 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly, Y& B8 P! g9 Y! J: m$ k* n3 X
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
4 Z+ v. c( K2 N7 lunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
7 d; \6 c( J4 [3 q, x; b6 E2 Q9 w! wprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by3 f: y- B6 ?5 H( x
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This8 t, h6 F6 G) T, g! g
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction' ]0 f9 Q8 F' \ A7 T) J& ]
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
/ l( p0 [! U0 F7 `& J* L/ N* T5 q, Q12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past9 E! w2 [7 E) L7 w
three years.
8 B( i( Z% I& l& h+ @$ [* `! ~By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
7 N5 A7 q5 L9 i* [- C- ~their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of/ D7 @- e# U" S' `; {+ f
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
$ C) G' i1 l3 O. h- gboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices9 y" a8 |" l& w" [ y
to fundamentally justified levels.
; f m) ?, M0 _We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven” H; d8 I" ?" T! M
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
6 S' v: N. \6 `! C% z4 `) Qthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”6 y6 ~0 U6 h+ D, O
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although6 P5 R6 E3 h. s0 N6 F1 g
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s+ i- d$ f4 O; N3 P
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
" j( T9 b9 M, K1 W, N5 c) hhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
8 n3 U7 }4 ^* ?5 j/ i- T, Gthat is now being rapidly reined in.
- M- t) l: e) P! d1 |While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,9 ?" T8 ?8 R0 m) f, O- F0 _1 G/ W7 r
the construction of too many new homes over the boom: I+ R8 x# h/ _' W
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh+ F. Y* x& E; N( G& ]4 a6 n
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers7 y* \* R! b5 r4 ]/ O; f6 Y
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will& V: Z6 `/ C9 m0 p
remain choppy and new residential construction will be7 S) u. u: m/ m' K3 J2 W
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction- y2 J/ m9 E( `- S6 }: G) S
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this X A6 Q+ O# h- y& H
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
" p9 ?, O; Q0 ^" p5 ?" E6 lresidential construction will fall further to around
3 p2 e& M7 E! V G- C0 [125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units6 y9 s; \/ f+ c3 V& Q$ E
in the fourth quarter.
& J/ x ]: u( l) STo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,. ?' J5 a+ ]3 A) g
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
, y3 b9 W4 Q/ I7 Y, y6 gfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each2 G8 ^' }# G( r/ m+ B( A
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
, S+ W8 Q4 }. Cvalues since house prices should track incomes over the, u9 x7 P7 h5 X2 S
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we( _+ Q- ~, Q4 a9 Y
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers1 ]+ J% d7 l- V W. l; M' h
of residential construction. Z% L6 d3 _: o1 n+ K. t8 X4 K
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a2 U Z/ C0 ]9 c- P0 A/ H& G8 ~
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
. K; O V# s, v: g! [would have occurred if housing had been priced! u. j* o% `4 r5 K. o- M* N, N
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
7 \$ I1 N0 }. ]/ y5 V- [6 Vfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new3 v/ Z1 u' |; N( C$ L! C7 v8 C! j! v
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too! \: C% J9 g* D5 h$ e
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
, N! A; I2 K: d1 d; [# i, a* E, oRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
' T# j x5 M- G* k# P1 W5 l, Qwhere housing demand will further contract under waning: o7 N: d5 a) }/ i
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
% o. J8 d- r$ f" Walready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the k; i7 p0 S" P, N( e3 {3 ~$ i
very time that the resale market has swung into strong& m! A' b) t; r" P0 K6 @
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
6 j5 w9 g( p3 S6 t5 x3 Xhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
7 S1 I/ w% O& b Q' N. T, uweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.2 D& r7 P. f$ `0 y% p' F3 `
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
; c6 ~* H. k5 [, pstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de8 ~/ N, ?( Y) X" J- u& y
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
. i$ b% y5 q0 W/ hgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
" O% V5 c- q- e+ L8 {0 ?rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
" {7 B/ ?- ~. @: a$ V, X5 icyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
% Z% r6 S# k# F4 b# `. Qlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto: p. X7 L' P) I2 s% b0 ~
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
" t; \* W% v4 `6 T( m9 ahigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
8 `) ~( H( K2 Y$ K' oconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will- W& A6 C! _/ q3 J: q: @/ n
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
5 d1 g' d( j/ H9 ^cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could: j- z& L g+ o8 ?
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while4 i5 Y0 m \9 w7 ?
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we3 |# V1 H" {) s6 x
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from% Z t* b2 V2 l' e! l5 M- r6 I6 ^1 u
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming: H3 G. b r( N. u8 I- K. I
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,6 D) g9 L+ ~+ s9 T. {
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
- c' I S: J/ b9 ]5 ~9 m! h+ [3 lOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING. D! X$ z+ i3 N/ q! ~
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS; A5 p- S1 i' b0 y4 H6 Y, F/ R$ w9 E* U& @
Grant Bishop, Economist
& K, k" _. g1 u! d' s416-982-8063* ]5 o" P0 P5 }! L/ x9 P+ [8 z- ~
Pascal Gauthier, Economist/ y5 R1 j% b1 g0 y
416-944-57301 L- o. L- f' n2 R, j5 A0 ^
6 o" y% E" y* X% T6 y- g R
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|