 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly, q( T+ ?. F# d
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
2 @ ^3 `. H2 Eunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
3 z6 J3 y V* z, G2 N6 x, uprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
, W/ u7 \, J' B. U) afundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This" W) E4 }4 B$ r
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
# A) Z; F" R' Y6 tthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
) }$ ]0 _/ T7 K$ A1 [7 b" \12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past5 f$ U) E: \9 o
three years.
9 Z& [; O$ F$ DBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
& I) H/ Z' }& w1 n) j. `( qtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of* x; c* ?: X+ \" c; _) E4 i
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects I$ ^7 H3 P' @6 v D# b9 s& ?1 U1 v
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices1 _1 B: X# n# J4 ?" a' e9 C; H
to fundamentally justified levels.9 H) x% K7 u8 `& M+ t, g
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”2 [* l+ e" Y9 K& @
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and0 n y! E! M9 u/ S0 y1 f \
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
; J3 A8 E+ j! @where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although a' ?) K1 G7 E7 K
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s5 n8 Z6 Y. D* ?2 {: A' v b% F2 w
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where! @ t2 b- d! N0 T9 l" v! w
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
( v1 Z; Y% X9 j: Z: ]that is now being rapidly reined in.) L& A: ~8 y3 g( h$ e1 g
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
5 Q1 A) b( ?/ w5 K% c7 q5 ^5 \, s( bthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
/ q5 W* D+ s; J/ B6 Wmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh! i+ y: W$ \$ N( w5 z# }$ f v
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers, r4 r! b. p {4 y
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will$ A" m# d: g' S
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
& P6 ^" G* O% S* u7 [7 e3 m% ~dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
p o! |# t. w' A. ois now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
- a# L {2 o9 m7 Zto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide: J7 `! `0 {" g/ o4 ]% N0 ^
residential construction will fall further to around# Z) Z) `* c: N: q5 i+ T
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units# ^4 e* u7 B! |4 N" ^
in the fourth quarter.9 w/ v! x0 w: `/ H, t' r q
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,, e1 E- p+ Z' O; e8 i# R% X
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
+ b' O7 ~; e3 T+ c# f h4 wfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
2 ~$ f/ T' u: {province. Affordability is the key concept behind home* b6 V3 x8 ?" A; w7 ?% p; X
values since house prices should track incomes over the" G5 T3 ?' h: I1 R/ L
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
+ V4 V' ^ _$ c& a: D% I/ C" U# S; v; N" dregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
5 U+ g% A$ X0 r0 f) W2 a- Q. p, O% l) @of residential construction.8 m* X# M: g1 ` h& z* I
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a6 ?5 M) H6 ^0 \0 J5 l$ S b
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction: Z' \8 H/ D! k5 A+ P5 E9 |0 p
would have occurred if housing had been priced: |9 j, @& }# U. [( [
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this$ F) c- _+ N" T( ~" `5 Y3 @
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new' n2 o9 M6 I% G1 \/ h
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
4 [5 P4 Q2 m& q( y) @many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
B: k# w8 |& Y" nRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,- Y+ A2 q: E0 b
where housing demand will further contract under waning/ a8 @8 z' M( |* m: g9 a. ]) _
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
) z* x( U( N* ]" p1 U# d( ?. m4 Q8 galready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the2 ?: }7 d; w" Q3 r
very time that the resale market has swung into strong7 L5 `1 S: Z! h4 T$ R
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces6 {& }8 b0 { S; v* `, X5 a: Y
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural5 S9 S1 B7 `2 u* o2 G
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.. d( Y, w; p! f
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the4 B$ N6 h8 p* t
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
% `- l4 t) I9 I- L* _5 l( k0 VMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,4 o8 J0 X$ m- p7 E" {
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership1 F9 ^% _' x' E% i$ n
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a& x8 R+ g9 u( [* k% E
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears4 s+ K0 n: U% U1 p r" }1 E1 I
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
. w, ]8 x8 G/ m* M, ccondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
& H3 D6 S) E" s0 f7 ^( ghigh levels of apartment-style units presently under0 K7 ]5 L, \- Y2 D } P* S
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
; q: m5 X8 d" areach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as4 I8 d( r( [' z9 r
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
' N- ?% p0 a8 n6 W _$ S# J3 gspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while/ g7 d9 i) ^1 g7 a; W, E; K
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we: b* R: a# D( |& M3 P9 D
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from9 t0 _$ `2 Y) b
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming4 Q6 V- u; `# A4 L
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
4 n2 ]: Y- y+ \" k, N3 k& D2 Awill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.5 N" B4 R) o: k/ N( l; M# }
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
" }1 ]; m1 M' B& o7 Y& FMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
k8 k: g( V1 I/ V) LGrant Bishop, Economist
) t! Z0 p0 g. P. Q9 B: q416-982-8063
' T0 y, U# D/ H& ` e+ WPascal Gauthier, Economist
1 R' { n; X1 c1 w416-944-5730
, _# g* z. `' B7 {4 V4 {" M" T( J, y7 j
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|