 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly$ Y) e- X$ [4 f
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
1 y3 {/ t2 A0 V( kunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house6 \7 a0 d8 \4 F( F! ~
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by- |- [$ L% L$ F
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This) ^# F, B* l; \6 m# T
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction, j6 h+ b0 d4 b* H! P4 M0 o# i
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
; I" b# N3 p. D5 X( ~* K) x12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past# R4 s/ [/ d. e* H
three years.+ r9 t9 V( ]3 j# X/ G
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from# {. x4 l' I& R2 B$ p- a
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
. F$ a' e+ {( J6 D+ W6 e0 Qaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects/ W" L! j! E/ D/ s0 J" M* |
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices8 E5 O5 O( e& W# ?$ I" _% G
to fundamentally justified levels.3 X' W4 K8 b, P7 f* n7 K
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
5 T% }) h" A7 |* A" l5 gwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and, Q- i$ Q, v$ H+ W
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”3 j$ U& ]- N* v
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
& F, v; t' ?4 V6 Jthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s! B1 @) X8 e5 {* T
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where& F! e3 b' y$ ]8 c. P
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch& i5 i) {) l# x" {1 ]
that is now being rapidly reined in.
6 E. I3 J+ `1 j& @1 @8 bWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
- g" j( C( a* ]% Kthe construction of too many new homes over the boom( ~+ a* m# y- i" G ]
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
2 {9 O1 I4 A* t L9 ?& Z3 z! Lon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers3 [0 O) W3 Y4 l) p' `; D
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
6 t1 v2 O E5 X' ?. ? b4 ~" \: lremain choppy and new residential construction will be
. E: g/ c( m# U9 n5 Gdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction. z/ `3 j2 n, Y9 u9 [7 h" g/ c
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
- @7 L& a4 M P6 v9 Uto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
( _+ s4 i- J, k5 }3 kresidential construction will fall further to around2 U. R3 Z6 p! G9 u& g
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
% \' o8 T8 O1 }& J4 V# P2 Ein the fourth quarter.7 W/ e5 F* \6 y4 X
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
) _' K( S2 U2 [+ dwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run% n' [& O* S2 X$ A# ^
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
7 j' Q- y# p0 m }: W& hprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home! D4 G1 @$ L1 C9 ~9 [' m
values since house prices should track incomes over the# A( S2 W8 w. G* x* P
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we9 z% g" h% @, N, I+ m" e# \
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers+ P2 g: [% s( W" J6 x m: O# B
of residential construction.
4 H k. L/ J" kTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a" l9 |2 W; l6 s: E! @ I; Q0 t7 e
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction5 ]7 @0 w$ Z* j
would have occurred if housing had been priced
M7 M8 [: }7 U/ {optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this& ]2 `0 m3 ]* D- [' c; J
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new6 U! J8 O |" F2 N) V. ~
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too) B8 b( w) c2 @* z$ {' R
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
5 |8 G+ K4 T; W5 ]) HRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
" F: d/ r [3 y5 f. Swhere housing demand will further contract under waning7 H- e5 m" r8 t- q
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are& E$ O3 M" N+ r. t% D: m
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the5 e6 e2 Q5 p3 L5 a% r
very time that the resale market has swung into strong% X) g) F0 A) u9 o) W
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
$ {6 ^. d' e! ~! a- Y( E hhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
( t; y! J$ d5 \; _weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.& C: x# c% B$ {& J7 f
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
4 X7 _! F- Y/ d7 Vstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de$ c8 E4 h6 b& C' f0 Q; r
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,& g2 _& I4 ?! F- a9 }3 G
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership4 C: F/ n1 l3 \- B! V
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a" f: v+ b( U7 q9 Z- A1 Q6 U% _
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
. c d' m1 l5 k: l* b( c$ k1 blimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
& `' Y' U# g) C9 C+ `% @1 I3 Acondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically$ n$ F+ k( B6 p
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
+ W! _$ V8 c2 s5 h# R# a' l8 @construction mean that record numbers of condos will, N f" n2 w. y* S j8 n9 U
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
+ P# E# ?0 I" Z' {( B& ^cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could H& V! i/ o2 E
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while6 p' I2 v3 D2 J. O* p% b% a
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
6 m) G% ~" B/ q/ l% n! X1 w6 Yanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
, A7 T3 U8 y9 @. minter-provincial and international migration over the coming" G2 h& n& F; n/ @' K4 J
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,9 i, }/ q6 B( q& T6 ] B$ L7 V* ^
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.! ^1 {5 _% r( B/ l
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING L, m' o n- ~$ w1 a& l; U$ B
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS6 G6 g: _/ s; E3 B* q0 @
Grant Bishop, Economist
) T6 j% E( [* J. C8 g416-982-8063
& o: |" u) [! G- R; e R1 r5 \Pascal Gauthier, Economist6 q- l. ?& W8 [5 v6 c
416-944-5730
/ J4 M4 x( x2 O1 z* ]/ k1 {, \" e' U# k) b+ Z/ W
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|