 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
: i) B, g+ D7 w* r( tfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove$ y2 A0 O9 j# c& F5 M& X& y
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house. ]7 a8 R3 T7 b; \6 o
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
: t9 J: s" g7 ~9 K: c7 q( K( G9 Ffundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
' P4 E/ O% i3 ^( ~0 w) ]9 U( qoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
1 d, E1 [, r) ?. ]5 [, U0 uthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately* f- Q0 Z6 z0 Y
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
6 C1 I% I- T( U( v& ethree years.. A% ^4 @/ x+ H: R/ U2 H0 ^
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from8 O1 x9 S* I0 m4 b2 u
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of* G' g; j' d1 Q3 T) r1 Y& e
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects( J2 e$ e: M" h0 h3 Q
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices$ o9 o: F0 G V. b) m
to fundamentally justified levels., G) c7 O4 o& N6 D3 b4 a3 v
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”3 u* [* L2 A5 q% L) K
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
7 {* Z3 R3 E( y9 Cthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
2 [& z9 X" c* v: d R, Ewhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although ~$ b- P0 A- J& w6 j
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s9 ?% P/ h8 W! u2 ]3 P6 Y7 a$ c
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where% k4 l8 U; R1 p% t) |
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch4 F7 s, O( @4 v' w2 s0 W
that is now being rapidly reined in.6 w4 c6 v# x* B* ~+ E( c5 E
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
/ ~! z& i% p3 B. qthe construction of too many new homes over the boom% u4 n+ q; q8 ]% \0 e) K
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
7 k* [0 d9 e) P1 M6 @on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers' {; o0 u* j/ U- o. ^7 x
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will6 K; E3 ]) P5 |2 E- t
remain choppy and new residential construction will be' d8 f% x$ Z$ d& A" V+ I, Q
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
2 p0 u& s8 y4 J. W( ]* Gis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
" [ h6 ]3 f6 Oto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
( D$ `+ @9 K z5 a7 m, t; Q; Oresidential construction will fall further to around8 m/ a1 r2 _! c4 ~; Q
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units9 b. o% _' [' `% @3 p+ c
in the fourth quarter.
) b# ?; t, F2 N6 z% B8 V5 bTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,3 e5 O; c" m- A- L/ h# z$ V
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run- b5 Q5 P7 q- j5 }/ g, p# X& v
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
# a5 p1 M. U/ H; P, y6 Oprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
, t: |" S1 G1 `4 O0 g& D- hvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
0 _" \- ~. r) j Clong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we- Z+ S' k$ H/ F/ b6 F: [# a$ e X
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers/ I; U$ o3 P9 i+ K1 A
of residential construction.
; ?" R3 Z$ R3 Z; o2 q1 c0 bTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
( W( M( }3 H# {- ~8 ]4 p; K“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
- w6 V s5 |5 j& Q- ]' S9 V. B( Rwould have occurred if housing had been priced: f: c0 s+ r3 [# j# U, s% a
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
: h, J1 _5 @4 y. r2 r! \5 Ffundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
% }. \8 a2 [* M6 T! junits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
( |- r% N8 m7 R8 B9 j7 `/ \; Lmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
2 p/ ~0 D! x+ p9 j+ q% uRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,, X, D: {: [" u; i
where housing demand will further contract under waning
8 F) b0 E" Y) i2 I7 A5 G% ppopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
! |, r! _* j+ kalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
+ {* D3 O) w \- `1 wvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
* \* m9 b n/ q# e# x2 o+ gbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces% B4 l9 D+ Y% e1 I1 e8 H
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
& [/ }/ h- l& t9 D4 G8 tweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.5 r- y( W2 R% u" P7 i9 D
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
0 C2 ?! `6 O( ^strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de$ R! p, A& `& A6 b6 p
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
8 X9 h1 D# O3 u& I+ O: r! ygiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership# o7 [5 [7 g, m& }' d s
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a7 N+ ^1 S" S( O5 @, q
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
! ~$ O6 \/ P# F5 b! u* S- Xlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
" b0 C" W) m5 q" j5 N! n) d4 z2 scondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
# H1 G5 Q" @1 L( Q! ?high levels of apartment-style units presently under E4 D8 f' b* K" q5 C8 ~
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
* Z! u2 }8 U1 u* q# Zreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as6 y" \ U) I* a& a0 k0 W
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could# f- a5 v8 t8 p
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while# g& `8 E+ m& I3 X: o, D$ r
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we% r& ^/ K- B: Z" j; d
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
! y5 y6 P% v( D" n0 |; Jinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
0 t! \* _+ a) y4 G; \) Syears, which, along with improvements in affordability,# u& k3 @! f# {% W1 c2 ~/ j7 e
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding." l8 e0 X6 }3 c: {! x* g7 |% _* B
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING6 n& m5 O6 e% z3 D
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS) u3 d" `) {; s8 j R: Z5 O8 R
Grant Bishop, Economist9 C, J! G4 Q7 x' ^2 ^5 C
416-982-8063
3 J: d) h. o( M8 ePascal Gauthier, Economist
+ u( e$ y$ k4 M, C3 |2 `# @416-944-5730
% v5 [# m. t% V- b- t+ W. {7 @+ E! C& E' K
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|