 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly8 S R$ y2 v( ^4 Q- ? J
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
) _( z3 N. c/ bunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
5 G5 y$ \$ U9 z. R8 j7 v& oprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by# M" N( y4 D9 K6 x7 P
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
. k, v" |+ `" z/ koverpricing compelled a level of residential construction# n& l3 e( e4 Q) o* ^% k
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately$ [- ~! c$ |: A3 S0 S c* |
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past* g- g9 e6 U# u* q
three years.
. B: m8 \, n; G6 KBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
2 O( C% H) P1 D6 t0 ?1 o( ftheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of+ w& @! S; D# n. j
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects5 {( D& K" R0 _. L+ S4 i9 y. [
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
: _* N: ~' R. F1 t1 ~" sto fundamentally justified levels.; _' ]5 [' |* X. R5 ]( m; |
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”- \+ y% c8 k' f
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
6 l" L" n m+ Z4 tthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”: j7 M' J- x& { i8 n
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although* G8 D4 w- m/ u: r; p0 A# ~" N+ ~- H
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
; t, T" b6 g& O# U$ D$ r2 o" W“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where5 {/ Y2 D* Z) i3 F* e; S9 z; B$ O
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch4 E2 f' F K; X7 }& m) l9 `; d
that is now being rapidly reined in.
5 E* \" P# a0 {0 H$ ^While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,# I! J% d: k2 i3 j
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
0 s+ Y* F2 ~; W1 K; k; f# Gmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh9 q9 z, W4 X0 }+ H! @$ @- v
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers7 I1 Y, V; g8 l7 @6 J5 c) Z! d
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
C; X! Y \& J/ ^) S; I( bremain choppy and new residential construction will be) ]$ E) J+ F0 B& @
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction% z4 J. P ]# {6 D2 L
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
; J# @3 p3 S- `to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide$ ^% V2 M9 h& W
residential construction will fall further to around4 i) ~3 l8 w0 f
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
" ?2 d) t* X% W- C# O3 gin the fourth quarter.# n, V5 h8 g- ~# Y" N) P" ?
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding, W+ }. {3 I' H, f" I. o% N
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run4 E$ `3 e- t* `! F1 J
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
+ n* m- \: d4 t9 Vprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
3 w3 g) \5 M* Dvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
7 ~8 |% Q! I# u* Qlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we5 @, d* k" E0 o; X6 u6 w. a" w
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers/ K" l' Z' X! P6 s h% l, _
of residential construction./ T7 K8 |+ u$ h( h2 u6 v$ a
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
9 I* l \! u6 D; m3 u“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
# j" H% Y( f. q( f8 zwould have occurred if housing had been priced
) U0 \/ `5 A0 I3 `( y' W& goptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
# l4 r1 T( H% y/ @5 P) R# u/ F0 ]fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new# u: a U! b0 B1 }
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too) x4 U0 Q4 `, N
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
, T+ }7 D$ q0 n+ Z7 z) G- tRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
' q$ p4 g( D3 k: t4 t3 n9 Q9 Qwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
! ^ D! h3 A+ ^, C% dpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
% `& x2 y2 Y9 v8 d: A0 Kalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
/ _$ ^" C$ O* e" P8 p; t+ y! Lvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
. b& t1 n& y; X, v$ d1 Tbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
( n% y$ a8 D$ D* }0 a- khas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
; e. q- D, g8 y; w% ]. ^weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
( T5 j* s' S; b- u8 I- E% o% yQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the% b8 Q, |# ^: H: a6 G. @
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de$ p/ r' {+ F4 J+ B2 z. k2 Z3 |3 e
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,7 N" M: x' i% i! @. _9 y/ K
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
, g9 ~5 i2 i w8 J2 b- }8 x( hrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a% U/ _7 N9 E( V" X; p& e* Z7 ]* o7 _1 S
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears7 R, C, y: k3 ~: F
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto" ^6 D1 }2 y4 B! {2 u
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically2 ~! d4 S: Y, O7 H9 u: c
high levels of apartment-style units presently under$ Y* ?( m4 N7 e" g- K
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
* ], w% h2 G8 B5 B' N ^reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as, ~: f- U9 I. {" m$ I; L( D
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could8 N1 p" ]) i8 o$ ~- a
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
+ }, i" L, L/ e+ R3 l0 @residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we9 m, s' g* d G4 U! z3 m' E' v
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
4 u& r7 _, W; Cinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
, s6 h O" N6 n8 A1 Jyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
4 T g$ F" t$ c0 Gwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.% _( @8 F. M- h* P |3 s
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING- {' t0 F( a4 @7 F' q; o# ~
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS# {0 \9 \9 j/ c! J- S5 q' n
Grant Bishop, Economist- V) E, F6 L: K
416-982-8063% ~5 Q& X5 u7 V9 V3 ]: e1 T4 l
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
4 `2 W C, T" c4 s9 o) t& B3 D416-944-5730
0 \3 o" ~+ X8 @% C
) z/ ^- L+ ]( O6 x& qhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|