 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly7 W6 p- b/ @. Q# W4 _" F
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
0 m$ B. q' { P" D& e# }6 |unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
. v' o1 ~& d( x) j6 Mprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
8 R# m" L# C( S1 L1 C. Y& vfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
" ]" S3 M( I) P# d. V7 K- j% A* w, Eoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction& X2 d. U Y! E0 F/ O8 V
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
, b* I X) H9 ]; S12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
4 p. }* P; a8 G# V' W. uthree years.
" M' G& H" `$ b; CBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
8 {4 l- |% d" ] z0 J2 ~6 k0 D9 Qtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of0 n: s1 Y$ q& j
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
2 U S% D$ x6 Y0 _0 tboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
( i5 u, j" t* E$ D. }' u pto fundamentally justified levels.$ m& a. c- G" ?6 w8 Y( P. z# S$ s# u! A
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
2 B3 f1 G( x; F3 G8 Z5 kwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
, ^+ E' @' @5 _4 {: c$ P3 Cthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven” e6 U. T" b: S. Y
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
1 U, O0 {* Y& N9 kthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
2 g5 l/ u! Q c5 W }“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
" z1 a. d3 ~# n" Q Qhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
5 T; B7 n8 i" A+ h5 q. Gthat is now being rapidly reined in.
S) G9 @% a8 Y5 s4 Z$ N2 p8 O* G& VWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs," y! m- I0 _: N% v
the construction of too many new homes over the boom3 l; h2 M/ q9 f( A7 }" A8 p- v
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh: Z) ~* y, X+ y
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
; a% J" F6 J9 e4 D$ N1 {4 [2 \from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will. y. F3 _' L7 f1 Y
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
8 I, m5 T3 V- a/ N9 mdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
- f, d+ {) l( N, ]3 Nis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this+ T3 }( ?8 p4 w7 ^! O* [: Y
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 l) o* k. F1 b( k
residential construction will fall further to around! E, ^' P2 O7 |: `5 m1 ~
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units/ `& i L7 I I# Q. Y
in the fourth quarter.
4 G! B& j" R' \5 b1 `7 ?$ f% ITo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
) W, B4 C% v4 f l3 M: t3 Xwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run5 W& Z. \& L" I$ n0 k& Q
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each+ q7 k* ?3 g6 d' k+ P; k7 @1 [
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home2 e! ?4 k4 ?) T& o0 _( T
values since house prices should track incomes over the D: b( J$ E, e, N( g- J, B& Z3 ]
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we( V6 g7 q$ ?8 p4 T& i8 B ` L
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers2 ]2 p. w) b( }8 ?: D9 u0 {5 A
of residential construction.
+ l5 G$ R- ?/ z: ~To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
, l: l8 u3 b% I$ w' M$ |5 u/ x“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction2 b7 N2 ?/ ? V3 ]; a% @* G
would have occurred if housing had been priced
+ M3 M( ]; l1 K& K0 v6 W+ koptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
: I1 p( W. e9 P& k- ?fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new& Z" a7 f$ Q0 T8 r& N9 f
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too( h1 F" t; t& B/ r, A6 y
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.5 }5 n: U. S O) g
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,. s, x. P D: f3 c* ^
where housing demand will further contract under waning
3 a" ~6 p; V) y$ {8 }* Mpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are# k# G4 }2 N0 M! ~8 [. u
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
& W% s( G8 J# w- Xvery time that the resale market has swung into strong$ O+ ?8 `) e5 c& U- v
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces$ O4 A4 g6 q, `- h4 t" _7 i
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
9 l# A; i; _6 @) a( L- j5 J2 s: nweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.: b8 p% y+ r3 c# S- k* F
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
) _" _. E$ D; T) V1 r1 O, e% _- bstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
0 F0 D; r( e. n/ v9 MMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
1 w& e) X E: \given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
/ l9 b+ y% L6 N, r4 Zrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a* N2 y7 D. |( }/ M3 n1 W
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
' _' b3 U9 u7 t& v# flimited – with the important exception of the Toronto7 s% E$ B' x4 r5 t9 n* w9 c$ H D) l
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically. C4 g/ u9 [% u3 Z
high levels of apartment-style units presently under7 O; } Q/ w) C; I0 V% }) F
construction mean that record numbers of condos will% c9 W1 U9 f/ c7 l. f
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
! g. Y) v* h0 `, n0 z0 t9 lcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
7 I: e# T# V* Q1 d! D1 ? \spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
: x: V0 q; J) C C2 Tresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we" o2 E+ T! ]0 _% t# K: c
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
" w% `0 ~; ~$ W% a# jinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
" y7 N7 h/ n. w7 Syears, which, along with improvements in affordability,8 G! z2 [3 }- P2 j1 ^) I @, k5 r: b
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
$ c: h. R9 l/ H) aOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING; C# r5 s: A8 u# T6 j' z
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS& J% W2 w% f! q# B' v5 L7 b, h
Grant Bishop, Economist$ P; d6 t4 y5 d F2 L% C
416-982-8063
1 ]$ S' j" }/ _ n/ }Pascal Gauthier, Economist! j8 d0 N: O M# J3 D, U
416-944-5730
( O0 Q- \/ P' y+ e3 ~( |6 i+ P8 O# l u& J2 y
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|