 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly* J" b8 ~ T& a) k8 J
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
- P% o& `; m. C, yunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house- Q2 j5 z4 f5 w
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
7 v- Z( \& x& F; Xfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
; M7 Y# ]) {6 b, ~overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
" k% W: ]# g" d; e8 Ethat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
2 {- v. F; ^* X+ q12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past2 n# n; |7 V# |" \+ l [7 {8 [
three years.! J9 ?, f! b1 n" _
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
1 i" ^- U, E2 h0 V; l+ ltheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of& c$ W8 L. W$ x; ]) q
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
2 i5 p& s, j" q$ p' `+ cboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
7 }7 W' r* v- w+ x9 e) @to fundamentally justified levels.
p0 r) J2 V* n: L/ \% sWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
! h& S( m; N) d5 ?" r: J/ U+ zwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
3 l$ R# ?! B. M- Ithat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”/ f3 v9 X6 E3 f
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
4 G% `1 v2 b. i tthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s5 e' v; ?) ~7 l n5 O' [
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
+ I, c1 R7 a" O4 ~$ p" O( fhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch, }. S" S0 E+ Y0 n8 s2 v
that is now being rapidly reined in.' A. J7 C, a4 X. ]
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,2 \! y: a8 X8 {7 D
the construction of too many new homes over the boom" g0 N$ G' B+ a" D
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh6 Z/ Y% C: q& Z
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
0 x0 V$ n. q' k8 v: Sfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will! c2 `- n3 ?4 z" Q: X. O
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
# y+ m, z$ Q) w) s: I" Gdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction" g- M: E4 ~8 Y3 C' I
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
% Z3 i& K% Y A( U$ [/ b" \to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
* H" ~0 D& ^: ^5 w. r$ A- A% `9 A. i sresidential construction will fall further to around* R. l) N0 [ c
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
+ L2 Y& i8 [! ^6 jin the fourth quarter.% R2 t: `' p0 [! L7 f
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
. b8 Z* l) d4 F4 Z. d0 Qwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
+ W* X/ {$ L0 C% M/ |) Vfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
; \/ [' f2 f1 Y4 v& J/ Eprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home. ]+ C8 ]) P7 ~
values since house prices should track incomes over the
' ^/ B, H. G# X& r) z! Mlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we6 M2 x( J5 U. _) ^
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers; ~; X; I" C( v. j
of residential construction.
' v8 L/ h8 ?. G A. S# fTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
! a* B1 W) z' I6 {) n. o) b“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
; S# x3 q) K- w+ W0 |; N, Bwould have occurred if housing had been priced8 ^6 L8 E: y4 @# s9 g4 L
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this5 X3 {+ f: @+ V- u0 {* y
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
* {% Z* S! ]* Z6 Z( G, Xunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too( O/ w2 P2 \( p, V9 {+ }( [) @
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
8 e% d+ l6 i4 D& p& lRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies, N- k5 V) l6 L$ i) O2 q( M! n
where housing demand will further contract under waning
8 ]: w2 a9 `" Apopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
! y' P, h+ I0 C; A8 ~% Lalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
& Q) i9 e$ q# P/ wvery time that the resale market has swung into strong/ _! m6 s( k- O1 I
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
. n0 i: S) E z5 \& ~has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural% D( t/ u, F% B* Y& U. G. C% I
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
# [$ }9 \: J, W+ N! b: GQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the2 o- P8 c' q( t6 L7 `
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de! V2 Q5 D: u& |7 W+ Q# _
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
R/ t3 M& m i. C: |, agiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership$ I% _% z4 E. T- I3 G
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
( D* Y) Y. L/ J1 n8 jcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears+ W9 g6 L1 b2 a. L% }" d
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
& Q6 A& e. D- r0 econdo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
$ [2 [3 o4 k/ T: t$ ^0 d7 M2 O8 B; Rhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under# w, R9 ]0 X+ z5 i7 O1 G
construction mean that record numbers of condos will- E* e: \ c5 ?6 N0 ]/ R ~
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as. e" @' l6 ^+ B/ ]! P4 W
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
3 q( K8 y+ l% w2 x: aspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while5 F# u4 p4 c8 Y1 l9 s6 X% R9 Z+ R1 Q
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
2 R3 v5 d s: I- f5 m* ]+ Uanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from! J! ?2 q, u& }- }
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming- _# C4 p/ Q) I ^" q D
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
% S' X) g0 h5 m! L# U1 t' o9 l3 mwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.) R' @+ p( B6 ]4 q
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
, @8 g; u( ^! O* ZMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
1 {* g0 [- s" b# J3 k7 iGrant Bishop, Economist* j# `+ s: b8 j; }
416-982-8063% Z- U, ?' Z- j8 L+ Q4 G5 ^" J
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
) L: b" v4 n9 Q/ ^- N416-944-5730
: [0 @5 H* z) P% o0 a7 r& ^
( `2 R6 O3 H/ h/ @# c8 Shttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|