 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly0 v8 v9 t. M r, [8 I- F
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove% d* D, r0 u7 i
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
9 U0 u1 n& K7 q" m0 L. A7 Y1 Bprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
/ k; ]- m8 M+ j, ]7 yfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This; k/ R. W8 P& W2 v" Y: y5 t
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction# K# N; o7 S! E0 u4 I
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
+ E) ~# i. K* B6 ?4 R4 @9 q% g12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
3 @3 y- L# c- `( r1 rthree years.
6 q0 X7 _" |$ r2 K/ e9 ?) h5 MBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
2 @8 F+ c6 y0 A1 qtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
. n8 s! f) Q& R8 k# a2 m9 \affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects) G& f( m: G0 D5 e/ e3 X& ^+ Q
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices! Z1 {7 i$ ~7 d8 b- n: G# c! \
to fundamentally justified levels.
5 u# P. i/ I+ j% CWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
M! Z! K; j5 k4 [where homebuyers buy up too many houses and0 C" J* r+ c$ j3 v; c
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
9 n5 d$ g* T2 _) s. z2 M7 mwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
! H5 Y! F- }" D: zthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
( T' b/ X: m" @4 T“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where8 _0 r" P# P. R4 e3 \" ?
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch; W" [! a2 `+ H1 D( {) o$ I5 i! G9 ^- \
that is now being rapidly reined in." G( R5 `& M. i
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,. K) O$ }" n3 L6 q" b7 h( H
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
$ @* ~8 x& b3 m8 Qmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
1 N, F% D! d: \2 H: a, Xon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers- T# j+ e4 J! [% n7 R% |3 m
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will5 Z* }9 y" P( B0 {) Y
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
+ f0 \9 y: {; W0 m. rdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction+ _$ v- v3 a# v
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
0 [# a# E# |% T; mto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide- l% Z+ h) U) q* S7 c" W
residential construction will fall further to around& h$ q5 B& p% @( d2 e s" D" Q
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
+ B3 S* _' e$ B. V5 a5 hin the fourth quarter.( r3 c) O+ p+ @% }$ S T
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
# C! }5 Z5 L V8 l7 Hwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run$ s$ X: |3 E3 x
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each Z: m0 Z- _! _
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home4 ~4 q* S" V0 B
values since house prices should track incomes over the
) k& f* ^2 ?4 clong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
) a# ~( h2 O7 rregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
4 ~6 i! ]* f( w0 Iof residential construction.
* W- L9 h5 a& b/ q3 `& F MTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
5 f# p+ ]6 F' c* p8 X1 [5 S- Q“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
D# c u6 }- Ywould have occurred if housing had been priced: [: P5 N, f& S% r7 x( w6 b5 Q$ D
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this# E7 N! t8 z( I2 k0 u4 \
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new/ ]5 X# E4 S% q
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
* g$ r* `6 R$ v4 d; _' Nmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
9 q$ \9 R8 w0 oRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,6 v C1 N0 m" F3 K" ^
where housing demand will further contract under waning
2 E8 v0 N, Q% |" mpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
* a( g& K: z- \( D1 q. Calready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the8 C4 S0 W* j1 o; e* P
very time that the resale market has swung into strong+ e0 k9 j3 T* }1 d1 K
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces+ q3 \* H" J5 J6 Q# Q
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural! P9 h' y# T) F6 j2 ]
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.+ {6 z4 _, e3 D) u
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the. Z4 R0 q8 w7 s) E
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de" A$ R( B2 m9 n0 l! J
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
$ \3 _8 F; B) V5 D. e4 f6 |given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
! k2 @& O& o0 i1 ]5 S' I% V) frates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a) A0 J7 u% @7 Z5 R& y6 O: L
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
8 e6 i7 i2 t" `1 Z4 G! J ^limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
" D) ^+ J* n$ G% M5 S: K' n* icondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
: T" Z/ y7 p9 x, z! g: G e5 Ohigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
9 j" M2 {. G4 Fconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will) n7 ^6 P+ ?9 w- [
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as# I" \. Z( ?1 X% ?: X
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could8 |% { m2 F9 [
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while) L" O) Z( X9 E3 c0 I- i1 d; ~
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
' e3 A- |( t2 r+ J" danticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from) ]* Q( e" h# a$ V& h
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
l6 W9 F& q8 E0 Y9 Z) \years, which, along with improvements in affordability,! S+ K9 N4 A# R0 X# [6 |
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
3 X+ v3 c" P8 l) M' pOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
. K1 i& I8 ]- g7 X% VMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS0 z8 X) f$ T( A7 X
Grant Bishop, Economist' u- I! I u7 n3 o; m; R: ^
416-982-8063
( j5 e, u& j/ @$ U0 G7 ?Pascal Gauthier, Economist
& o* ~; F- Q. f416-944-5730+ @0 p# T+ a% e( |9 ~/ `! @7 T
4 F6 ]+ U5 C7 x" w. l% z2 ~http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|