 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
. ? B! K& c: D- d) yfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove$ V) f: K+ M+ _ j5 S2 X- H0 z
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
* n4 _: K K/ v9 Rprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
. \+ J4 S6 T( C4 E) [1 e- m3 vfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
6 Z9 a5 ? J7 ]; K# P0 yoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
# M7 W" } @7 [3 w$ f3 _7 n" ^9 c0 zthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately3 O7 |1 x& W+ V
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
" q. S! e: y- Othree years.3 u! n! d+ y# @( \$ E
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from1 K5 C7 A) ~, v3 u3 J* S# V; W
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
. l4 [# u/ H2 Eaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
% B3 v+ ?/ M4 b- Jboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
6 _- V, \4 M3 b- R& y I; Hto fundamentally justified levels.1 {' w* H o0 H% }
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
* [; o0 Z2 m9 |7 \0 a# Awhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
7 o% L- k# t, O. E4 a$ O8 dthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
, t* s3 x$ h- U5 F% Nwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
/ Q# H. Z7 }$ kthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s e( `; D' H0 @! G
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where! s3 C4 r2 A$ Q% @2 O9 R* y
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
, o/ \$ k, F& d5 j4 Y1 F5 ethat is now being rapidly reined in.
$ t3 v1 h# j3 Y. G% kWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
8 d; V. G, X% o) y. z. Hthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
, A9 q* N1 D4 @& rmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh' R$ l' S' ]4 a$ d
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
4 P% n8 l# ?+ Q/ `from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
* e. p5 G/ R, e) U7 s3 Hremain choppy and new residential construction will be
; L) w5 y0 `' J) e7 i! J% ddampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
, _: M6 ?0 V6 p- K/ T% E! His now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
" d" I; x! I2 d* i; [to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
% l; F% T7 X& y- _5 F. I: u; i* ~0 Nresidential construction will fall further to around3 l0 |# z" w" ]! a6 }( @7 [
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
7 e: ~( j' j% _$ i. P1 _5 ?in the fourth quarter.
6 `' K. Q1 S7 C) m% W* C" I; JTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
8 w( y2 x* [& c$ J* M1 N$ b) Bwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run& ~, d% m/ ?' d U. r& y
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
/ Y9 i- X a7 y zprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home' `/ T# w# p( }- S7 V) ?- H- p
values since house prices should track incomes over the
7 [$ K/ i5 N, g1 D" O+ |long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
5 Q! ^* k% C! I+ I9 N! }0 v% bregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
* @; ^ u9 _2 B h8 z# Xof residential construction.4 n! y" D2 h+ O. q6 L
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a! n' e" U U0 K0 V
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction4 \* G5 D# c$ b5 s# `1 Z) O! q e
would have occurred if housing had been priced6 P( N" H7 g2 t! a& L3 a# u3 i7 L
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
( C I) R5 ~& G! Efundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new4 i( c' z2 d% Q* [7 M
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
3 t" O: R( }" a5 F6 w Lmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals., i. ^$ l, c# r# k' v, T
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
8 R# T/ d2 h8 b4 D; Bwhere housing demand will further contract under waning8 x" ]# r" y( Z4 }
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are, _0 _/ C+ ~) d' b9 D" [* Z
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
3 x! Z. [' Y- S( Q9 Fvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
1 u* y8 r' C( ^( u! P2 }* h' k; L2 ubuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces2 l) p! N8 M j3 @ }
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
8 h: a6 J w' \/ t$ W$ ^2 u% K: ]+ rweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless." q+ U0 ~6 v9 H4 A- v" e
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the7 e' T% ~! c! H( t. `( T6 S# g2 y
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
( W k/ {8 i3 s. H+ CMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,$ W: K3 [' A Z! y' B2 }2 _
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
/ L2 } B9 [- g7 |* _rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a6 c$ x& d5 r. K' q8 u
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears s) c6 }$ j3 Z3 ^6 @
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
, r0 j' r7 y6 a+ e q- ^% a/ _condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
6 z. d$ }; X; y* J, t% Phigh levels of apartment-style units presently under! h+ J& e+ z9 _+ N3 C
construction mean that record numbers of condos will5 {" I+ t+ M1 u0 x# N5 l4 S( n
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as- D' L9 Y; p7 }: @! B
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could k. A" ~3 i x. n4 s/ ]; X
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while- T, H% f: D0 p. Z6 `' Q# f! }
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we" x; o& P, z0 w/ H
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from" G$ X f& N1 F- @
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming5 Y9 ?4 U% O9 G) Z) r5 g" w- |' n
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
. K, `" \4 L/ ~6 F# [) F+ \% Qwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
( g" F& u$ r2 C8 @; {OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING, O0 W3 I3 B Y2 l$ i
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS8 V" U; p6 y0 {1 G
Grant Bishop, Economist
3 Q7 e! e* T5 f416-982-8063
) {& w* W) k0 i" qPascal Gauthier, Economist2 a; J2 D1 S2 n. |6 c0 @8 E
416-944-5730
. ]& N9 @& \: N" b4 Q# N( w& v% w# V# e* s; J2 e
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|