 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly$ E3 Z k/ A. ?! d4 J
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
7 a) X, O/ q0 }" S/ S1 E- \+ n0 runsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
8 {: l& p' m" w2 y; J5 \" W% w* R; Zprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by, R8 v( t* Q5 P9 a9 I, n( Y
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
% ?* ?! u! i; p, h. k% I5 eoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
5 ?' w. c. ` K6 Q6 Gthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately$ f$ {; g( ?! v& v1 v0 `: ?7 q: N
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past. [& [0 ~4 V$ x
three years.9 E8 _1 N' {" W
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from9 G& _$ c q" p# a4 H+ ~/ C+ o
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of. I0 C% U- w% n( ?" E6 X7 g/ G& H( t$ `
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
5 v5 v6 n% k! ]1 B5 ~7 y" G( pboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices6 P* ]. k1 u( T# P; g* `" z
to fundamentally justified levels.5 i' w1 s! a- t" a: p2 U- }8 c
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven” M9 t+ [+ Y( y6 K4 H4 B
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
- L6 k. H. S1 a- }. Tthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
& E5 f/ y0 S" _# v! qwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
+ y9 E# ^' V) Z9 T1 Tthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s$ D* J4 o' B9 P5 d+ y' l' g0 A
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
7 o$ w3 M0 V7 C* N7 w thomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
" N' {" z" J& _2 Dthat is now being rapidly reined in.3 t* c% q) r1 z# B4 `" S( b7 {
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,: w" H- n8 i( Q
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
! ?: o) T4 S$ N( M3 F$ r* S/ m, lmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
' s G. Y2 z) a5 B# |- t; son markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
/ g5 R9 f; e! `( [+ u9 b ufrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
9 y1 ~+ i" H, r# J$ |remain choppy and new residential construction will be6 q! x6 q$ U% {4 G3 C
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction; y! k6 _, S0 [+ I* J2 o% [
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
% [0 D3 |# |" ]+ y5 i6 bto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ ]' U* v$ }* `3 S; k
residential construction will fall further to around
( G; e* Z( E* ^125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
! ^) F# U# i6 k/ u$ Z* D2 @' j' W6 Ain the fourth quarter.
; W+ M9 E* ^* R! u& gTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,2 ~# i& {9 ]% B& i
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
- }* M0 h+ s2 d4 ^' r) }1 b7 [fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each7 L8 ?/ s9 g) K$ _; p* h
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
1 G4 W% ~- K" Rvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
4 N& e# i8 I1 b, R7 Wlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
Q8 ]8 ?, p3 B, k: S2 pregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers+ k& V& V+ A% y+ y% _; D! |1 K
of residential construction.
8 l, b' t8 ]$ u: s3 a- ^% ATo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a5 N; d/ ^, a5 I7 r5 B, y
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
# U; H- z! L; v2 Y. Z2 Wwould have occurred if housing had been priced
0 k$ P% t( O* @* } c4 n7 Z. a$ toptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this/ A0 ~7 _$ H" X, e
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new' P6 n: r% T& V* N/ ]' Y
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too, k' @% X( L) |/ S/ |1 x
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
D: ~/ a7 u4 T9 z. a8 J; t$ A7 W- VRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,% _6 w; ~* \: m0 c! Q7 {
where housing demand will further contract under waning+ p3 \& X, j! E
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
+ n) r# R$ b1 \3 ]9 ]9 T* Jalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the7 W- o% G6 c: _3 K; \7 n3 M
very time that the resale market has swung into strong! W6 e2 M/ z+ y9 C) g; f8 q5 s+ b
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces1 t& @* I) N' w- v* X
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural# K% A$ z6 z, d: h+ ]/ [0 `
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
1 @) s' `! z3 h: k( I# ZQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the, X L( G& r+ \; { o( i
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
J' l( z, J6 \+ l' nMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
& T+ ^2 v _7 d! \5 Z# qgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership5 S# s7 b5 l, Q
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a+ a* j! |; N0 P8 o
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears2 |4 `7 _0 R% q, Q
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto& L ~ N k8 U8 {
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
5 S% u+ s) F2 h4 q; ghigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
. V4 w# d4 X% Q; U2 G& c/ N8 `construction mean that record numbers of condos will: v+ O8 ~, a# b7 E; L9 A
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
: e& Y N6 E/ H p* h# Zcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
2 p/ |# Y# Y) n. V$ `7 j0 Xspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while) ?0 C: g- V! {
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
9 [5 F4 S+ o3 f% p/ h y! Q% Janticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
9 [. i6 n) G, t) a9 ?inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
& l# H$ x+ g- P) Qyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,) v# W9 P5 V1 o! P7 G
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.) D7 K! o# V5 s9 g; ?2 r' w
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING4 H( [! `1 V/ I5 u; d- s m4 m
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS- O. d1 W: Z5 w8 L
Grant Bishop, Economist
- n1 Y, F) o F0 [416-982-80637 e: i5 Y! r0 c6 O y0 z. N0 n
Pascal Gauthier, Economist h" C" i' ?$ O- Q# y, v
416-944-5730
$ a+ K6 }4 P- t4 F9 c
& B* z0 Y) T/ Y6 t6 w1 Ohttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|