 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
8 `/ I' T7 P0 w4 z# f9 o1 Y+ efrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
' z. z ~5 W8 ?3 F: L) Sunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
( \4 Y/ [" O$ c Y$ q( Gprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
: Z2 o6 u3 S6 I. }fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
0 ]+ R* ?( P1 k: z+ r9 ioverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
( v! M' g) i2 _2 `# Rthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately% F2 n( b. [. n6 Z( E
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past$ Z! C# Y" N J3 _% h# \
three years.& j) i) }4 {# E1 H( _, w/ d
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
( L' r: p. v6 jtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of& f2 G' C# s" d9 m6 _
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects- H5 ^, U5 C& g7 E4 w9 ^5 z0 L+ e$ ^
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices& \; E- k! _ `$ ^' y% O' T
to fundamentally justified levels.
6 A. v: |2 @/ V& ]. K* S {3 Y4 EWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
' C& K- ~$ R/ A- P3 A( fwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
) p3 _0 ^+ l; v E; B1 hthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
, Y2 j" E/ c/ N# F! `$ fwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
% s: a6 s# z" W: j' N. v! }there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s. k& Z8 G5 c7 ?4 P; T' O% o
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where; [0 V! M. \! H& w @; _. H
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch( Q# `7 }( r* [
that is now being rapidly reined in.! F& C" G. i3 w% ?) Y* p
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
( m8 O5 I, m: J/ ]& A( Lthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
# [- ]* @% A6 d9 L1 A; X: kmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
2 M+ C% Y( |8 q- ], g: T$ q4 don markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers0 j" h% R5 ^# g, J1 T4 P
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will2 d4 S% U* Q6 G$ a% B, z" u3 o
remain choppy and new residential construction will be' V4 B7 y% W5 x% q1 J" @
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
9 R) R+ V2 o2 L" zis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this' z; @/ N2 H% D( `
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide) I& ]. j) G% A" Y4 q( ^
residential construction will fall further to around4 U! P) p8 L1 W9 F+ G+ A3 x; ^
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
8 G6 x5 S& i* zin the fourth quarter.
# [- u; n. Y; O( ^To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
0 f/ a y3 F/ P7 h Z4 `we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
2 `6 F9 d0 O* q8 nfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each% L' x% `8 F$ q c' { r
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
5 J# n+ C; [& T- D5 E( C7 u0 Yvalues since house prices should track incomes over the/ w4 i5 w; [) Q1 d
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we( j/ y7 e. g. a6 h6 ^7 I ^
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
0 m! T) }6 W* _* @of residential construction.
) q& O! j7 O4 ]& `9 {$ n! mTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a: o0 X: X7 e" B" Z
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
$ }' a" A5 O, l9 e" G+ Ewould have occurred if housing had been priced ^$ f- A3 [& o# S7 `
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
4 g- e" m4 w3 M2 ofundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new4 |0 J5 t/ J$ o; f& |* R
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too4 D* U2 Z" C, l
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.& A5 n ^2 W I7 Q# u: _/ z
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
. s6 m% C8 |5 nwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
. Z3 g1 {4 ` j# ^population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are+ G* @& O' H, X& {+ F
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
. \: P9 f3 w6 R E9 R4 D: t( overy time that the resale market has swung into strong! B2 F0 Q, s5 W' U
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces' [ F7 O; n4 e5 Q( B
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
' L/ b# w! s6 o- m: Q5 \# c& cweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.4 q4 P3 W; P# u. R
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
! C" C% D6 I3 z* G& qstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de! d1 r8 v" J; i6 H* `7 S
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
" K* R; }" c) zgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership8 m! \" S0 O8 e) r' q
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
; J% k( q+ T6 x( K4 ncyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
' k% ]! a1 `$ S" @limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
# Q( Q7 |: ` w/ ?condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
. B v# I! B. O0 F9 f' o5 c3 ]high levels of apartment-style units presently under5 x# y2 ?% ?' s6 w% r( Y; d
construction mean that record numbers of condos will- o3 a. Z$ E- u. {/ ^
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
$ @1 Q# ]& q; S$ z% w* e. g; hcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
" H5 F7 v/ A# ospike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
5 ]3 e5 y$ Q" Y' W) @% |residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we: F8 H. A6 o; J* D9 G5 ~ P& s2 }8 D
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from5 w- q" k1 s; M1 Q
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming* w6 L* ]2 M9 r; c* F# ^0 X
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,8 u2 z- Z1 R* M% X4 M3 X- t
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.7 w) Q4 ?1 |0 ~& M
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
& w% ~" p4 C% T' P0 \MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
9 x! N) i) {" J0 kGrant Bishop, Economist
1 ~5 O U" V1 s" k$ l5 v416-982-8063" ^) p: O8 `/ ]3 P7 s) y6 O! [$ A
Pascal Gauthier, Economist# m6 f# c8 `1 X+ A, R8 P2 c! W8 I2 i
416-944-5730
4 ~0 p: \. S* T8 M3 h. X. B [% z' X, j# J# b2 d
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|