埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1602|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly; f2 X- Q! f; i  I! u- e5 j+ E
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove; J) J2 y, j" c) E# p
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house! U! |8 S4 y* }9 H* P$ u% S
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by/ ~" W/ p# s: W2 ~( y1 c( V2 ?; V
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
9 o! }9 H4 ]& B6 n  @2 voverpricing compelled a level of residential construction# x0 V, t' M# Z
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately3 s5 I" c! z6 k' w
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
7 n/ B1 v1 I9 I& @4 d0 Pthree years.$ o  D+ L0 D3 ~5 l- g
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from% I0 n; v, I2 w& o7 ]2 y! x
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of1 k9 i5 u( U% m
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects  H; w" X5 W. r
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices4 E+ h# \2 G0 p" v, I3 C/ l: t/ r
to fundamentally justified levels.# ?5 t+ _1 u% X/ x% h
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
. R5 t, l- d' Q% h- Bwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and5 ~) n9 a* V& {2 A0 Y$ k4 X+ C) y
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
4 L" U7 ~7 Z. q# t* a9 |where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
& r1 k* J( X" q: y* lthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s7 k( p) a$ z9 N2 Z) z  F
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
/ {- B/ n; ^. d' E- L$ Nhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch1 N. ^( R; M7 U
that is now being rapidly reined in.3 l: M2 }) [$ @4 {3 S0 j. y- t
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
2 @0 y5 s2 L1 W* f+ l' Bthe construction of too many new homes over the boom! M$ n4 w2 Q. T
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh) M/ u/ x8 d7 s, O
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
) {; r1 C2 E' b$ s, y9 `from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
- e& q2 v- i7 a3 w. c; M5 q) x0 Aremain choppy and new residential construction will be2 t, P) J4 C, ^5 m
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction8 a* h, b$ l9 t+ G
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this" d. R( i# M+ F# j% B' A
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide- O7 |3 U  I: v5 ]4 Q1 [2 j8 y
residential construction will fall further to around
1 H. H7 y7 o5 V; w$ X9 P125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units2 h# |) \2 U. X
in the fourth quarter.
6 b. [" g0 _* n5 V5 s. s+ v9 aTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,  ]" f# `/ R& I
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
9 ]! z1 \* z) m1 Lfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
& j6 ?. l% w- E" S/ Bprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
4 X0 q3 D9 f( D( v1 h& d4 m! ivalues since house prices should track incomes over the# y% e, W9 J7 J2 _% s& I( Y
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we0 k  \0 v$ \6 B1 v) t
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
  h# V+ h, A2 A3 L2 \of residential construction.
/ Z# N% j' ?! u1 w8 @9 A, mTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a0 L2 j" ]& V/ [, a* ?; \* _# A
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction* U  F; K/ @& x0 t$ ^! g
would have occurred if housing had been priced
& Y6 r$ F7 c# I' C' G4 k0 \4 {optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
1 `( L2 s9 i: _& q8 k, B9 r$ vfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new' k: @7 h& N% T9 Y' H! z% V
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too. @% g% w  ~* _
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
# W# u/ ^! ?) c! C( ARegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,' n/ k% d) j, o
where housing demand will further contract under waning& ?; Z8 K( |* X- d' o1 V
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
$ W# s% i/ ^; z; ?9 Balready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
' F2 x( ?2 Y3 c3 _$ C/ X1 e3 avery time that the resale market has swung into strong
0 ^$ |+ K+ N8 `0 x! c) i4 Tbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces! g( T1 F. r+ H# q( i9 X+ K
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
. c& C; ?: [0 M' I# z! G  A6 ?1 sweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
+ K, ]/ ?  W3 oQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the8 D4 [2 i; h" Q3 `; N5 m7 l
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de4 _3 y. J4 y1 E
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
" V, |8 e% y. i' s3 pgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
0 M% c4 a% [6 I" {rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
, o, e" y, ?& Q; B- u+ s6 j/ lcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
1 ]# l9 P& |: K7 `: r+ i3 T: Flimited – with the important exception of the Toronto, I- |$ B+ [, G: P% M/ q
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically5 {) e1 ^$ W# ?' B% Q+ o: b
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
# ~4 B  X# H/ `6 H4 H6 tconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
# [. ~& T: b4 Y+ b! f$ ureach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as4 q. j$ l: w. B, _* B
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
6 r8 ?8 i1 F  U4 Q: W+ ~0 Qspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while) d/ ]0 E9 Q$ _: N. `
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we: ~/ K- a" O9 T/ b
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from; u7 s+ K- p4 l+ ]1 s
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
4 i' j: R+ q) N- {' p; \years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
2 P/ R+ K; n1 ~. l. ]will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
5 U8 i( G4 r9 ]OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING4 _4 u- L3 S3 N8 z" A3 t
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS8 o( ?( ^+ z3 N0 E5 J
Grant Bishop, Economist
: s1 @) \: c7 E* p416-982-8063
( w8 ^) F8 N* v" `, EPascal Gauthier, Economist$ L5 g- c2 ~5 ?" h. e3 T
416-944-57309 q6 V2 r* S) g' D3 v
$ E0 V: J3 B( e" o9 x( F5 q3 Q
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-2 13:14 , Processed in 0.141985 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表