 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
. O) X5 T1 ?7 J4 F5 Bfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove' t+ ^7 y& i$ \1 T: t" a
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
: L8 h; O A, b/ T; V" kprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
; J0 P; `9 e4 |7 m! pfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This4 D* l4 u g8 F8 b' w" m
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
5 Y! V# E# P Q3 s% Lthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately3 |, _& t, S, p! O( A! P
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
; }- o8 y$ X" K* s9 _2 A5 Y1 I7 _three years.
2 z, u! T+ V; o, R5 M WBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
& [9 R9 r1 W7 b7 [1 s/ |& Dtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of: |3 A8 ?& Z4 D& _
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects" @% ]" {) j; p6 N0 q+ ~5 S- l
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
# c+ ^+ L! ?0 d8 {% w0 Ato fundamentally justified levels.
7 c/ u- q8 _* I7 f" S% MWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”7 \2 ~( b' c* Z) k- @
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and2 y2 T+ k# ]- H y: X* N. F# q
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
9 x8 b* b( L7 F. v& Awhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
8 ]5 q; \9 x% m4 S9 Bthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s+ k( F" B3 |9 q; L. n1 n
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
5 J: z" q. A% J( Z% Y, P: ?homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
`6 V$ I6 M; B' Qthat is now being rapidly reined in.
' o" g- B/ R" B! G& P9 nWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,, u a9 d( i# ^# F- j, n9 y
the construction of too many new homes over the boom0 R% A/ u5 ]- j" |6 U$ c8 W
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh+ O( m1 W) @: m3 f
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
, x: A/ s0 s/ C8 w+ D# u7 vfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
9 d8 @* d" l) A& H/ L' I/ g/ X3 }remain choppy and new residential construction will be/ w3 x, j' j) C+ m
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction) ?! W& A# j! w0 ~7 r. N( M
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this3 \* y( n4 X: @
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide% l# C. V, u7 c, W) i3 R* F; |0 k7 w
residential construction will fall further to around f$ J/ e; r; F
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units2 z/ u7 \" C D4 B; `
in the fourth quarter.6 n0 y: t: p+ J
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,% W; V8 s5 P$ V; h( S
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run( R# Q; J9 T* K8 n* j/ j
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each S5 i X; b+ N* f8 }# [6 I4 Q5 B
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
$ h9 w% w1 j( i. W6 C8 Z' Evalues since house prices should track incomes over the% v6 |/ D7 |& N$ p+ b" O* g
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we' @/ z$ S9 R+ I3 p' [
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers+ X/ n! {& I8 |3 U1 D
of residential construction.
# Z: {$ b9 _% T E. V4 D' QTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a/ |) ?8 X5 W, }5 y8 v& M
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction, R. P7 `* N4 n
would have occurred if housing had been priced. C' P! t$ g I; O3 y1 m
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this" C) k% F2 ?7 W7 ]* t& z! {
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
* ~& u8 S( E: _+ C3 f2 w/ p1 c0 ~units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too* E* M2 ~% L8 v* T2 Q& e( J
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
3 I1 P% x! |( g0 N2 S& xRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,9 u: Q3 E$ ?+ ?2 c! h
where housing demand will further contract under waning( ?8 P* ~1 T, S4 B) _& h
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
9 p- w5 |& f' o* ?already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the ?: ^( ?& }- [) f; C1 h
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
1 W, F3 l5 q5 O. ?9 Ibuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces, @* U( f. [+ V T1 \. n5 f. _
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
# l1 Y, c) I/ fweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
3 r: @ H8 [8 ]( t! _7 qQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the/ d2 i7 D# H4 w6 O5 K
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de @- g5 a$ `0 S6 G9 e9 q# _) o
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
/ B R4 n, h' M( N7 c6 v/ vgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
- v5 i% O+ Q& ~" f8 F: jrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a# a" k' N+ K w( ^2 R
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears( l2 s8 m8 A7 R
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto) Z+ {: M: A7 S& v
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
5 ^+ j% e9 d5 z9 V% G. a1 T- Ahigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
0 h" Q- R4 n$ m3 Zconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will! G$ w; x# C5 j t: W% J/ _' `* \' |4 d
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
( c( ~' k* S( A; Ecyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could K. V) x4 V+ N/ `2 ~
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
+ ~$ X3 m$ O5 _5 m" Z, T) v; iresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we5 k* j5 v1 G: z$ b" E! x# ~
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
9 { _8 |# z2 g8 ?& ninter-provincial and international migration over the coming" I" \+ j2 R0 t4 b; J
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,4 D h7 G% F5 \ }9 n
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
' h! a: m# z, n+ ^) DOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING; ?/ S3 K/ {- i
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
+ K i/ }- S5 N- {Grant Bishop, Economist
6 h W( n" |2 A6 ?- d$ _416-982-80633 W+ a; ~7 J a( O
Pascal Gauthier, Economist- U4 y8 l4 r4 \! t. s; q1 f
416-944-57301 T3 I1 U8 E' Q$ |0 g
9 d' j' K5 e- \) X# s: F$ v6 T$ }
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|