 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
" R, j' |$ S2 ^& k8 }from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove6 C2 E( A8 ?& J- o
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
0 o6 l* e9 U# y R: |* M" ?prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
' Y, H/ G8 r' H( k( P- }4 N3 `fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This/ w; F; I3 K& x; W1 X% `
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
/ B0 [+ I+ O# P1 n- i) lthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately* B; R& a0 K9 k6 F7 V
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
& l" b G. p$ P9 X$ S; w2 T' zthree years.* S8 ^6 W p: U( y
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
. N4 j) C* O* P$ H* l0 R6 rtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
7 R9 q4 c/ K, ^9 a7 ~/ U0 uaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects; e$ @( E* s' M9 O
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices/ U% E. h8 l; ?8 q! W& c
to fundamentally justified levels." S2 K8 o' {% X& J1 q O$ c
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
- h" d% m3 h% M! r0 q* Y* T' kwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
# [% I+ v) i5 Z& Y* W5 `2 R. I1 Ythat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
9 h0 {1 l* `1 x- J! Twhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although$ _1 Y. u' Y) Y# }, d; Y
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s6 V! P# `. z9 b7 R
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
/ Z5 u- [$ s8 n( O! l# ahomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch/ Y2 N- u( l& _
that is now being rapidly reined in.
% s7 B* m7 w) h+ B9 z, l9 ~While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
+ V! Z* H' t2 Y, dthe construction of too many new homes over the boom; \$ E! M+ Q5 J, A
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh1 ]+ }) ^) }- Z$ h6 S
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
2 p+ I- Q) B! O) P+ u: ]4 Jfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
7 b U& c; e. i( \remain choppy and new residential construction will be
# K/ }! E5 J& R( Ldampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction# G# A- y- W, u2 r# V
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
9 \ \& T8 s/ ?, U3 W! U$ @8 _to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide. g8 y6 y4 G& p$ V! W4 Q2 X
residential construction will fall further to around' @3 z' ?: z+ ?1 E' K; k0 |5 n
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units( I) p0 F& |8 m+ r8 I
in the fourth quarter.* h% F5 s; l# D6 }0 }# l
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,. ^% ?+ J1 s5 K: \
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run) R$ e& }5 ~( Z2 q
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each9 i5 ^4 {' T2 b
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home& {" m% l* l7 b6 c) ]
values since house prices should track incomes over the
& J9 i: U7 \" v! ^1 ^& ?5 K: w( u2 nlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we, w% `, h1 A+ S$ M8 j
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers" a4 X* U5 f! e7 f6 B- W" q8 ^$ ]: g
of residential construction.
" Q. M/ r) }) {To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a7 i" |; W8 C0 U1 Q: Y* u8 [
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction/ O$ T- E# f. d8 S( j( p
would have occurred if housing had been priced
/ Y1 Z9 a1 O& Q2 M& [5 xoptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
+ v! b M* l6 Y$ J4 ~fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
2 }* Z6 b$ h+ O8 aunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
% Y% |2 V8 x* imany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
2 B5 c9 G0 h7 lRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,% S5 p" Y) q- S% [) n" h1 Q. P
where housing demand will further contract under waning
7 W! z, U8 O8 ^, F- t \/ R$ [population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are5 o( |! T( f; T# y/ m9 `" S- K
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
) T9 H3 i) X% I% D+ X+ ]2 nvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
; P t: a5 ~& Y7 ~" y8 m9 s- b: Abuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces! R, h$ ~5 U$ d( D( L- d
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
( U! W, M {2 i+ n6 p0 j9 B/ w5 pweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
. f4 Y6 G, L' @: o, `Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
& {; r. B/ x# L2 V: w* qstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
# V- S7 _; [8 c( A4 \! G( E6 Q n+ JMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,* D$ E4 h4 k' k. `
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
: w4 P8 n) ` trates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
& L- e' D; e7 R8 [4 p! ] Fcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears' T8 P$ Y: P8 P" B2 c: c; C. N
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto; H. o% e1 \% o3 n% w, c
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically# q* T3 P+ g5 w% {
high levels of apartment-style units presently under: B" z$ }5 j' y! l& h% H
construction mean that record numbers of condos will' e+ l. ~3 W6 U3 |' k: j- y
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as2 \) }- a7 W+ ^4 e8 c9 A
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could& h+ t& t0 B& ]1 T d4 }/ `
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while, I6 `2 u! K" P4 S8 l3 P
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
! k! h {: s4 [$ ~7 q; Y5 vanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from. B: I1 ]9 K) L7 w( ~. h+ j2 Z
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
4 ~ u3 K4 I) r _! z% Pyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,/ s5 c5 O, T! `% U
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.) D+ E1 m( g9 H; {* l
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
3 A1 q) e) \- f$ ^MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
2 ?$ d, X0 A& R. l4 B- C1 pGrant Bishop, Economist! C/ B' ]2 ?& I# c& n
416-982-8063- `2 g& v. f- }- t1 l
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
% h4 |4 l W) G- N2 K7 g4 A- j416-944-5730' H9 z0 N/ E* F& X4 U
! t5 C N2 i0 ~9 F% v6 Y' p
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|