 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly' R* z1 ?7 B/ i5 n; e. {" O+ H
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove p; z: N6 e( r3 c) l) |
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house, B) d3 S8 d1 _: K# [' M# c" V
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by7 Z7 Q# U7 }! _% H% r, y0 k
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This8 g, }9 c& C% E; Y) i4 c+ w
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
) a+ l" j6 v2 R" I# e* |9 r' j5 r4 Qthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately. p+ _/ J# R% o5 ?! L* d2 }
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
7 P( R' t) q! W2 v7 uthree years.) ]+ v( L) @. `- }6 [& z- ?6 I
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from8 p( Y4 c/ P# P5 Z; ^0 D! w
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of6 D0 e2 |- c& B9 H8 s9 c
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects; @( S, e/ a+ o3 T- T
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
4 ^/ w- q; @. R6 V5 Eto fundamentally justified levels.3 v% D* d, v& W* p/ p
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
5 R" d! d4 @5 ]: ewhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
4 ]; |% V# K8 a! ythat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
" o/ \ ^ _3 v1 `& g; c8 h; k. x$ cwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
! V1 X9 V) S: U3 mthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
: S4 N0 N% ], K5 b" D8 s“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
0 F- ~* F0 C( y4 R+ a; e& Uhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch1 \7 f/ u; G' n8 d
that is now being rapidly reined in.! N F# G5 F4 J4 `5 `
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
+ X v+ @ R$ s" G8 r# Ethe construction of too many new homes over the boom P9 Y1 Y* u9 R+ M+ G0 x. c0 \, _
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
$ z1 Z0 l" w5 v- b# Con markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers2 b! S/ K2 @5 O! d9 D% D
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
" z! c+ w3 J4 Y6 m9 z! Y \, L; oremain choppy and new residential construction will be
4 |8 b( \- x5 ]3 z0 `dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction: V0 `3 l% r% U! h8 t* Q* Q( [
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this$ d" y( C+ q9 Q' |8 \
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 v9 D' ~+ ?: V7 n
residential construction will fall further to around
/ ]9 T5 T/ i+ x/ E8 f/ }# T- Z125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units. j5 q: u# ?" h4 [2 x) k
in the fourth quarter.2 I B( u2 ^, y+ {& a% e+ u
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,% H- X- N/ z2 [
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run( B; |6 F O: m! {( t: K
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
3 w& ^. n0 N* eprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
, `+ f" E2 G9 g9 i- m) f! Svalues since house prices should track incomes over the% B8 I. z; Z+ T/ |' k% B% @4 m
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
0 ~& F# L' D* H3 \6 E/ s( ?. H) @regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers2 F% l0 r. i& G( D1 d* i
of residential construction.) {! S1 ]# N$ h
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
6 s# t* q3 N! I# F3 u/ s“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
2 R; v- P( h& R9 V4 g$ J" H+ x" Ywould have occurred if housing had been priced
: E+ h3 f6 y5 |# i6 Yoptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
m3 \; n/ F, Yfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new5 i6 [/ L; k! D/ C2 U
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too" n) W8 u; S" i" Q
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.3 N. I% u1 m Y, d- Z9 f5 O, h
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
1 y5 z: x: ^8 u ?where housing demand will further contract under waning5 d$ k H V/ d X$ W
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are [% I# P7 A3 O
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the5 n: a: r9 }9 M
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
# K) _- y0 g% |! Wbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces1 |( j9 y: l( y5 ^0 v3 e, p
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural$ b u8 A5 K, ?+ q& X
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.$ s; c) S. Q* }' C& L
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
* J5 q+ Y9 Y9 }7 Nstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
0 | R; e: e* S; H% F; m* M# BMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,4 R9 z4 j) F6 k D# f3 F- A
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
& G& K% c: I2 \6 srates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
$ h0 q( X' r1 y5 j: B" E) w! I9 ?! ecyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears$ w' B3 f2 o; J& N
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
* ?0 n+ S2 U3 ccondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
}' p) z& `9 G% C! J( _0 l$ Ahigh levels of apartment-style units presently under& K$ z/ J- n" U e1 p T
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
' d0 ?+ x1 M+ m; P9 F% _! nreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as' E/ G$ q7 b1 k' d2 I
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could+ c9 \" E, A |% D
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
7 h7 y$ a( ^" \' ^residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we3 P% J& ~. b+ U) N `. e0 l0 [
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from0 F6 m0 a% `* p/ ?
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming8 T0 R& l. b( v& p& k$ l
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
7 a( N7 H: W# l" r vwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.# k" b8 V5 A; R" W& M8 J# V! {
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING7 S/ r9 Q/ |% \0 i$ `
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS9 T% I9 V6 Q# v) o
Grant Bishop, Economist. `7 @5 A- S9 V m5 s* E
416-982-80635 {1 ~% P, C( I' M
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
$ ]1 X# }5 H- M7 {5 }7 u416-944-5730; A* r: K9 g* h9 F' s
$ a7 J1 w& Q( i0 F: i) j0 @0 ^
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|