埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2154|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
. ]' e. v; U5 [  b8 Ffrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove( R9 N0 ?. Y& S  w" o
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house7 x4 p8 q- E1 p) z/ _% a1 f
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
/ a& Q$ n9 u1 C/ J/ w  l0 Tfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This9 @1 n4 [- m* ?3 D. g5 `/ v4 e
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
/ t; [+ X7 Z3 U! bthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately1 j6 u  z5 \2 q
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past& q+ V2 r6 O& R+ m0 O$ g3 n
three years.9 F3 `7 \4 O2 y4 Y  L7 B
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
4 i3 I7 ?& o6 k0 D( l1 G4 k( a/ otheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
: i  s" q, B) e  L# t4 |affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects/ ?: V/ l* H6 J" c% p3 c
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices7 |8 N" f$ P1 Q+ |7 T9 G* @, R
to fundamentally justified levels.
- m5 C' z  Q2 l  X# eWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
$ J$ J0 ]/ `/ y1 awhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and) `+ M1 R5 \( k- R! d2 L- }
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
: O  q  J* V8 g7 L7 J2 xwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although5 |; O* \$ U: _* v+ k
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s& d1 O, `! t6 Y# @
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where+ B6 B* h: X% d( W
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch' i1 g) f* X$ ]" T5 j: I* v
that is now being rapidly reined in.& o0 X6 T; K- o' Y$ U+ x
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
5 P: i) x- k4 ~& M: zthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
3 s" `: c- U7 o  Y. a) Lmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
. ^+ G  K* t7 i; u; |; bon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers  _% o' E0 {* q; p/ c9 b( B- h. g
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
- f7 n: ?8 L4 w3 E' mremain choppy and new residential construction will be
: G1 _- d  }( N* N" Fdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction8 h3 X- x2 w3 @# n+ ]. }
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this  `* w3 r2 }' e* d/ F6 F% Y7 v: @
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide2 W1 W  |7 l& ]5 k3 f& ]
residential construction will fall further to around6 ?. o) w* @0 j( O" w* h
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units7 V4 D: I7 `1 x2 H
in the fourth quarter.' V$ A1 B3 D1 Q+ Z" }* y9 l" `
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,+ |1 S) U9 e5 k* ^+ o7 y3 w
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run: u, b- T; z  H+ l( u
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
, I. j; r  U: c- J$ U% nprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home" N, ]+ f% D3 ?, \
values since house prices should track incomes over the
' e5 m$ X" e7 T( glong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
9 m2 z; J/ G9 [! f, h" a3 mregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers7 I9 l) I" h) L: H
of residential construction.2 {: U* t3 E2 |* E) g; p0 M3 J3 n
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
) C- h( g- _: F% R“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
2 e$ X! L2 H4 i1 U$ H5 j9 [would have occurred if housing had been priced* ]' e: _, H) t  ^+ w$ _, O
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this2 z2 z5 V  R7 A
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new) h  p5 Y3 Q9 W: n
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
9 B) j: _$ E  W7 M4 }# r9 G& J% Imany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.4 E, U7 S" w  b5 t) I& e
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
. [- F% P( r9 {* I" ~1 Hwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
6 Y. U5 K  }+ G. r" r2 i% qpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are- Q- B) @9 @' Z* x$ J0 W' S8 Z, q
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
4 L9 t; s! F+ J" M* z. R" Nvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
5 {7 |# s# |& k1 `. }& Q/ rbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
2 f# r( F: @, o% Mhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
8 Q7 U: ?5 \! X3 |weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
$ \8 _" O5 ^" n  s" t+ g+ wQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the% }9 o& z, a& |* L; L
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
9 o1 Y$ I9 v) e" i8 @9 w/ k: iMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,! J8 ^+ ~" V& @2 ^: _3 ]% L
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership/ y: V1 O" s! ^; t: G
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a, G. v6 V; e: E# _* F. ?
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
9 ]5 `- ~! x  K/ E: e4 z- nlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
, o  p9 |$ B9 P8 @condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
: S( {9 y, O4 vhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under4 ~% V0 ]( d2 `( i3 r. o0 W
construction mean that record numbers of condos will: b1 ?: {  p: i+ _0 M
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
" L9 u2 ?' c8 E0 Ycyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
2 v$ z6 S" L) [" g% Aspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while3 G  _. d! w$ B( v) U+ i
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we( z  y7 g6 |$ ?& ~# z& S
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from# i5 M# Y0 B' C+ w0 s1 @
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming6 K* }# \% y7 X0 \  x0 |& W' i
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,; |0 F/ V( f8 O3 i0 x( {: D# V
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
8 e/ X* g1 L: p8 {OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING' U. b' _- T4 W: D3 H
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
+ N, i7 }& C0 Y" u% a3 GGrant Bishop, Economist
! V5 L: i5 f/ W( u2 |* c) E( s9 a416-982-8063
, O1 e1 J- `9 I  I$ w( @% ^! KPascal Gauthier, Economist
; M0 o% C6 t& G! R416-944-5730
: T# p" D9 B) ]4 W& K: Q* o! T% V- p7 W! ?) i
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-3 08:23 , Processed in 0.110516 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表