埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1983|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly# W2 F' Z' F. A& X3 V/ u& h
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove" _  {8 E+ c' y6 @
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
8 R8 x; v* k; E4 ~5 a3 e0 H' Vprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
% p- |2 b0 b! c1 yfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
7 t9 u$ N4 Q" l0 g9 v; Loverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
* i3 ]+ i0 U) M* U3 Gthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
$ ^) F7 o1 _0 ~5 J. `2 F1 @12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past6 t: }  L2 U: z
three years.
3 k" n( B2 p" t% i  v) b1 B9 S+ i9 NBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from! o4 X( K3 Z& n
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of/ x8 t' c8 b$ J" d1 m
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
3 e+ d. I! ^1 t/ @both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
  X. O7 |. t1 h% a9 r8 {to fundamentally justified levels.% g+ O2 g4 B$ ]- S, g$ U. m: p
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”! g( ^3 B# ?. Q; m# a+ _! F
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
3 Y8 `5 S: j7 S/ w3 U7 r5 G! ~that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”& \' O5 o6 W. I& F5 X& y1 k) i  h
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although, F% m* V4 N3 Q" ^/ h# o" B% v
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s  \1 B( Q7 C$ P# z3 o1 U
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
9 K: M5 {  J$ g9 s6 C* _6 u" `& p3 ohomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch6 F: s7 \7 Y7 j- I4 o) ~
that is now being rapidly reined in.
' b' j6 t5 [5 a# J* b1 B/ NWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,+ d. @5 [. Q  [% L; U
the construction of too many new homes over the boom% Z' Y4 |: C, [& u$ N
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
/ Z" [6 q& q) Z; u6 |  h! R5 fon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers! w/ I/ N, B9 b" g; R& J( ^9 M
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will2 p2 L' Q! N4 \. d; ?
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
5 F+ J2 O* M* L( @' i6 T# e1 P" kdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction' t( L3 \' N4 i
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
* y. A7 o/ O5 Y- ], _. }' ]to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
4 `& t1 G+ z" E( ]' b: q+ j7 Gresidential construction will fall further to around6 C4 |. ~$ [1 M4 D
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units+ l7 }$ \, ]# f$ `3 x, [/ O3 j1 |
in the fourth quarter.
% ~9 C. D/ w; m) \" BTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,, Q. X. E9 m4 W6 @
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run: o2 s7 {) [2 F( Q3 h  f" \5 n
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each; Z6 F. F8 C1 _" G# u  b# [
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
+ a$ n" \7 w1 h2 E* k9 y8 h9 I- Yvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
: G: X8 D$ \2 `long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
0 _/ R& f: m+ K. Zregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
* Q. A4 v# q4 p; J$ lof residential construction.
+ D6 X6 k/ w' o+ {2 Q! |To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a/ U2 E6 {, J; Q: G% D
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction# e- R+ E% \. R2 n2 O' M( N
would have occurred if housing had been priced
& Z' l( I/ U' X$ a* t. T0 d4 s' \optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this& h6 n4 `' }1 |/ R
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new1 w, e+ s1 f8 X6 Z' E" q7 Q1 [5 |/ b
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too  D3 }! y" e7 W. F
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
9 x; K( z# v- @& C. D( B6 _8 aRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,+ y! J+ j8 T; |
where housing demand will further contract under waning
8 {! [( P: s) gpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are: Z% h# O, M' L( U4 m% t
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the! s5 |% L/ g% h2 U8 h3 g1 S
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
/ r5 n7 g# k: O3 x( ?2 Xbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces% R0 Y2 ^% [5 R3 s
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
* N- n) V$ z/ d0 w8 X. Rweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.7 n2 y4 b* Y( C* R( M- L6 t
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the' J7 M4 s' |  I( h: ?$ W
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
$ T* r1 ?/ Y+ A" Q# IMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
' d5 @3 [) x: |$ X7 S- Jgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership8 M4 W  w. t* g( r# K9 s
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a5 s( b) W; r6 a2 C
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
& {# X0 [# m: d5 Ilimited – with the important exception of the Toronto# \- h6 P/ G( h; F1 ^
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
* @# j) y6 ]$ Qhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
6 h$ Q& a" r, V- a2 c% `9 U& wconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will/ i/ B1 H7 d* I( b: ~( O
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as$ z' s  w& A4 `
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could. y1 t; z: H, H" ~2 E
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while1 v1 b4 L: _& m- k( ]
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
! t. y* z. x$ L4 F2 ranticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from( M4 R% M' d" ?# S: |7 T- O
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
* N6 M6 F. E/ k; Qyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,+ t- p7 B' b7 w
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
% l6 t* \9 t. P* m: o& k5 g; h1 vOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
! K- G& H4 P/ X' |/ g7 D3 ^MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
& n6 V$ K9 t. n) SGrant Bishop, Economist" R. M" U* T: F6 P0 ^/ ^/ o
416-982-8063, D5 w4 _( ]# l/ o& U' E- ]8 g
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
0 A$ r1 S1 B& f+ T. A) ^416-944-5730
3 g" m$ A, p. @. S* B, V4 M
8 _- |- {0 R1 h' `) ?! @2 x9 S/ Phttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
大型搬家
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-2 15:21 , Processed in 0.274919 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表