 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly+ w. z7 s/ W+ F( i
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove8 x8 p6 l' q* @! L7 _2 m) c
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
# v+ n# y7 ]# z o$ \3 Y3 f& |prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
3 ^6 m+ n' n2 H. Efundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This6 W4 B! y4 \5 ^; H0 r! _, i4 m ]
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction3 ~: G- D6 k; q: f$ P/ l* b# H0 Y( C
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately% [+ }0 R2 g" d5 l$ W
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past& e1 {% [& f; D e; _& X5 d8 Z7 Y
three years.
C) m0 m4 ]. k$ B5 IBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from o) Y: {1 L* K- h8 M$ F; H7 m! f! k
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of+ Y, @8 E: T- `+ f4 \% `+ N% K9 H
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
8 U& J- [: T: q* h: gboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
% G- N9 x) r; o+ B0 I% R2 rto fundamentally justified levels.8 q' V: Z: S: s, {
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
7 @4 i$ f5 s; _8 d' R/ J- zwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
: D( {5 M8 W/ X2 ^! {that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven” m/ t* k! i- P2 {( d
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although8 g# e9 F! I- f- G' M+ W+ t5 \
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
8 w9 V6 R2 N6 z3 O# b0 O) T“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where2 I4 Z0 Z6 M0 n" M f$ {
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch& H$ r$ n7 N0 M; p- W, {. G! U2 H
that is now being rapidly reined in.
4 k& ^' m' `! C" P& I4 |/ \. g9 fWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
& k& \7 F5 m. h: Hthe construction of too many new homes over the boom5 {9 E2 l$ t( L0 A
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh5 U7 e& c5 v# y, D( X+ q0 W' L
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers |. f( C. O. o7 T! |( [" E, m
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
* z1 `' e. R2 zremain choppy and new residential construction will be3 N* w( E4 P! e9 I
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction9 P4 y8 \2 Z/ N5 U- ?
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
+ i* r/ l5 t; T* p l) Hto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
3 [# {! x% k w* H) ~residential construction will fall further to around
[, N0 h: |6 {0 n. H* J" b/ X125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units" K4 a( E9 z# ?/ E, W" x
in the fourth quarter.9 v. M% a9 I* Z' U
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
8 x: x# u- V1 d8 Awe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
" r- w' H5 @ a! ~4 Lfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each! C2 L \3 `* G9 F7 F: c
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home D% B& U7 a' L% C! g/ Y0 l
values since house prices should track incomes over the
% M& s1 @* d, p8 } ^% j! Llong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we( |" s6 G4 X! m2 y
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
; C+ L R# Y4 f: gof residential construction.
1 i1 W6 I7 Q* K/ YTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a( s+ S3 y, Y/ D6 N4 ~4 Z
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction+ R; n" l2 C& \/ _
would have occurred if housing had been priced' f0 T; e7 O1 x
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this7 m, L |5 B+ p/ _, P
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new T* Q! J2 s* \$ W2 M
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too; H2 h4 X+ A8 P6 f, k; m
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
3 W: w% i9 ?- g$ a P1 FRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,# `! M6 A% E. v
where housing demand will further contract under waning
4 K( Z/ r* E' o9 o6 Y9 j) wpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
" t5 ?' _8 v1 O, _4 o; calready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
% m5 [8 N1 O$ b, vvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
" {& ~, H4 A8 [/ H/ Gbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
I1 k, K2 x! e8 Hhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural/ I5 U# }4 Q3 @7 P2 T
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
1 z1 I) Q) r; V. ?+ _Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
: T+ `4 m* } ^/ I: B% L+ bstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
( u F8 Q5 V# N, MMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,$ a' P4 N' e/ ]0 Y4 U
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
: Y& k, ?0 s# i6 Orates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
* b) q1 I: ]( W" @' b& p* L3 {1 x) ocyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
+ B* b: e, {# I. flimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
5 \/ f! C- B# ~: ncondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
! s& ?; A7 }/ j( z+ l7 k$ K8 X) H/ Ehigh levels of apartment-style units presently under' O7 q i, f+ U* @- _) J. m
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
- X5 r6 B; U* ?7 w- P/ j- Z9 ?reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as W' y5 g+ N2 g0 Y! ~$ I, \5 t
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
, Z' E1 G n% V: w, D5 v; O3 _spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while" k6 K# y+ f! u
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
/ L! S4 h# t9 ?8 i ]7 eanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from: J$ M- m, T% h7 v- K
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming" E: `# I `: l
years, which, along with improvements in affordability," S# X2 m3 ]+ S* ~, M
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding." D, j3 K; P+ ~$ f4 V/ T
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING$ O: N6 ]+ ^7 c0 U2 }6 | v
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS# E2 F& q4 C; `; L! d6 p
Grant Bishop, Economist0 ~0 b2 a7 B7 y7 q' h
416-982-8063
# r9 `2 P) G8 V1 qPascal Gauthier, Economist
# S. J% T1 H) E ?; Y$ n( Z416-944-5730
& d! n" X8 X! S3 E4 ~) f# N a4 p3 B# T' p7 x$ ?
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|