埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1787|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
6 x8 ]9 v6 b, Y& a# e' m( C' ?from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove2 z, P3 ?" R' @
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house& Y; k& T4 Z& L* Y+ |
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by( t+ e: B: r4 R5 h- I# \
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
6 c- M" R: \# t" U: G4 ?overpricing compelled a level of residential construction9 x7 m! m; S  k
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately, d, a  \& L& _: [( |
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
8 d* M$ I/ G: pthree years.( Z7 u7 W- m  @) S/ T- P1 s
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
9 v: V+ i4 X9 R" S: ]3 gtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of- m; W  L( l$ i$ q
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
! Z1 V5 }; U6 @" _. A9 N# |both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
- _' O) o* |( Dto fundamentally justified levels.
5 f/ b9 z# a! h# [1 [3 O' k- @We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”3 k* d' [* |5 r  f
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
" Y" j, z! x+ a  ^! d. i  F% bthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”2 z1 \0 [. \9 e# {7 V
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
/ s1 A( a5 ]: m3 \; I: v' Jthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
' p  s' ]6 c0 S2 S“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where4 d- }3 h. u& L6 r9 `3 r$ q
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch0 {5 O( q4 g2 O# H
that is now being rapidly reined in.
* u- I, o9 K7 I: V# qWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,6 d7 g* }5 \4 t9 e" j' g
the construction of too many new homes over the boom% q9 ~  i1 X0 P) z
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh4 i4 }# O  ?- Q* e' e6 s: F/ a) C) k' i6 V
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
: g4 P) w0 L$ N* G# [3 c& H6 `' Bfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will. s) F" s; j2 O
remain choppy and new residential construction will be5 w2 j! _/ \2 ]
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
; r# Q! I6 {$ {& G. Ais now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this: h$ K  z3 n; S: Q1 @& ]
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
* m4 z1 {( T7 [# ^5 a7 ]. iresidential construction will fall further to around
( r, f! U4 F6 Q125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units" h' e- p) n- q( K9 _
in the fourth quarter.; ~, n4 G  Z5 {% ~5 T1 N& g
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,) D- s" H" I4 Z# ]
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run; d4 t, m6 g* f
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each) y! \4 @2 L. [  T- l9 ?. o
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
6 u1 V: r1 }5 F( tvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
8 T1 g- I- y  rlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we' \0 |0 i5 m; Q* d
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers, n4 j% Z  T2 B4 G1 T; o
of residential construction.
$ U3 R2 |: e2 l1 ETo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a* ]9 t: M  V1 R
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction/ K9 ]) W& \  m
would have occurred if housing had been priced6 R9 o4 M4 @# O" Y2 F# J% m8 Y+ x0 g, a
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
9 T& o3 A% i9 p+ f3 G7 Bfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new# K% H3 A: E! W. ^5 `9 V. e8 d0 N
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
/ c' x2 F; G" \, t% G( bmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
3 {# _- w! X, C# h/ t8 i8 DRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,2 w( @+ K" @9 w" y6 k
where housing demand will further contract under waning
, L- ?' H, Y5 F3 epopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
3 P5 M, Q, G7 b9 r' l6 {already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the. r7 i! C' W6 f4 A7 J8 g( @
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
4 o, s7 o+ V" k# r+ x% Fbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces5 ^; d" W- |- U- \8 M1 c
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural3 R/ L6 A2 H) D# O
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.: ~  w) p% n3 P/ F
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the# P* P8 T* ~) E5 ]2 U, s
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de% E) o: y  s& @5 w
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,+ J% [  ?2 v( K5 O$ v
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership# z! R& ?7 |3 b2 y+ T( t/ ]/ [% O
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
' v; c# }3 v4 ^9 {5 J5 gcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears% I( b! U* m) f& e. Q/ x
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
2 L2 R) V& Q$ K! Bcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
% d5 S: h+ m2 Z. N4 e) E6 Whigh levels of apartment-style units presently under% z( v# c) C8 a
construction mean that record numbers of condos will7 M9 s4 @3 S% ?7 j
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
0 D" F- F( ]$ F/ _, `cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
, V/ x8 M. m+ U4 p  ^spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while9 {& K) f: _+ m" W3 [
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
+ @5 Y0 {) f% b% b+ Santicipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
( S" X* y, ?1 U$ Finter-provincial and international migration over the coming
$ }; R7 X0 j" u% I" G6 w5 a- [' v0 ~years, which, along with improvements in affordability,7 }7 N! M3 @4 d4 h+ ~3 }
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
$ e/ b5 R1 ?2 R4 I1 n& k1 BOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
9 b. f( h" X- CMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
7 _# W7 C$ I, ?1 ^6 NGrant Bishop, Economist
: w1 s+ G2 m- w/ E% g416-982-8063. I9 \" C/ d$ X  i. `6 b4 f% N
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
4 l* B7 b7 F' W. o3 B6 M* s416-944-5730- k0 N) z5 B4 }/ o) Z2 _2 D- k$ Q
7 [2 `  W2 H! n8 ~" O
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
理袁律师事务所
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-10 21:23 , Processed in 0.631235 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表