rthe construction of too many new homes over the boom+ m1 Y- y' y( F& k) B9 @
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh+ {) w6 L9 s) z$ y6 u4 G8 i
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers2 S9 O$ F" F. F" c$ t' J; [
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
8 [ ]# p& Q3 G" ^) g: i0 X0 E9 jremain choppy and new residential construction will be
5 @8 z5 J: |* S- b& ^0 Cdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
" p% Z s% D. V/ K1 u6 r! Zis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
& `* Q) ?0 f0 v7 i$ K. N- \% k# g0 Eto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ B3 G* K" t% ]/ N/ b/ J2 M3 |
residential construction will fall further to around6 P5 f3 g/ F4 \6 [9 X
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
! q7 b0 F; s) e' S4 qin the fourth quarter.
5 B! F6 w8 ] v# x/ \9 G8 |To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
5 l) I( b/ E1 B; x7 }% Z7 C( U; o1 uwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
6 ~7 h2 H4 I- }7 W: q4 dfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each3 ]& A) [4 _( G; U5 P' A
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
3 Y. s# }8 s# j4 Q% J( `values since house prices should track incomes over the
; @2 r4 M) ?' \7 i- B4 @long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
7 X7 l5 @: r& c, Z7 Y. Pregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
; R% I0 l1 X. Z6 q* j7 w2 }; Y; Fof residential construction.
) d5 \/ D7 ^2 ?3 Q4 ITo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
/ l, S; P: v$ v1 o“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction' D: d. p+ G4 T% h) ]4 s4 v
would have occurred if housing had been priced
, `: ^8 B# Q7 W) R. C+ \optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this, \# w9 r# A; G( y! _$ P
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
, a0 k* W# y" A( }% h0 `% Hunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too7 t5 m& q0 z, ?6 ^0 h, ]
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.5 S5 ~+ i. |% _ _, f- {* h
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,9 h! I& s: {: ]& J3 j, W% L; L
where housing demand will further contract under waning
' U4 J1 Z% ^* i7 T" m2 D7 Ypopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
* a7 ?, n! _# V# O4 O7 p; Ealready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the* q" q% ^4 o% I4 k+ d$ r6 ~ L4 O2 L
very time that the resale market has swung into strong" m& _) K- F$ [/ }
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces% D$ V0 `. A4 R; a, ^
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural0 v, Q% j! p+ A l4 ^, Q
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
% W4 K1 H# n" R4 S9 M2 X- YQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the/ {# Y. [$ H- \% t/ y0 s
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
. y% R9 U6 e1 |# z: [Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced, U. t9 b: c% h; ^6 ?' a
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership' s+ S% L% l( L% k4 i+ }
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
$ ~ Q, D3 ?) X0 p( ]cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears' R3 i$ ?) ^- c- N1 `2 }
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto- D+ f/ u9 h& ?. D0 F! i
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
6 l/ o; s5 Q+ n( f2 Z, i+ Uhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
! e& W; j4 O& g5 Tconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will. A M4 q8 `* T6 v
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
8 n; a7 C! C' X4 |0 t+ Scyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
2 p$ }. _, h# k: C/ v' kspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
( g, B# l; a, m& v& Dresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we* c$ p8 L m& C, ]& h
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from4 J- _0 i3 }# ^5 C7 o# }; P
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
% K( z/ R" ~; o4 L8 Gyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,9 [3 \5 w- G7 ]* q
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
4 v. Z+ z% V' }) ]OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING1 `6 c* p$ H7 j' q1 N7 P- E. s4 V9 d
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
, w! j# `1 N) g( [ wGrant Bishop, Economist
) x/ o* }- U! X% x3 R416-982-8063
/ g" C) O3 n* L! y; K, C) lPascal Gauthier, Economist
/ B, G2 y' B, P; ~9 S416-944-5730 W& Q% t7 Q( Z8 g4 e
. Z' l4 p" `- }; H: n' w
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|