 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly* V5 E6 C! u$ ?$ }# L
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove. q" q! C0 ~8 z a! R
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house7 A- W/ ]+ d9 D- ^* m+ C3 w
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
' W; {# S6 N9 ~ n/ m) Vfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
4 m0 X) S, R/ t# y, v" d$ aoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
( b: Y& c& W! b4 c4 H; Q, d' E" wthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately ~3 Z8 C' i# H: q" H: w* s
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past0 l) t% Z7 e( ~1 a& u2 c# ^
three years.
4 H, e8 ?% k" D. }By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
: p/ [& Q: X, z2 ztheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
' n9 V# Q" w/ `) Taffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects( x* K, U0 i3 B8 _' s' O( W8 |, J
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices& H5 `7 c2 L8 j& C$ t' _, Q2 X% L1 Q3 P$ D
to fundamentally justified levels.5 N) V0 m0 @$ r! G# W
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
! ^$ P& G4 z! z5 y: j1 Cwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and, Q6 m4 `; M9 x. e& [3 v
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
% A) Q6 b8 M7 @1 l5 lwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although' m$ h$ a' N& w( Q4 N! t% q& n2 ~
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s* R+ E; ~! \7 E. S; {
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
) G" {0 U/ [2 V5 G) U' bhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
' K, [; t) z& s$ xthat is now being rapidly reined in.) X% }& Y+ W5 R9 {9 {
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,7 @" }' b: v, j9 Z; Q; A
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
3 z1 C. ?4 }! Omeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
) }, s. Z, f; \( a V# o8 pon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers' D, c3 Y% t9 j
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
3 B" J. q8 W5 ?9 ?8 i) Mremain choppy and new residential construction will be5 P" n t0 j/ c
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
) J) f% i$ E9 |: qis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
/ y. f1 Y9 f8 E( K* j3 hto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide$ r7 g, M5 n4 ~' N
residential construction will fall further to around; ~! @& \% q. G
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units, ~) o1 G9 s) |; U3 f
in the fourth quarter.8 d z( r4 O1 V% n% A7 P" @: b
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,& S* ^( r; b2 N, k
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run. _" W b* c, V8 {5 }) |* k
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
# d7 x6 [. |( X1 wprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home* M* s& B/ x& z& ?7 Q& [% T& \
values since house prices should track incomes over the
) h) D* s, c7 e! l8 Y0 u% U. glong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we0 `2 u( U: Z% }
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
4 e- \9 p- f3 Q8 gof residential construction.! g+ K/ k7 C" D$ w8 D) k
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a7 p" \/ s( h8 ]+ T/ P
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction! c& _* k6 `0 S* }# t/ i) e* }& D
would have occurred if housing had been priced6 b# ` v1 ~- i0 T6 P$ \0 x
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this" f( Q0 ]* N) O* d* D% b
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new) `/ u( \* H& o, s+ F
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
; l2 s8 Y: x, Rmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.3 F" ]" Z/ l& L0 Y, B: b- N
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
. d* ~8 \% c% a7 }; X5 D: N0 Awhere housing demand will further contract under waning' t& I' R$ [4 D$ U* _8 ?& ~1 ?
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
* s) l3 I1 Q. R1 Ealready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
* e0 n0 q5 e% ~6 h$ g8 Avery time that the resale market has swung into strong
& A* l/ ]1 t6 B$ p4 Q( I+ g; y( dbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces! q3 \/ c1 p" e3 B' T3 G. Q6 ]
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
4 G1 ^" Q4 N% Z/ C" @, K1 f6 iweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless., k- n1 P5 ]! c+ l8 k E
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
+ j Y( m1 ^/ `9 ?& Mstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
3 C, o9 q. a6 N0 e/ v8 p1 U. ] OMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,: ~; {8 J( } k$ W: B+ f1 E
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership, Q( p: M* X1 L' f k8 S
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a. [4 W; Z# L5 q( t5 s# }/ l' }* Y0 G
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
% W3 m1 O* L% [+ w& k; z. xlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto- J- W, m5 Z& L8 m' w
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically9 ]. u4 K( M& X# o) C* _# P, L
high levels of apartment-style units presently under. r8 d& P. X7 a
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
" d' T3 x+ M2 E2 R/ |reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
- M1 A$ S5 d: V: x: bcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could3 l2 b4 @2 v5 E$ U6 K
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
9 `3 M! G9 G+ u$ r8 sresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
/ }% N0 U! _- Ianticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from5 C9 x3 a( }* ]# C: O. N7 {
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming) B( G/ j4 {, P
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,3 [3 c9 H" r, o- G0 m& l
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
: d0 c$ s- c1 A( \% G B( d4 {OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING! I# V. H' a( ~) X9 W
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
8 k0 t* \! r, o, jGrant Bishop, Economist
6 J4 y. p: p1 X' d7 [( J416-982-8063: ?" G% L' U p* T( e
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
- x& y$ P4 @" N* T+ J1 e6 @- x# A416-944-5730
7 G) J4 Q( R4 } s P
( f7 p. I+ C4 i9 fhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|