 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly; p5 _' x8 }( @) H& W5 S" P/ z* T& c# R) g
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
) y8 k' s+ z% c% Eunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
/ f9 ?6 ?+ f% D: U3 b# Uprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by# v7 B7 q; `3 n" h9 ?
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This `3 i+ `: ^- z0 `+ ]- J
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
9 y0 ^7 f' G, Othat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately' M( V( D3 `$ B! d' M' Q2 `6 U) F; o, f
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past# {3 T6 f/ H( _' i. E! G! q
three years.
. M: j. d4 w( |5 ?5 P- S. PBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from ~/ r/ f( y/ ?0 j* t; [% | _1 T
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of# [( l* }+ S) v4 z" D
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
8 @+ ~: ~& A! fboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
# Y# B2 M/ J* C2 `. E7 xto fundamentally justified levels.
6 Z2 d1 W( a7 h9 L9 Y; ZWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”" A/ r+ h8 ?4 ?1 P
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
% A5 l( \7 Z# i, ythat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”: I* S2 o$ O5 t% d
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
3 g5 A- H4 b( _8 qthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s/ ?6 g7 X# J4 R' t. b
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
; s0 S w' s0 x9 fhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
$ [9 s8 O( g- z: `& B- i, h" Pthat is now being rapidly reined in.
! s( J$ W3 }% }0 g2 k- i, p2 U: `While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,. X4 t/ v2 k. @2 q6 C
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
: j% l4 j2 [: ]- T1 W; J @means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh |4 V6 Y& t @( A
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
, [" M+ T. L& \( _& Ufrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will+ z9 f9 w! t1 b: u1 o2 l
remain choppy and new residential construction will be f* v6 I1 v* [$ e, i
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction5 n' O+ ?5 w1 S/ k, I) T
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this Q# ]' x& W5 f9 G' p7 f: E
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide5 j" N5 V( Y+ Q9 ~# ~
residential construction will fall further to around
7 k+ e& O5 [& o: O8 l V$ E125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
2 u8 D3 C1 V6 I1 ~9 nin the fourth quarter. O7 g3 ?$ \( {
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,- h& \* d. N/ H+ [1 F/ ~ }
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run; Z1 S) [* @3 Y( K2 V
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
9 K! Q: b: S2 I: ?$ t/ @province. Affordability is the key concept behind home2 G- u, }; G1 l2 a
values since house prices should track incomes over the3 R: @4 B: D! h: g2 P- Y
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we0 }- a* h5 Q0 X
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers5 P4 r) j8 D: i
of residential construction.
1 _# @% c# \2 Q. c! F: XTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
5 a/ C7 [6 n* w7 x8 F6 _“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
4 x, h# Q8 [5 i! A: I# vwould have occurred if housing had been priced* g- r6 B- S! l9 r/ S( [
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this$ |; w8 J9 {! c: S& d
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
^" o- s) `0 Gunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
0 e3 N& q+ P+ A! n2 E" Imany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.6 ]- x1 d+ u' t d! X; S$ a
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
4 j! A6 v' L- H# O5 ^: p. Pwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
" b& @3 k ?0 D2 S- `population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are( d8 D$ e- c* f v5 V
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the" m+ M# m1 _% ]7 ?5 b
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
" G7 K2 r! m8 {+ j l7 V1 Gbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
+ q; f7 }6 t, Dhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
# @3 e# y1 Q- |# l. N5 q1 j! F( D7 W& }weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
. R7 z) {' n4 o3 q" e/ o- G# x4 FQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the$ r! h9 g) f5 A8 k$ H
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de2 U( z# ~/ m, W% ?
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
, ]: P; i8 H5 H, b* @given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership: T3 n5 L& D S5 ?, }: D
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a! ], K2 @; ~: J, p/ p1 _* B( W
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
, {9 `% J9 F( | q& ~0 mlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto, F0 a0 t* N2 ~# i/ Q
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically" F# l8 p. X1 L Y; m1 _: q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under* l/ ~5 V. y% @
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
: v% w+ K; n4 r9 L& qreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as4 }/ k" L+ ?. Y# X I5 _
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
( R, M" R( L2 s% \" H1 }4 t& wspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
" K& \ E$ V& ?residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we7 ]8 a# J4 T6 D$ p6 O4 \
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
' A; a& E- i, s0 Xinter-provincial and international migration over the coming, b9 l. K" [, y/ _9 I
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
) e5 `6 Y+ g! d4 dwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.! ~! f! {0 r R, f/ Z) z
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING$ C* I" ?4 I7 g7 @
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
, W ]; t( Z* U0 I, NGrant Bishop, Economist7 o( P: U$ o% @* {0 Q8 ^ O
416-982-8063
+ R9 |$ J) W4 K4 C7 R7 r/ lPascal Gauthier, Economist! q8 g# R* z+ D. v$ W @2 R: E2 r/ Q( g
416-944-57306 `# G( j' V' ^6 n: |
7 X; U3 J2 X: W: G6 f0 y5 C- L
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|