 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly, v3 G! N2 i5 ^9 I) D& _
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove. b8 R! M1 ]9 a1 j; u3 g
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house' f$ w, J' f% \: e3 D
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by1 f9 P* i9 }4 ?2 t
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This% }" j- ]4 D; Z" o9 {$ i8 E
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
" t- z4 N" z) f2 K. _that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately. V% Q$ w) m | T7 T
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past c9 m! {% j. D$ L+ H
three years.
# T+ G @: W0 w n! V3 pBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from( K9 J& A/ ]% x( S
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
$ U! S: V9 {# N3 oaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
' Z) F% m, M) ]- K) Hboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices" V* m: U: U& d' p; z; r" |4 e
to fundamentally justified levels.0 [" K0 M7 i2 i
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”+ k f9 ]' o y
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and) g( f" f9 T. P5 r4 ^
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
1 L- r8 }) j) N" A3 Zwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
# k' x4 z) t2 D+ J0 Z. P, Q8 }0 |there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
6 ]" G4 l( l% f% I# h“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where+ J4 R$ \0 ?& ^* K# }4 E
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
) v6 W8 d4 ]" w' y$ [, ~! Mthat is now being rapidly reined in.
$ A! ^7 E n! b* WWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
7 L; Q7 K( g! B3 e! Ithe construction of too many new homes over the boom
" A1 J8 Z t) E# x7 |* t+ V: xmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
; s2 `0 R$ y r+ bon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers( V5 G: J0 E" Y/ A& l2 `
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
3 A$ \" c' S1 u; H# v3 c) r; Kremain choppy and new residential construction will be
( h# s9 i' ]3 Z/ Y( ddampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction% [1 z$ D' f h1 `* `+ ]
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this7 G) I! H M5 n- D
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide4 J& m( ~0 D& h Q/ O% g
residential construction will fall further to around( m4 S2 E* m* W, a
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units& `( ^) t7 j9 d. ?1 A$ i ]1 z
in the fourth quarter.7 t( [% H$ h3 i0 Q; T& J# x
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
- A* ]$ H5 X: U8 N( ~we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
* G' K- c) I" |! W# p9 \fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each+ P+ v, s8 b6 w# H( j
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home& v( b% s: O$ T
values since house prices should track incomes over the
! h) v1 C0 l! U% V! |9 m) N: slong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we1 I6 l4 \3 Q; |% C! O
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
1 B' C. i2 E7 l/ a1 |0 y" zof residential construction.
; I+ i3 E9 X UTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
$ m" G/ n5 X& I# I( T“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
/ C% ]) \# z1 h# N5 K8 c2 ^, Y o" Twould have occurred if housing had been priced
8 S3 l1 H. U$ T" koptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
* \1 F7 |3 B- {3 {fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new9 F3 o' Z; V; j/ w, s
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too/ O- T, F U) k- g. f7 v7 S
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.# S5 ?5 ]4 V5 b
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,- @! A# l0 r. k
where housing demand will further contract under waning
; i4 L) {4 z6 S. h* cpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are* Q5 G6 R) d5 ]+ i5 c
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
( S& \: B9 {* N0 [! R8 jvery time that the resale market has swung into strong6 O) N5 O/ W Q
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
+ Y1 w* K5 x1 l2 P- Vhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural1 N/ Y7 d9 ?( B8 H9 ]4 ? s) M
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.7 V$ A/ i5 M4 J e5 I0 R0 g
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the1 b9 K! V8 V& Y. B& p b6 C/ t# a# `
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de- Y! S, Y4 T) W- J Z; x- T
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,# G4 Q. d* X5 o# z) L
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership: w1 `6 U3 d5 O$ [* p
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
; p7 D( n+ V# Hcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears, s! M4 i' o6 H0 m
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto" v$ Z' Z' }7 r, h" Q
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
+ j) G' N- n+ G- v% }: C' Vhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under& c" @- ^. t L8 H; c9 `. E* d2 |
construction mean that record numbers of condos will: `$ V! W& z9 v6 u
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as0 U3 L2 s' J- P- o) l" E; @
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could) f' _+ Y, n8 `' o# \/ g
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
2 v( {. K# G+ L5 wresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we1 \5 b b/ ]6 s
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from, L/ s% n0 r3 c
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
1 _! I3 F# \/ X! r7 uyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
6 M! E7 H3 S5 U$ b' }; lwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
- N- q8 p0 E6 I2 MOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
, [% }% l! L, @2 k1 DMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS4 W8 L$ a2 T) R3 d. C: x1 v
Grant Bishop, Economist: D, _& @/ R6 X# x% ]
416-982-8063
% h1 r( |4 m$ y$ lPascal Gauthier, Economist
" ^2 s; h; \5 T3 a416-944-5730. ]) @+ ^* a$ y2 q1 A4 \
. e1 j6 n: u% R& k
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|