埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2178|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly! ^' I. B/ R2 `  ^
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove% W" S  g9 u' o! U2 x) i
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
3 c6 C! M, ?7 s  L4 k- ?3 Bprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by3 o* B* \! I1 V4 `( I
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* k4 C/ u3 b% _8 ?3 Soverpricing compelled a level of residential construction4 s( n5 ]) C$ C) l' d
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
' P$ X( r" A( r3 W, ^! s% R12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
! A8 U- _# Z: X0 U8 lthree years.
) o$ L5 q( N7 {( ?! p; BBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from- H5 Q$ X# _- l8 y
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of3 ^. C' V; a2 r5 N% C7 V, d
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
# `* N8 L4 n( `: dboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
& Y( q0 h4 Q2 x# g" q" k- Oto fundamentally justified levels.8 l+ f8 b) X; @9 R" n' w
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
6 }: ^, B) \& V: f7 \1 F5 Q  G, Iwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and5 u3 O, U3 E, [' j4 X2 |
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
$ t. e0 E: T4 E: _where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although! ]6 \0 J1 r2 g/ B" D5 ?- S
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
8 Z( e( L" n3 m& q0 p% p1 g( v! L“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where) G# J: a/ j+ c7 {9 _
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch% [- K: K9 N. t; c7 [  F4 }
that is now being rapidly reined in.: {+ _* R5 ~6 E, X2 F
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
8 E% {6 M, S* Z! E" G* Sthe construction of too many new homes over the boom% F/ H) b& @6 w. I2 P( _- m) l- {
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh; i( q% U% ^7 r8 Z, l( e7 }/ `
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers. z( b4 Y( B4 S+ Q+ i* {, N$ J
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will* N5 {! E- n" ~/ ~& S9 U0 H
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
) q! U; Y2 O; k, W, x7 Y+ e+ {8 |dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
" P( n) K* @4 }! \is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
: v4 E+ }: B, N, @$ Bto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide$ I7 P! S# Q1 `3 c
residential construction will fall further to around
" _" _% B( O0 H" n125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
) [  X6 M7 K. B1 zin the fourth quarter., n% ?9 l+ l# F; {5 u; K* D1 _0 e
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
# b% W6 A. B6 l+ q) p( I( zwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run  c2 C5 k, e* x4 k
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
7 R% d& c6 \8 ]% w- }4 ~province. Affordability is the key concept behind home' Z5 t7 W0 k* S! u" O) Q: q
values since house prices should track incomes over the4 ~6 u0 o) W0 n( x
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we% q- H0 J# b' F0 n% @
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
- b+ i6 ^4 [, T/ d2 x) l/ N" uof residential construction.
& \% M* b$ V9 L, NTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
/ B' M7 G# a7 i1 V% y- M“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
2 J" r8 \4 i, Ywould have occurred if housing had been priced2 n) Q& E, \3 Q# f2 B: j
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
# |5 _% F. N0 K0 w4 r$ yfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
4 o& r$ ]5 i6 y/ `1 r* K0 W0 ~" F$ ]0 tunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
1 T  h. |" O! x. O1 |many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
* q: O9 v: G+ K/ l/ a. T' T3 d+ _Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
# d6 z- B# T4 O/ |/ H) Fwhere housing demand will further contract under waning) H! C5 \4 U4 H! u, k* k
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are( ?3 k# a: n, r2 l
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the# |- `; j! L  @4 U3 u& c
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
/ B0 u+ ~0 R' M  B2 ibuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces0 z9 Y" T  H0 e1 r- C+ \* O
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
, q; M) A! |3 g2 q" O( d0 S# Iweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.. R& ^! V+ e% d
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
! `1 g% i# n% Xstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
8 h% A4 r( P7 F5 SMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
& c/ _) q6 U  K' x" S) j0 Ogiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership3 M7 r" A) Z. t( q
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
6 N" _# M, j0 ?+ W) i5 h9 H% Bcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears' E* I% Q  l+ E; [. d
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
! X( k9 q# E' Z! i- J4 ycondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically4 B; Z$ K3 t9 z6 e8 ?
high levels of apartment-style units presently under+ T0 y  Y, C2 F
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
7 |. C: ]0 i3 A( R2 j7 U0 h% O! |reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
" t6 A7 F8 i/ N0 O4 s% s- _( n  icyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
  C7 R. z. q: e" I6 Aspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
' N. x+ M* }  C' zresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
/ N1 E# n, i; u4 p  a1 Danticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from5 l9 m5 @+ M/ d% b$ u. d: K
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming* d3 S. p! U2 e( N) i3 e" v# g, z8 F
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,$ s9 G0 {" |& I1 ]* U
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding." h& D& Z. Z  R/ ~# f* i8 I2 L
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING+ \9 b6 E( ]2 A% w$ n
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS& \. x" `2 ?1 A) N  I) [
Grant Bishop, Economist; _% `% S6 D# k1 {# }
416-982-8063/ ~# P0 Q7 Y% O# M+ U6 q6 w
Pascal Gauthier, Economist  v; g1 I  Q+ R! {" H* `
416-944-5730. I7 g+ P0 ^3 u0 R
8 H- l! Y! ]1 ?; E. ?5 U
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-8 19:50 , Processed in 0.483725 second(s), 13 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表