 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly; u0 h: U4 s; B# q. P3 [. p @
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove9 ~, G7 u$ c7 A4 D( G9 P
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
z b; t9 R! x+ P' B7 Zprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by3 w$ a' _, i+ q! F& D+ M
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This; n" r- n, x* {0 i, o
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction; m/ X9 B/ e* {& K# ] U
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
$ `) o) {$ n' G# P8 P& D12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
a7 R: t, K8 u$ U3 h" Tthree years.+ B& h, f( @* J+ P1 ~1 G g! v' t
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
+ }; |% _3 h9 W% f& f$ i- @their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of& ?1 g0 r$ E" P; r8 ], [% }
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
) F& v. s% D% T9 m' p9 Q1 i' kboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
6 M8 d* R, e( ]. O( Q' Hto fundamentally justified levels.2 p) q4 R- L8 @+ F9 Y4 X' _
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”$ x9 |$ @9 s0 U9 h$ ~
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and7 ? X( `, I6 p" m5 o6 v
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven” D6 }; S/ j ~$ D' A t0 {0 N
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
5 B/ U% Y: L0 J( Hthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
! Q0 i Z2 R+ J7 C“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where! Q& O! n$ h- P% h1 i- k; u2 z
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch) J& h" G) z! e. Y Z- a* _) s; g, @
that is now being rapidly reined in.* z5 g( r O! s2 G& c/ ]
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
: X- K8 f8 |/ t3 G6 V7 q- }& F kthe construction of too many new homes over the boom4 E3 y! v8 U: _6 e( }7 `8 `* y2 v
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh$ W9 `, \# E. P9 t
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
& @* u/ [( e( a5 {# i. g4 k* d- cfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will2 O2 ~$ c! f1 G& \) G
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
0 k! |; e, k: J8 P3 N. Wdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction5 D. ?# k. m0 K- |2 I
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
$ |7 _1 V5 q+ G ^to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
- |0 U. z N. h6 O& ^$ rresidential construction will fall further to around4 R# b; i) T: |9 {) v0 P5 x
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units. G: z- G6 w: {' [- ]
in the fourth quarter.
2 X# J+ T2 a wTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
) z5 n" W) g# Swe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
; R# S. I' t# C( d7 w& afundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
( j1 m5 ?7 O; c" Q# V% `9 R0 S2 V+ N: vprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
0 q9 \ K" s, D! x: S7 Y- X' \( O( Q5 svalues since house prices should track incomes over the9 g7 H5 D* z8 R% D2 ]# g& h, N X. W6 W
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we* k. m& i. r. j$ N' a; {
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers% F3 ` S# {( X: g+ {" ]! [
of residential construction.3 A# i0 I' o" A( }$ \
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a/ s/ k; z: c4 i% X4 _; g
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
% t X. |+ h. q: C( awould have occurred if housing had been priced
7 F- J5 s6 u3 m1 s9 l8 {9 v7 ^optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this* }( S& L9 a3 B0 [$ d1 B7 e3 b0 S' Y
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new2 D" _! h( H5 v, x) l
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
3 w, A1 I( M4 q) X9 M3 E4 rmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
8 z9 @/ O% a( M( R1 O- [# zRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
6 {9 C; J$ u( swhere housing demand will further contract under waning3 v& P/ Y* {% s. ? o+ h
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
* [" i) ?* W) k& A/ m2 x+ |already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the! L. z; V8 _, [& I
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
5 L4 I% i* {3 \% {$ _9 X* k8 Ubuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces; c3 x4 o% H0 D. ^
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
8 U$ O( l" z4 u" |/ @weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
6 Z! O2 [& W2 \3 T' B& L) R6 v ]6 d4 {Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the3 Z1 |) J& {7 V; H
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de3 ]8 F+ C# M1 J
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,4 ] m; W* H! |) x
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership0 L; F1 U; h/ J: V: x
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a. H5 C5 Z0 }' |1 H; r8 W9 Q3 x
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears) @. p0 `4 e3 A# ?7 o2 }3 p4 n
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto, f. q0 P1 s4 a- `8 W w
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
& n4 S- ^) Q6 {, N* phigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
, z9 v0 j1 k) S$ ^construction mean that record numbers of condos will
# Y/ p0 k- I) h- a6 V6 P# nreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as4 U5 j" u% Y) Q. W$ h
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could2 J3 J: n1 F/ K6 k! l- N
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while* i& N1 s% a7 B- R- J
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we( r: p9 K, O# x+ v
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from5 G8 K7 V6 b+ r1 o! [ i
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming4 U) ` d3 ~5 ~& |* R3 e
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
M- B5 j& O- w& e0 ewill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
: t: _ \ E0 }1 v2 D; v, `OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING0 C, a& H: _$ g$ ^" y% Q+ U( |- A0 l' ~9 m
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS r4 N) x. s5 B) ?( O; y
Grant Bishop, Economist
: U2 v+ [2 z1 U% `9 z7 y# D. y416-982-8063" ^+ }; j6 u/ Z' w! ?. O) |
Pascal Gauthier, Economist! K3 B: g' ]! u( W* ]1 T6 A
416-944-5730! w/ W& E' p! P
1 b+ t3 e9 a, a/ Thttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|