 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly+ M) }" O! J+ y$ |+ @; |
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
# C6 D7 B, J' t! x+ lunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
2 O' \$ n8 R8 h" H+ ^- ]; v8 Fprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by2 c) H2 k+ ~% \! x8 H
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
. E; q" [1 L9 v' Z7 `" p) {overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
5 S& _. u. E6 R/ athat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately3 d9 v# {4 r: d+ j; I. ]
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past* V5 i- s! z! j, K' m# _0 s
three years.
; n0 N: p! ^1 p* Z' X: q0 q$ `By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
6 G1 P; I3 w6 s9 r. \their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of# l5 E: T1 `5 @- T* j6 o
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects) C0 t! I/ A, L6 M7 {: N1 ?* \
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices6 d3 e) D7 T2 ~# C) C
to fundamentally justified levels.
- l3 ~, g; ^+ [. i7 {We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”9 Y# e' `: A1 t& |: i' f. R
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
' j. \$ ? o! F3 p+ }' a$ O1 othat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”! ~3 n* X+ Y# D( L+ c3 p- P8 I/ W
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although5 B- B4 d; R! u, z4 ^3 _7 w
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s9 V3 \3 K5 Z$ C+ o) J& t0 n$ S R
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
9 m: ` I# Y+ F1 D6 ~/ m; ?0 Ohomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch7 C ^; _! o- g. e' T% {: m) }
that is now being rapidly reined in.8 F( T6 ~+ ~% m/ r( i# i
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,% A! C# c: g6 `( H5 `; C# S8 |
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
) G9 o; b& ~9 M# S5 t$ Qmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
( H- H6 D+ M- k0 j6 ]6 Yon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers2 L" ]3 B: S4 w; p
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
" C* `8 X4 i6 P; p: _9 e4 Dremain choppy and new residential construction will be# N0 H8 b: E8 T( Q5 z" h+ D. B/ [1 M
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction/ {$ u/ C X8 d$ j9 ~
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this: V+ V7 Y8 I0 l7 J1 I/ F! [- j7 r O
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
2 J) p1 U+ A8 }' G2 k4 n i; \residential construction will fall further to around
2 I L U |, k125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units; r/ }" u% E4 U" I
in the fourth quarter.
3 K) x# Y$ s4 Z1 @To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,3 a9 g2 ~7 A2 N9 ?. d5 _
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run0 F, \% g. T4 H' a
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
+ W B5 c% y- L$ ^province. Affordability is the key concept behind home) W1 e- ^) {9 V' j \. B" T+ u$ U
values since house prices should track incomes over the% Z* O( h$ |) w! Y
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we2 b8 u, P) p& p' t+ r
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
: _6 C9 @* Y7 T. H3 k( I! _of residential construction./ [) ]8 `8 L9 x7 s* ^* a
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a/ E) s& S. y0 [( [# h
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction, ?5 Y4 U" i M- H) q8 X1 Q
would have occurred if housing had been priced
" `: t& T6 }- Roptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
2 R' g/ @) [' l6 Xfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
0 ^6 z ~8 N5 }units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
- R9 b" _8 S1 e' O( ^6 Wmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals., d( s9 g5 @# ^8 `/ L& N+ @
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,( t/ B$ }: F4 T- H
where housing demand will further contract under waning" ~) S: L, ?* G' [
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are& n5 b F* O V& y; l, R
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the, Y: k( f( R$ P4 t Z! G
very time that the resale market has swung into strong3 G8 I* X( Y+ X# q* h- |* H" {2 S& C
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces+ a. D& P1 z8 S6 |
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural n) P! _5 q0 N" u+ t% [( a
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless. _, ^, o5 j' e% f! {' t
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
6 g- C( N# w, E3 t; y. _+ R9 D: Ustrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
2 O+ U+ {) ]/ x" Q% r0 mMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
& l* M; t1 l/ w( Z0 s3 ~given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
+ E& g) N; a1 t% f2 r. Lrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a# K4 f& o' f# z
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears5 E: a' z* G- @
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto1 ]+ z; S7 O2 l
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
: Q* |" o- U# d! e/ G8 h( Qhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
1 N8 h" [, ]0 h4 f7 v6 kconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will+ T# A; B' t# x! n6 N' y
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
% r" G, x& L6 V6 e5 Ocyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could$ f: ~! @+ L' ^% k! S
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while+ h) b- e& b s% l* W
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we! Q1 v$ e; {5 w7 b" l- I* M
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
/ Y' g" m% V; ?0 R% s. `inter-provincial and international migration over the coming- \% l; E+ U" F4 l
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,2 M3 h- {7 j/ z0 P0 ?5 N& Z# J
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.# R6 c2 `/ l3 u7 f3 S
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
3 j; B' |- d' G H7 nMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS+ @& `3 E4 y" V [
Grant Bishop, Economist
3 X$ L/ _# W* H l416-982-8063
7 e$ [$ y+ e$ vPascal Gauthier, Economist
7 }) R; T, E: C0 O# K" _9 d! h7 f! B416-944-5730: Z1 G- L3 r2 w# H. U L. Q3 e4 @
! d0 i' `9 G2 b hhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|