 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
6 q3 H' d, O# ^6 o& B% Hfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove: E0 E/ N$ c2 r: s; M
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
% F6 \6 o3 V4 ?4 O$ @% Hprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by0 o/ Q l2 f- j( {, O) ]# R
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
: g4 ]& W6 f [! C: ?1 ioverpricing compelled a level of residential construction, a3 Y' X! W5 f# o& O
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
7 ?. e) t$ `- T( u8 b/ S0 d* h# n12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past9 }3 r2 r& K m; r" V4 Z
three years.* \' l6 }& V( F0 a3 _. K
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from8 k4 s& Y+ ^2 [/ {9 a2 M
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
- r- c& h# ? k0 C I( C1 L( H( N/ Gaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
! l/ O3 y2 P5 X b: W$ vboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices0 ^- \' u8 U1 l. C) D
to fundamentally justified levels.& j# ^# k3 p8 X- K1 ^+ @1 J
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”, k% W7 M V8 ]# _5 W3 ?
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and" y6 V ^+ m/ B. q
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”3 I5 |" w y/ j/ h8 [! ~
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although% T3 T: [( ~( z
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
! k9 g# |4 C& r. W# l- P! l“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
: m% n+ ?9 L# T, C( `2 B5 ~% Nhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch9 a( U2 |& U' z) t
that is now being rapidly reined in.
/ e3 I2 f5 s6 f2 [: _6 j$ [1 eWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,2 D9 \ V, l; s+ h8 q$ Z6 @
the construction of too many new homes over the boom" L* ^, C! |( d9 v l0 u# q
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh! l9 G! r. _) u' ]1 F
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
1 ?+ h& t/ L1 Dfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will& x/ }4 m! o3 y4 t) e1 F$ _. q( H
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
, r, O/ z" o1 L2 \dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction4 |. Q5 }7 O& f! ~' q# }3 M% O
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
: Q' j1 w4 z8 @' eto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
0 s# ~- u2 w( T5 |) S: Bresidential construction will fall further to around: c% {/ x; [: h" z0 n
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
, b7 o$ q/ d: s& Y4 U/ |. Vin the fourth quarter.% \% e1 B$ F" m; U5 m
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,2 c$ \* q' Y' ?( `( N/ ~+ B
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
6 W7 R" t+ S- j7 y4 dfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each% a3 L: ?, w1 ^* B s" {
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home( x! _8 D* V: f; e9 c2 S
values since house prices should track incomes over the% J$ c3 u8 v" M- b$ u G
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
7 v) w# w, S" Q: G0 q0 ?regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
7 ]8 h- P+ c& O2 w, h$ e F1 iof residential construction.3 H) J# j& _" Y- Q+ E7 w6 ~
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
2 q* x2 l" Y7 F0 N“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
/ [7 m: e7 a5 T. u) l: l0 Twould have occurred if housing had been priced
3 n* y! t" Q5 c% v) ioptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
; l/ {1 R8 n3 k2 S: k& Bfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new2 z4 Q+ p6 m7 f2 L' i( u& U
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
, z; K( F! B# nmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.: z" i3 Y9 E, g3 e C* j' Y4 g
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
6 X# J6 v( k5 f/ A0 d5 ]+ A( `; Swhere housing demand will further contract under waning
- a' H5 a- ?3 |7 r) ~5 Spopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
& `6 z$ H$ l _1 h8 T% C' Ralready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
6 X; p. w2 ?/ D6 R. Svery time that the resale market has swung into strong- w* Q( G R8 ` f* \
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
* r O8 A6 x Y$ ]: b% r t- G T% Zhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural# c/ B: G: T! C4 z- E: m# Y3 r
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
0 Z7 g( r- ~ b: dQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the6 B, ?* f' l9 O$ E* B- f
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
8 D9 |2 W8 E( C' r% \' w L; r2 VMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
( s# c+ e/ K* Kgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership7 g9 F9 p) z: H
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a1 n. C" Y6 c0 ^; ?& V7 S( ~
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
$ V' u# f/ h) w% e/ Nlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
! W& ^: b5 R( X6 @3 K; `condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically; Y, v5 X. |1 q$ \) a& _) Y. |# B
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
g$ I; B" u4 |2 Y7 B: a& Nconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will5 {% {5 t. } g1 ?; O& Z
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as+ |6 O7 Y3 ^+ M' Z. Z6 l
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could' Q* a, d6 T" Z1 Y2 v5 t
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
8 d. q: c( U6 F; X% O/ P4 wresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we3 ~3 \7 _& Y) u* O
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from# U6 j0 N- g) e: a, k( Y
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
. H. {. V- K, I2 B* qyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,+ f) G0 }( O# H H3 ]3 O
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
% }& }* n9 ]* d+ d7 H# XOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING* i/ T; b2 {2 {1 @, W
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS' @0 g! [) U0 N0 W8 i
Grant Bishop, Economist3 w; K" N/ l8 u4 C0 `5 w! N, @
416-982-8063! x: S# |% c2 G9 P
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
0 j& f& {& g2 H _: D% A416-944-5730
; B3 p: J- G7 g, x+ M) S# Q4 x5 V3 ]% D0 D; c0 I
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|