 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
! M3 G2 }6 e5 x! s' }, n! ?from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove7 G' n3 v1 @% G. o i& v
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house4 R/ g; k) A" I$ |- Z i7 @
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
8 d, m' X, w ^6 ~" B0 @fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This1 L8 S. `! O8 t$ X. @4 Z
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
$ I7 R; S: m; V# x9 s2 M+ ythat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately7 v& |1 e$ [4 U {$ C$ E
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past' {# y0 _+ I- h n9 e6 j
three years.
* m0 G0 D/ m* V; dBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from6 q) l) u3 o% m u; T# ]
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
: b: h' D T2 Daffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
9 {% p2 J) ]+ M! A2 d: [both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices6 q; X! h& [4 ~5 i6 g
to fundamentally justified levels.* Y h8 M! W0 u. B
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”1 s) E/ k0 i4 r) ]8 r! \: O
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and: I: r }7 E. O; z
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
+ s3 ^5 m2 v6 m/ J) ^6 v! Wwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
' E! }% g; e! o. F9 Z7 Nthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
! S t5 ` G: R1 T- S“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where- `; \# g: Y% B. M- n+ C5 J, A# E
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
6 Y+ c4 q+ s7 ]2 w/ y" J% ~8 r/ hthat is now being rapidly reined in.
' n$ V& F- N6 v9 j# {; r7 ~6 \3 {# `) KWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,9 d3 E1 M e. O' c" ?; V0 j
the construction of too many new homes over the boom$ x# Y6 U w: L9 h: d
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh+ M9 |& P2 g9 e- n4 w
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers$ m5 P+ l \: e) U7 f' o
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will& C3 O8 F7 P6 f0 e4 F' c
remain choppy and new residential construction will be- e) D; [5 }, R' _
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction4 @$ h/ z' E+ _% X' N
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
* x: ^; m/ q- s' z3 A' xto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide) W6 I& g7 z8 `, o1 g0 M- k( u4 y
residential construction will fall further to around
! n" r6 N; M {3 t& v; m125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
& A4 V4 X& c gin the fourth quarter.4 |- M2 ?3 R" J% O6 r
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,$ G, T& ^/ L7 A4 m' G& x
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
' W5 k* T0 j2 ]' \; r# Sfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each$ y/ @% i9 G# e% X
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
( b+ b3 n2 j8 zvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
+ `% n/ u3 e! p* K* Y2 u, w$ Slong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we! U! {3 x0 a) l6 d7 f
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers, o! h+ D1 g, X
of residential construction.6 d! v3 }% v& h' p0 n
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a4 c6 ~* W( M5 a6 ?& v. h" S2 ~3 ?- ]6 m, g
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
" Z1 p \1 ^8 G8 S; ?& |would have occurred if housing had been priced
6 H. P2 h0 t7 L; [. Uoptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
$ K/ e$ p3 L7 r7 Efundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new7 t& w( ?6 \+ Y3 {! d
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
( x7 o9 x# _' y- R: Zmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.# Z6 D& t, z9 `! Z" l: l5 z- Q
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
" S1 \& v* r2 K- twhere housing demand will further contract under waning1 N; l z2 w% T) N
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
: K. M- D$ y) J. @, `( {already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the/ L: B* b: T6 M
very time that the resale market has swung into strong0 g$ Y+ |5 a$ T! n& i$ v6 B* ]/ g
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces# Y3 D! C3 \- X8 {7 n9 s- v& t; }
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
( P1 Q% e. M4 w! { y# Yweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
# o7 _ J( V! b$ m( `; `2 MQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
9 ^7 o) j. p. O1 K7 `strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de) w1 }; e: s+ ^) e6 M
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,5 `+ ]" L. l: N1 F4 ~( X: \
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership7 R% N% y2 K! p8 b r
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
# V! M2 z. m$ N% Ccyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
0 R& [* W" }! q# I- |; m3 nlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto4 ]" |( F( ?) z; ^; |/ `
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
3 u# v9 W% b% z" E6 a* Ohigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
( L* q' `9 _' ]: Vconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will# i7 e& j( ^" Y" |4 ^
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as3 ?7 o" o& [4 `) V# A
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
( }, \/ T2 O4 {$ S/ ]7 ispike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
1 k# n! T& G* ?. n6 I# D% Iresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we0 @! ~5 s& d1 Q# J' g
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
: {$ G8 J4 `0 V m: ?) |1 t: I& Linter-provincial and international migration over the coming% e, H- S& g3 v+ n: ]/ t
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
. K5 S" N/ N f! Owill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
s( A7 b4 ^; p5 ]: k: bOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING* u1 x# ?/ r9 }8 g7 C: A: g
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
. e9 v5 K% Z8 I% n; b4 [8 E, OGrant Bishop, Economist
& q- ]5 f8 j% x* d2 E- I416-982-8063- k( C% Q& H, q$ c. L
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
, B7 p4 Y0 ?! g4 W& \! E416-944-5730# \- X# O8 R7 T$ r' M+ g$ F
& K7 C9 r/ j5 ^7 ^3 ]) n* o x
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|