 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
5 }, }2 H' z) I0 u; Sfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
6 [8 d3 h5 L* }) d9 _4 tunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
- G5 V8 S1 }. i3 `, t: l. v& m% |& dprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by1 A8 g, x% `7 [& u0 r
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
+ @9 s* u0 s; g8 S$ Q- ^; m4 {! ]overpricing compelled a level of residential construction8 ^+ @1 n Z' I
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
. f' k3 k F& g3 W12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
\$ L- O! a. z- K( M% ]three years.- o1 y5 a" k# P6 x3 Y+ y0 A
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from* C: u y/ s* w1 F \$ E
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
4 F) R" y. V; e1 I$ l; Paffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
; }$ P C1 C h* X& Fboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
7 N' l+ ]3 `* J q! ~: @to fundamentally justified levels.: B v1 Q- Z/ ?6 c R
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”- y/ H! b' R) a; `, r
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
; P0 _& k: s7 i D- Othat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”/ {6 O9 {3 Q- M* N+ D, h, `# d9 ]$ p
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
+ s9 G0 G/ \2 ^. ~+ wthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s1 s5 i" E5 k/ P
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where/ _, \$ I `* h4 x( G
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
6 o7 o k8 S8 R8 Fthat is now being rapidly reined in.0 m6 J; y! [5 ^* n; v
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,) v: K! F' a" j* f& J8 K
the construction of too many new homes over the boom( i9 J/ @+ t6 M1 n+ Z
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
0 A# R! r" D# [# H- e: Lon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers5 G5 F- ]. f8 J% g, H( |+ M
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
/ f: [4 l6 A$ D0 Sremain choppy and new residential construction will be
, t# ]9 e" ]4 ~) c% fdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction: _0 }) F. Z3 ^9 L
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
' V6 y: q; M" N2 j# vto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide! t/ K+ v/ @/ Q" N) ? {
residential construction will fall further to around
6 S+ g* Q6 n- ?/ `2 i8 J, j8 N125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units2 y$ E. G. W1 V2 i+ \
in the fourth quarter.: o+ n l1 ]7 r! p
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,, I! }' [* Z9 b5 P. e1 ~% v
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
- V' y3 `1 D3 {fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each# }9 R$ |$ T0 f$ ]
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
, S. o$ w1 O" Wvalues since house prices should track incomes over the/ Q' t6 Q$ T O
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we- K' Y: d# x4 Z# T) B7 @
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
4 r i5 f6 {7 e' t& Pof residential construction.( }: i$ N! Z7 t7 j! \3 |
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
8 z* O/ Y; d8 {: D K“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
& V$ S8 W% C" ]$ Iwould have occurred if housing had been priced2 m+ r, @0 g3 p4 c! I1 p& w
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this+ [6 }+ v$ z" f+ M" w
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new; G1 `" i4 m! k+ n
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too: v7 ?: i( J8 [" A( Z4 H- L! A8 `
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.+ f( E" t5 c* m; d, y' O
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,7 M6 y M6 C1 C D/ T
where housing demand will further contract under waning ^0 V: O8 I6 I
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are# \) f4 @6 L3 Y1 W
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the# I3 H" j" p; ?
very time that the resale market has swung into strong6 s3 D2 T- w& t' p7 b' v w
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
' l5 O" O5 u( m3 O: qhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural: X' k" d3 a+ X3 r9 j! Z+ v8 r
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
( v3 A# C u2 K# X8 ^Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the, O, C7 A8 H3 w3 p1 z8 C: s3 A
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
! Z; m, s" E- D% D% p; xMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,+ S1 n+ _3 T2 E8 ]* A4 v
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
+ K c6 Q/ x. Y# {rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
' v8 a5 l: B3 t: m+ Z+ Lcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears2 c* C& v4 Y/ O( ]# _+ j% o
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
. W/ E4 X9 a9 ?* a+ z* M- v. ]condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
, v+ I+ O7 b9 a' Q {high levels of apartment-style units presently under
& Z( R- P$ ~6 U) Fconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will" J; ^2 ^$ x' w/ R8 y1 z
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
0 a9 c! a" j3 Q. v* vcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
5 g' d1 e' ^ x+ Q+ ~4 wspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
- Q. v u+ o0 r0 s" c9 H3 R T# Zresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we9 v! _" l1 m$ E! I
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from( z0 @* u. n0 ~
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming# F% ?# d' c& x9 h. [
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
6 l1 r4 U/ ~6 y8 ]/ Lwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
3 s' n% y- u4 E" v6 f2 }OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
# n4 H9 Q7 m% P' I- l3 ~- x" eMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS" U7 z |$ s3 T# o5 W
Grant Bishop, Economist
& y0 a# y' N6 u3 E' i( Z; X416-982-8063# o9 E5 z6 l7 z& Z! e" C Q
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
6 {8 T% |. B5 N, d# i6 B416-944-57304 J5 R8 c5 S% W8 Z- a, ^) ^
3 ^% u: n+ q6 k' I8 thttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|