埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1901|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
9 R* {7 H6 i" r' U2 ~from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove: ^% I6 u  S/ R" q; x1 K  ]- u; @
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house# K& d5 c0 |( a" H1 q7 a5 H
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
6 e$ U7 v: [+ efundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
, F0 j: G8 r& Q2 r, O- I0 H2 Yoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction! v# N0 q* X) m. F4 @6 z5 b  I
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
  V( r& @- c) Q2 l% p" a12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
1 n) |6 u* O8 T/ j4 Pthree years.
) T5 R3 z. y  X+ G; }By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from% t( D! |, i5 g7 `. a* V  \2 `
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
6 T0 E9 D  x/ t( o" ?affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
2 J# ]; T) i/ l. f4 b% mboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices' R' m0 b$ L' d9 D, N# z
to fundamentally justified levels.7 P( z9 E  M1 J& a8 d% |+ w. }
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
+ Z$ I) w4 i; c2 Gwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
5 m! |" o1 Z5 O9 Zthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
0 V3 a) Y: n; c6 _where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
  p: C2 q" h+ r* s/ v* ^there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s' l  Q+ O4 w/ L" ~
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where, T4 M- h* A- m7 T# f8 w& Y
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch0 G! C0 G. [+ C
that is now being rapidly reined in.: {% J" W) P8 o) q% l7 q- t  k% |1 _
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,3 j2 L! J. A/ ^% O' {, {9 _- m* m
the construction of too many new homes over the boom$ ~8 s" k) a; M4 N8 E4 y
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh) ~# g6 Q1 b; L! \# e: J8 ]. P- V+ ~
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers- E, s! G) h& B6 y
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will1 K# g7 z' m9 J9 U/ R$ `  K
remain choppy and new residential construction will be# o& p3 J# T* }% E6 N
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
2 z* `. y. r! T0 ois now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
6 D! _0 d4 u1 B, b+ |8 y2 s& N2 Eto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide* ]/ c/ s2 ~" ?
residential construction will fall further to around
: `/ M0 v( Y$ n  L# E4 b% Q125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
5 c% |3 ?" z7 ?* J6 ^/ B4 f9 g6 Win the fourth quarter.
! T6 }) s6 \- b- Z. w# r# t* {To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
4 D4 |4 n: S% M0 p8 K  xwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
$ ^* D; q, T( d' Q$ F- h5 I& ~' s" Ofundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each4 T: c- q( l! L4 Z- e. p
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home) g/ S0 u& `# t! r4 |
values since house prices should track incomes over the
1 k" z0 b" \- Dlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we6 {9 y2 T: u* m: _  @! E7 D! ^
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
  X0 Q2 F( v& Cof residential construction.) h' {3 u% G: t; Z0 l) f
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a* `4 I4 t% P6 H# g* e
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction8 l+ B& p  {7 p8 A9 B
would have occurred if housing had been priced
, F+ q4 ~) {' v" O" M: {optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this: Q5 t6 F) X1 q' H% _2 H: ?
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new' b3 @2 U3 R, f  K6 i% X2 k
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too* v8 s& w: ~% h; v8 d- `6 r' G4 y+ ^
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
* n0 m$ T: j7 o/ bRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
5 Q0 M; M( b# Q- s7 e* ^# U4 B/ C7 Lwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
4 _0 g$ D3 |+ K) Zpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are0 ?* C% {$ c5 I
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
; Y  _5 g6 v' v  s" \9 n1 w( H4 h/ G9 Uvery time that the resale market has swung into strong8 w7 w: ]! t, P, }( S' j
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces2 B: @7 I0 ]. N' X, E  G0 U
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
' j% i% y0 A( l" \6 p/ nweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.8 ]2 F& q' o1 U' T
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the. ~5 [7 N. u4 Q( n
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
( [& w5 C0 z- p5 VMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,7 s$ |: M, ]  X  O2 i- H
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership/ g8 z  ?* ?& K- W+ Z
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a$ ?' G' J: u$ @3 x
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears+ Q+ {- o% ~! u. n$ y; U9 y$ k
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto! E1 G6 E7 S2 a7 m* ]5 o) M4 x
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically. W" \: u, r/ S2 E9 u
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
7 }; C# S5 t! A+ Aconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
5 {: l5 ^' o6 x- u2 _) B4 _reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
2 D4 y2 [5 d% o: i: F! Z, vcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could7 K, `& a" c6 l7 O
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
; |1 W* W" D1 f1 G4 f' yresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we( Q6 G# G0 e- O3 Y  f" }& ^
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
5 J6 j. Z9 R+ d: B$ {+ Hinter-provincial and international migration over the coming0 i. L$ Q; E/ @1 e, i( X- s
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
, m& C9 K7 @- }4 dwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.% H) c, _9 O  ?9 q5 [  q) @  i
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING( U% Y) K! B- A1 W8 C( E) n+ r9 |- [
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS6 ^% s- E" U! `4 h
Grant Bishop, Economist
0 F% q' f1 i' a5 b( R416-982-8063
9 f4 r  B1 G& F8 l6 C4 }Pascal Gauthier, Economist6 o) D) J- g# J3 |3 [+ P5 p
416-944-5730
9 w4 }5 l0 {  S# T* X
0 w2 d4 ^7 o% s/ Ghttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-9 10:30 , Processed in 0.272623 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表