埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1564|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly2 Y2 |, ^2 p" a4 u
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove5 a( n. _/ G! c4 K+ t, P. u. e
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
) v* Z; D/ e$ d6 ~7 {. `prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by0 B$ M8 Z! K2 {' u, |' z" L
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
$ |1 H9 g. H8 f8 c# n2 C% {% r; eoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
, n- U1 n. Z' E. i5 w. Wthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately5 W, W2 ~" e% `) s6 D4 p+ a: s
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past6 s1 c; _# T* d  r2 K* J
three years.
3 U1 k1 K4 v, WBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
* e& n% X: d3 ~, atheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of! [( U; W4 f* M1 N- r
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
  Q& p: H: D9 Z- H+ U% zboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices3 u1 y$ W& t: @' b% [: o9 n
to fundamentally justified levels.+ y: m+ R. Y$ K9 b$ e+ ^7 t
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
. D% n3 e" J+ G$ s+ J7 k8 }where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
* d8 k' @5 S. L$ pthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”8 J, W& B% Z* M' l
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although- d& W& w1 s3 G) Z' L
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
1 @4 h+ p$ n" I“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where( i; ]; g+ r3 J0 _
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
, Y& c7 V9 }! Bthat is now being rapidly reined in.
) Q! Y; t3 k8 t9 IWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,9 ~6 W2 w7 J; O" c) p+ n! Y+ S
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
0 b: w/ i+ ?8 ?! `means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh+ P- V2 M5 R2 _% J
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers8 T9 |5 j- Y5 u8 N* v
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
, J2 p4 m# Y) A" nremain choppy and new residential construction will be6 K/ L- s* n! Y4 m) @2 j
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
+ G8 I; o0 ?9 gis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this! O! D! ?$ E3 ]  i
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide( D, D4 s1 Y+ [" {9 c
residential construction will fall further to around! \4 Q0 E2 ]# [( N; d9 Z0 r2 r! X
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units, f; V& ]  ~% H" n, O  }% Q
in the fourth quarter.
$ {0 o% D! R7 f4 ^To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
4 C8 X8 [6 s  H" _we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run( [, V& N2 s% [3 c2 }
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each; a' @+ K% ^& q: y" ^1 d2 n5 U4 f
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
" L5 X; t" T, r- W7 Qvalues since house prices should track incomes over the4 g+ u3 U6 N$ O/ Q1 a4 z* ^& h" N
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
- t+ J0 _  A: j, p0 xregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
' F7 g1 Y0 j$ y) \of residential construction.
! \' F' f2 h( M( Z! w* rTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a# V4 V: Z3 N- m7 Z$ w4 c& \; e
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
9 ]* @0 o1 A- l8 S) @# h( |would have occurred if housing had been priced3 g$ P0 F( V7 k+ E, V
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this7 H: Y  P: n/ K( A
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new3 T5 e+ @8 k6 s
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too3 \/ \, ^5 f& V, _. x! H
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.3 ?( s' D0 V: F  w0 S
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,+ x% \8 T* G4 W4 s
where housing demand will further contract under waning
0 J, G! n, F. S( U. u+ T& l8 mpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are: j2 L7 s) j& n
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the; p4 L  U+ e/ G' U! n
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
, `6 q) p& ~% ibuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces# k, k+ h" p+ r) r( b
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
% p5 N5 J. h; ~( j  E( Zweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.0 C( t6 M' j) {  S1 g6 Y) B8 W; v# J
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
9 G3 ^& U' y$ Ustrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de9 F9 B- r" [4 x* n
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
0 i* M7 r% F5 h+ m- y9 Kgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
9 `: L2 a: }6 R: ~1 x9 I" Z' Rrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
( T5 B* C1 e" Icyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears! L+ x, _: D# S! e; A. g
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto- g8 a6 o1 [2 j' e( i
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically/ w8 l& m$ d& U5 n
high levels of apartment-style units presently under- L; ^/ @7 ~1 t' x4 U+ i( V! y
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
. e5 H+ w; x" Lreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as& I: @  M9 ~- t8 N6 D
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could2 S# ^$ c2 {3 d, G$ h' y
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
0 E# [! F3 |. @1 C0 nresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
5 {6 [/ @5 }$ t, X9 K; Santicipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from( @& o- H/ u5 k/ |+ v
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
) h3 B  B$ x, U9 o- V) ?! Qyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,% J" A3 z6 G- l, F1 R. H
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.2 d$ L2 X8 l3 h6 v1 T
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING! g0 Y7 E: i* ?, }4 h, ^; ]
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
6 B3 F6 l; _( qGrant Bishop, Economist
$ m  ^  R/ _0 ]" [416-982-8063
- d. ]- S7 j& v6 [- _/ ]5 l" hPascal Gauthier, Economist
3 {9 m1 ?* E, W5 i416-944-5730
( |- J1 N5 s1 z4 q8 S) k6 @
9 y# _' p* ^- I# J6 k1 Z9 C% B; k  L" Ghttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
理袁律师事务所
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-19 05:05 , Processed in 0.094519 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表