 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
7 `. E" M9 M2 x8 O3 Rfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
) b& E- q; g( x+ W5 R0 aunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house9 \+ q- p4 C7 G4 K$ P
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
4 f- r+ H$ |' f0 [- J$ d6 f! ?fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
" w! K$ t# ?9 _& Koverpricing compelled a level of residential construction$ W6 M, g% Y! E, _2 d
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately7 B: K" Q$ L1 X6 R
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
) S1 r6 F/ S: ?4 K: k8 P! ]- Q" Dthree years.# J' y1 J- c# x
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from2 k1 |5 j/ H' {' D3 z
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of* R6 c2 [: {% x: U: F0 O! ^
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
, H9 @7 S2 g* {1 T1 lboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
( N3 h1 @$ p, d2 F9 L0 Z* J( Kto fundamentally justified levels.
6 P' c3 [2 G0 ^3 m1 c& r6 lWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”- H2 R! f' q; V
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and2 ?+ N0 N, p6 u* q/ I
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
+ w( Q5 q7 a% U5 q2 I# Rwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although2 O! H( H; b! |: N) M! h5 {' N3 ?
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s4 m0 s! U7 X! j* B3 L& y6 \3 Q+ B* \
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
7 @, e: ?. j5 Q- {- Thomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch3 w: I# n3 ? ^! r
that is now being rapidly reined in.. [; _6 m2 o' r, f/ @
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs," Y& o$ n c% l2 p) m o* u4 c
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
+ s4 _' k4 O; ]. @2 p- b! I( B; Hmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh; h3 R' j0 I8 L+ @) H
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers- X$ L2 X$ Q8 V7 V
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will* v7 b' g" Q4 L2 R+ F+ q
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
. `3 g6 m! f3 E' r: V: `! {2 O7 Fdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
3 q% x$ l8 e! his now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this1 G0 X5 Z2 h/ Z6 o
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
3 r6 O* z% P6 a) x8 q2 R, V: Presidential construction will fall further to around# Q7 u+ w2 c1 o. W8 Z( }
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units3 l/ X' Y; d8 Y0 e9 s
in the fourth quarter.! L( ]+ T k9 ~, \/ n$ W
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,/ j" W0 ?: r$ @5 {4 b' T
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
e8 O8 {/ n) F, \; @: jfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each8 l( E3 a7 u9 h: d; P
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home8 f" T/ Y- }% x1 x+ `
values since house prices should track incomes over the, m: _( u v% {# m
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
( [6 X* W1 p8 I7 tregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
' b0 \$ I$ r A9 Nof residential construction.* Y8 o1 M5 X4 Z" _( ?
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a/ e( E, K: B* k4 m' V, X
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction: |0 G8 C6 J; l3 B, m( L# U5 h
would have occurred if housing had been priced
# ?2 @. F" N9 @7 b; ]optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
3 O) _) M* N& g4 {/ X/ [7 lfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
: I* B, c# c" ~units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too0 R+ j0 x# i( c% `, x
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
/ _- f9 I6 S; V2 b- q3 `: ^Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
" p( S8 b3 {& d' ?4 f0 H9 gwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
7 _: O7 K- K [6 ^( l4 xpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
3 o# ^% m$ b' ], R$ ^already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the; L) [% l3 I& D! x6 F% u
very time that the resale market has swung into strong: _# x! C, I' \; }- I; O
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
, O) |2 v. r# p [* ?$ j' Lhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
9 @: S* T# t2 C' ~9 \weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.! P; |5 \5 h% {( X: E
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the( Y3 I1 w/ w" _ |" E/ _
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de4 w: ^8 y1 h7 A8 p8 j
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,1 {( u; d3 n- Z* \
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership" Y/ ~7 v) u% x4 R, [
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a( T v5 N6 k$ |4 ^- \& H
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears. F" k8 ^5 x3 [. n
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto- P# r/ b& x3 j2 f& ~$ I
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
( a9 S1 N: F$ X! ]0 p" k5 nhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
8 v. a' f0 b1 a" u" Yconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will ?; a, O6 K, K3 G. C( {
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as3 X' d9 ?- s2 L( X) l
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could( v* q8 Z$ l: t
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
8 W+ w- P! {; f9 S9 zresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we/ C: z7 d; X% f/ ?, Y' Y Z
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from: I. ~2 V' @. p1 l( m6 D
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming r7 T" ?) x4 v1 i
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,' i0 q7 U( l' i1 D( |
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.% O0 L' Y% U- f' f6 M, N: Y. k+ J
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
5 R" p7 k% H T( P% jMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
Z0 q3 L4 P5 i( D/ t" E8 w( c( QGrant Bishop, Economist
, I# Z4 h1 x8 f. z416-982-8063
' }+ W( B0 x" z4 \( FPascal Gauthier, Economist
5 I: z+ W9 C% g( v416-944-5730
1 h" Z4 B3 k# q1 Q9 G8 { k) [4 R" g* V
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|