 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly) G: i, ]5 K+ V# F) l+ I
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
& [* A- x- D E9 dunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house2 r9 }; f! a/ m d8 j
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
" B0 S5 A9 p$ ?% g: {/ `9 |+ Ufundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* c2 N0 Q9 [( \$ I$ m Q& Noverpricing compelled a level of residential construction' |; T+ N2 L" a* V5 g( c- w3 M6 j
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
. Y3 i+ i: d6 | h6 P) V! V12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past$ C' Y& F% K: P
three years.5 d7 `$ w- t% R% K! L
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
% s/ l+ e- R$ ?0 Z( Z& X. btheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
4 o7 J0 V/ Q" R; |: Faffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
, V( d8 r8 d* A% H" D( R& e/ bboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
7 G% S6 `! q. k5 m' r9 qto fundamentally justified levels.7 U% v( t; G( J
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
; y8 H4 U2 }4 ?6 A/ h+ Q: owhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and; Z0 t* K& x# X2 B# y6 `1 O
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”6 J+ F4 s* d( [* K `+ Y* C
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
+ G8 }3 }1 X |; C. E) Hthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s' _* G% B/ Z. w& i6 K. f5 V& V; D. d
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
% I# t# x7 z! @! nhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
* C! X4 N: H. `2 ithat is now being rapidly reined in.
. l- c; U! }( {2 C( @4 jWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,6 w* q& n; E6 j) ^! _8 S
the construction of too many new homes over the boom4 ?, t5 ?; R* z- Q; h7 B1 z, A6 O
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
, o) ?1 { s8 { I* c6 `on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
+ ^4 Y1 w; l% D9 J# ?0 u+ C, pfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will4 u. O5 P, n0 Z3 W7 b
remain choppy and new residential construction will be' {. J- X, Y1 J( ~
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
1 G$ I% N% d% N: `! Ris now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
6 i' @5 K4 T" G+ p$ [) @7 k# Dto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide, w, `2 _. p0 G5 F' D
residential construction will fall further to around
! h" W2 j' A0 }% `1 R4 f/ e5 W0 V125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units# F2 o: F' d _, q8 ^% v
in the fourth quarter.
) X6 ]0 X# d" y: j5 f; f( ITo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,- K1 |" l! T8 o& X' w+ _' @$ U4 m
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
9 \! W, P# M& n6 f" M( U0 Vfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each" x6 b/ _4 D$ B. k6 D* G) y
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
% x3 x1 n; c7 m- Uvalues since house prices should track incomes over the% O! o; Q7 C' l z
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we; a* a. e `$ n# k$ M0 x6 \
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers+ x! K* ~. ?) b. i. t$ _
of residential construction.
+ v+ Z) O! K# s. k: P) DTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a1 h. `: y1 o* L$ @5 I
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
* o; d3 u8 n2 N/ \7 s& Fwould have occurred if housing had been priced. r! L) p6 J2 ~9 ?- A& }) B
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
; f n+ E6 Q0 m' w# h4 Nfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new! W! _$ [& I( A4 ~' Q# U! B& U
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too, Q. @) J6 Q- D- R
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.4 h1 d& K! Z4 u$ V
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
' ]. y8 y9 Y5 S4 I0 m8 ?* |3 Wwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
% H: E* k. a- U4 B0 J7 `population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
4 s2 [6 k) ?! I; Calready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the% a! G* r7 S- q) e# A1 L/ L) X
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
* v9 r Z; o+ R dbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
3 a+ Y* C% j. b; n A. fhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural7 B0 A" a; f( W: ?
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.% i7 t. X+ y8 p- k4 h# M% s
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
2 e3 B6 n* @8 M* f4 K& |" W( e2 fstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
, N2 q9 ^+ t6 A) [( y/ w/ RMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
$ `' l. I0 Q8 j7 wgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
' h) @" N/ f9 W3 d4 }3 N* e4 Erates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
. D0 [6 [6 ~+ J5 H% b! scyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
: c% ~5 [& e2 H2 w# O' alimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
* m# P/ |# C" p% R) ncondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically" {$ ~$ X' u! N. P% u( ^: a
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
}% b$ p5 ?9 t4 v* Aconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
8 A6 z$ }1 j* S7 B+ E: Preach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as1 O* h) Z$ y) q |- ~. x- L
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could6 p, E" o- U1 Y4 i- d3 U/ x: i7 X
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while! D ?; j" A2 a. C- s" {
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we: M% j1 k) u" Q- |' |" K- B
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from' U" W& f# ?+ G
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
: M1 k* W; X8 o) n2 Z: E& eyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
% \- A3 L$ f) jwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.' ?8 @0 T0 Y0 i
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING4 j( e; ?2 Y' I2 q
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS& C. n: c9 |4 X5 Y% {! C* ?: Y: B
Grant Bishop, Economist
- k: R8 G$ P& M7 x1 U" u+ g416-982-8063
! R+ p* {, z9 `& B: fPascal Gauthier, Economist2 E3 M& }! ~: I* k! U# g$ S
416-944-5730: X8 o j0 E/ e2 }
+ [! I8 m$ V1 \+ p! M( |4 k+ J
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|