埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2187|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly% q. d9 T- i7 [  k' u% V4 z
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove  M/ r7 S2 Z. E  w  B! v
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
6 J' ?! S, E9 r* g* Q4 P6 cprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
4 y- P+ E1 q4 j6 B, m; E5 sfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This/ ]6 M2 g  E2 ^- c) ]% V# t
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
, w) z* B  M& qthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
* W- X# g* {1 b0 o, n12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past: D- A# m6 C  \# d* n: w" E
three years.5 T/ E6 p# I% w4 U( ~7 |
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from, O1 p0 m2 o3 g" m6 z1 h) T* K9 ^1 O
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of, D7 u% k  K5 R$ W- ?7 A
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects2 ^5 w2 Y1 m% R) q. d
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
# L: r; l) U3 {# f$ a1 A) P( E$ eto fundamentally justified levels.2 t4 ]4 n. i7 s: a" ~' M8 M
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”8 X: O9 [! c: O9 f' `
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and/ b/ K6 \: d* s+ }
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”1 f, o9 l0 m- Y1 F1 f' k
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although8 q0 L$ d4 h3 c9 E' P
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
& c- ~/ _, `9 A0 e. S“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where2 ?( ], r/ `2 D! b0 i; j
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
8 j, g. y6 l1 ?; |) ?; nthat is now being rapidly reined in.$ _: ?/ e7 |& V. |& \( K# t
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
4 d( f" D1 z7 c; xthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
# _8 h. X: Z6 o0 f# B" L' Cmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh: C2 [2 F7 J4 `3 t
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
8 N, h9 x9 s2 j3 Y- X; tfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
7 Q* o% J" l& P: |" eremain choppy and new residential construction will be) }0 g7 K6 T" @
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
2 K' F- {9 V; d: yis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this/ W. g- t( M, Z) Z( H" B7 [
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
1 B3 q" o3 i- @; P. `& }  R$ Lresidential construction will fall further to around
: b: \% ~* X' C- i7 E125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units$ O; m0 A/ e0 x7 C7 {, x9 D
in the fourth quarter.# }3 u! n/ l1 Y% X7 u& f4 n0 U
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,* O, M4 ?: B( P- V) m2 T
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run9 a! m* i0 {5 C/ D; k. W
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
( ~- A% q% @1 Z$ ]province. Affordability is the key concept behind home/ V6 i: D4 m$ f+ W$ C: Y& G
values since house prices should track incomes over the
6 X- o# B5 n* `6 B. A/ b9 ulong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we6 \8 R( r8 I2 J2 X5 A3 Y3 T
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
' u: z! G- V5 N& O% \. U$ g* Wof residential construction.6 \! @8 n  x# [4 u  n8 _" o6 ]
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a# B, l' C; O- E) e$ ^
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
* E; Y& P* {* l0 a- [4 Jwould have occurred if housing had been priced
8 Z1 Z, {5 `  toptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this6 l9 N7 l+ k$ q: U7 H! @
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
# K; |$ u- k: D5 I/ Yunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
; k+ _2 \& h" ~: Y3 |9 Jmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.* L. g  E' u4 b9 L3 d) h" o
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,0 \" ?+ s& r& J" Y
where housing demand will further contract under waning+ d+ v: a& h/ i$ s2 K
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
$ ?4 B+ \7 s) T5 H! I4 m9 x# z( Aalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the6 i" ?# ]* p, n$ \/ W
very time that the resale market has swung into strong  E  F, H; Q0 D2 A" ^9 m* p# b
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
  Q1 I' z0 b5 X( o/ Chas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
" l' s! a  e2 ]) ^weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless., D. R& J% Z" F- _- C/ U0 ]! t1 q7 h
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
# a9 D) a( `& o6 ?9 j# |/ b' sstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de" s. G% h, T6 ?: L5 V
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,; ]$ G3 K% m; k: p( \" t+ S
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
3 I; b5 n- u6 F4 J& M& `rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
+ M9 `, C" D8 V) \" Scyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears, z, b  _% B3 D
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
% p$ t3 E; w6 q7 o0 ]condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
7 Q7 S7 K4 y) X. n7 x& m* g" G7 Whigh levels of apartment-style units presently under9 w1 k1 U9 p/ a7 @- Z3 A+ v5 C$ h( h
construction mean that record numbers of condos will, d6 N" S" X) i( u# F
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
6 V. k) G6 y) S- A8 a* F8 Ucyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could' l' Q7 g& h. y" I4 }4 u
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while1 Y# W: G2 B# [7 X( L% U4 H. c. \
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we- q3 j# f# _8 ~- }9 l
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from4 D/ P& b) Z" m+ K2 A& }; t/ s- w
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming; T- E; \( _6 x, x: o, W
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
' ~4 D2 n  r- w  @will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.  a6 m$ n9 J* ?) D
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING, {) b: y% W' {5 p0 E- U
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS' h9 B- Y  E7 u
Grant Bishop, Economist
! q' e8 w" e8 v" y: S416-982-8063
9 z! G- q# L% L4 OPascal Gauthier, Economist' _, e4 A- ^% T
416-944-57300 g* |/ z/ J% v$ Y' |; E
; p( p/ S$ A, p1 S* j, S" s
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-13 01:02 , Processed in 0.325172 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表