 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
- d7 `1 e- l( f. `( }! kfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
) h4 F- Z4 w. m' I) \unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
+ T' I+ V# ? s' A7 o. P Jprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by" l: Q+ t9 p3 V$ ~" ]* A$ g0 m0 n
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This2 D o4 g9 T0 M2 B2 M, \/ y
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
" _8 `) g* ^9 f+ c2 b7 Q* k5 ~that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately1 Q% _) J( `% j) V! h u
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past3 ?1 Y" ]3 K3 B( j' d+ w8 g
three years.6 ?; ~4 n5 E. |: [) y" q$ g9 w+ W
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from+ C" l) M$ {3 ^
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of" w: Y1 D! ]7 C4 @# N$ k2 a+ P
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
6 l) n( a0 b, J$ T- P4 z, {both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices& q3 i6 o' S, x. m
to fundamentally justified levels.0 Y$ r! o+ d( }; }0 x1 y
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”. r0 K9 O& ?# S! G) t$ @) r3 e
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and ~: ~( Z- C' W5 e4 l7 X: ?/ r. ]" }
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”% w. l9 _! X- m w
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
- I, X- Q! v- L R$ \3 kthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
3 x# k; {& L; |# N“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
" v5 }) {5 p; V ]homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
" Y. f4 k8 U6 G5 Y4 H b' [that is now being rapidly reined in.
) n' u/ L: x( y6 |) o8 xWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,& X/ |2 s- v7 o6 Q8 Q" {3 s
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
) j( O& o& i5 Umeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
/ d: u/ y# ?, o7 D/ w: c" lon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
" c& j& f4 o# T- m/ K) o! F# ^from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
6 J' I/ B' ^8 w/ y) y/ r; }& U: a0 Zremain choppy and new residential construction will be
0 @* D" C Z1 ^3 Z% _! l0 odampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction: ?1 v8 B. R# U, r& f: |" ?; ?' r
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
3 {/ c# z; P' y) Y) Cto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide; f) |1 V( F% Z) T. b9 l
residential construction will fall further to around; G1 y4 g) C; s+ T
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
' H6 _$ |- i! o$ a0 D. V/ L cin the fourth quarter.
! I& T% J8 ^1 j4 YTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,+ ]1 @& }* K! H: G& h1 U/ Q+ o. h
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run4 d7 F0 J% K2 B- I
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
8 b$ M2 I# t5 u6 ~0 B2 vprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home8 O4 \% g; {; @/ M2 Q
values since house prices should track incomes over the& y- R) n* s- S) Z
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
% y' H& d' [3 \) Dregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
: ~5 P, V+ ?5 ^; l4 L3 q' G+ m1 w, Gof residential construction.
6 t" M6 H1 C* k, C; y, HTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a3 @5 `" X" n7 F# N! @; d! F. x
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
d" p; U* b( K! h+ iwould have occurred if housing had been priced
( ^) q/ I: S) j5 V/ `optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this' K K5 \4 X+ l: t: @$ u
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
: x* n) D. z0 g* B; d1 punits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
) c0 T8 S& l/ Q9 qmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.7 ?, n; C. r: V2 O
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,/ N: i$ `# \' A2 {1 c) P
where housing demand will further contract under waning0 ~+ ]; I! ? U6 n
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are% p: w# k, q+ P9 z% R! K {
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
0 w1 ?+ f% n. bvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
0 F3 M7 t+ R5 Pbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
& |9 j( p7 E, l& P; I1 lhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
4 t# | I; O4 ^8 Z- Y# a8 `weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
1 I' d2 I' j9 t( F6 E: U: W4 EQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
, { y1 N/ E5 W* a b+ Lstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de; L7 |5 n) X: `" ]/ Z. s
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,- _% J3 n( y$ u- y+ ?
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership$ b4 ^/ ^7 B( C9 y3 N w/ m$ v
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a7 u o4 @5 ~9 z( C& _$ C, K
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears; Y: A* r+ m- h( V" V
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
/ z% k; b1 z9 r7 \% }$ pcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
6 x7 x9 ?1 Q/ t! O" |! I4 I' nhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
0 E7 V/ n6 Q. Xconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will M: d Z4 t8 J" h+ w6 `. M
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
( x; t% X X6 Dcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could; G& S1 x+ E5 J; H1 I
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while( i" X8 x2 M2 G$ V) b
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we9 @8 p1 H7 E& a$ y8 l# V
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from. C: l3 C- |1 S8 ?3 x1 Q4 G
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming/ W: O1 L! M8 L9 v+ R
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
9 P7 f, ?8 B* s- [& U' | {/ ~( Vwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.' e: Z" a) |+ i) B
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
% C+ J) a% y- D% o- D. WMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS5 k- `& R$ C& m) A
Grant Bishop, Economist
7 z. l6 N! Q4 c* K* k416-982-8063) ]1 m) s# P; H% v
Pascal Gauthier, Economist% P/ q9 e3 E7 ^& l" y- `) U J. u8 z
416-944-57303 q2 C0 Z9 S0 t! B$ N [1 i
% R4 I" H$ ~5 k; ]' r! J( L6 h
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|