 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
: I6 a- {" {( n8 L1 dfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove8 L Q [3 x; s; C
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house! @% s: n( {. @# X" _$ S
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by/ s+ w9 O. Z N2 A' e
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This" n! ]- l" b% Z' H! X( d
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction8 Z! u6 L& X; q9 d; `- Z
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately2 d5 K2 Y0 D X: K# W
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past' x9 e% A, x, C9 O! d% U. E R
three years.
6 s6 v) B' B* ]: d9 E' ^ cBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from8 \9 V, Q8 b- J# s4 ?. M" q) a
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
: C% l$ p2 Z; S' D7 Uaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects) x. @; R% O1 x5 a+ }3 [8 s" `) i. X
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
s& m" u+ H1 [$ q, `to fundamentally justified levels.( {+ }+ R' x8 Z* y
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
" y1 V7 x+ J0 j1 n# {5 D* `where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
; z- o5 f5 v' W. \" r2 A( Dthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
7 C4 x: H( ?/ g. J; \2 B9 A" W! Wwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
5 F/ B1 @- J( `+ N0 X- s3 m+ jthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
5 f6 e2 T/ b1 b9 l l, j“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
& e5 z# k9 n3 I6 L; C$ H' q+ ?+ Mhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch# s$ K8 r, q1 w8 n; j, q6 V
that is now being rapidly reined in.8 h! H5 ^. X, L
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,9 m9 |2 h% b: u7 ~: a# N! x4 ^
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
4 m4 N6 v, Y: k. Q" o" U' rmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh( c! z4 j3 j' C/ h2 f4 U' W' S
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
# }8 f7 z9 {1 T9 N* ~' cfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will: m- b1 f3 p. Q. L' Q
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
* c9 m# A" e* ldampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction: W: ^: |$ W, A* |3 g: A
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
* ~! {2 J$ P; `to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
! q' w( P$ g1 D% H1 r+ N* fresidential construction will fall further to around
/ O) k0 T; M/ [* D. M! s125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units4 u' |8 b1 s `: b" C
in the fourth quarter.
0 Q7 A a7 w# E: MTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,% r- i$ c$ p& H) l; x% n
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
2 ~+ G8 {6 y T5 \3 D) pfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each8 B+ M9 ?1 Y7 K+ u( C9 J
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
3 W7 g- n/ H, Z J1 U% J% Yvalues since house prices should track incomes over the1 v* G3 v$ F( Q. D$ @+ V3 b
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we) K% V% e0 x! ^$ {* h0 c+ q8 ^
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers# `( L1 i, r, o2 W% Q; M
of residential construction." t7 C$ P; O) J( n; b1 `, d- S. q. @
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
; N. w; D" ~, n# `9 v0 X“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
! `* s, N- F& `8 ~! x5 Cwould have occurred if housing had been priced, ?. w) w: c% r3 R* h
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this* N( O$ t7 h. n B# E' x* H4 V
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new! x# }0 l& w/ |1 q
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too2 {0 x0 t! \; ]0 r- Y9 r1 Z
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
& x p# p) S1 J# y5 A% XRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,# y. O- B4 {- C8 E
where housing demand will further contract under waning
7 F/ `/ D4 \1 t9 F4 apopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
3 s6 h' {9 K+ Z* b2 X( calready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the' _# F' M3 @ D5 s; J, n: P
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
; P0 ?* `, ~* }' ybuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces: E5 r, s0 {5 @7 i: t
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural: |: i9 U; Z) t3 C3 V
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
" X+ N! ~2 t% ? AQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
6 ~: ~8 D, I0 s8 ^' }& l- Nstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de2 K+ \# ?' I& o$ e }0 q
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,4 O J: D, \ n4 f+ I& O! o" R9 f
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership% H7 }$ V1 m% @" k' n( u. Y0 x
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a8 w& N% V, }( m. q, ?! e3 M
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears& F. S( `" z! J, _+ O; T. ~* L
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
( Q+ a* [9 }5 j7 N% t+ u' z( Ucondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically$ v1 ^; E. {+ g m+ j
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
3 {% }. ^, f5 p# qconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
# u% j- d' ^2 B2 L2 Creach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as. A4 U! w* d/ v! z
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could! ~2 X% d" m$ c; |4 Z. o' R l$ Z' A
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while" q, N: h3 P( R* A& k" S+ H; ?+ u8 L" f
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
" A- g d' s) q, w# o" I/ C1 wanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
; b% u( e: w& U Z" R- e' d& d4 Jinter-provincial and international migration over the coming% v- C( B' o) D: N2 p6 x. H* {+ u
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,4 a5 ?* a) s, ~1 p
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.6 }! C( t& t' t, P( p, a
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING9 @9 C: G8 e/ {$ Y
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS! v. Y) |7 F# V2 u
Grant Bishop, Economist
& }/ _9 m$ c1 @' [$ b) }416-982-8063% ^% q6 f( i! M( [. u- Q9 ?
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
- x# W! U: s4 I5 w7 G% k416-944-5730. v; D3 {$ Q. |; k1 U, L8 T
9 w" q i J: Rhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|