埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1810|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
- v# r" L* _7 }& U+ xfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
; \# s5 S9 R5 ]3 r4 H4 }. q  dunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
% q5 O- Q9 v1 }8 }8 v9 q! j5 Z" j* iprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by3 ~1 r. U2 b0 O( \! i3 |4 I
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* b5 V/ \$ y: N8 k  E* Joverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
. I; Y4 Q1 X3 |: ~8 w8 i, x& @that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately7 I$ Z: r* O! l+ Z* m/ q. ~
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past1 S# Z# w3 F& p: h: K2 d5 `
three years.* e8 W. @$ Z% H, _
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
/ H( S1 L( Y2 [! g4 ?' Ftheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
4 V2 b5 R- F; D0 _5 vaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
: z; F3 B6 ~. Q- B) S" P" j- [both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices: x# K0 I6 X" s! f# e0 v: L4 G
to fundamentally justified levels.$ {) K" n  Y' T7 y  ?- ^: k
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
: z0 O/ e3 {  u4 e* Vwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
' j: _& m- t' e+ F; `that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”, B+ ]+ f6 N; p3 c" x) f
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
( |4 {/ \4 h) L. z' othere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s( `5 |+ I# g. a1 [4 o( x/ g
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
* H3 _" c; A- G  Nhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch, @/ J/ P! j& r* z
that is now being rapidly reined in.
  k/ E4 H$ T# ], F- U$ \While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
9 s& C. X% ]  D: i9 M3 f$ N5 athe construction of too many new homes over the boom# h8 T8 d7 U+ e$ i$ R7 \. Q, O
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
5 {0 B3 p8 H" l3 L% g3 Kon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
/ F0 ]2 |1 ?! Kfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will* T2 V9 M" \) N: B4 D2 o
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
1 x# f% F6 R- P- J; x8 Y, ^dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction5 i# @/ J- {+ [. Y. ~
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
& ?) D6 m8 a& U( r4 ]8 f% M6 [; M+ Eto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
1 M; Z" T: k0 o0 _residential construction will fall further to around
- p4 i* z+ m" I125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
" B, k$ `3 S  D/ h4 X$ Fin the fourth quarter.+ ^4 e4 F4 f+ N
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,4 s* b# F: Q9 L5 T; ], _5 L+ I5 R; X
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run! K+ S' t( X- ]4 R6 b' Z
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each/ Z1 W1 `* }1 T  f- a7 @: I
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
1 S* @# N" f! r6 m+ H" G6 ?( e' `9 [values since house prices should track incomes over the
; V( h! u: d" ^1 R2 zlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
  n5 J$ x, i) c3 Uregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
+ \' ~: ]7 R; B7 w  w; {of residential construction.
, f* Y: {9 g$ H) R: e5 {- r$ _1 NTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a8 H. U& X& }, N# }5 o1 w' {) N* F& E
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction' I- }: Y6 R- f4 Q/ r( E
would have occurred if housing had been priced
2 i: v. p4 B& Z+ M7 Moptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
: t( U+ r5 T2 sfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
0 `! J0 _$ z- {' Q8 H$ d  Qunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
$ _( f+ U5 E6 S6 h% R8 a, Hmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
+ s0 m1 s; t0 `9 sRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
  ]0 I% s+ \- M( n' k' f3 Jwhere housing demand will further contract under waning) R( l% h2 v  k/ N# N  u
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are% X) `7 }9 q3 m1 U3 `
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the' a4 q! p. v: x; o
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
. v+ C0 p8 ^0 T+ m8 Vbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces( \, Q- b4 K# a1 P. u! W# G! O
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
- G0 I$ Q4 E$ ]8 |+ e+ q7 G! Hweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
% p. R. i) E6 Q' H9 JQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the0 Q+ P; f) K$ O$ ?3 \2 u
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
  b9 x" z3 j) n9 i/ D6 q4 xMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
$ I, Q* Y* e. U) ~1 egiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
. P9 O& m& u. qrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
( T( j, E/ E8 i. _3 kcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
$ w) e& H6 E* E& X& s2 ?limited – with the important exception of the Toronto: w$ T' r" {2 p( R! O9 ^# C
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
7 Q; q- B4 l8 X8 `% _7 Ihigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
, u+ Y0 g- ~+ c1 n4 n; R9 Xconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will. s! j# a! n+ j5 `: |/ D3 l7 c$ R# C
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as) D) k7 s, h  X7 M$ U  A- e
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could! [! r4 S, l" \0 [6 t: P
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while' L  o( G$ h) L: ^
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
" i/ H2 A. E6 `0 o+ eanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
/ \* ^. q8 h% v* O8 k& @# s1 E2 kinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
1 i% N$ u% L7 n- J2 Byears, which, along with improvements in affordability,0 \1 A6 G, [* r& T" M1 i7 i
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.! y6 i) ^8 V. L& n, s+ S9 {8 i
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
4 A. t' C' Y" P  o- }# `4 c, [MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS  w- M/ i* d7 E6 A0 ~
Grant Bishop, Economist) y4 m! I; d) z! C, K
416-982-8063. V" |+ X7 c* m+ G
Pascal Gauthier, Economist2 {' h$ B+ t# ~) K/ @8 h+ C
416-944-5730+ L1 G/ b9 L7 N# b* F8 v
" B1 Y9 [5 i& Y
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-15 00:41 , Processed in 0.162219 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表