 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly. W5 g8 ^5 }: g4 U
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
% W- e/ a0 f [: Y) l Dunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
, }$ }8 a7 a/ K' [ V r, Lprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
8 A; m1 ^3 d& o' f% |fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This# S ~* x% X$ N+ \$ j- Z, J
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
" J2 O" c" _" S: i4 ~that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately: p$ Y' A ~' {# y0 w( K
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
' E7 z- q& s( z: Wthree years.
3 Y8 F6 R$ E- HBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from0 K# w5 S8 K' o$ U
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
5 T- A6 C6 _5 w3 k1 [. r- maffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects1 U2 G% j! v3 {+ c
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
0 [1 K& m5 g) @to fundamentally justified levels.% Z+ n9 ~, I U, u' b8 S3 B
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”/ C. i6 L6 ^/ X8 p( X
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and. F8 r: t# J& |5 Q# x. K
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
; Q. w" p& u+ m! c7 K' v6 V" ?where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
# _ Z# b2 }# R+ othere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
6 b/ t9 S0 G% L. `6 @% V6 W“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
. r/ d0 a1 Y4 R& A3 i/ rhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
( e7 W$ K* m: z& Cthat is now being rapidly reined in.
7 N2 W! c. w0 B$ [5 B3 d2 ]2 W! lWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
% W7 f. z- Z2 ?/ K3 E# y: y4 u6 Bthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
; `- l+ p0 {) i1 N2 bmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh! ^: K T, }5 R0 R# O
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
' K8 \) p! |* Bfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will$ e" k9 A/ a+ O% {3 f6 F
remain choppy and new residential construction will be/ G* n1 d6 A1 A2 H. |! u
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
7 c b% m& d$ D4 [is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this' S5 d( ]" O5 h4 u9 q8 @
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide" j6 O; w {) `- A
residential construction will fall further to around4 K7 [' C: C% j* e& q
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units/ T* `# J! g3 O C6 P. z! F# G( q, r n
in the fourth quarter.
' w' m. Z! c& o: ?To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,, E# |6 O; I5 h4 d6 r
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
3 E) O* Y; X; R; jfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each' M" a% E2 C, } o8 o4 n- U
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home' [. R: b/ s7 F3 H- C) [/ B! w
values since house prices should track incomes over the3 ^3 C' J( m, N$ K: f
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
. s* A, t/ n t3 Dregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers! ^4 J7 ^; {1 G: h# m- x
of residential construction.3 [0 W, M3 Q Y x% @/ u
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a) T. m" i4 V2 E5 w+ D% t) Q
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction6 b3 I6 F! A: y6 q- j
would have occurred if housing had been priced
0 j! ?$ j% D& f) @optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this! \. Y% b! p8 s
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new3 X, L1 j+ _/ i! E3 H; |3 C
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too6 C; d' C$ u( h# a& |, B6 w
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.9 L A$ d0 x0 Y- e
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
, \" Z2 R0 @' B dwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
5 v% `0 U- z) x: H7 spopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
V; |4 b9 S5 ealready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the9 G* G$ l% @2 j4 I% `. D
very time that the resale market has swung into strong" A# K: ~; Y! O- t
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces+ @$ w3 l- C8 a3 b/ I, E
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
; F* H% \ E/ I7 K; T1 A( Oweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
( \3 w# ^4 @/ cQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the' b! a+ B4 J3 U9 a4 o5 \* T. f0 t) O
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
6 @7 n' a8 P7 `4 \. E9 u2 UMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,5 A) K% ?! x2 z9 a8 K2 f& \; z; _
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership4 s/ S) F8 ?6 |8 A9 d
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a9 C5 Z" E. A( q1 x1 k# M1 m
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears- S: u, B* I+ Z# _- o3 a0 ^& g0 \
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto) B2 E; @8 g, B+ v
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically q+ e1 M3 v. s+ L. c
high levels of apartment-style units presently under5 Z4 j* |8 Y1 `/ P* P6 E R4 Q( u
construction mean that record numbers of condos will: O: T& d' |8 H* h7 u; Q
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as. u( A4 ?( N, }# _' W( v
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
0 `* L: H# o J6 n1 {2 Mspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
2 j E4 k' k6 q: q, B. W4 S8 @residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we; `$ B; u9 @7 n+ a0 O* r( }" S
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
5 w+ U' ^. Z9 hinter-provincial and international migration over the coming2 o' r9 E3 Q/ s8 w
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,' [9 p2 Q- L& p- ~4 z
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.; S1 G0 i( o0 j2 K/ [ `: I
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
4 Z% U5 c! e2 R4 z& hMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS/ Y. ]2 j+ a2 j: q: [
Grant Bishop, Economist
" }; n2 t O/ N& o, r/ @416-982-8063& \" |8 s8 D: m% v2 q$ G
Pascal Gauthier, Economist7 b1 ]' @" i: F! \9 p
416-944-5730: l" N3 v3 u/ V, _" B B+ d7 j
2 Z7 U9 }; r; Y- [" \& l
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|