 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
+ B3 g1 y6 ?$ O. c Ufrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove- I1 `6 C; N0 Y- O4 D3 m$ p R' c
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house0 d' ]" h( s% X9 g
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by2 L* [; G* M' l6 x6 n$ P
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
6 ^/ f+ l3 v: F' \, Voverpricing compelled a level of residential construction- u, K, |# V9 f4 Q% T4 N1 \- f
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately, X9 z5 b! ^, L% o! J
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
6 I( G% B* @" kthree years.
' m: v7 z- ?- O1 h' h# q! jBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
j% ~ j) \3 R; t! Jtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
" O$ I/ J; s. |/ Aaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
K q# B$ k$ b# Y h+ z- a+ N- hboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
* p/ k1 ]9 {; |( Q: |5 Ato fundamentally justified levels.9 S: F- ?" J5 S, E6 Q" c
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”8 ?. x+ E2 u2 Z2 x; Y8 E8 `
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and& ?, o7 l/ B0 Z' _* a
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”0 Z: R0 C9 U: U3 \
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although& s: d! c6 Q- }- a/ H# l9 J
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s7 H7 k" _' ~- A( ^
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where8 _+ R* [+ k' x4 k$ A# ]
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
2 p5 v) O, R) Wthat is now being rapidly reined in.$ f) L0 T& f7 z- r) T+ L
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,3 I- X9 z% [5 e' F) _
the construction of too many new homes over the boom$ B2 f4 Z8 Y8 U; i
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh& {9 v A- O* \* Z: ]! X
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
, j3 w1 |4 F; ~from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will* o1 Y- R& l' \+ v' l O; ]
remain choppy and new residential construction will be! l# _/ o- d" t: g: {/ R. v. S
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
/ j1 M' L9 Y8 U; a5 o3 ?" s9 Gis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this: u) @: Z1 w$ j# X+ ~0 V
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide5 r1 Q9 c( I1 y( j* {
residential construction will fall further to around
/ D8 Q8 {/ N; g. b" l$ v/ H6 H125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
G7 X* V, k) H6 f6 t# pin the fourth quarter.7 Z- |0 r9 }; V9 F* ?5 v
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,9 G. B L0 L" @8 ~, M# ]
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run8 Y4 R6 K1 I3 Z/ b1 L8 r) b
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each( i* @- q7 P* x& g8 U
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home, n5 n3 B$ ?' l* ~/ }- |
values since house prices should track incomes over the
$ t, b1 G& X) @long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
, }/ q, ~& o3 q8 Z* cregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
! \! G9 W% S( s; fof residential construction.6 a$ H+ K' w: @9 y. R. U/ I$ K
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a% v% t: U( G4 Z$ D" e( C
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction" B! `2 h# N: o' {. H, ~3 K
would have occurred if housing had been priced, ]+ |( u7 [) u1 x) `/ r
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this- A8 g5 b' Z r6 U7 n+ s
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
4 L. y5 e+ F* h1 N1 _ F Vunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
& {6 V# _' t. B9 pmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
+ d' Y* t |. N3 t) ?3 u0 q% [9 `' ARegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,) g$ C( ^3 z @* c6 l
where housing demand will further contract under waning+ g5 G& K1 c" N( c$ A
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are0 X: v8 Y% ^' @) R/ \- N
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
& n, _% ^' I6 J) _very time that the resale market has swung into strong
9 K) T7 Y4 H' L( n0 r Hbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
! c! j8 q! s( T+ V4 ~4 Nhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
% \" A% a* d# x% ^; ]. Xweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.; U( A% k% m3 X! `4 r7 E
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the: ?# ~1 D1 R% j9 H3 h
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de# A# M5 n) b2 g7 w1 ~2 Z$ ~' C
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
% A3 L8 H! B( Y5 s! _" p8 Bgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership& D ]/ U% Q% w7 [! p0 N) R
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a8 Q6 g' |6 u7 H1 I! y% A1 Q
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears8 h$ ]0 \& V' j/ B$ Z# o* J
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto2 c9 e! B9 n n; o: Y% B& g
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically% S6 u: r) U+ E7 ]) K/ {! Y# u& `
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
, d1 _0 q* \% K9 Nconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will8 ^8 q; l' o) j$ D+ k* s0 v: g( I
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as* [2 y1 P* h& A& X1 I( c0 x
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
7 h8 k* Z2 y9 U Hspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
9 P8 y. x3 I2 X; b6 }. uresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we1 `7 O2 H" w( v2 p
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from& r$ `# X) G/ r$ ?
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
. U( J8 ]% L) g) q2 iyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,2 t$ N4 {' d1 H+ U2 q
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding. U7 c! d5 W% ]/ K2 v$ o: G! w6 d- O
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING$ a5 c6 a1 }9 H5 `" @5 j2 T9 y
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS% h% e$ v* |) b+ |/ h" I
Grant Bishop, Economist6 s4 @, |4 A+ j
416-982-8063
9 I3 L3 O# |/ v7 CPascal Gauthier, Economist) u( [$ D; X- |
416-944-5730* l. e3 R. ]- E+ n/ \* G
" a! X% F6 y- x) N7 K$ k
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|