 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly) d* V; [3 E9 G. C/ ^- w3 E, o. y) `
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove3 v L3 ^- w( c6 E |4 ~8 }
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
4 Q0 c8 c4 u0 W: T& g1 d- O) cprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
, G+ a( ]- M; K8 ?; S! Qfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
) t' P$ m, @, o. Loverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
, W# Q& H4 @5 R& L+ i5 lthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
+ e$ @1 o$ G* h12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past& B! o- J5 K8 d0 {
three years.1 o' b$ M4 ~$ f1 |- B9 Y
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from) C0 J M7 r9 d, v) I3 Z
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
' o6 X( t3 g% a- baffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
+ j8 ?% F9 e% r+ K' Eboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices9 H- q, E3 x. b; G9 ] s
to fundamentally justified levels.* f" ?% h& o- s* e5 D, i. f; F2 o5 I
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”2 _1 G* ?+ f1 m2 S" k
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
9 R9 A) ?5 ^& r( N1 z/ zthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
, X! p3 n. B5 U" ~. Twhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
/ H- n6 l" Y! p5 [& Kthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
2 f K3 l0 {6 U1 L“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
( Z- ] c' ]: Ahomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch. o" f3 }* ^0 V! w2 s( Y- B3 @
that is now being rapidly reined in." k5 M' a7 U' r- D
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
( |4 z7 ^4 N, P0 J9 a5 |" Tthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
( X5 O+ g* x) ~6 Y5 @means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh6 z7 r* z* k$ K/ M
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers1 Z! r9 S* b+ b3 p
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
" } R7 E$ M6 `4 c, W5 |remain choppy and new residential construction will be8 J, H$ D4 g9 M9 F6 I5 |
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction; \7 T( i, t8 p& C8 `
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this7 ~0 X! H& Q0 {6 S# y# C# v6 {' @
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
5 T7 u6 \* E% h+ f i) W+ B8 q: s, nresidential construction will fall further to around. ]2 j7 h1 a$ |, B3 D( Z
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units/ T* Y* b1 O* ]( ~$ u- ~
in the fourth quarter.
: x# A7 G0 p% _& G' b3 P& o& yTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,. b- T, i q4 {1 X5 K; k7 f: H0 o0 O
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
$ [, N. T2 e8 `3 q# ifundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
9 i ]! ^4 f' Z+ G! Sprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
: v) b- z5 P7 [+ P7 k4 t) U+ rvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
- D) y+ k2 _) I) g3 glong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
2 X+ f0 Q' T* x- zregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers8 _/ [% `1 Q3 p
of residential construction.% x i- @$ i3 [# s4 _- u- Z
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a" ]8 Y u9 T4 r$ o, g8 O
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction8 w4 f2 j/ s2 C1 d5 {7 J. l, U5 C
would have occurred if housing had been priced5 i2 Q b7 k: p
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
( i( q2 s- S+ a/ K# Dfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new) f& ?. h0 h' q) P9 n% B# L
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too, L ]8 I8 r% l0 p, I& g$ U
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.9 B2 T1 u2 b% P4 @9 Q [
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
# k! R! V2 b3 q- K9 Fwhere housing demand will further contract under waning4 A6 U/ w( _! B+ O/ H2 G) p; S* \+ K
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are. p" z, T8 f# e: _' N; h7 h
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the, L' P5 b3 q* p+ K9 W$ i
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
( I+ d! b& o0 r, ~. Ybuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
) f9 v( }6 b/ w: h% n" S/ _3 Z; }has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
/ t7 o# l+ N* o8 V0 dweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.$ Q% B$ M7 W: L1 T
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the9 `4 |$ @; p F" b
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de8 e2 S% h; G! J( W; m3 M
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,5 X* K) P5 ]" m; U
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership5 Q0 q: G# Z. [3 N: x W; `
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a2 v2 A' d( M- _, S
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
- Z; R& B; ~" climited – with the important exception of the Toronto, G! K0 Q, x8 c1 H) _$ I$ F
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically) S; M5 k4 g+ x; L& R1 F/ I
high levels of apartment-style units presently under! K$ ^* r0 W% g% y8 R e
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
# f- a9 J8 C! E/ y T; |8 M, \5 ^3 [reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as( w% _7 |+ P7 e- @0 Q
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could$ L+ m" b! V. R- t& t4 T
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while5 A6 b7 m& C& |5 T* c: v
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we6 ^4 O; G0 m. ]* I- E$ @8 q
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
: [6 R$ t1 L# y) t# Pinter-provincial and international migration over the coming. S# s& Y5 w& d( d' d$ W
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
: u# {1 ]8 X3 h1 b% f4 ewill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.7 Z: \! ?8 g1 H9 n* V+ t; n
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
, m- w* x# }9 n1 }1 R1 jMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS, p+ l& w$ c% Z1 l
Grant Bishop, Economist
) m$ ]" c8 J3 O# A! o' K4 w, j0 M. {416-982-8063
) b' m l5 \# ^$ q$ ?& nPascal Gauthier, Economist
2 o C% K" o, ~0 D! Q+ ~4 w; `416-944-5730" U' ]% c$ _/ v- K% m
; J' z9 K% }* s! ^
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|