 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
! q+ z8 l! g7 I+ [& U0 R, r/ u; {from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove& E8 c6 U5 \' U9 T i0 Q
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
) m+ p+ m7 S( ^( Y% @3 v: Zprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by2 ?5 Z0 t; \+ E$ g+ r- H9 z
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This4 S' p4 @6 @: m! [
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
% d: o5 O* A, O7 S7 v" f$ Vthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
/ ]5 `8 D; ^2 B: W& C12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
. a% ?& [, x$ k9 Pthree years.
& V9 R; V8 `/ mBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from$ ^' | D, d, e) \- D
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of, z) y- }& c& R5 l2 n" g! \
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
; ?7 x% ^* ~+ i8 t4 mboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices, a, @9 s0 u2 M: |: p6 G
to fundamentally justified levels.
7 s. ~3 D4 D+ t: pWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”( f& Z o8 c6 Z. J3 r
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and* I" z: x0 `: |- \ I, b# x
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
* @" |% I# t. Ywhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although3 q' C) H" D7 `& _- L
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
' I, _6 N6 u. M# I, H1 u“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
3 H2 u' s' I/ d' vhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch7 D( I# ]2 Y. f6 o8 z
that is now being rapidly reined in.+ i" M$ F& |- r9 L) r( e
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,. M# L" K2 G# k$ P' |) o% Y/ |
the construction of too many new homes over the boom# x! x5 v# z# _7 s! r
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
0 q, c5 A( D0 C; W2 son markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers5 d; r9 I, l: r" r( t6 {9 v
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will' z8 {; u/ p6 Y/ m7 x" v
remain choppy and new residential construction will be: ]9 z/ m3 s4 F. t1 A" _4 _$ E
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction3 T+ S h; A: R% W' d
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this' P o3 _' }3 z% a4 ~' a, J
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ P) y: }+ Q. S# |
residential construction will fall further to around
8 u; Y, \/ q @, j6 Z1 l: _125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units% R' u7 } J* C7 o
in the fourth quarter." R9 [ }8 T) u) E- X
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,7 L( f1 B' j, B$ ~. H
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run6 `& w. b8 b9 w! Z; y& A9 ~
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
2 I# A6 o; l* {5 c. a. kprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
* j3 `3 s! T4 [values since house prices should track incomes over the- A# h& x. h/ e* `' q# a! g- x
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we9 V( C: R9 }# a6 J& u) t( U8 U0 j
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
' c7 e; l. q9 L, V; D4 e" \of residential construction.
$ l1 B5 T m" X1 I' e$ p, U$ aTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
% m [1 d- V; @. e- p“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction2 d( A9 G; m( s/ }: {( U( _
would have occurred if housing had been priced1 M% n8 ~2 O+ P5 M
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this4 V5 m: b- A% M6 a6 ^
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new0 o% X# Q8 z6 K* `: P# P0 w
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
! f5 m$ B9 A+ J( Kmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.- [% e6 m2 s3 P$ E& w+ g
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
% P% y( L, O# i; M1 Q& T3 Cwhere housing demand will further contract under waning# k# n1 E5 E/ F0 F
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are6 ] W6 B/ m1 r! i9 q
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
3 s$ ]1 G; x1 z* P7 N5 }+ nvery time that the resale market has swung into strong4 h' l6 E- _, _: F* u
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
; G* G! F+ {" @6 V5 m5 z1 uhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
N$ D5 y, S; L. t4 p/ ]" D) ~weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
- ?! o7 J- T9 J* O3 P: IQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
* H* b% y3 l5 M: w9 \/ v, Vstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de; d) Q/ E* m* G/ I \" g
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,- L# g" h, ` F" d. J/ g
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership" V. g) l7 v, C. Q$ D8 n* {
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
8 c5 ^+ a1 I5 O0 j5 Acyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
" E0 X3 F# F* ~- n9 flimited – with the important exception of the Toronto) I9 ]$ M; `* S1 h3 p, L
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
& Q+ Z' A6 b5 Z3 s+ H* Y3 yhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under! M$ I4 I! s& }2 ]0 c _, g9 k
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
1 m: m/ U2 v8 m. V0 d" c! ] vreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as, O0 b- D( N& f$ y
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
9 h' V9 v# H' q9 O6 k' Espike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
( Q B' F9 A# q1 |$ \) _* E- kresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we8 `" N" g, m; @9 X0 J
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from" v) C, M7 F6 h. ^
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
2 R% [3 L. v" Pyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,! ?) O+ X5 t. `8 x9 r3 K0 s
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
. Q6 Y' U+ \+ b. S* w6 oOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING! t2 Q2 z/ I/ m, p+ E# B |
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
) u9 l+ Y% [7 I7 DGrant Bishop, Economist
0 j9 U7 M! |9 m5 o0 Z6 z9 t416-982-8063; H# v2 \. V" a$ A% P; \8 G; u
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
+ R, s# ^1 [6 S" B+ D0 B416-944-5730
3 d: s4 u0 \( F) S& W/ h, U; C
" M/ T* O C; g, p& ^4 Mhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|