 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
4 o/ H7 w) m) W6 r7 X5 @from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove; Z3 J+ I/ a& e8 M: j
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
' u* `- S+ \, `; y. z2 D3 U, Vprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
: z' {" l$ N! W4 U6 |- p0 nfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This3 C4 r f0 ], b5 _) @
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction- R1 L' n4 K* o" F( p
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately& d( K+ a& x8 t+ N+ I: J) o
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past9 H9 ?8 t$ B6 H! ~" x
three years.
" J/ l" {; j" n1 X$ Y' ~' \' XBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
1 t- ^7 `8 n; W( W6 K2 k$ qtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of9 \* p8 o' O# M& j2 x1 [- P4 l9 T
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
: i, D( C! p7 |both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
: _6 [& @/ D- d5 Q( y2 q" Pto fundamentally justified levels.
. \9 N8 R( t# T; P! xWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”$ |9 V2 ?! X/ @2 c/ r9 f( y
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and$ P) p; I6 W, c- C: k2 M
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven” M: x: l- F: b* s0 \7 |
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
( ~2 b9 I6 S% ?( r* b6 C$ _there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s( a/ [7 C/ M7 @' W
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
9 a! F0 s7 ~* g! f' E+ Q" Shomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
' e! a# }3 R3 K: b+ Q& `that is now being rapidly reined in.
- r- H# s: h* a3 kWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
: D0 o% J. {' s/ P/ ^% Fthe construction of too many new homes over the boom7 P |6 k9 \5 c
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
' X" o: ?* g: W% don markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers5 {; ]1 L, B" ?6 f4 `5 }- k
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
2 M/ ~5 V& I% M; @remain choppy and new residential construction will be/ ~( v( Z6 U0 R7 i# J
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
& H" d$ B$ R ~% ]/ N4 C9 X$ g6 } pis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
! ^# q( X1 p5 u% ]/ I8 @2 fto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
. v' p- L6 _& A7 S/ {7 `; F A: Bresidential construction will fall further to around
0 Y1 C1 X+ Y6 M125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
) T; N6 S9 L. N+ e9 pin the fourth quarter.
) M* i2 A3 U8 m5 {To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,( d( g4 _3 |; g+ v$ `
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
1 I) ?% x* f, |; N2 P- t+ [, n0 Rfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
/ J' t4 J) H0 u: H/ s( Xprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home) p9 X$ P& H( `5 D$ h J* ^
values since house prices should track incomes over the4 p; H* }& r/ _, C
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we& O5 V% T0 y+ J1 @5 o4 E3 F; e
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
! z" g8 g; Y% e' q0 Z7 R: Tof residential construction., E* \$ T7 p6 _) ?5 X
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
0 w! n6 S$ a: m- }8 F1 D( I“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction) K/ ?# P9 ~0 [, A# ] h7 x
would have occurred if housing had been priced: K2 P$ ?4 s# S! z0 v
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
6 y5 d: O" _' i# a, pfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new4 P4 U! V) o4 O S$ E
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
: Q& s5 a; l( ?1 i! z5 wmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.4 [% ~/ |0 _, G, F
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,& E% n- ^ ]/ `. j* u7 i/ l
where housing demand will further contract under waning0 a0 q, b/ r9 z/ u/ M& D
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are2 N$ `% ~. D( K
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the- D4 z& @! s; Z+ Q0 A
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
* W1 N% [) k K H2 _" {; [buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
1 u) `4 X% A4 Z g9 l, h: [0 zhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural S! R( M5 F V5 P; U0 x
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
/ O D7 o& k4 ~5 P; aQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
4 A; F8 j, v3 O9 c% Hstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de- R) o# B0 U0 |# a7 R
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
7 F# U( a1 y5 e5 a$ z2 @3 Ggiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership1 i% K# x: }8 I7 @& N$ @
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a3 q* g% l; r; p& v2 l
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
& s2 n6 ~7 {' Dlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
5 b3 U1 z+ Z B9 Dcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically, _4 i* `. A$ Z/ _4 p/ ~* K
high levels of apartment-style units presently under1 C* c( C6 a1 G3 U' U
construction mean that record numbers of condos will( F( R5 e, B2 b- d. R, i* C
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as, N# w* u. R. M) D
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
- u- r3 V- n7 sspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
3 K! t* s6 k) j0 a+ X2 L7 x0 kresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we( w8 V6 H2 x! x& }2 f# f
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from! o# t- u( s! q* T U
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
% [* `5 f ]! q; yyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
) t! s' c- G1 h5 R3 a0 l. zwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.2 L$ m9 b, n8 x8 T2 ], X! _
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
6 _0 m5 t/ y8 j7 M6 v4 x, t8 HMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
6 C) A. M% e0 D' i S+ i8 g0 YGrant Bishop, Economist
9 T. I8 m9 M) [$ y/ }; B& J! Q416-982-8063( ^/ M, h3 b) Q) B5 V/ `
Pascal Gauthier, Economist4 l' Z6 B' g( N. J1 m, ~/ V
416-944-5730$ V" b! r4 @* `2 }
6 b" w; }0 _2 b& {0 p5 |9 ^
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|