 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly6 B9 Y: A* ^8 o- U4 Q# ^$ n
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
9 A( c8 R0 t3 t j B Kunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
. b0 P$ b. \( [5 q% c# Pprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
& }5 k# l+ D5 p( q; hfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This9 [# G5 [% ]# C; q0 q g) ?) t5 v3 @
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction0 d6 \ R5 V- s( w* E: H' V. }
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately2 C3 p( a: N* V7 O) h/ k8 `* N: s
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past5 U$ S1 Y) g5 z% u0 _) U6 X
three years.0 Y+ H B' H5 B: M! P
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from! h; _9 ?8 X5 Q0 C+ X
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of! G$ o3 g, h- u; H9 `: b) A& ^
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects* m3 d% R9 D" h' _0 X1 |* ]
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
# i; c7 a" V. Pto fundamentally justified levels.
3 Y0 M& L* l! I" u9 OWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”* Y5 D+ T$ t- D/ Z: E2 w
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
; g6 I0 i0 x2 ~! b+ x; dthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
* W/ o& |# C+ v4 S `where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
5 o Y+ v: t1 U! x- q' t6 M' }there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
1 d/ V! m8 r) d* f“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
! Y3 h/ O0 n9 Q1 E @* b. lhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch: E6 v3 {0 ^) R
that is now being rapidly reined in.- I3 ?- p R+ U/ H! u8 V
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
|% `1 H& Y0 R; S7 lthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
' Y( _9 C3 A" e9 ~) cmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh5 I1 [& y* G6 q7 Q- u ^
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers( `4 } @. Y& z! r
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
+ l5 b n- m8 ^/ j2 `remain choppy and new residential construction will be( E7 P& k9 `6 A/ r/ B
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction) X/ u3 b. Y2 y4 ?7 [
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
/ ^, u: Q' O4 s5 f+ t* lto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ }# j; j6 w3 U7 [3 t
residential construction will fall further to around
$ S" }1 @! } L# O, k- M6 I; v% U125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
/ ~ J" C% _) }4 e! T r2 E7 T3 Uin the fourth quarter.
* `8 R, H$ r2 J0 _, dTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,/ ?* p. Y9 z; e! c' f
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run! T6 u) d: J% U3 P- H6 }; l
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
3 B8 J% d5 T: b0 K+ w2 n0 Z5 `province. Affordability is the key concept behind home8 W$ a2 \. m' K+ j
values since house prices should track incomes over the
& t6 d* F5 _3 {# V' Hlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we. ~0 O) K0 H" `) X$ u
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
: Q, H* d( L: T9 t, @1 [ A# n- D Zof residential construction.
) i) M7 }9 M7 r; x& ~+ b% {To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a( s3 K' T) t. h8 U' u$ F r8 C
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction8 `( r. r& S/ R. T$ l: ^
would have occurred if housing had been priced
) T. l R( y0 Toptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this) j2 Z7 f8 P) l( { G* w
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
2 b/ b& Q1 N5 ?9 D8 W* q/ \/ yunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
+ P# E' ?, ?, Z% Zmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
" g1 y+ U# ~" p$ ~, U g1 t. [Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,6 S1 i+ f1 V {- W- u8 {
where housing demand will further contract under waning5 \ e5 G9 @7 ? v# ^
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
4 x: N7 n$ U4 B4 C' ?. lalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the4 j/ |( m) ]7 h/ e- z* _
very time that the resale market has swung into strong& b& |8 P7 H* K {4 p1 t+ i
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces4 C! l% r l4 R3 Q
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural, c! W9 r1 Y- L5 a! T; d! _0 O2 B/ T8 G
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
: I# l1 {$ ?7 H; |: jQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
0 |8 r5 s" u# Y: U! W7 Zstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
M2 q" K/ a2 fMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,% u$ o) z! Q) C, }- X7 X! f
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
D4 Q* H- e) R+ j* J3 f; z+ C1 urates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
# I5 l9 X$ |, x5 ^0 l+ Scyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears5 i* ~& i# Q, G4 A$ R8 M$ D1 t
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto# Q1 B+ d3 E& ?) _ n
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
: c: m, `# i# F: M; e* Nhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under! j0 B6 U- @1 {( e
construction mean that record numbers of condos will; _7 ?/ M T/ U3 _: |8 U( a8 P
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
' a- T* Y V8 [# { {& y7 tcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could4 ~' H) l+ H5 f2 E
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while0 k* {2 ^: r1 I" c: A$ }
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we# ?5 I; X) D7 O8 H7 D( t5 s
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
S# q5 `8 C& l i+ n5 Finter-provincial and international migration over the coming0 E$ p+ E1 {2 Z ]$ D/ Q) @
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,( ]- d* V! w* G& T( P( }- D
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
$ x& w `1 o, X# p- k0 v3 fOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
" q; B% p5 w, U, d6 ]MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
9 e$ R. o8 S+ t* }Grant Bishop, Economist# ]. _7 Q) C! Y6 ?1 v
416-982-80639 i- i F! }4 ^! k5 {
Pascal Gauthier, Economist4 e; x. o) U5 _% A- \8 T/ D
416-944-57305 z$ l6 d5 } T% {3 P& H5 }! n4 A
8 Z0 m& K2 S/ \
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|