 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly8 p5 r: ~/ G1 H2 _" P5 }
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove, }5 z, w& x4 }' o3 {, f4 e
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house" C( M. g2 B. f8 z- I6 ]
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by7 _ v' n( Q9 Q- s; `
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This, }1 H' L2 d3 a K6 @ G& k
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction4 J+ z3 \) H: j* m% Z8 Y
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
: q) v, X% b P) p' Q12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past) f) G/ x; e1 {
three years.* H" n; p( ~% k- f% ]
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from1 b7 R9 r6 f9 Y- \1 I8 [
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
- d, b: [5 y; Y! L) |+ Raffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects5 r0 p2 G4 ?; H8 T
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
+ }, f( Q! J1 ]6 [to fundamentally justified levels.
) S2 {: [$ ^! W0 Z: qWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”5 G: b- X8 P3 {" a1 L( a* Y
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
* k4 M; ]2 x+ j$ [" g3 q- {1 R3 hthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”7 L0 o$ U/ K( q, p* G* n2 S5 @5 B
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although: x& A1 Q; g9 [% u5 o2 p4 _
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s) X8 W6 }4 Z# m) N' {
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where1 J3 Z" @1 @: ` ]
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch; f7 i( k N) W% B8 T$ {
that is now being rapidly reined in.% h/ N; x- E% A. h' m
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
& h" o. N# p1 c% athe construction of too many new homes over the boom
5 l0 B1 V j0 r; imeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
6 e6 P0 L C( l1 Z1 t' Ton markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
! O1 G+ W2 M7 wfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will% P* y" k. |7 @. O- i+ K
remain choppy and new residential construction will be& @; a1 r* M3 W. J% A5 j, R# Z6 Z
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction) W' ~$ S1 T7 t* s! C
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
' D {9 e5 L* d1 y* l' Vto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide8 B( j7 w$ ]( A$ k) s
residential construction will fall further to around
( o( D; F2 G2 c# H0 ^4 W125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
5 W) J$ u6 M b! m, sin the fourth quarter.5 F0 q2 |6 u8 F& U$ v
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,, W0 k% [9 \7 x& a& A0 ?+ X! y: I
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run" C/ a) |2 E A
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each% m, s% ^% V& m. O6 U
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home! D: s0 E; r8 w( z4 i8 Q# [
values since house prices should track incomes over the
' F' m$ o! F2 f+ Y1 [5 Olong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we) y; H! o9 H- `* P7 c% t4 _
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers0 q% J9 b: k& `& l4 K
of residential construction.
: K- p: K) ~/ CTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a. I3 d0 g% [; X" L3 y- b& U7 h
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
& U& V0 M' \6 q3 M8 w9 }8 {8 h3 jwould have occurred if housing had been priced& y p/ g) v* U0 s9 O `, ]* |
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this$ ]& o( i' \' z/ G
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new1 _3 _6 j1 c2 g# I( U' N0 D5 D
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
- x, }# i& L, {. v4 a* e, }6 p% |many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
- G. G B# z6 I- l% ^$ FRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
: c: y8 q3 k& u8 Gwhere housing demand will further contract under waning: Y/ t/ _ w2 C; t" _" P
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
- M* j% H% H6 i% _& P& O2 [already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
5 p+ k. q; a7 C7 D& }very time that the resale market has swung into strong1 G& H0 z# Y# w) |+ J
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces! ^' U$ t! m; U
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
7 t% \ ~2 C' Vweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
, J- T7 N" J5 M, @* s Q% k6 `Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
5 d: {& H# {( t" N3 M8 C8 m, P* zstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
0 K) }5 k# E& H( HMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,/ q, e; M1 V$ H6 _
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership5 |7 L& i% q; P5 r/ {& j
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a' G& V! [7 k% q: C
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears) M% B3 ^' y1 H+ I0 d& n1 ?
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto6 v* t0 M7 I0 d1 C
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
; Y$ a: d) J, z9 Uhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
5 j9 B0 f1 b$ C) K% {construction mean that record numbers of condos will2 b: }' K* ]# M. ?: K; Q
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as$ v& N8 M. \) N2 m. A
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
" k! I$ j" i2 K8 [) I% Tspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
1 k# z8 b% E3 fresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we: J; D2 O8 ~$ F2 B$ J' K
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
1 n1 u& I" q+ C6 z2 ginter-provincial and international migration over the coming
9 `( f% u" d @1 l2 x9 Cyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
1 d8 s( n& X% C& V1 I }will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.) E* H K2 G0 F$ O4 u) h# P# G9 j
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
J* c& k T& I$ N7 K/ d, IMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
% _4 S L: r3 W6 HGrant Bishop, Economist
6 [& w" M. I& F/ A% M: \. j) h416-982-8063& L2 I8 E. ?$ Q! l/ Z- q
Pascal Gauthier, Economist) ^7 Q& Z f; {1 J! ~6 ?
416-944-57306 N( e$ S5 @" I0 I3 n
6 Z: `9 X/ C9 y$ ^http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|