 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
( M4 H2 w6 o3 ]7 I& X9 J2 {3 ^5 Gfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove$ w2 D! @# Q5 m5 t. Z* `$ Q
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
( M$ S) I* B4 r0 mprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by8 O4 [+ H2 [# ~) U% ?
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This% {8 h9 E+ G# R1 V4 l# j8 n2 R
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
5 t3 Q7 P0 J# g8 h" c1 Xthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately2 A4 p3 }. q3 U9 X
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past& v: b. X/ Y% ~. v" O6 v
three years.
- h- S( q; F8 T! Q& \By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from" f% u) `% i( q
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of4 L" A+ s* K6 T6 h* V
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects8 ^ r! Q8 h+ j0 p5 t
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
: C8 E% Y6 }# ]& i' ?; R' q; nto fundamentally justified levels.
, r/ l8 Y2 ?8 z3 V2 kWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”: d+ F6 E1 _+ Z2 H/ d( q: z
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and! O" Y% ?7 n' b, s# t
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
, ]4 n# y: c- Cwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although$ J: i8 B: c2 j w# C& a
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s8 j$ k% R1 W. a! F1 ^
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
. O" [6 ?' x7 p* phomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch$ o }4 N0 J2 }# k; h
that is now being rapidly reined in.$ ]; q. C# h4 }% d
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,1 n) w ^7 s G$ d* v3 @! w" _( B
the construction of too many new homes over the boom# V; w. b' q g# C: X6 Z" H) _. M
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh* \" | w& E- G2 w0 ?( C' C* O
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
! G7 w/ R+ c) ufrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will/ P5 {9 o, e- x5 @+ O$ k5 V g) c: n
remain choppy and new residential construction will be- T2 C- A' Z; d5 ~
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction0 y6 h2 K0 t2 J! r0 \: n
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
1 t) i5 F/ a3 P' O' Xto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
3 e( n. l" i- d3 l* W# V. G- }8 iresidential construction will fall further to around
8 `+ C6 u! J7 M9 d125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
; E8 f3 H+ Q4 u. D- `- Qin the fourth quarter.% v9 y, Y9 z, C, U( k; p+ C- }
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,; ~9 t" |+ A, ?1 G
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
6 F2 e i/ K5 Xfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each. K9 I4 M, `$ k% {7 w
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home+ i& @2 _- ?5 P4 G
values since house prices should track incomes over the {5 }/ Q) s: u' `" g3 {% F0 `% C
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
& [. B/ U7 X: i6 s& t9 d! }regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers3 I: ] K; P& d1 N
of residential construction.9 K" A/ d f; ]
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
" c- Q# [ x* Q+ a9 ?/ N2 H“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
3 \/ ]0 v$ [% Zwould have occurred if housing had been priced
c# B6 J* |7 _optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
4 o, ~3 ^- g( L+ S6 gfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new T1 u z% \# I/ u/ B5 G/ t1 D
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too1 U: n9 t2 e5 F
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.8 d% ]! E! R& y8 d6 K( u
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,( O& Q9 n$ A# p* R
where housing demand will further contract under waning4 c0 ]! j d" r2 g: S$ o
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are& Y! T: O( O2 N P& m* C6 o
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the6 x( r; k) m$ Z7 P( q2 {
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
1 c+ B1 c* [7 rbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
; T' P$ T) m$ _2 d: p9 a; Phas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural' V) A2 l3 R0 j' F- X4 Q
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.4 G+ R' O4 p. w6 c
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
% J* V- R3 v, tstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de V; |- e. i) y' u; b( f K; P( v
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
$ X' ]5 t. S( o* E( b' O! C0 pgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
3 }3 x- y! \6 Trates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
8 L0 w+ k5 ?: W# B2 [/ Lcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears' j. Y# h# W" ?) H+ q/ A `
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
' @. H% k+ s# _0 o1 F& jcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
! o: e n/ z8 u2 N* A3 Whigh levels of apartment-style units presently under/ d2 K/ t7 n7 {+ y; X5 Q% H
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
( a0 a0 D! t O( sreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
9 {/ Q1 F0 A5 o6 V. Z& W) Jcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could: ^5 N, r; d' E _* c
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while6 R' o! G) ]+ i4 R: ^
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we# O, e1 l- a; x- V0 b/ n& B& T
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
- {; e/ _. @: ] ^' O2 Rinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
% C! e. s6 y" b& j" b0 s' @* C& {9 Wyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,* v) f8 z, s" K' G0 B
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.) h0 i4 n3 u+ g8 N b4 t
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING$ M1 q! A2 c1 S1 T( M
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
4 M; l+ i) [" V+ g/ r) oGrant Bishop, Economist
3 ?2 ]5 E1 @2 {* A416-982-8063
; K- [; A7 W* v. {8 ?Pascal Gauthier, Economist
4 J' \8 y5 T% p$ H7 V416-944-5730( K! }3 ~6 D1 G+ F
; m( ~# j6 }6 d) g/ a
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|