 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
3 D: g7 Q0 l, D" {from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
" P6 T' u" r1 X7 T7 T0 K, E1 Dunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house+ _7 p1 R' f" c' S
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by# P( x1 D; [2 s5 T
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
! S, y. _$ ~1 ?) e& O3 Boverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
& a! z$ P3 E \$ \' E6 h1 {that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately0 W* G; @. v" h+ \0 E
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past; O, \% ~5 P, E" [
three years." x9 }# V- d% W' T2 H1 c# \
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
5 P2 O1 z" d. P0 p, btheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
9 l: ?# D6 c& a7 p L2 Zaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects8 h* J4 T0 K- \! Q. H4 A4 N
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices4 `9 g) R4 c0 L7 x' c# S
to fundamentally justified levels.
( U! } J1 o* n1 ~We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
4 B, @$ N( x5 r& Q% i4 q& Pwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and6 w* c2 O" l1 ]' ^1 m0 ]
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
2 V) o( f& ~" L1 Awhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
. ^4 \; u9 V. i; E; ^& ?there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s) M1 R d' I0 m% I- S" C9 ?9 R
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where! W: S8 \$ R) q3 p
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch9 h9 [* o& R7 h# g. P* C( h! E
that is now being rapidly reined in.( u& Z( L: ~& f6 A# Q3 T% l
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,6 \9 C' Q% K' j B7 G6 { t* d1 L1 W
the construction of too many new homes over the boom' w. s3 D, X6 G: @; k9 N* J6 q! f
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh) x$ u- t# H3 `0 h% q* k
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
( u: Q0 U' ^6 F+ v1 f/ Efrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
# i, g2 b% F( I+ L6 l* U, J0 Qremain choppy and new residential construction will be9 |. L" B- s' ?% r3 P
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction' x. o# Y& `; i7 P' `- {( q. G
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this U8 O1 }5 b8 D( k
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide$ q& P7 H/ X% g8 H+ e( F
residential construction will fall further to around8 L$ r& n5 A7 L5 Y
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units+ e! |0 V7 ~* T! \* B
in the fourth quarter.+ D, N. r6 P8 Y
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,7 I3 W+ i! S1 y) b* Y
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run% {. k; \ t0 H" m! h: A/ H2 ^1 M
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each, ~; u$ B7 W- U L- E! t1 V, r
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home3 N5 {2 {+ U8 {) e" n$ |
values since house prices should track incomes over the# R6 G) i- @% I s9 k2 d
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we" P- O2 l9 y* B+ ~6 Z$ `
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers2 m% \, f: z) |9 c9 I
of residential construction.
! n7 G* ~: x8 S& G/ h4 I- T% OTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a( q; k" x: v! q
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction: }+ t9 M: l& `7 g. @
would have occurred if housing had been priced
- Z' y3 Z' a9 Y2 c8 P6 Voptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this ]2 I s, y$ j4 Y
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new% ^+ g) g: P8 ?3 ? J
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too5 J: @: l. H0 F) C8 M
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
$ u) x/ O' {5 v, R7 a( _. zRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,: u& z2 w$ ?* y' K: @
where housing demand will further contract under waning3 v$ T0 \; W; C: o" ]5 W" Q, L1 `
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
N! `: y m2 r e9 ^already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
5 _# ]. j. w+ e3 ?3 Tvery time that the resale market has swung into strong% |; U m+ X( J) X& n
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces; x5 ]% P3 H# L, L/ ]2 I
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural7 }; }* |5 \) [# `% @/ N
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
, P" P% P4 J7 r% J( K% xQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
8 V8 U& J, y# Rstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de( y, T5 _, ^6 ]) N5 Z
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,4 {: c( Z7 N0 W# H2 H, b2 O
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership* ]' g8 T, T* a
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
% C5 y1 |: ^. O% T% [5 Z, K3 H. G6 J* [cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
6 A/ K }# U* B o, H9 Nlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
8 @9 |$ B+ f+ B$ ^6 y- y7 Rcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
6 k- w0 h+ P3 d2 c( ~) m' Hhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under5 O% L" T7 s0 q! c6 k2 O
construction mean that record numbers of condos will0 ~" y' Y7 D% D1 Q v; m
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as B0 O9 |7 C0 j$ W- @
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could3 m( s' I* ~) m# e7 x! |
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while$ }( K k$ j9 Z3 _: N+ p
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
# c. e) ~7 Q* D7 `0 Vanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
3 ` z9 i# a3 ^ s+ I' ]inter-provincial and international migration over the coming3 D/ A/ \, u8 S7 w& _
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
# f3 R9 I7 c* hwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
D" Y( p {) \- B, c+ zOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
' z6 |) b: i, K$ n1 w, ?- @MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
6 H+ n" b3 d j! JGrant Bishop, Economist: `; M3 u4 ~7 {0 X( \2 ^* @/ P3 C
416-982-8063
X- V. F* R1 CPascal Gauthier, Economist1 v1 J* F9 ~% v" h) V
416-944-5730: t5 g( A# F3 o, n
) M" e' d+ h/ Q# O! H, m
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|