 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
Z4 F) V# ? E" ifrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove* K* ^% n5 @0 {6 w) n( R7 t. `
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house2 ?) q8 o) p7 Z9 q2 U, z5 R
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by& l3 J3 \% j% h" T8 ~) n- ~+ e( y
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
# X/ J \3 P7 U% J9 q" `5 l- t( Foverpricing compelled a level of residential construction* s. _1 p% }9 h7 ~$ {( p
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
& G$ O" W+ B) ^( M$ Y7 O" e12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past9 I' i) O7 b% d9 y6 }- I7 ?
three years.
8 D/ z. j' G/ z# I5 u& L1 {, eBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from0 V& x `# u. f
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of% d! k. D/ Q o3 e. A
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
( }7 |5 f( {5 I( J5 R! oboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
- |- H& \+ g3 E+ Hto fundamentally justified levels.7 D" B1 d- J, q% n
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
$ w- ?; `' ]% Z/ pwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and& G# B# a( S; Y: J& x
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”5 J# l1 [* x8 O
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
# y! \6 j# v* r( vthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
* v) i1 j0 M5 a8 M9 K; O& m“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where$ a9 T* S+ \! Y4 j
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
0 f2 @' S( d) U* [* ~/ `/ mthat is now being rapidly reined in.4 R- M3 E7 `- G0 x8 _! @4 y
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
4 [$ k2 T" o2 Nthe construction of too many new homes over the boom$ m# w2 K: ~- x5 _- ?" w
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
1 C& c/ E# _9 @! r9 b. n5 Y4 don markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
0 r& K# F/ o* Y% ^) ^from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will) }; d ] y" n8 _
remain choppy and new residential construction will be2 J" x% u+ ~- u
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
- f9 H u& T+ U: x J+ |. y1 Pis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
* y8 z4 K- C2 A! X6 m9 Zto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
6 Q/ `; O5 W) f% }. eresidential construction will fall further to around1 M, k0 ~1 ]8 Q* T) A
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units4 _0 N" ?+ s! Q8 }1 U4 N2 t' o
in the fourth quarter.
) I) N+ P) s* E0 l% FTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,( |' P* Z9 l! a! M, l3 \; F! o
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
0 I( h: t' P4 |7 O, x1 ^* Y; Sfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
. k6 ~& d' R5 x0 e4 [3 dprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
2 P$ Y# u* p) ]4 b0 n) @6 bvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
3 e, K$ t$ c7 Y) glong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
' T% B5 h P) x- G( `# i. n: B8 J2 wregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers& H" |2 j" [% P0 A6 j
of residential construction.9 J' `5 [" t" Y9 r0 L1 p, F% B
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a! D: }% X( T g) M1 T
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction i' ~6 Z7 u( v" o
would have occurred if housing had been priced
: X5 O7 W) w5 ]$ Y T1 `optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
6 K. ]% I; ~2 \ L1 E( }; M1 L6 Sfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
% V9 C' V( I) c! Yunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
2 {( V+ O" A4 Z- J: A" kmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
9 Y! y0 z' j9 Q7 }Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,* _3 |5 ?: D4 ]+ C% q% u4 z
where housing demand will further contract under waning
* O$ M6 R3 b1 k2 F/ v A \population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
5 |) F0 d! e. G! m6 N C7 c# aalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the& P+ h, m v8 z$ T. t+ b: d6 `
very time that the resale market has swung into strong) _) \, P9 Z* E/ Z- z' v4 |9 \# O/ S
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces. y9 s" d |( p4 @0 s7 K) Y
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural$ r" r0 u7 e7 @. e. d' |
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
4 X7 M, c _/ i9 C, i0 G2 u7 g) FQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
' _4 A8 ]+ P% C7 Kstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de5 H) v' q6 C3 W
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced," T/ y1 b9 @4 l Z
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership5 M4 ]3 o3 h3 G; U- q
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
. j) m/ O2 Z0 N) @9 ^cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears b, H9 D/ y4 h6 t
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto* Q3 A9 ~ i# ?2 @2 [; ^
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
9 z+ ^/ M! Y9 G4 m1 q8 d# hhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
8 J* v+ Y2 R5 U* x' q* p3 ^construction mean that record numbers of condos will! H, o$ l" t9 ?
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
" l( D8 }# l; Fcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
8 H" P) y6 L0 qspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
1 g; Y0 j" u( S: \9 ]residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we! V2 X4 h, F J! T0 {) D+ T7 w. }* C! S9 F
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
( y+ Y4 _2 j5 h) p l' e) `- ^' K0 Vinter-provincial and international migration over the coming# z( ]" [" H5 j* I
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,$ z L* l; F# N$ I, }
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.$ q! ^, L" v# p' f9 j' Q
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING2 J g3 [, _5 F0 ]8 r
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
( k8 X2 Z( m, F! c- R; O( gGrant Bishop, Economist8 V6 p) V L, G
416-982-80632 I# Q& G2 a2 B7 p% q3 q8 {
Pascal Gauthier, Economist i5 R1 S' Y8 x# S& x V/ t
416-944-5730# u$ T. O, I2 Y0 x, T) w: y7 T
9 N+ \+ V; s$ B
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|