 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly) K( h$ g2 b, C0 L) k) }, e# `1 n
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove, b! N2 z; ?7 r, ?- O* q0 N
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house' I# n$ C8 H+ J) ^; a1 x% n) }
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
3 b' Z0 k, t- [fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This6 f$ D* k# E9 k8 ~( A8 Z% B
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction* p/ J2 h6 r8 ^. `4 L$ R
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
; L* T) F- k3 R9 R& f- T12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
2 |* o F5 `& ^three years.
5 o# u. Q& J. z+ rBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
' k. A+ F, P2 B$ [% htheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
. p* ~$ I' ?( g; d1 P; U9 aaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
9 a& u+ n5 ]) q4 T, N% s" t# Uboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices+ Z( \8 ?+ c5 `+ G0 ~" g2 E4 P
to fundamentally justified levels.) t* s% E, B; y6 G! `$ x
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
5 B A. l2 j b# L1 {6 awhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and( y2 }- t1 ~5 X/ P
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
9 P3 e. m$ ]" O$ ^where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although4 r0 h* u+ B6 U4 G
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
4 D/ c2 z+ Y- [: K$ E1 \" b“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where; X- K( o% G( n: v
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
8 Y2 }) s* {$ zthat is now being rapidly reined in.
& C! }3 j1 v) u( m' vWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,# H. X, H, [3 f j- T5 z# ~3 G: f& Q
the construction of too many new homes over the boom$ g) u4 U, `6 w. G: X) L9 A
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
5 t5 c, ^+ H2 [# ?1 R, m" h" Xon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
* `* ^! k) N, V+ `from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will. n: @+ `0 h9 m( K( s3 A! M7 w5 K! r3 \9 O n
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
! I7 [" R9 O) F- E- ]dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
/ \9 B' ]" _' Q5 J, x- @is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this* v' N* ]8 ?! V2 `, a& ]
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
0 q7 A f1 B5 n. t0 Q( gresidential construction will fall further to around
- G7 k2 Z# [- C0 U# |7 ~% ?125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units! O7 Z3 }$ ~# k- e/ e! C% n
in the fourth quarter." ?( T$ c5 @) d: {' X
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,- ^, T" u# P: L
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run8 V! L/ r$ ~! C8 x9 I
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
- e) ] E$ h" t2 E( }% c# xprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
0 q: @9 ` }6 q$ i* ]values since house prices should track incomes over the
# C3 U. |4 x/ V8 q' Ulong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
1 D& s& X5 m* z3 o- D- ]4 \* O4 h- jregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers2 B- D9 y: M# o7 y6 q
of residential construction.+ u2 E9 a5 s- `: a2 w
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
) l7 s$ N6 ?+ w, \“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction" F, T- B( |& F' E# \( G8 n
would have occurred if housing had been priced
% H; Y6 m# g6 T! F- j) poptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
" m& n5 p& `$ A2 G u; Mfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
y; |8 ^) N" h2 u7 `- G4 ~& nunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too* b( n1 ]* r# m& m& u' e- d$ W D
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals., m8 d# Q+ H* D) n, M; c
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,* a& J9 v, D; ~4 y1 n
where housing demand will further contract under waning G& ~4 w) M0 i) E3 b Y9 _) ~/ |% K
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
8 F& B0 c: Z4 E& b5 R7 l( Nalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
3 v$ \1 D* c- y( t& e" ^6 `7 ?$ w7 Wvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
) t$ |( ?' B" X( v2 Qbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
. y8 p0 x. F" bhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
& l2 V. D- @2 g3 {0 D. xweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.. ]# F% P% ~" n4 L* {% X' v: u
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the0 u2 }) b5 K& W2 F. u B6 F. \
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de+ K$ E! Z. P; L
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
% W# @0 K( r9 c/ Q, G& tgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership6 A2 G4 g6 R6 c8 o @
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
$ }4 p; K6 J, Q1 ^cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears( Y* O4 C" ]" u
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto5 Y$ Q/ B3 {( u) n2 b' F
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically1 P- n+ v6 J, ]# h3 k
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
* [5 P( j1 z3 f s$ i; m/ e; Jconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will, l& l% ^$ Z1 n1 S
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
$ L; v# q. K1 U! r2 |5 k R/ y( vcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could8 v" ^' v5 v& R7 N+ ~1 G7 Z* f- L
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while; K2 j- G- L0 D& a2 D
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we9 k/ H! A) s4 N$ y
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from3 \. Z7 d! [& X0 _* l) y; t2 A
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming B0 ]& k, z7 g1 n9 C
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,6 U: l$ Q5 H2 w6 F- \. Q! Z: a- n
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.# b. o+ @& M. D% E$ ^9 R- Y
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING* P# r/ I& X3 x2 |& ]9 n$ Z f
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS# h& s$ M. [5 _: w
Grant Bishop, Economist$ @) g/ y- Z3 B% y) |
416-982-8063' o' }1 ]; Z9 U* q, E# ?8 M# t
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
1 U+ m: p" M) f. C416-944-5730
5 j" ^2 T4 {3 W& a9 a( Q
) ?8 f& |: L: B6 Fhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|