 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly# a! w9 D$ }3 o4 T) }, b+ h4 h
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove- f" A& W7 p) B' V8 }4 p! o5 U
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house6 B6 Q% Q- @9 u2 }1 D7 O
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by; J, G- U! W% F
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
8 z7 }* M- t- V2 G; Foverpricing compelled a level of residential construction9 m7 p1 P+ j: @
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
, i% ^7 y: t% d2 |4 y12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
- X" f+ k* X0 Fthree years.
3 I/ \7 H" t$ Y0 j4 k' s2 X4 w: sBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
8 t3 X: Q! A4 P. w: i5 d$ E+ T; `their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
. h6 A' e8 O1 j4 B* u3 U* F) zaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects: ~2 R8 y6 K8 x/ _0 x5 N! n
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices' C! J" X& \! U. K
to fundamentally justified levels.
# n- C8 Q: m# {) U. m# T' a( iWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
& _- A5 Q" E+ X0 G$ ]/ I! Ewhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and/ i0 `* U+ w/ h2 A; K
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”% a! L( }6 a: l% [
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although" D& W+ }5 z" d
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
# N1 O( x& t/ B& t- `6 K“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where; E$ j3 S/ |/ Q! e4 @' m
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch) ^2 }4 c+ r6 {0 N
that is now being rapidly reined in.% j: c' T' Z& C, D e. x7 G
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
0 I/ U2 l7 X" s, F$ E8 @& Ethe construction of too many new homes over the boom+ i+ j9 Z3 Y: j+ `
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh* {/ |; d! r6 v, T1 h. d$ q) h3 ~) k' k
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers# F. J: B7 C% v% f
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
# i1 O9 f5 O! k5 p1 l9 }+ ]% ]& gremain choppy and new residential construction will be7 [: C( x' J: b* f$ P; r1 \
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
' t8 m& n- e) C* H5 T. p- Y2 Z! [is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this) N. J; f% W5 a. h7 V( y! u
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
/ Y; R$ |: ^1 q6 Z! z$ gresidential construction will fall further to around
1 V8 b3 o) i% [) s9 d( z125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units" L4 E+ \% D% T) f
in the fourth quarter. F# D1 I9 x' |
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,8 Q4 v8 D! {* u
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
- ~- r$ Z! z: Ofundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each. I: a6 [+ y! i# h5 e( _$ e- J
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home4 Q1 n4 Y& ^0 J
values since house prices should track incomes over the1 [- F/ z$ l1 Y# F
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we$ k* A+ }* M, K4 C" J, X
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
6 Y; K U& P* t5 F: w% Gof residential construction.6 l6 L1 C0 |: k3 U
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
5 k. J f! B7 T. D7 c! C+ b“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
9 e8 h( @' ^; q( L# J0 p: Bwould have occurred if housing had been priced
( y* R+ }7 n) x; g) |optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this2 Z. I/ @' q: @% F6 \' e
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
* P+ L5 S) @3 v" j0 f9 qunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
2 |$ D4 y/ M9 h' f# x" n5 mmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.' @+ C0 j0 N' v, `6 T
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
$ ]. i1 V- G! F# T, E$ P6 {1 x# Awhere housing demand will further contract under waning
# _) Z6 n1 c4 F; Y7 X) Y+ n! Ppopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are# H- N4 a2 @! F8 C" K6 e
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
W" _+ F, D- S; b# ~4 Kvery time that the resale market has swung into strong" T) `- r% G) F: G' \
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces" O( A! T2 \8 K- w+ Z0 m3 H
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural$ C. Y2 i7 r( Q5 y. ]5 e& H
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless." k: J. K9 P( m. Q! W7 B- J* J( @
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
) J1 ]4 E7 Y" Z: j7 c8 W' T5 L# e' Istrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
* P$ H" @. ~: }" g7 Q4 C3 R: V( oMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
! @( K& d* b$ [& egiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
8 ~0 I5 O+ M" R& a% _9 [rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a4 s, V9 @, q' J% H( y. H
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears; O; x$ I* l3 K$ V
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
, d6 Z0 U2 s# \- Hcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically- D2 s. D% M% }+ @# `
high levels of apartment-style units presently under9 F5 T& |3 u2 ]( S% m; _' W
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
5 g& l9 h% a' p5 l f6 h/ |2 @3 F8 creach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
2 J. k" v0 F3 Q' ]5 M- q3 Tcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
! C9 F3 x j, Q' J# e4 `7 Y( I8 Dspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
" V ~- A/ t" Hresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we4 P9 v3 F8 @- P' @/ P- Z
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
/ T v0 _2 f. q! b* ?; |inter-provincial and international migration over the coming/ q9 x) p1 V% @# |* U
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
' Q5 `+ K# Q& S' s# fwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
' N0 s2 `1 B% ? k, `2 H' W& eOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING5 \( j7 X6 H% z, g/ b3 A
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS1 f: o+ K9 o/ @6 I5 b
Grant Bishop, Economist3 N: w# y9 A# s+ P
416-982-8063
, d1 H2 u: q# t( F. q- SPascal Gauthier, Economist
: R5 v/ w+ W5 V- h- O416-944-5730& z6 ^, Y7 ?. w' L- k2 {/ @( @* ^
& j9 i, m) u) e8 ^6 e
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|