TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

依勒特

During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
, p) c( j0 z  x: e. t6 r) Bunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
) E, g. }3 ~2 Fprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
' o' y3 n; z7 f: Y' t* Y12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
three years.
& y* a- O7 Q5 A% M3 aBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
. T$ K$ c. h. J# S/ R) ]( W% laffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
to fundamentally justified levels.
6 l( p6 i, g/ ^8 T" ?9 VWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
4 e/ l7 E& |3 ?: u4 @" Gwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
5 _! J4 ^9 j% r1 }0 gwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
2 x0 m# V/ R# i! pthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
' k8 _+ C. C) u7 T- ?6 C“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
+ z2 q' C2 o$ @9 e! ?+ N7 c& N( Q) Ehomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
9 y# [' }' S/ v' B) nthat is now being rapidly reined in.
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
) F' N' e: g0 z5 C  n" ?; I2 ^the construction of too many new homes over the boom
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
# U. s. |9 a. b) N8 |2 c0 n& Pon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
6 Y: q% C# F: ]- t4 V3 wremain choppy and new residential construction will be
6 }: s9 c5 M- _# w9 Z8 q. mdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
) `$ d/ W1 T3 {1 ]4 oresidential construction will fall further to around
; b) @. c5 e  L4 T; C125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
* U# O% l& D' {+ b( P7 |in the fourth quarter.
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
. \8 @- z7 {3 sprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
values since house prices should track incomes over the
$ g7 `6 k* X0 T. Plong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
' c2 M: ?1 ~$ i1 h3 x: jof residential construction.
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
, y# Q- r, d0 K  `$ T( `: awould have occurred if housing had been priced
+ }( W/ C9 i" |. Toptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
$ _6 {3 `+ R# o+ H. \% hfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
5 ~+ `+ t/ n1 m* v% zunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
- g$ M3 n8 c9 q1 iwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
2 J* N; o; q  T% \population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
' S  }/ U- t, V* n' {# D: Y8 V) tvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
* [3 P1 T; |" e, J8 K9 [Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
2 G2 A" l: }& c; M" G. astrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
, V/ x( T2 w. A5 k7 v4 o6 \( Q$ zMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
* C& U6 D  j3 ]5 Z7 x' T( ^8 S) ]limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
& v' E' X7 V3 y( @high levels of apartment-style units presently under
/ k4 N  u* l2 S! a& A) ^construction mean that record numbers of condos will
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
- }, A: j9 G6 a' j- {! \( B7 X; q9 h' Iresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
' R* M, E( h0 k6 m( P/ Z: `inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
7 w, G/ D+ i( V8 H+ ?! Mwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
Grant Bishop, Economist
416-982-8063
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
) \7 k/ H$ k+ U6 x0 G416-944-5730
! R; J, t1 ~4 f9 L' p) S' H7 G
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf

宋兵乙