 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
+ Z, O% S/ r: n+ mfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove4 d) i1 H4 R1 w- d
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
% Y7 J6 B8 l; g/ r, }prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
0 |: P& u3 n) b- d2 t0 Dfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
6 P8 W6 W, l' J5 o5 s, aoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction5 K" T- \0 R) }, V' X( L( p- W8 y
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately9 s3 K3 w( ^/ n( @/ b+ v, l
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
- Z0 E8 U. g% S L5 c% E/ Rthree years.2 Q( c( g1 H% A; L; b
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
6 A% Y" H1 e: ~6 q/ \! z. B& ntheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of% t4 A$ s( a( }- k* W% s1 P# o
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects1 l/ z2 T! I5 v3 h, [" ?* o9 W( r
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
# t- q7 K; f7 B& l; hto fundamentally justified levels.' S5 @/ e$ q2 R5 H9 K
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”) p/ Y. j" ?0 B- D
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and1 z3 `! O) g: n2 t9 Z
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
+ a2 d$ }) `) qwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although% K$ p' ~# }( U1 _6 |
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
4 v( }& z {1 D; \! j. {1 `“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
4 D) a% I# h4 `+ c' U4 d4 xhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch- z" N' w" D- }# n3 J2 K- P' r. F+ M
that is now being rapidly reined in.2 W! A# j5 q6 h/ C
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
* p- u0 K9 X( H, f$ f: Mthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
9 f" K) O# k. i: v; R1 J, c5 xmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
& {9 T1 ?8 d7 ?% Xon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
5 q& K# ~6 R( nfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will3 \7 s. R4 d$ x6 j+ i Q T/ {, E2 E
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
" w9 _ K6 r5 D- Qdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
, g! _ s0 _5 S4 f, f1 dis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this# R4 Y4 _ H2 } H
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide: F& \* f, x1 C. G: L$ {9 h0 m
residential construction will fall further to around- B: z( O- q7 W; c( i
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units$ O" u% w0 w/ o6 e& e8 b% x4 ]
in the fourth quarter.$ ?. y' M: B1 |9 L+ ^6 `* B
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,: X6 F: Y, k6 ~9 q/ r
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run/ m- y: H, Q1 ? |
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
& U0 ?/ E l m, Oprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home4 G- q- D$ c3 {6 j1 `, v4 j; ]
values since house prices should track incomes over the4 X: x8 E6 } z- Y8 o: a
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
3 ~ Z3 f; m% O' X* _! c7 A7 d9 c1 oregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
' ^9 y, z8 _- M: s# Y4 G; _. v" Xof residential construction.
& U0 u8 D4 s* ?% n9 S) q" NTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
. R- {$ g9 ?8 ]+ L“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
3 }! D' b6 A Z# L G6 W$ Xwould have occurred if housing had been priced
# S1 L& i O5 y1 K6 s* ?optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
, `' x1 a4 W- f" R' ^/ i$ W" V. Yfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
" E- p6 c" V* o2 {1 M' g* Runits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
9 }, H$ ?' R! |% J8 Xmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals., g2 ?( j. I6 q2 s% z A# \
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
: F; E2 c/ x( U; y4 pwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
) ^5 |+ r( x$ n( Fpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
. r% z: ~1 ~. R$ \8 t8 u* galready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the5 y" o5 Y: i. @5 r2 Z: h9 @: \
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
! o5 Z- ]6 ~3 {; t% ?* v$ @buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
L3 d6 p, t& B' Q/ v# b: z9 E0 vhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
' b4 q. R4 ?2 n7 _" V* q8 Tweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
" t+ h6 t$ P& K5 p7 i. y8 ]Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the" J; [2 n2 L8 I! Y b
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
; z1 ]# ~; Q& QMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,( ]+ \8 k& i9 J- o
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership4 s5 V) ?( Z1 r4 |9 C2 q
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a+ q2 K) Q8 F- @5 x
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears4 ]6 }- {2 r% f& u& v
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
0 m- Z, z, R4 M+ N4 C* `" Econdo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
% N$ L6 u) F& [high levels of apartment-style units presently under' m3 Z/ G9 w# K6 p$ N) g
construction mean that record numbers of condos will+ A+ R. }7 | f& I& C& s) ?
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as7 b9 T+ ^5 _! j; m/ W5 R$ G
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
) e+ P, v; _' N3 e/ ~* rspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while4 p( y6 }5 S8 w
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we! C3 Y( p0 S7 x$ I* k1 h
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
8 S6 l; n; L' {9 } Minter-provincial and international migration over the coming
9 Y/ u4 |5 a6 f' \9 `7 {' h% Q7 Pyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,; m/ C2 _0 J% k+ ]
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.8 ?- g( u% {+ e" P- {
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
' R! e5 G4 _0 B' @MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
' ]' _% T0 k- Q: m7 z, A9 [Grant Bishop, Economist- {0 q& r; R* _; @* U5 v
416-982-8063
6 q) d3 m3 ^% _5 CPascal Gauthier, Economist
; [6 X4 [5 ?* k# a) }: _" p1 A4 K7 X416-944-5730+ q' c5 [* n5 b& E$ E
8 P0 R. J. i( B% r/ hhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|