 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly1 ~9 E: J0 S5 ]& H# S, J8 M# T- D6 F( C
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove, E) h7 ~: ]0 X2 p1 j% p- b
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house$ o- F1 g& K4 t) U. c; [) |0 M
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
, v$ }3 Y. C2 Q& K" _* G! Zfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This2 | y5 Z8 M2 k
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction( I# i, b/ h0 a1 W; D. U7 m: \0 m5 P
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
C: p9 |: Z. d% t7 H* ]* z* i12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past0 D# [/ L( M5 Y& ]' y3 l
three years., t* w+ z" P2 g, q
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from1 O" g! Y" Q! w. Q+ V/ p
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of" g' x: g8 x. p+ C3 G/ K W
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects2 c7 p! d' \! d6 o9 F
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
5 r Y h- Z8 d# {2 T( `. _to fundamentally justified levels.& [9 c2 n0 E$ r2 [5 o& Z
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
( Z. _9 `$ T7 pwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and/ R9 e: A5 F) W& S+ R9 C$ w! O" V# S8 U
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”1 n$ O& s6 M+ @6 b0 c1 C& e6 z! I
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although9 G% F# Q* R* X, [" e
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s x8 f/ `$ C; F
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
) |9 x7 B5 I: Y( l( o8 qhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch5 t! N' U# d4 l0 ^
that is now being rapidly reined in.
) M! \" ~7 \ x7 G# k/ F; w' YWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,( V5 [0 q4 ?3 H+ t
the construction of too many new homes over the boom$ t+ X1 S. n) I/ t8 }# Q7 [5 {6 a2 k
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
" N8 G5 J0 C; ?' qon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
# }. M0 n, J- i( Wfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
" M7 G; x* C' L! f; W; I0 U; l1 mremain choppy and new residential construction will be
; @0 @+ x3 J6 l, Q7 L: f# M" w/ fdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
. L" V& E1 T! Y5 {! k9 Eis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
2 Z5 `, A j" X4 x3 s/ @to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
4 y" _) u/ N: cresidential construction will fall further to around
( w; i1 B! ]4 H2 S125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units! }/ F! X) U% |8 z* t
in the fourth quarter.
' q, F) w6 |. m% h; }" u, _To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
, I" a" V/ Z( Wwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run! I$ H( K% l) S! |: J
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each; ?% j V9 E. Z7 t& {
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
/ X! K/ q, ?" Z8 K: O6 X& o tvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
6 ]. E9 N4 b1 V% Clong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we$ h0 h- v6 M* |- B9 ]- b
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers$ I3 T! S s. a- ]
of residential construction.& O N. _/ {( ~- `; }- d
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
! [. R& F v# p. V2 `2 s“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
5 A" a M7 w6 owould have occurred if housing had been priced
6 u/ k Y7 C1 ooptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
1 ], d4 v/ b z6 G( K dfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
& d9 r* \+ T _5 P& r+ W' I7 R+ C- eunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
/ x( b" R p/ ?many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.( N: ]" `$ E3 V9 p* C7 d: I
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
- n D& L/ b& ]* w1 ~+ O* ^where housing demand will further contract under waning/ [" ]4 R [% F% |# b( A2 z4 o
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are1 L7 E* {* `- p& E' C
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
2 D3 U" Z8 {8 y0 P% Ivery time that the resale market has swung into strong D' c' b: b+ I& Z7 K& A
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
) |8 O( ~ J* M/ s3 qhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
8 P) h$ V, {$ dweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
, ?6 T# `; k l6 p# hQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
% l) V9 G7 m! k1 ]* `strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de" b& U1 {3 C r0 Q0 T" f
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,% }/ ]- `4 h, O8 j5 Y, a
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
+ R: u) k2 d6 ~5 U/ ~! W- P; ^rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
9 w' b/ h4 A; A$ S i* ucyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
: A2 k2 V" a) v$ ^3 Blimited – with the important exception of the Toronto0 q' U$ q9 c% c( H) O
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically6 ]- k% a M/ m- I" ^5 f9 _4 a
high levels of apartment-style units presently under( Q, f" }% d0 T( |6 S+ o4 i
construction mean that record numbers of condos will9 h# \! ?* p! D
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
7 h( J! x4 E) R! R o/ V4 g& xcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could) v& s6 s, v9 v. V& @' s
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while* p6 d2 V( D/ C6 Z- y
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we/ _! p) l& I0 X3 o. }: ?$ T
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from- U! F( s3 ]% V3 { d; J
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
3 ~& u: z( [- X& H: c$ tyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
$ x% V- a6 g5 b4 i* awill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.3 W3 s9 ^+ W7 z! ~+ h
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
8 [4 k# O! ]- a Y; EMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
% o/ r3 F2 X$ [5 K7 i0 s! X9 ]Grant Bishop, Economist
4 ?9 {" p6 P( g; M# W! f% |416-982-8063
$ x! v1 L, u. a6 O- }& i" {8 a$ b/ RPascal Gauthier, Economist
" E& H$ Q6 v6 L- H416-944-5730; e" a; p/ x" C, ?9 E
9 H5 a0 k* T# h5 r
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|