埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1551|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly5 r6 E: ?2 R. Q5 q
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove( E$ b* I. t  {. b1 I
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house& X$ f( g4 n4 z3 W
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
2 x! _3 H. r5 C1 m/ E$ Hfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
/ q( g9 q  _+ B! |/ v6 p( Aoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction* S9 G+ r1 ?# N, b/ f$ J. g# F
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately+ ?5 v5 z2 h. J8 Y
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
5 p- w, M/ J; _three years./ R" O/ g, R9 o, ^8 r+ m6 e
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
9 d; k) c! i$ ^  \+ M  C. ctheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
$ a$ ?. H5 H2 M2 V% @/ naffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects  m6 ~; |, P% K5 n2 v; ^
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices5 Z7 R4 o# x% \, S; f4 P
to fundamentally justified levels.
8 I$ W9 a& T$ K, Q; {/ s" f" B7 qWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”8 [0 {2 r, T; h
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
0 f: }% G1 S& h; X( ethat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”/ k4 f' Z& s, \
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
; W. i' H" D* P7 q0 ?- f7 k9 @( l5 U, Mthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
& ^9 z5 g0 D4 `1 y3 m“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
  {! T/ _% p" a* C& A; S) G: fhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch2 _; f8 J5 g. _% C8 p
that is now being rapidly reined in.
3 G  X# H0 n: [/ s; M3 T& U3 I5 LWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
5 j2 j% S8 W% m9 B9 u6 jthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
- n$ u' b: ?# n) Bmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh0 ?! C! A: l4 r
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers2 r  M9 ]. J1 a$ V2 z
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will- f- v! f" Y5 [3 ~' R- f' U3 b
remain choppy and new residential construction will be' Y+ G$ q, _# K
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
. l! Q' i* K  \8 T" E4 Vis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
! G0 p: }. q8 y* i. B" e# p+ W# |' `to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
9 j& `4 u0 L5 h- X5 iresidential construction will fall further to around+ n0 U, t% a2 _( t- g: f9 {1 T" ?
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units; P8 {/ H1 b# Q' y
in the fourth quarter.
$ K' r# m  D7 \- @7 B4 [, MTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,! T" z- f+ |1 O! \2 V% O
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
' h3 |! F1 t: Qfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
+ X: y8 O3 ]* P' J' ~province. Affordability is the key concept behind home4 x. U) d2 V" L7 p& k5 Q
values since house prices should track incomes over the
" }' {  \1 z( D: j; ?long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we! L( ~1 K- }8 a+ A: s) \
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers' r  O3 j" t0 `/ ~
of residential construction./ `+ s6 h. n. q8 @+ K
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a! E  a7 ]( t- U: k
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction* G" k4 [' ~3 u, ?
would have occurred if housing had been priced8 V5 C$ S: F% k4 d& _4 Q6 e
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this: X$ i' a( ]9 M1 \+ z2 ?2 W
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
  z; g0 Y( L$ a0 ?! }4 xunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
' G! V+ {' v, B) Pmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.( {+ J0 g2 T( I3 |7 b
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,0 D  Q. Z6 V) f  X5 C# n
where housing demand will further contract under waning
7 {/ b; Y! T" ?# _* Y' r- i# Y' d; Upopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are( K& f) ^# J& H
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the' W1 y9 ]/ f  j  K% ?& X/ [
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
! n' \, n# x; O, P. Tbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces' Z/ k2 S' }! U8 @: x( T
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural# Z, P$ N) D" E. S; I
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.9 @, ~: H) J1 W  s" `* A8 s
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
7 ~0 `! n' O1 U/ X2 r% a" @strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de( v4 J! n6 j( B6 ~) s
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,1 C- R1 r, g6 Y4 ]6 p. a- K
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership; }& d# g: a- H9 u  V0 S& d" I
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
/ Z2 i9 L" Y% R$ \cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears% z) t; f9 v/ l1 h$ l
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto! v0 W6 @$ L7 k7 v. e) ?( V9 H
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically4 N6 R, `, C/ z
high levels of apartment-style units presently under% q/ d) {* x0 t4 r& B! F
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
, f, V7 s% H$ C4 `1 [# x4 k% Preach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as2 v6 B8 Y. D: i+ [
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could4 `* q& J+ w- v& ~
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
" e6 _7 n/ D* c2 F/ t& B2 qresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we: E; P6 i* J3 h7 q& n* o
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from( O4 O/ \6 p: \$ n: d
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
7 w* |4 V' Z7 Nyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
+ Z' [" E. \: Q% }: Iwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
5 p" c& L4 e8 m/ E) N, r& _2 eOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
! N3 h: f! ~. W# J- l+ e" I# j4 oMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS2 |, z9 Q" E7 I, X% q# ?3 Y
Grant Bishop, Economist
0 P& E$ s, S. b" F& J7 {416-982-8063
8 C" P4 Y, q5 F3 R3 i! L. APascal Gauthier, Economist
/ j/ X2 n6 D  L$ h1 Q7 m416-944-57303 [9 x4 O2 t" U( c+ c( v" f

% S- Y$ @5 y: fhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-13 10:26 , Processed in 0.088063 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表