 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly( T$ A3 q; X% b& ]
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove% _" l5 ^# M1 M7 {! C
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
7 @/ _3 k3 d9 Eprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
- l0 |) r* Y. b" X ffundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
1 {% o# V/ k% T, j' ^overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
& w4 v! i2 X5 M9 W7 [that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately8 |4 O, x, l5 S( H6 I
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
; [" n; D! X" hthree years.
' ]& k9 w4 ~ Y2 ?: S/ H, CBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
7 U: W9 R. k! R3 z2 ~their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
2 K. G7 a/ F1 P' z( i# baffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects* b, a5 a. C- Z5 Z. y
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
( h, }+ g% p, t7 [0 L1 }to fundamentally justified levels.
9 _8 ]% s4 V7 V0 d& oWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
5 m: Y. X$ C" R" h& o% Uwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
% d4 P# w# i. w. ethat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
1 \9 l; i8 ^5 [6 _! X0 l4 bwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although6 G/ s: ~. p7 H. d
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
$ t: t/ Z* J4 G; S5 p“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
. c* n& l% \3 g$ [" _+ y0 `' ihomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch& I) Q$ I; I4 G* a. v8 e
that is now being rapidly reined in.9 B8 a$ e: l4 @! C
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,) S2 l+ y8 s8 w% d/ X X: I
the construction of too many new homes over the boom: B8 f$ o' J) S5 l
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh* `3 H! u1 Q7 J0 N" l
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers+ }! ?4 P5 ? F3 q$ x" E2 i
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will1 ~9 g; v7 |2 a# D8 t" o
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
7 C: R# e# ^8 g' _dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
k/ _ p/ K( v0 H$ N h& w$ x5 Ais now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this- I$ j7 e( P- P0 v9 |
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
+ r. u9 R% a# U- V' i5 V* iresidential construction will fall further to around+ F9 T% ~# M |
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units. ^3 j: @" ~. r
in the fourth quarter.9 `6 Z, r# G, i5 O m9 r
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
1 u. v4 g! g: P/ ^" Ywe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run( c; { Z" E8 O Q0 m2 v
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
% y) e8 d# d7 v; uprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home. Z$ e% e3 C' q$ Y7 N
values since house prices should track incomes over the/ i3 e2 r. |# i5 F( }+ `
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we8 @: Z( y$ ~) A2 T7 K
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers& C4 c3 Y, F1 @. D% y
of residential construction.' h8 H& B5 `# a- R) K
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
) i2 z* H" E. j* f6 S5 T, ^1 ?“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction. C; _4 z9 ?8 M2 g) R. j" l% B
would have occurred if housing had been priced9 V: T# w; x( J) r& v
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
' ~" f+ C6 z& z, Wfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new" }4 ^/ P; ]1 S! t* w k4 q- G
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too& C; N7 |- M8 ~5 V" \* h& R1 |
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
/ \" W, I% n: E+ E5 |% c. iRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,# C w7 G& d. N% L
where housing demand will further contract under waning: |0 l" s# d1 `3 I& k6 u; X7 h% o) m
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are/ N6 i! d1 q b: T) e# Q1 r, a1 T$ o
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
) G# n; r& \- G' Bvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
6 n. A2 D$ D& J; ?2 `( vbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
4 _! @5 ?" D" V/ o, Dhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
3 c0 ?* \; q( [# y% y2 [. Lweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
) H) i* B* q/ E: S( oQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
& b( E0 a L( w! {strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de8 z" t9 Z% Q& D7 Q4 u. B
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,3 @. i& V3 v: F+ [) G3 C8 j
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership4 t9 Z' r5 ?3 I# q; v& _3 i& C$ @
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a. x+ T& X Z5 c6 E/ w4 r
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
/ g: V P" D7 ?6 Slimited – with the important exception of the Toronto- H! W2 K6 W" ?
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
, n7 H9 P; U! d3 k. O, ^high levels of apartment-style units presently under2 C7 c# q% c: C8 X9 X
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
1 }, J! R/ R7 l* Preach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as, {0 \ K- g6 j+ q( ]
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
7 w' w6 ~: p' z; d3 ?4 S1 u1 `3 Tspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while* k2 m4 J0 r9 T0 m0 S7 N
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
3 C2 ?( u- j5 B* t8 S( X* nanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
: S! e, f% }2 ]: x5 v Binter-provincial and international migration over the coming* y0 j" c# x5 |! u: I
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
4 x1 r* X# [. W" |& \will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
" K" f) k) a$ o3 ROVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING) e% R& v# a0 S
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
4 I0 ?8 N, M5 J% iGrant Bishop, Economist. n8 @" L- L9 e6 g. H& \$ z
416-982-80634 h& ^1 x& f5 s4 L) b8 u
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
: U! ]% F q3 r, l416-944-57307 a, W( w7 u$ t4 b: [' U
, e4 H. B" G4 o* ]" R4 M) w
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|