 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
- n' A6 r! x P% u$ afrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
' [: e( x9 B3 l. e5 }unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house/ w' G6 h, t) \- r
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
8 \) x+ D: x* d2 Wfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
. ]; u0 l/ F' q5 r$ i! zoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction1 x4 A( h2 X7 b) v
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
/ F, ]9 q3 w# x. M& F( s12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past5 m. x0 m/ l k! J* b
three years.; P' O3 t* y" P+ W+ E- S
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from+ u" f) @$ x/ Q
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of: _1 W' S8 @; E F6 K
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects1 t8 Q' ?' e* b
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
3 V+ J. U- J" M8 Yto fundamentally justified levels.
# [: r1 v% i7 V4 UWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
# a3 f- {0 _# ?9 K3 ?7 i) N) swhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
; U4 g) h' v# X4 H+ D! }1 cthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
8 k' g L- t3 {; n/ s9 I$ ywhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
! m/ U o+ k9 S, z" j& ethere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
2 g8 k0 _' B: _7 L' ~“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where1 B! l" H% v2 `( ?
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
$ S( J$ T4 G0 H- Y5 ]that is now being rapidly reined in.* o' h9 g8 _) _
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
: B) i1 G1 o* \' q S. dthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
0 P% V3 r; E7 Cmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh$ O: M: B7 P, n7 ~0 K7 h6 ]
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers/ C$ U. ]1 z- p# f( v" W* U( Y
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will3 h5 I, y0 R3 G/ ]) b# a+ @8 v
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
! z1 D2 a& n o. f: i0 Bdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
( F2 M' k' k, y$ h" dis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
: k! M! w& H5 I5 Vto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
3 b5 W! s' k: p1 Bresidential construction will fall further to around
! B; W& J: K9 Z7 T# l7 w125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
' X) ]7 @0 t6 s, fin the fourth quarter.
; s7 O; z% y6 k2 b6 G' `2 GTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,9 ^3 ^! ?1 |, J
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
, b& t# O+ r# C+ mfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
7 P w5 h+ w/ J8 s4 L* lprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
\- V$ c. K; c' ^values since house prices should track incomes over the+ u9 v7 F8 H: _6 M- f
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we+ r4 f: t6 f9 h0 ^6 q# H; i
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers4 k; Y* |- t6 F- a( j# i. j5 H- t: m
of residential construction.# m( f; f8 d7 W! \
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a- B1 J _( E, t- v) s6 ?
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction+ P B" ]# t0 _8 k' I4 {- z
would have occurred if housing had been priced' d( G \6 \; g/ F
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this. F6 F& w9 G! C* t% d
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
0 h8 p" O) C4 v0 L c/ B1 j! @+ S- ~units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
! E( s( F3 A: o+ @many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
5 c ^4 F) R) h) y' F! iRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,3 ?, I. R3 Q6 P* ]! ?2 s
where housing demand will further contract under waning5 A+ i6 K( `& D% Y
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
) O" b9 [% W6 A5 Q# \already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
* ^! u, B# d% |' B; m0 b. Wvery time that the resale market has swung into strong( ^' Y7 D9 R8 V. z3 A( u1 |
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces; l4 J; y3 I0 @+ _, J
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
5 a& c" H3 ^1 H0 L6 b$ Cweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.* ]1 O4 S+ |/ v9 D" n
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the$ S/ h' G. `/ M+ g3 R* P: d
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
, _- r( l4 p- d& PMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,+ Z J: {" S. E# K" q6 y4 t
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
& F/ g9 k. b3 qrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a8 |& b Z6 f6 ?1 f- V) U, M6 O
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears7 b" ^) h. V# \& M
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto2 ~ L: O( |! L2 s; _; _
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically# Y, D1 Y% E4 Q0 ^7 O2 Q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under! T7 V* Y+ p: i1 R R3 A; X
construction mean that record numbers of condos will+ b& ]4 [) {, N
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
7 T m# h% G k* |1 gcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could+ z1 R$ a8 E& h: b
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while! _. f4 e2 [6 J1 J. X( U
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we+ Y& Z5 D: I; ~
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
- Q- u7 {2 L, @" D$ A$ f6 K; Iinter-provincial and international migration over the coming+ e8 r) G2 E+ R a
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
- K6 N6 {4 Z/ p+ p, n1 `will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.& x" y, z$ a0 i0 q; T, N
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
$ ~+ x: O- p* B, j+ y1 KMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS, b/ z3 F4 p* f& v1 A) _
Grant Bishop, Economist
' B8 e" D1 P% W8 U- J" K( e5 T% ?' Y416-982-8063- t2 b5 E6 k; ?! w5 L
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
9 c+ X3 G3 `# h4 W6 z! [416-944-57301 F5 _! y2 S. Z( `8 l9 Z
$ [) N4 L' C7 r, G* r- D6 rhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|