埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1531|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
( V) B( r# n8 _" N4 b! j; cfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove' f+ d4 R% k  ]; T
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
% _5 V$ p2 n2 X% P  a1 d5 yprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by3 }4 H  G$ r5 B/ h8 v
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This, {( N5 B5 z* g6 Y& q2 s1 T
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
& k7 K( @$ X6 B0 q/ c* Ethat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately* ?" d% }0 k  ~2 w) n3 T) X
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past; l* q' l2 E5 r4 M% o" C7 u* m5 k; v
three years.+ S" v$ j  R: P: [7 _( u( J
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
* Z* w% \# y( L& Q( ^their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of* o0 V4 Y( r1 N; }5 j8 p
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
1 h) p7 B8 V/ m/ uboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
, ]! y4 d- R* e$ {7 Oto fundamentally justified levels.
* C) ~6 o0 C9 M. @8 @/ @We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”6 K/ m" h+ b% ?9 M, W6 f" @% W
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and9 k) o) C6 d8 M+ X
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
* S! B# w+ |( G% G1 Fwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
2 q" J8 V/ F. r) d6 `6 k9 o3 Mthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
0 D  B/ q, r$ a5 A, Y“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
0 o+ G" o6 p6 O" g& X( ?homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch' O- `% ]4 D& w- F  d! s
that is now being rapidly reined in.
7 R2 s' z2 b) a" WWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
) h1 D6 e! v0 ~8 l8 Fthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
* y- S& `! r! m" Z% J; Mmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
% y& I  N! H  A# uon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers; i* N$ P" C* h* e# I( H6 L
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will$ p; J" R. F/ n: _% [7 R9 ], S( V; b
remain choppy and new residential construction will be/ G8 ~* \& Y9 X) S3 _3 Q; n# }
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction" g# j) o$ I) W# ?# s' C8 V
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this: ~$ p; [; Y3 ]1 m# c% i) [
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
( b7 u# ^2 L8 X: M+ Y4 ]" zresidential construction will fall further to around
' e. K6 ?/ c0 O6 N! M+ h125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
! Q" n' w& B9 x7 K5 b: g* Yin the fourth quarter.
! A. m8 g% p2 c0 G. z$ UTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
0 G5 \# i5 h9 c! M' o! E5 gwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run- h' O( W) i+ H) ?, G
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
+ C  d$ m# ]' o, u4 g! x' R$ Qprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home6 l% N9 ^7 \1 _$ G
values since house prices should track incomes over the
  g+ ~! w/ B# G! ~long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we$ a' g( U, A3 a
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers: ?1 M! f/ p7 @0 J! t% w8 q5 K
of residential construction.6 T1 j* g& b0 M3 k& |
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a$ O) m4 z1 L  e1 k9 S6 U  F
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
; o- P! t! {0 a6 W9 |) Cwould have occurred if housing had been priced# O$ W4 R3 }! E8 z! I8 V
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
& \! U7 p$ l% W( l3 zfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
( S. E5 z) L- O3 ]5 W+ u$ Nunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too. {$ ?6 B( O9 `) c* J$ d
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.- K$ t6 ?' L6 o9 m
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,% u/ r. t5 n( p3 Y+ S
where housing demand will further contract under waning# q9 U; |: c+ |( W( l. e
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
: n9 s3 V+ `8 }+ lalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
9 z( {1 a; _7 j# q8 A6 ?0 [" {very time that the resale market has swung into strong
+ S1 C( j& M) d/ B! Qbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces/ m: p& w! @$ A/ y/ K* Z# `
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural5 S$ ?1 o5 m3 T7 `) s
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.9 F; E; j. \+ r  W  {' y% X& I
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the% `3 N# i- c% R5 C1 ~- O1 g
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
- S) o0 J' U: _2 C8 \1 q/ QMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
5 x( ]3 `- v+ v2 U, J3 r: Vgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership" ~* z" t$ q4 @
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
# t# Z4 V) k0 H; E8 O/ t- ccyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
& u$ B( d4 l. e% Dlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto0 G! t" X  l9 e. Z5 a0 h# T7 M& r- e
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically9 L# `( Q% U1 y
high levels of apartment-style units presently under# K8 L2 J  m) |; P* p
construction mean that record numbers of condos will0 Z8 A' H: Z' v  Z# I8 S  l
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as6 I# Z9 M7 n" t: P& K
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
- V& p( ^- ~5 C8 ?- K' Vspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
- Y. T% p" m, @, uresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we) b+ t- U) ^$ ?+ Q9 I, v7 n
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from5 s, T, N- @' W) _
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming! S# E7 V/ A3 G# C# [  Z
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
' @" L" F' I3 x$ e" E: zwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
3 G) e( N( d% ^9 h% {OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
! V  Z4 V; A- i8 rMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
8 g  Y( x  D- m$ TGrant Bishop, Economist4 X, s6 `. \! _7 c
416-982-8063$ B4 l, O6 ]4 R# I6 n0 U6 s
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
" p& c8 {! ~. ?+ n* A416-944-57307 O5 k- G! {( O/ ~# h

) `; g! n3 F& Q) }: x4 K7 ?% v( Khttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-2 19:55 , Processed in 0.119203 second(s), 13 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表