 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
& H. _+ V9 y4 k9 h" wfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
5 v; {* _( r. X# u4 wunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
0 a* i( n4 ~7 nprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
8 K; w& l) q: j0 z& Afundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* T+ J3 Q7 w/ u, t/ `' zoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction; [) p+ _7 ^# X
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
0 l) v' {- u. U" I12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past% w$ e2 r) H% s9 Z0 A8 m4 G
three years.
2 m: D; N2 Z" y" ^) j8 hBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from* X1 |( T; r1 ~* p
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
4 e2 @' [, x9 i/ ~8 d4 {affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects2 J) A! _3 c( F0 E! M1 V4 j
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices) J3 t; B, J2 C% A6 o
to fundamentally justified levels.5 w/ n$ A# a" ^/ D! G M$ F
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”& F6 N- h7 L+ J+ C+ A, o r
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and' t( o6 n4 A3 ~) q$ y2 u
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
. F" O1 W2 }1 u% rwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although# L' H W" s( X
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s" M' _8 `- B; u3 `+ m! y; b: e
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
# |+ J' y3 w) y* ]4 d% u5 J9 ghomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch, u; R. `& i6 H' W& @' f' x
that is now being rapidly reined in./ z$ ^; O" D' z; B5 V
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,) C, ^! H Q& i2 w% l5 E
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
- G, z9 k% O5 ^6 S9 Tmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh5 p3 p9 e% T% L0 z; q6 R! h7 J+ I
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers5 e7 D1 f: p9 r2 h" h
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will! I% N0 r3 f0 D! m' u; |- p z1 u1 ]" K
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
+ C4 e1 ^: h- U d: zdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
& F* N2 y2 w/ Z2 C7 Xis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this C4 B6 A* d. x: X: O& j
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide0 Y! g0 |; P+ M" {7 F
residential construction will fall further to around
: Y% |, m2 ]7 O) D125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units$ }( W$ x- T0 ]& Y
in the fourth quarter.9 u* J: m+ a! h2 S& G: S; c
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,2 B. s+ U. {4 {" G
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run! [7 X) S3 U# O! d6 T2 H
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
a! z* N" U0 f+ @4 I2 o' S5 S7 A( Dprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home J' @, g& l' b: |& |
values since house prices should track incomes over the
+ w" U3 `' f1 d- s3 Slong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we+ [: v9 s/ i# E0 _* P7 O
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
8 E1 [. r& Y2 Q! F# ]- ?of residential construction.; d; r& f, m: e% ^0 b Z
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
# a( ]" x7 \- k; S9 ?" `. u“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
5 v( g4 K: Y% ~+ O3 h/ y) X: ^would have occurred if housing had been priced( K$ C* n- i2 [( i
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
: F7 q, A/ ~( P( h1 H; Pfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new! U6 n* l7 Y; R
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
" _% b5 Z" \' emany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.4 T& h: S) C$ I: O3 q
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,/ L }3 p! `8 @0 M. e( {7 K) b/ F
where housing demand will further contract under waning. ?2 G9 M. x4 p
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
5 o9 b) B: D; \0 f4 ~already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the0 r' ]+ e9 m" s- d% S! e0 s
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
* m# R+ H, l1 q1 S% \2 pbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces4 g& a9 l {: X- ^
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
' ~ F9 f6 e" o9 E& kweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.$ M7 K! t3 z4 w& Q: ?8 [0 B3 ]
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
9 Q0 R8 E! [* E2 \: N/ xstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
. _# s9 j5 U! q' p6 Q2 m/ z3 aMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,- x, N4 K$ Q, H6 {$ L
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership# h# c) r' B7 ]: T
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a* f7 u9 [1 i' Z8 L5 s
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
- F1 }* P1 h7 S+ p! t3 [: p; h- Q4 ulimited – with the important exception of the Toronto: w- p' m; n4 ?# R* j( {
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically2 G, e0 V( t ^5 _- n
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
/ ^& \* i" L, v5 y+ D- i% Wconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
: L9 f( J( G/ v0 s9 m& `! |7 ^reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as) f8 r6 m$ ]: h4 D6 @
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could$ \2 K# \; \4 D
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while, Y9 Q3 G8 \3 Y+ h7 o' Z# K
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we+ p" b+ i7 b+ q9 N3 N( A6 M6 p3 p
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
% D4 P# t3 T/ T. q) \$ u5 W5 l' minter-provincial and international migration over the coming
+ m# e; G: C+ v% G" D% gyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
# R, x0 n' G% t, c) w" a8 ~! Hwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.: C8 o2 P9 U5 s; F8 ]2 r
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING2 u5 u B+ G* H- m( }5 [' o
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
6 S g1 T2 f {# @# TGrant Bishop, Economist" |7 D. l! G" A0 v/ B, y
416-982-8063
$ J; t; h' R% Q% _3 r( qPascal Gauthier, Economist
: g' `5 n7 s8 s5 Q3 z7 h416-944-5730
$ ]$ i6 b! U: V# \6 @! t( A' Y+ z. P" J! N0 ^7 f
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|