 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly, f" n8 P8 B' w+ g) E, x: `1 V0 ^
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
* L7 k9 h6 F9 O9 ?/ F$ j2 K) n" [unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
' p1 W% `- K# D# oprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by. k @" J# M" S! E, N
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This0 k* g' N) @) |/ v0 ~9 f
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
( k; A: `% q3 {& ]9 s5 W; Lthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately1 F( ~ w) B1 i8 `! x9 t2 {
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
: ~& p I2 Q- A9 i) D+ S0 w4 Ithree years.
& {+ `2 k& w: W2 ^By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from. O) J( [& w+ V9 i& h$ s a9 `
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
. Z7 o# f+ v8 b# Taffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects" p' b8 |# a8 J4 [- s1 L
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
0 f+ y. q5 @+ `! @% |" T; ito fundamentally justified levels.% i4 l$ @* W# k
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
S; ^2 r% ]; h( B: c8 [( D* fwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and, c; z7 I- O$ ~9 g& l' `( ?1 M
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”: p$ Y6 i9 H; e4 |/ k5 [1 S
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
D( U6 Y, q" O4 H3 w6 }there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s% ?6 ?( W# I4 w2 M1 ~
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where3 ^! P8 y0 x1 u. ]# D/ o4 x) f$ ^ ]
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
; s1 {8 L- l/ _% w+ athat is now being rapidly reined in.( C0 y0 m8 M3 P q7 g4 S: ~
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,- X& u( ?* ^. t8 O7 x/ }
the construction of too many new homes over the boom7 `! o" b2 A$ E7 X
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh& o2 c. N5 K, a6 E
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
3 H. g. L! ~4 ?0 |+ _2 C! gfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
- C" W, L* G/ ~: J6 premain choppy and new residential construction will be* h1 U" n2 B6 m/ j/ K$ E( w4 u
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction# O/ U) J" ]) T+ B
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
( J! Y3 B4 |; m# Y- x. L% Jto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 J7 w' p6 Q# F$ t5 R4 |& X
residential construction will fall further to around- K6 i, N- Z ?
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
3 t: k% z. j" @& ?7 V& Tin the fourth quarter.
2 e9 d% _; N! N; r; cTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,$ y# i; \/ {# l* k1 r2 j3 F% Z
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run# ^9 g" k2 r" ]
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each+ C+ t U& b+ F0 I( H* B
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home2 F1 m+ X0 S7 a7 R) M8 G
values since house prices should track incomes over the) O" F# u( L9 \: n# i
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
6 K7 |! |0 e( c& a {regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers/ e" `: K# \4 E1 V
of residential construction.0 F4 o7 ~* ^& a- z) p! i- ?% `7 e0 D& f
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a9 N3 i$ p! H( w+ {
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
1 [- o' A! ]" \1 X$ Dwould have occurred if housing had been priced. A3 I; n7 N' D
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
; K, p; m& b& Pfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new3 ]: m( C% L f! v2 F$ ~1 ~+ [
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too* S+ x! k7 m$ I' J4 D8 f
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.+ d. Q* Z1 ~5 X' X0 V5 {2 l! j; P" B
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,) [( j9 }; Y2 r! C
where housing demand will further contract under waning' E4 v4 ~# D% ?
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are/ P6 J) v% l/ [# R, r: i$ H
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the! x: y7 q: p* y h
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
" C) K4 P5 i0 A- g" N4 _( Fbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces u4 c+ @4 _4 G3 E8 }! s
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural- p; ` i; E- l) V! h2 {/ q
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
6 ]8 H: i8 i9 R$ |. \2 a- [5 KQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the$ }9 [( X. S0 C, ]1 i, @
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
$ I9 [0 B9 t' i3 d; rMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
9 R5 F( _7 H; ^given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership- R9 q8 X5 Q1 [0 t
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
1 h5 h- J/ o0 t# gcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears9 T( Q% |% D% V0 X* s( T4 O4 {: q
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto# @4 [- m5 N9 a0 Z! l8 Y
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
! u# _6 |4 r5 S4 j" N) F5 Vhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
; K/ |5 o% T/ gconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
( E. R; _8 M z$ \" g! greach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
3 t% U) |* j) W: _& z) B6 u5 ucyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could4 F& f1 C% W& [) h7 u+ \7 ?
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
% u' K$ E% p% z2 s) f6 [residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we- g" f4 L! m: a9 ^( V7 F
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from, `0 P, b& N) a$ f& E% v1 l
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
2 O1 j, Y1 n# `9 X* Uyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
) D( H, d. _% ^% J mwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.6 C1 `/ [9 r4 I& x
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING' }5 m* G# I7 X; t( i+ u" e
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS* A" k' y7 g# O' y. {8 [1 s7 c
Grant Bishop, Economist2 |9 t; Q6 l' y
416-982-8063
" k! A9 L+ D* s$ l7 f9 }/ e3 ~Pascal Gauthier, Economist* v" M1 S! \, y5 e
416-944-5730, m6 `7 F! j/ D3 W: T" j
* \$ d+ E6 q3 Y* u V. ~+ q3 ~# e# u6 G
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|