埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2204|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly1 @6 ?, p( A% }$ V
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
# S% a8 z/ ^# j1 funsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house5 N* Q2 z1 d6 @
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by% C+ Z- q* a& {$ T0 S
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This0 U0 x4 v: o4 ]7 D
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction+ b3 \, @) V& s# \( {
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately' f! B. `1 |# ?$ {5 R7 [. E" T! [; B
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
6 L: o- E) [6 o3 W4 V$ u; Kthree years.2 m8 d, U$ O2 X8 J
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
; }% N2 K% b) J6 x. wtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
6 S$ J6 e' K0 T( z4 U& l/ Iaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
: \' a$ j* q: D9 P+ f: G) E0 wboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices0 {3 l+ f; A1 o
to fundamentally justified levels.
( h  i+ m$ z3 ?2 X+ x5 EWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”, b+ |8 q; d4 y$ x' u
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
/ w' e  j) j3 M4 B3 J5 Xthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
( X- e3 q  |( ?. Q# y7 n- O. E% dwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although2 g. x% c4 z0 ]% _2 G' b/ y
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s  A! C$ _3 ^' a/ N/ [
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where2 D5 o/ T- e( ~% g0 e* |7 y
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch- D. Z3 Z" O+ q8 B# Y
that is now being rapidly reined in.
% r7 J) e  h0 m0 t) ^% ZWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs," C- i: l* U  z7 y$ b$ l, p; H5 D
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
0 v1 r  I5 c; p+ Gmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
) n$ D1 C% M8 S5 N% X, I( o$ Z) ?on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
; r/ O9 L, c, B1 xfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will, H( W8 c9 Y% X& S
remain choppy and new residential construction will be( Z( v- |* @8 I+ }# N
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction1 E! l" q( c$ c, V: \
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this/ {$ F) g' m( J2 E2 Q  c3 F6 p
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ M& D$ D  {8 [$ Q6 @! f
residential construction will fall further to around
! O2 J' s4 @' I% C125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
# u7 P& J6 l3 ^3 {& v1 c$ q3 ~in the fourth quarter.
( \) _( m8 y- |To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
0 j6 G; S; N* h) q% Nwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
+ B7 l, I6 q* x! s! o$ c6 E0 afundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
1 O$ A/ U4 }( w) L  I% o% G: d" V$ |8 fprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home/ {" E  p1 d; Z, d( `  p( n( M
values since house prices should track incomes over the7 Y; c; k, e# |, `, Y9 r4 Q# ?
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we  Y  n: i* H+ E! O
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers9 B$ f$ b5 L  Y8 N' I
of residential construction." X4 L! }+ N# o; s, l3 R* V
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
* K$ I2 j$ V# Y* r1 `" Y“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
. W4 ?0 `- H$ `& |, b$ @would have occurred if housing had been priced( v8 ?6 z8 f& f- t7 ~( A
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
0 R2 j5 u8 V4 [1 jfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new+ d, u5 {5 Y% t# ?! {0 o4 Q
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
* F3 ]4 p& m% Z' ?many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
" O( d2 T$ U: R0 Z4 A, e5 yRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,* S: }9 L7 T( K# C' m5 i
where housing demand will further contract under waning5 m* l' W9 X0 s4 _  R1 n5 C
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
7 p3 ~$ }8 ?: H9 walready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the$ s) ]9 j+ i6 G. N" b
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
3 i) K. I( y7 i, W" s; Rbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
* ~& g& h+ T! z$ ?has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural) K. B7 ^' ~( E4 V* d
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
! i( b0 E+ I* f3 U! m3 h* ~+ }Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the+ r" f8 \6 F0 O7 `$ @
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
: R' i$ o0 H$ ^+ q0 n# c, xMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,( Q' S' [8 [$ z8 w9 ?, ]
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
& h1 N7 h) s0 x7 i/ E8 s7 _* |  Irates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
; f0 x: D( T' ^5 y1 D+ x  Q) lcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears3 f6 h' m4 _0 u; h" x% t
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
& T  [% j- P5 v) j5 B7 r7 X. p, Rcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically' _% O6 Y- i! c2 ]9 W1 t. a
high levels of apartment-style units presently under* X+ p( C4 x9 \' j' s
construction mean that record numbers of condos will) k4 i5 Y7 p/ V) g% t# S
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as5 k$ @0 t9 ]  g, c; r
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
0 e* A7 W' m( O% z: r& _spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
6 f. d5 M! P7 n  Dresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
! I3 L% _: I# Vanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from. l- @8 S$ Q# i. b3 c5 i
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming: K; @7 Y2 \- ^2 L9 u' y
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,- g  _( M% p7 w: N
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.+ A7 ]8 ?' M9 l9 e- ?* n
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
" ?5 F" W' R! @MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
* c  d4 ~, L: E, |8 K/ c* O: v$ vGrant Bishop, Economist/ @4 w# L$ R( b- I: }: |/ |
416-982-80636 k! Y9 _7 h+ l. y. a2 g5 t) \
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
. m1 v2 ^. Y; T9 t416-944-5730
% _& h* K  y4 k; @7 f  D' N
& i; ]0 ~8 F* T7 l6 A+ ~, T, n* ]http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-20 22:34 , Processed in 0.178530 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表