 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
6 d4 j$ R3 ~; f# J0 Dfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove' ~7 v8 t' [* y
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house3 o' `* P5 L0 Z6 ]$ b4 Q4 P4 D, y4 B! C
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
: @ [9 W _6 f9 p8 E2 M- {- Vfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This2 H2 ?6 c ?! Z$ F
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
& }2 F* ^8 [' }- P' t* X& I r% ythat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately/ x; M! L+ d7 a% W$ |/ C c1 y. u! ]7 W1 h
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past+ T' F, Z( r; P! Z9 H5 ~
three years.
: o0 @& g0 v1 YBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from( A1 N8 k, ~3 @% b& }
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of2 p0 H7 k) m' S, Y2 T" `. [
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects( G# y3 N" ]' _# ]' b* k/ {
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
9 O, `" G, r5 X' W; d9 d. x. T! Kto fundamentally justified levels.8 b! Z* Y* B0 V6 E* b
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
0 u" k. j) h- X3 Hwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
% r6 C. S9 J" H7 M6 \+ Pthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
9 y' N# G5 l: z6 X4 r* u ?+ jwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
; L* u1 e$ Y h6 [; gthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s8 T: f' E8 m0 F7 U( } K
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
+ i! {. {! d& V& nhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch4 X0 P" K! T6 o9 O
that is now being rapidly reined in.
x9 N" ` m$ Q) x) q2 E6 EWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,1 `8 i; z7 ^( W/ z6 `
the construction of too many new homes over the boom, _8 g2 M! X: P( o
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
! Z0 h, k# Z* z0 k' m# ^on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
! O/ K( N' u6 t8 bfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
9 |" k5 D8 `" y" R' \remain choppy and new residential construction will be( o8 {6 h/ h7 k- Y( }, h1 a2 V
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction( l4 q) O( R* k
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
$ y ^" h( Y6 I1 p9 Y: i9 z& N" W: Hto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ K$ {4 t4 y3 v/ p* Z+ y* |. d2 ~
residential construction will fall further to around
( B4 h# _7 Y' ^+ {9 \1 j" H125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units: I. A, F1 w+ J( m
in the fourth quarter.
# v- \1 M; E4 w6 c+ VTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
2 B9 p8 b, l5 e; kwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run. f0 Z4 n4 c0 U
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
! W; j( d! e1 N' H! hprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
. b# }( _, ~9 ~, o1 Vvalues since house prices should track incomes over the- B4 h& }! K9 h, `4 H) x2 X
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we) ^9 @. H6 H" N% f
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
+ {+ b% D" w& g9 o' ?/ eof residential construction.
: ^7 x1 v9 p$ z- RTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a5 a4 h% l4 X1 l
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
9 ~! {0 q8 v" n$ ]/ Z+ j' rwould have occurred if housing had been priced
! Q. f+ E; q* U7 C. L" R" Doptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this+ j$ X7 @7 C6 ]
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
5 D' d8 ?. Y- L. E" A) c: f; Bunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
; b* x: ?4 x* umany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.4 u3 ~9 `7 A. A* X6 z) H C: G
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,& g* Q5 N9 Z$ d6 M& M3 j1 }. Y
where housing demand will further contract under waning
- U' Y) r9 o7 tpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are) V5 E$ v1 R T, W l
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the1 K) k `) f6 z/ Y, N/ c
very time that the resale market has swung into strong7 q/ r3 i( ?) }9 Z: h
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
" Y# G& \& G; Yhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
' D/ d0 r s1 Q( X( k3 |weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.8 f2 X/ ^$ U/ G7 a
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the/ B- Y0 x: F \9 x6 s/ y
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
) N* |# }. y; P* h' ?: {3 @8 s; i8 y5 vMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,' J5 x/ \" E1 L5 T
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership, `; u2 ~) K) h/ j
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
# Y+ S" ~; `# l0 {; e& d3 Hcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears2 E( f* d. \, o
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto' y7 k0 v6 i4 B& D% D6 i
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
- _+ C. j6 S# ^, c: ^7 ^* R2 [high levels of apartment-style units presently under" h, L" V% d( X6 W& B7 i
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
1 @% T3 m% d$ [- areach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as. F- P: N( Q# _ f$ p* N
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
' w* A$ x! f: ]; k Uspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
, E# N, A3 ~" T4 s7 Tresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we5 R. n( ?$ b _2 s3 m9 ~: u5 c
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from5 F8 W; b2 |) ~. |6 W) z
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming' @* J- K$ v1 e% W/ N
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,5 H6 M! V! e: t/ T7 ^
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.8 @+ B! y9 t0 n8 `. @, }- I/ E# _
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
4 {# \% m- i$ m& x" r8 aMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS1 Y, D2 X F) s: z3 q! m
Grant Bishop, Economist/ p( \- B' ]3 `/ n4 A
416-982-80633 `' G7 U4 H/ r
Pascal Gauthier, Economist% t7 `' q/ ~# g( t5 |) l
416-944-5730+ u9 e/ [8 h9 m& Q' B" b8 q( p0 q
% t/ o; |4 {4 z0 Q/ A/ n
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|