 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
- W& m* s0 e2 L9 O/ ofrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove0 Z+ `0 r( N3 g* u
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
4 H( h; ]. O3 h0 V0 u) i( P: @! ~prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
0 @5 K6 ^' U. C( e( i9 W& u% S( Ffundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This& z3 ], U7 n* T) ]+ g c0 m
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
5 {& Q: Y0 i rthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately' a* Z | }- F3 u, n9 Q- \5 V
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
7 @6 ]5 y, C1 ~2 F. o; Fthree years.
0 U3 f7 [0 h. ]: T/ R3 t% CBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
/ L: ^. k3 t) Jtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of/ h; A# g) B% x3 U9 T+ C2 [; s
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects# ]9 u$ H% G9 h. k" Y* C
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
8 e! D5 V& m( e' y0 W# x0 ~to fundamentally justified levels.) D+ k9 ?5 p0 T# T1 B2 {" A
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
6 w( C0 b* X+ K6 K, Swhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
+ n4 X& @) q- F# W6 Vthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”4 c& }6 l9 Q/ k4 L
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
6 Y2 L& H# b+ Sthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s& S& K6 q4 l. }8 i& r
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
( X0 M: A K$ s& Y/ r: c5 ohomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch1 z7 p( }8 `4 U
that is now being rapidly reined in.
9 w9 O0 @$ r! g t9 c4 B8 W' X) VWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
+ @* ]5 H, S- S: pthe construction of too many new homes over the boom/ T0 }: V& l( r1 {
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh- v1 Z7 ]- ]) r/ w; D5 i
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers) B5 Z: ^- _: q) c" ?1 k* x
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will% q% E5 E6 c" L. c1 l/ C5 N
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
2 Z' l; G% i- h1 ]( ]1 @dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction8 N2 J1 v g; S/ c% n) d1 R' I
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this3 f; }" v+ g' E- p; ]9 ~' o6 S* N
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
+ C, _4 C, n& a5 Y0 \) w0 q9 i: zresidential construction will fall further to around( o! f: l" O) N( q- h) a
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
1 d' t. K E4 v6 A2 Y; o% M win the fourth quarter.) M4 G5 I% q- _1 w
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
! n2 q6 j- j1 O o2 s" ]3 Zwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run8 D0 a |8 P+ D# ^- \7 w
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
: v+ D0 A# i5 y6 |: _province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
- Y8 ?* F+ H- z: Z5 ^2 x" o* U" Nvalues since house prices should track incomes over the& ~3 `5 s# E6 }8 U& q
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we3 l# N. ?1 f l; b
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers3 z" m, @! J# d2 C+ r" C* S8 `
of residential construction.
. }* N3 d, A/ e$ u) ITo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a' n& v3 H' V h8 H" G. S
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
* R" \. T+ X1 P+ \would have occurred if housing had been priced' ?* B0 Z7 j0 p# j9 w: R9 K0 P5 b
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
4 K/ d% w$ n" ^) b, Ifundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new9 ]- Z2 O, D0 A* ]9 {* ?& N
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too! \0 x& {% K) T0 x4 Q
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals., w6 |( s5 F5 K- w# W
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,! v7 l+ C& D+ N, Z* Y, X
where housing demand will further contract under waning
* j3 _6 F; O8 i5 k& D. v) opopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
( D! E9 L& L, X2 d9 C- ]" Salready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the1 T8 u9 ~1 t- x! t; Q4 J+ c
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
0 f4 x" L# U/ \, v5 S. S* \buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
l7 J2 |* g$ N& vhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
; f+ e/ g# Q3 W( k2 l% z# {weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
( |4 o2 P' f0 t9 eQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
" o$ R6 r7 _( j0 @strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
- R) I2 Q1 m" [& h: k" M- W6 sMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,: E T1 J9 \( Y
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership! v7 \( U6 @( i7 x
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
- w5 X: v+ z9 B6 Z4 H0 wcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears- _" o0 w2 S+ h1 {; Z9 o
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto j5 U9 f: L' N; P) |: D0 Z
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically8 R6 o5 N; M* ^
high levels of apartment-style units presently under! z) l% r( C* O3 k' Z+ [! v: B
construction mean that record numbers of condos will4 B, e/ h0 f) @
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
8 R0 e0 y, ~5 X9 P# q) @1 s$ {" tcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
$ ~, n5 j4 b# p' G5 K# Espike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while3 `7 Y R, w7 b& C( h/ |" Z
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
9 L, p) a3 u: S7 Y: {; C/ U. Oanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from" O: m' ~7 t& `. k* d6 E3 t
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming& p( ], m2 e9 L
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,6 A$ F" E' f$ h" O* h
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
, Y9 Z5 n; R9 B) gOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
7 v# I+ S& c4 Z4 L4 L( ~4 `MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS2 |7 Q. _7 G% T" _+ e2 P
Grant Bishop, Economist. Y; g: [5 r1 F, f
416-982-8063' L: m# c: T- _3 `4 D% C; O! E( j
Pascal Gauthier, Economist" A, W- {# r/ b/ L) z6 ]( y9 j5 H
416-944-5730* f0 N5 N) M. E8 G; [( C
9 B; v: I& X& Y
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|