 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly' |4 [+ |! ?, m: g
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove& Q1 T& L F- {. M8 @5 E
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
! q& z. {& l9 ?* S/ }, V' Yprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
: s4 s( h V9 q1 E5 Q2 E2 A, ]fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This; I7 k# p4 F' u$ U
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction* S0 J5 v0 ^7 k. R7 Z' ]! r
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately, C! t: c7 A, ?. v- C5 i
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
! L2 m% n/ X/ fthree years.
) n, ~/ z3 Z0 `By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
$ {, a) H" j etheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of \' z) D" J7 F2 |
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
+ m; @" I9 M' o. m1 Y* Wboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
5 N0 r5 s1 u. a' Tto fundamentally justified levels.
H( Q% s9 \6 X' O. y7 B0 YWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
) N, r' e3 D; l! i% F$ ]! Cwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and8 J9 I' G {7 J, l3 B0 `
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”: R. d3 m1 V4 M+ L: r+ C, u
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although* X( y; K9 q \& V/ q
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
7 R3 a5 k1 c9 Q% ^1 A+ y3 ]“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
5 F& l, F" x9 C8 F4 V+ K& Shomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch P2 v: i7 z# m% z
that is now being rapidly reined in.! i) z L: P- ?( G4 k8 {
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,( a# c& Y" C' G5 l( M
the construction of too many new homes over the boom: t8 J5 `# l3 v7 A# \# ?
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh# L. G4 C4 U( V, }$ O) Q( n, e
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers( R ]! o- |4 ] o ]4 M, N9 j
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
- v8 n8 x5 G/ X* H" ^remain choppy and new residential construction will be* V! N5 }4 j' h( q, `9 ?
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction( C: W* e: p8 U9 k! H; h0 A; Q" E
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
) _1 w2 N; r; h- o" W6 K/ uto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide: u3 }0 }9 a) R+ z* B* i0 `5 p
residential construction will fall further to around
- ?. r3 a/ l n5 l4 D* E8 Z" P125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
6 j' t- H; X; l4 J! \9 ]" uin the fourth quarter.! H* V1 c6 k/ k+ M* {( T5 b4 i0 q7 D2 ]
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,: ]- {4 B$ `, A
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
; W* `3 ^2 A0 Y9 J+ Ifundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each( E4 C- c4 X# Y: E H( d, i& y* M
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
& h0 @7 ]9 E, p* Tvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
2 P* R5 {! {: T9 [, X/ ylong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we4 q$ b- A4 n" j; J9 |% ^0 T
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers) x+ K" Y5 ^2 h5 \, N
of residential construction.5 M8 E) v; p" B2 ?: R1 \
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a6 l3 r! E( }: O" A7 Q, J9 L
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction4 [' c" I" y( q: E4 b
would have occurred if housing had been priced6 M2 s4 V8 v: a3 I$ l
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
1 b5 l" {1 w( qfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
; C- R- ~+ N/ N( n) cunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
0 U* G- [$ U6 R" Q; Z3 D0 ymany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
/ L: R1 K J3 U8 Z" W5 d1 }Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
( {( x: r9 T" R, N1 H0 k* Zwhere housing demand will further contract under waning0 d2 o) D, q# J# ]
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
! {1 w" @% f# q# R# y% U; u5 Y" calready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
+ ` p( G$ P l+ ivery time that the resale market has swung into strong/ [9 a3 J* e, p/ S/ h) n
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces# s. n- }9 ]. T& `1 X
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
9 ~ r" b2 U. q0 m9 a% }- tweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.- v W: N/ F* c/ |7 z
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
+ K2 m/ G% F0 {( J& estrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de# e% h5 X1 l7 x- v9 f9 L* n
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,* U: n! Z0 Z* L
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership8 F1 a# G. i9 [9 H* }
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
$ F3 A: U1 {5 W& @3 U1 ~2 B5 \cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears7 H% P# [% n8 g& m9 p) ?
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
0 H# g# U* `8 ^! `0 ncondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically5 Q$ c* N2 ?5 G9 x9 W: b) A3 V r8 [
high levels of apartment-style units presently under3 o) A$ x- c3 ~4 F9 J L$ h5 \" T
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
. F/ V" g4 l' ~7 z4 Rreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as+ i% X: m, l9 q, x
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could3 @: T( P( a- p7 ]0 Z- H- |1 v) c; N
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while/ O! O7 o/ T* E7 |4 d( x8 ^0 R, G
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we& T4 L* I" \; D
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from6 J. R6 O$ O* ^, O: d c
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
) Z4 ^: K# g2 f$ Vyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,2 J1 q; e7 @( Z$ U4 n" N0 i
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
! V( a( _! |7 W# |# _- `- ?OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
. Y% A7 _ L4 B, EMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
; T3 x) g- P$ U ?$ p! _0 J4 eGrant Bishop, Economist- k- O7 \' x% a4 S$ t
416-982-8063; ~$ Y# h! O. x8 h: s4 w
Pascal Gauthier, Economist/ o7 V' h6 l) {2 z' }# D
416-944-5730
, W9 Q6 h$ @8 A" ?: L" C J* v/ [2 V+ V: s# U0 x1 U
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|