埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1606|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
6 D3 Q' P! I& |! O+ J# M. Vfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
0 ?; f& E  O6 R" [# k: z' Punsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house% n1 Q' h5 J% e0 s) s6 L4 o5 o' a" Q
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by4 L$ O: @: O* W. r
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
1 G  g& n/ @9 O1 I* ]8 _" P7 t6 a! hoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
, ?# \) k; c5 l1 S. e5 }' qthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
. r7 R0 K, f/ v4 D8 S12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
+ f( n% ~' S8 ]three years.5 ~% Q2 m% \0 V6 p/ d  Y
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
( l/ \  W6 ^" P0 W. j- Z; Xtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
4 q9 ^6 D4 r$ z3 `* ^affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
8 R, Z; \$ u$ E. P6 @6 aboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices5 ^0 {& u, u4 p, j4 i5 [" A0 a) F
to fundamentally justified levels.
* B& z$ f& O5 `! \2 X' aWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”5 Z! V, s0 k) R% }' e. `
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
# i: a8 Y- \5 z9 x+ othat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
/ m0 m7 l! Q( B9 A& F9 p& ~; pwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
4 Q! z  p- L% q  A2 F0 ]there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s% L8 _: M9 D. A  M3 f( j
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
. f% @% |  M  [* o& `. s# D3 _8 [homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch* [& N' c+ `7 _0 R; Y& C* j; s
that is now being rapidly reined in.! t8 X. U- V/ z' h
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
6 H9 `2 ]. {- ?! F" [# Kthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
/ c  x' \. C6 x$ r  Imeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh0 M( a' m3 C$ F% s1 l
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers; M1 c7 h# B3 y. a0 \: u
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
& ^* z# y4 p# y3 aremain choppy and new residential construction will be
8 |2 Q$ c. S( a9 q: m# d, C) Jdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
# @, @$ J& n5 v2 l7 l& i& ris now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
0 D* J' M, A% X4 Yto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
1 l* B! k& a" s4 u6 K2 J0 {0 d8 Dresidential construction will fall further to around
1 A" ^8 v" }0 t+ J125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units6 b; E. g$ l8 z$ }) @/ a
in the fourth quarter.
* f  F1 b4 @( D1 l# `To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
  K7 V& h) r. X1 B: ^we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
7 ?5 d* B& @9 W$ C* Mfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
. V% \/ b7 L( p" bprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home" j3 y1 h4 T  E8 L' q/ I
values since house prices should track incomes over the
7 ^8 u: h0 ~! B7 L; r) I6 o, n: \8 xlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
( s( _6 k. ~, G- x! @) q! c* v0 t) |regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
  r, j* n7 T, Q7 V" Xof residential construction.
/ g# Q$ i! r, Q/ C/ ~, mTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
" T4 s9 e% d. Q+ w& w“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
8 T& p- H" E& xwould have occurred if housing had been priced2 H2 y4 Y) x8 Y) c2 Y0 W9 U$ [
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
- j- y6 [) q  u' V! K- ifundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new) g+ O3 h9 f6 ]1 }- U, {2 S/ e0 Y
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too% o* k' y+ O' d0 I- l7 M
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.& p! M# E. b' h& Y, U9 Y9 D4 ?8 y
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,) O  F8 P- C9 G7 V
where housing demand will further contract under waning8 @/ M3 L6 N  N) z
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
* ~( n* r$ G: V8 P! Q8 L1 U6 }3 Ialready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
( l+ S3 X' i3 e# h, ]very time that the resale market has swung into strong7 `1 {7 S6 l+ C7 M
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
" T" c7 C+ s& u8 z& \has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural; u' h/ W( x: u& U
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.: M1 c- O1 O0 P3 K9 M
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
+ L  `* `- V' ]( ~" vstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
1 ?5 E/ |$ D$ I" m& lMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
( ?# B  S* d4 V, Ggiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership( \3 G3 \* q9 P0 z4 \
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a  f: |5 C, U4 r+ Q1 F
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears( t/ \" k; N. B& L0 i; _
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto* _5 y/ t* Z6 x: F. C  A2 m+ m
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically9 q) N/ z+ I% l' G$ _0 [
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
9 ?( u0 s9 }% ^! fconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will6 N# I4 c8 H6 D! j9 m- i. b2 M
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as9 T3 s" j& B5 W, g: S
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could0 s, L) _" S7 p. Z; E$ J
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while8 L( R* T- E5 R6 I
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we0 n6 l' g, m7 K+ F8 G
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from. D1 ?) G  E6 S0 m. Y& \7 T
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming! n7 q7 A. A+ N9 n
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
7 |7 p8 w5 s- q. n) Q& Wwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.: T% Y+ T7 J$ ]4 V2 s& K
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING' L& `; M7 m+ T! P! X
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
" Z4 h; B9 B$ [+ J  r+ q( fGrant Bishop, Economist
7 f5 O1 d2 w3 L$ Q416-982-8063
" i* ^1 C+ G0 q) \' g: h* U- T) x6 vPascal Gauthier, Economist
" h. A8 @" W- j% X) g416-944-5730
/ z/ Q8 [, r! g% [& M1 j
- M( g: c2 t, }+ k9 L, Qhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
理袁律师事务所
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-4 07:43 , Processed in 0.194247 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表