 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
% y' ^" p5 c" Q4 P+ \from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
7 [# i" F; E& b+ P+ N- P. eunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house6 r8 M _6 V+ }
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
- S& C. [' H$ l. Hfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
/ [3 m7 b; P. d. |- `) u G+ ]8 `overpricing compelled a level of residential construction: o# s: d& L3 J, e; D
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately* \. w* J \: _& E+ \" z- ~4 M
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
, a' s1 n$ D1 J7 l! f) {$ ]three years.8 f8 L) _- D6 I
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from0 i8 B& e3 T1 Q
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
% B0 l+ O3 G8 {+ m- x# paffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects, p' O8 X, w5 e( L) \0 F
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
( O" h- J8 ~( r N, o! r3 x3 fto fundamentally justified levels./ c( `8 t3 \4 m" S* b% q h
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
$ R2 [' b" e% y4 owhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and; Q/ L/ F+ ^8 a2 B( M* a
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
3 [* ] `' a( u5 ^. b4 Awhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
- X3 T* g# A. ], {there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
- M( _: g$ e/ ^9 T“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where3 I- x: t& X, i( ~3 W. P3 m) m
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch1 K% Y0 G4 w8 n
that is now being rapidly reined in.
( M" M% r) K: W4 BWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,( d/ j5 U! s) ?1 I9 @
the construction of too many new homes over the boom! P" i2 s4 P( s2 R' N' Y6 L
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh: T* _/ u) L! j. R/ s& Q
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers: J, P. H2 K- g9 P6 K) x) l9 T
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
4 g) b* b; M+ Eremain choppy and new residential construction will be
* i! a& g4 |& N5 S) d5 Jdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction! V2 n q* w) A7 v0 p& P9 X
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
/ l' D; q# d# @% Xto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
2 M$ R+ _3 a2 h* N' ?& T2 u" Cresidential construction will fall further to around4 ], r0 R' N; a7 }- A9 ~5 D- ]
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
; H( [, Q7 }; }5 d" @# pin the fourth quarter.
' V+ u; g7 X, l, v$ a* zTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,. s/ p( ]: f; O+ @
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
. G. {" ~, |0 y0 B1 w) M4 J) x7 e9 z' s9 [fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each1 ^. c# R R( Y2 _
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
0 b! a: Y6 k- w I% H4 W. tvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
' |( r# t$ }6 [* ~ k* W; ]long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we! w- J" D3 C: C, R" G- }' P" U
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
. q& u) ~- a$ w) z& |of residential construction./ U; p0 R4 }4 M5 F- C2 p
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
0 {( } J5 y# n. U“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction b7 _. E7 b) b( P7 E. Z, W7 n1 d
would have occurred if housing had been priced8 b0 T' h& I; M7 @4 q$ |. H
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this% f5 j, p' V+ m9 ^
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new! e& u. k) o/ U/ v6 W" R8 i
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too0 N, {& m% u4 L( x% H+ v
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.* u% ^! s: q, C3 c5 {/ N! u% F9 F
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,( t1 u6 _# `& j1 P" ]
where housing demand will further contract under waning) s% i' e# ~1 i: {) j# E" J# R
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
8 _4 Q& m8 }( ^5 K( }- ~already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
% x+ L" M* R/ S4 }& C2 Qvery time that the resale market has swung into strong0 ^! A; k( b: ~
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces8 ]" Q& J* m4 Q, r
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural( [1 M7 y& k6 G* ]) Y( C
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
( z. N' U0 o" i- l0 G) w' [Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
( I; D+ O' f e3 E& |strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de% @# _7 |9 u8 M/ d5 e3 r* E& U
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,* f" _* f! e" C, m) g5 L( f* k
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership, y m2 B- B4 s2 g; g6 J. Q
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a2 R& C- q- Z5 N x3 |2 _
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears0 p; M2 \5 Q J1 q& U% g
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto) R( v0 {' r. B) {" W: a
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically, I4 p% p- U0 w/ I8 C* Y& N
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
- I8 e5 U D% p# |7 X7 aconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
8 ]1 w8 B/ f6 P9 i+ \, ?+ Freach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
' H3 ?% `- e6 _) d scyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could/ [; d. V% p# H# j) o. C
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while& S# A" ~5 z5 a* s
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we; S6 v% S* H+ \, q( v& _
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
1 o' L! y) a2 winter-provincial and international migration over the coming
% T/ e/ ~* w9 ~; |( iyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
, I7 x' z/ a4 F1 cwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
, h8 `0 p, x; {OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING- X: T' u5 c5 e- @3 ?2 N
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
+ R! @7 I3 [& R4 {Grant Bishop, Economist
0 }+ K! A4 b) o5 P3 v2 h7 d k416-982-80638 Y) T; H* A0 g0 J( `% n+ a. j! P' g% j
Pascal Gauthier, Economist8 D+ V/ P% J8 u4 X! k: \9 \: ^7 d! C
416-944-5730; P: N7 K1 R X1 ~8 F
6 J# F: D9 w9 ehttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|