 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly$ C5 {. ^1 A! }$ F
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove v/ ^3 C( ?! F
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house: s8 D! y7 A" H' i5 ^
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by- D& s8 y9 M+ J% r" t0 b0 l
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This* o7 V7 B6 x- s. e
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
/ I7 E/ Z$ V m. r3 Gthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately+ s9 m3 m0 d+ ^3 h
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
8 L7 N" S4 \% X. athree years.
9 U5 ^- H0 J1 N$ w; C) w, `; DBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from5 l) I9 U0 }- e4 Y7 m8 x, H$ K( n
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of2 e" q) U6 B# q& j7 G
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
, q' ^$ g/ T- Q4 i j" xboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices% d, l k' D+ m& _+ T/ Y
to fundamentally justified levels.% m7 Z2 X$ A. d5 q$ p" _
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
/ v- E1 p6 Y+ B9 q7 q) a C: @2 jwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and; {9 M; }7 t9 x: @7 X
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”9 z4 M2 U' |$ H, x, L
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although) {- d' K: p' p4 s# E8 x
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
0 Z0 u4 l: b8 N L“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
" [& z1 H6 T7 Whomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
5 N) B% ?- e( P6 h# P! \% A" tthat is now being rapidly reined in.
" B# O1 \4 |" a4 g7 ] h0 e5 n! {/ @" ZWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
' \2 _6 s% y: b) w3 Z; dthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
3 M+ `+ m U- h% s# lmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
6 M% d, J1 J8 b; A, Zon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers5 L8 |# H' b, M
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will: L! B+ b8 d" ?9 S0 s
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
- w% o% }+ G3 t1 @5 [& Q0 N9 ?6 ]dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction) W; X, s- @$ g* L
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
1 X* A1 x( d/ |: K: yto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 f f2 O( }" i0 u' t, }
residential construction will fall further to around
2 p) \) b! M8 a5 T125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units8 Z; J$ G% R0 g. C9 Z6 _# ^
in the fourth quarter.8 m1 U6 O7 X4 ]" Q
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,4 N J" l1 T& ]8 _( f8 h
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
) K9 B( }5 ~' K9 ufundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each m0 H" }$ l$ S
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home! V" j7 F) E( E3 X4 ^
values since house prices should track incomes over the
9 ]! f! r. L" R1 Jlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
" j- X+ a4 Z3 |! f }regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers8 ?8 u, o& b4 g l6 l! j
of residential construction.
5 F/ T& m) Q5 ^5 T. @# [9 [To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
" B5 A" y! x" r! b( }5 W; `% Z“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
7 Q3 c8 z4 j& U _" q6 @2 Uwould have occurred if housing had been priced
7 C8 u4 g0 V. W( s' c1 [/ P# Moptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
; h {/ E4 o0 y' j% @- gfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new. c, t" A7 e0 l J: k/ h( R
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too& n# \- ~ W* A8 J
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
8 d& N: i, t8 `Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,; w2 j b N6 Y8 f% J) h
where housing demand will further contract under waning
& V( b( V1 A! o" N+ Spopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are5 ]9 l+ ~& Z9 {) D, l5 i* b) o+ d
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
: @- z1 B& R+ T" V% [very time that the resale market has swung into strong# I: Z" e: l4 ^ [6 p$ l) Y
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces( C' [& `8 g* `. x( b; h: K
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural4 x O: f" C8 G# P$ v
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
* K7 D4 T* g6 C1 S& GQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
' ]8 P3 U9 w" \5 Lstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de4 A5 I# {" D* { a( x6 ]3 g2 H/ L `
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
- t5 Y2 H6 X, z4 egiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
; {4 l7 E7 p* x" k- a# `rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
9 x& ]* w" [/ scyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears! j9 [% k2 R" p+ m
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
. I# u( H8 i6 e; Ucondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically! d; k, M5 _/ I
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
5 v; k w# U3 L0 N J' r) pconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
; W! ^ i) b7 M" [. s7 v; ireach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as" c1 w* m2 D6 A$ `, e$ G7 E
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could5 N. N) l. Z6 J
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while S) g! S V& G, K
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we @- Q" f- W" v0 Y' ]' M3 P
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from+ g7 k/ p( P! a0 l1 v$ h
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
: O: l0 U! H: A4 q& n* wyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
% O0 p1 P/ ^0 N! Gwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
" x% b3 X5 N8 K0 u- H9 WOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
, @$ v* F& }9 ^) SMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS% |* ?8 f2 Q2 u* {: }6 ^) z+ S
Grant Bishop, Economist3 e# h/ I% G" c* R3 @0 a& E+ c
416-982-80636 ~. O# [* F/ W# R; }! L
Pascal Gauthier, Economist+ n( P5 t: K3 j# K, m, F0 R
416-944-5730
7 R# N- _0 w, E9 b
& i+ X) M% n; [7 L$ Lhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|