埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2343|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly& Z1 ^' a# i( y- v4 P5 K1 _
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
' p9 t: J7 O3 k8 H  f3 I  _) W: Hunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
8 O# y1 h  l; K  T8 d& Xprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by& H( Z+ A2 J0 }4 r5 ?2 l" ^; @
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
4 C; q5 ?$ H( F. C: voverpricing compelled a level of residential construction; O; F# i/ E$ A. t8 j* N
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
+ R6 D' l5 U, N/ I9 A! S. d2 g12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past4 R2 \1 A- G  p
three years.' _6 }6 S- I) O5 A
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
0 e" q8 O& v8 @& n( Utheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of# [8 H* z# i+ I: K! G- Y  [! Z
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects4 R7 X: D# D# Y1 p
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
+ T) W% E% x+ c. _6 c3 n5 ito fundamentally justified levels.' w* q9 O! [: h4 M! ^
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”7 ?0 F5 K- O4 ^. b
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and# a( v  ^4 D8 J! w
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”. J2 |: ^- C1 [5 j; @
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although, ]( y3 w1 {$ T3 f; c
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s' }5 _' s. V8 [/ p9 P" c  r7 k6 x
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
$ }$ K% Z3 R8 j2 q+ \* {( Dhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch2 i* e+ U5 a. Z  y: o1 a% C0 s& u& l
that is now being rapidly reined in.
. B1 X7 E( f6 xWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,6 F/ H$ v4 n( c
the construction of too many new homes over the boom6 r8 C3 [7 d$ l
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
8 W3 c" ~. `! D* W' D+ Y) P6 P7 pon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers( h; Q7 O% Q' g. [% a
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will* l6 {4 M6 H+ y3 }8 V  f% o
remain choppy and new residential construction will be4 o# y) j" c7 v  `5 f
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction! f  i1 K& Q4 c) ^# [$ B
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
! \- q5 L) B; |, |. x& u& ?to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide& [7 B: A' a7 C+ e- g
residential construction will fall further to around6 }: o+ T9 F0 E9 u. M; g2 N/ [5 {
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
) t8 P& ]( d, z5 Z5 \6 R$ b, Yin the fourth quarter.3 u9 c& g2 Y' X, s
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,% O( L4 A* ?, T6 z* O' {, N2 i
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
" q- v4 H: ?- \- |  s' V  Qfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each# V% B5 W- e$ o0 g
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home/ ~8 `4 X& x) {- b$ J
values since house prices should track incomes over the+ Y, M5 B" g% l! P7 f* x2 Q: D
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we: w  K/ _3 }8 _: P5 M# N! S. [
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers% D* M; t# D7 F$ d/ _
of residential construction.3 o3 i( k; U+ i+ W
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
2 ~* L' }2 ?1 g  _+ b7 j$ ]' i“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
' W- j5 K6 {6 h8 m$ G6 E8 [" cwould have occurred if housing had been priced4 B* Y' l* i( {/ M
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
% `. Y$ d, v6 e2 Z! c* p: J6 h& efundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new" o! U7 n  s6 ]/ h
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too. o: D# {$ R" ?9 s& g
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
' c9 s1 k& T% f; _! S3 aRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
2 ]  H2 R2 d0 j4 S: L. hwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
( E: B; y1 ~% Q$ f* cpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are: [; M& A1 o2 z6 K
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
4 b9 w  U  D, E; Uvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
  F! s; Y; W9 j* }* J# E  _buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces' V# e; Q$ U( e
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
7 s  F1 D5 [. x3 w5 T+ U8 {weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
" A9 g& Q- D/ e$ M" H& OQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
( u2 s9 j& r  }$ [6 d9 jstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de: ~* j+ s8 L! A8 J) h
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,. S$ K, @+ B& p# b
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
) q. ~' Q/ r) Orates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a. s3 [/ A! \2 g+ n. B
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears$ }% P$ `3 o) h! Y1 Y4 f. y1 M
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto8 m8 l; r, {* b6 `$ ^" Z) T+ k# _
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically) {  K7 Z# }$ F$ B  p. d
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
8 F) ]9 C5 P1 i4 A8 [, Mconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will) k5 g4 E% h) o% p7 @8 x  h
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
, s! Z8 G6 w+ p) |8 ccyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could1 }2 n: C& i( O$ n2 D4 J+ C1 f' O# i6 L
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
, g" Z' V8 s# f. X+ Lresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
( p; Z: C% q/ k3 santicipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
* [% Q7 J! P' _5 }/ Winter-provincial and international migration over the coming
3 s# p) K6 N: q0 h8 Fyears, which, along with improvements in affordability," ^& H! w8 }- f4 K) n4 ~% I* N' X2 s; c
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
# e% `7 v: Q; }, G  Y+ c5 V) sOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING+ D) {, A9 ?" o$ H& D& L
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS+ x- O9 @+ l. h& l: F" E
Grant Bishop, Economist
# s: h7 {, M, w5 i  F416-982-8063
; u" k/ `3 ^6 v  cPascal Gauthier, Economist4 ]  A; t8 N/ r- g. G( m
416-944-5730
( W3 k: T1 T: a. e. D  Z# q: D/ ?. Z
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-9-18 19:07 , Processed in 0.080904 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表