 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly& g1 g. ]. a: e
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove- I6 V: ]( b' H; S* ?: M
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house6 P. g9 R0 w" R5 ]' `# J' R
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by6 c& g$ l8 A' z/ a
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This+ t8 \# u$ h' c' J# P, G1 v
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
$ r# R" R; V+ u3 d; n, Ithat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately6 c0 Y4 x; ]- [/ F# k' |
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
t: p2 Q/ i+ k/ R+ Tthree years.+ U4 c2 e9 X2 S; ~" ?/ w/ ~
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from; L7 A: B ^2 H; z
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of% s) g6 I- q; ?% i6 c$ l9 O) y1 x$ w
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
: U& p3 {3 h$ m7 Gboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
2 _+ f* a. E' u" O- lto fundamentally justified levels." w0 I$ m7 z* d- k% P0 j' J* Z, B
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
& k2 w9 k8 s: J2 W$ h2 k: iwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
% C: j; T; [- p5 c; c. othat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
( w2 C! U% F" c; C6 nwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although% `- D' B6 ?( z, p# b7 a3 `
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
; n$ E4 q" F* G“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where+ G) g" g. S; x& o. ?% F) c' U
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch. W$ y4 S4 |/ {4 w4 L# @
that is now being rapidly reined in.
" H- _3 E6 l! n3 e$ a' t- R" O7 ] XWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,: m& \/ L# A; w8 D* m* D
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
, K: ?6 O6 w$ u* ~" W( L3 t/ {' v3 Cmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
! h" t2 t3 s4 s1 X5 Lon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers* Y7 f& i$ @0 q8 F6 {' N; [, x4 o
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
' Y5 X* z: Y' q. O7 X- Yremain choppy and new residential construction will be
/ V W0 k6 Q9 ]. Ldampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction1 G' h1 i/ M/ A. b3 U
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
5 H8 z1 {& X/ |to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide7 L' w' Z3 y9 J; n: q
residential construction will fall further to around; X. y& _ U5 p: @
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units1 x# d) C+ Y7 m- a$ _1 U) }
in the fourth quarter.
" d: ^" {! o8 K; O. tTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
4 R" I3 y6 O" `- W, I% U+ swe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
6 ~' c B N. z9 n/ N, I+ Jfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each# D6 t/ j% V7 `$ [
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home2 ~0 Z6 p6 V% T7 k& _
values since house prices should track incomes over the% [4 X( [, k( b+ N; b I, h
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
! n6 t8 y0 ?: N4 L$ Wregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
$ K: D7 a8 P( a& tof residential construction.. ]. K2 x1 i5 Y6 U$ r% ~1 f
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a7 B& a4 l* ]6 g6 I1 V4 b
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction& H) R7 h% Y2 D3 e, ]; ~
would have occurred if housing had been priced
( k/ V' i; q6 s3 Noptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this8 p2 }" Q: o& g' @8 @( q
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new( o0 x1 E' r: o* g. ~
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
3 u+ }% G; q. B0 g# h$ {7 H7 fmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.: {. `* {1 }3 D$ u2 V2 \3 z4 l
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,% P/ ~& f# w) d. W
where housing demand will further contract under waning
& N* _7 B) n3 ~/ bpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are! G' B0 \8 `1 Q- j J; v4 l' }
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
' W) r' a6 A, q, {9 K P+ } ]2 U# cvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
% C6 u, q# k2 A* p( J& n3 u% W& ?8 vbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
: A0 k7 d; B. Khas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural* E1 O$ S5 }& H, a a% l
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless., d4 j3 T/ u# }) A* i
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the1 z* z0 }, S: f3 H) G( T# M
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de5 z0 z, J9 X6 W5 |# b' c
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,/ k! i) S* V8 o1 \8 e- }7 }- u
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership* H' r4 n, e+ A& X: z
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a* k/ q5 j0 k) ^1 h, H) G9 o7 Y+ u
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
1 q% {" g* L& olimited – with the important exception of the Toronto! C6 Q) v- D) q# E% i2 n
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
% ?7 e1 X+ R6 Ihigh levels of apartment-style units presently under& q% O/ K. b& \" \, Q
construction mean that record numbers of condos will9 G f3 M; f% e. A9 V* Y
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
+ [: u1 ?! w- D- P2 t# i* Acyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
' i' i8 }$ H& [spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while0 H0 Y' F" @7 r5 s' u' E9 L2 ^
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
$ c; j3 z- M: H0 Santicipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
`5 u% j# l" H+ w9 W% }/ @inter-provincial and international migration over the coming" T0 c1 i8 O4 D4 G" B, k; G. l. ^* \
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,, |" T2 c& I6 f& W5 u1 k
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
. h$ ?. \% _) [OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
0 k' J7 O! d' S( r2 bMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS( s8 F/ D4 C2 n. F. T5 D
Grant Bishop, Economist
, B- Q" M: J# r- ]416-982-8063
: a' D/ p1 U y! @, T( r% p, BPascal Gauthier, Economist! C0 @5 v/ _1 `2 H8 _* O) K2 q
416-944-5730
- a* C, t/ X0 p Y/ S+ a$ d
* \4 c' j5 T5 ^$ q9 q7 _0 D2 Ahttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|