 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly& ]$ P: ]' p0 y! H8 J j9 [
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove; p1 B9 I9 A! z5 D
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house( |" u% E) C6 @% r9 y) x+ z
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by8 O( O$ `- _( m) K# v( X; V: C
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
% c. p8 l) f; m/ O5 {6 ]overpricing compelled a level of residential construction9 S/ D2 `) F3 U9 U p; s
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately. j( m$ @* `8 R6 P$ `
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
: d& P% R/ C, J; Q" U/ Lthree years.) ~. a7 J4 ~) s7 u3 _1 r
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
I) J6 F$ H& q- N6 C3 o9 ctheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of# ?# \( C0 n8 L. k& M7 i
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
" Z( b! X# p2 ^) tboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices5 L# B! e; N! V' e: t" a+ J
to fundamentally justified levels.! r( j8 S9 q, N( E
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
% W7 {9 g2 [9 W w0 o( `where homebuyers buy up too many houses and1 E T. S0 }- `7 x8 }. z! ]
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
1 ^; E6 F# p+ }8 r5 v [where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although8 R/ |! A E) U6 M% q% o
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
$ @, O3 _0 |' q+ `" M“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
: | X* d5 F( s0 Z {- `) ` K+ {; |homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
- a5 r' O" k' z. rthat is now being rapidly reined in.
/ i2 K/ V* u1 Z" V& C% E. ]While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,- a, D3 ]! d$ q( H7 s5 P
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
6 I- R0 h6 c J3 ?4 tmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
- P' B, v6 R9 v$ c7 z' ~9 kon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers8 N0 k2 c# K4 o3 ^8 j
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will* Q0 C, w) c5 e! |. e; g
remain choppy and new residential construction will be+ R/ O: p" \7 `! }
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction" @- e3 P3 n5 J' L' g
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this( j# l# P0 l v5 l6 F# q
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide: F; ^- r, g7 Y' Y- c
residential construction will fall further to around1 j& S, N1 B5 J u$ i
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
. n: j5 c u, N! P, Min the fourth quarter.( ]+ b- I9 j9 Q k
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,. p$ H, x' u7 i3 @3 W
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run+ R$ @- }, g! Q' W' L! B
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each; S2 o2 V/ j- E+ ]( v3 [
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
+ L4 S* X: f4 G0 r: U( G; dvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
% x5 V$ m* F4 A( b2 v: Mlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
, V7 J! l6 T" |7 z3 n7 Zregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
0 |7 q# F/ c. Zof residential construction.- z& A1 c2 t) o/ y
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
; N4 R+ m' b4 z9 e' @# D“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
) Q; J, C( J: l$ a1 P }2 Cwould have occurred if housing had been priced
5 `; d$ c- [% Ioptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
! s- o( g- {- y% `/ f/ Pfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new& b+ W$ E" o2 w, j( U; o$ \
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too0 Y G' n9 f9 ~1 O& I; H4 T2 l
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
3 O8 H3 X9 J0 GRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
7 l8 U5 S7 d) q9 Z8 L& W: Hwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
6 S% k8 ~ K5 b$ }- Dpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are2 e$ @6 f+ j9 X' o
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the: r+ e, d% y& ], ]
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
' K+ g. h) n+ g1 A, ]buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
8 p% k n* _7 O9 ahas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
1 z/ _4 w* _- eweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
4 c' D9 T& @) W u6 s( A! IQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the3 F; N+ [2 k: G; ~+ n
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de: j; |0 h5 h! v6 j! N5 q4 d
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,' `* F/ Y2 m$ U @
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
& Z! M. s+ V2 N" I" Trates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a- S5 \4 y: J' y; k9 [7 t% ]3 k
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
3 W: ?3 [- j9 e6 k6 b8 ulimited – with the important exception of the Toronto8 V. @% E4 r( h( G' D# K
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically. y9 i" K1 v' o0 k* _* U( u
high levels of apartment-style units presently under( N [$ E+ Y. t% U F
construction mean that record numbers of condos will8 ^/ k! J4 j3 k% r. K' C
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as9 x8 n" M$ D! a# Q8 g
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could6 k; T4 Z8 k! ^: o U2 O
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
; m- @1 y" h4 A* R1 x9 yresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we: l e# A' I: M0 c
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
- }0 E6 Z, H/ vinter-provincial and international migration over the coming$ J, A- F: C- \% ~$ k C
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
8 d0 t% m) J f- e3 [+ G$ mwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.0 x7 ^7 T* R2 U3 u' f6 P2 s; m
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
. {1 O& l: `# R, G. QMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
, ~! v: x7 G5 P+ hGrant Bishop, Economist# H" x$ ~% C9 d- } _) D1 [
416-982-8063
% E% b y: J- i: L' ~Pascal Gauthier, Economist9 B4 ^% V6 g" t1 u! l E+ e
416-944-5730
- W# t+ T5 ~# T" F& u9 X
: a! D% I F" {0 r+ l$ o6 t( |/ @5 }http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|