 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
0 n, A T! c: G- v/ l" Wfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove4 g i4 n6 F+ f$ n E {
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house8 ]% V* E: k& l/ D g3 j+ i
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by1 {+ x* a3 C6 m
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
4 v) n& j" M* P7 x) @8 \overpricing compelled a level of residential construction% Z3 Y* O& f, ^0 p
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately9 s# K( n5 f1 V+ x& B1 C
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
7 c$ D4 m, ]/ c v8 bthree years.
8 I$ x B9 U. }By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from: ~, z4 l8 I9 }0 @9 n; J, @
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of) `2 U9 c4 Q2 i! }: Y2 R* C' ~
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects3 U: O V2 |' R3 l& q8 D6 J
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
! V C7 \6 s' r' |to fundamentally justified levels.
. i* ` ?1 T$ u4 JWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”; t+ c# X6 c7 K( h7 X/ I$ V
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and8 C, h0 t, T K' {0 r i
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
8 K- {: s( \9 w. N$ Iwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
" z- J' b8 z! s- w3 Ithere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
) A# r: B3 J r& N g“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where; r- O# i- F1 P+ }; g7 k
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch4 J l1 {, ?$ |$ B& F
that is now being rapidly reined in.- H* h; j4 E, L+ d( ^- p$ l
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
" d! I+ j0 R6 a) e0 }the construction of too many new homes over the boom/ ]" y1 b0 w+ N0 G3 r
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
7 \* {, W1 z. C K6 U7 Mon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers% I7 S1 C! y4 K ]6 y
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
1 ? Q' p+ R: `8 K2 c& z6 y8 Zremain choppy and new residential construction will be3 D) j* i5 {! `
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
8 R3 V; `, T1 L. Y. w7 C' qis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
# W: p/ C2 {" \0 A7 j# N3 V% V% Fto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide/ D: J$ T7 n0 f/ K: I) e
residential construction will fall further to around
% O: A# a, d$ y& ]! H125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units: g5 a" ^9 x2 R
in the fourth quarter.. K, r' H: O2 K! B% ^
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,! J& x- e0 F8 u; S2 Z2 p1 Q- B) v3 {
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run; o# E% |# D5 N% p
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each v% m' `9 n0 ~7 e7 b
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
" P3 F8 @/ S% `5 qvalues since house prices should track incomes over the% K' i: n# X$ e% q9 y) d
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we% A' p) Z. I4 H% h* N0 V3 i) p7 f
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers* Z3 ~' r& X! t' F5 a. A# U
of residential construction.
' x4 t5 t/ p8 J+ ^: xTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a9 y& P) d: m! u. U+ j
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
- A/ i8 g7 P5 z1 l/ n9 ewould have occurred if housing had been priced6 m" _ A8 f7 s# J- u
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
1 O& J7 d0 G* ]fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new; s0 }. z9 C9 D( [' E/ d. v
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
; L9 s9 o" B0 \0 M( V/ vmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals., J0 D0 `9 k: `+ K! X
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
R/ @# g, S7 ~8 |where housing demand will further contract under waning
8 u* v5 `! F0 J& U h& zpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
1 Q& f, P$ s% X5 }- Y* F8 @2 A0 A- Ialready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the0 y- P( i* _0 D
very time that the resale market has swung into strong; n7 Y0 M) r/ G' l+ T4 ?
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
+ z0 `, K- c1 Whas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
6 o/ Q# q( ~5 M# vweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
* U; `- M; v* Q$ F" WQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the* D* O/ B6 y F W
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
& Q: k" ^# z$ p0 UMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
$ h; {8 x3 q5 W4 mgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership& Y$ B8 @( o" i. I3 k
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
# D2 \" O/ n3 P- t, s- fcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears' e( O% q2 j- D. N4 r) O
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto, r2 `3 D, _0 r# L" A' X: ]- ~
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically$ s% S& |3 n6 Q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
8 |5 W# U7 L" Y0 s4 gconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will/ V) ^8 P- d/ d; z0 f) ]
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
' b; }8 ?1 a. p& W& Zcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
) G! y7 s9 |* xspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
: w) ?: v2 |6 R6 V c& F7 Rresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
$ o+ @$ R1 [+ U/ ?anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
: N% V1 }) q0 [inter-provincial and international migration over the coming. @: T& P5 [" q. q9 _7 a5 l# k
years, which, along with improvements in affordability, O+ u4 C, s' @5 w2 _$ @
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding. N* A# F, v7 E, Y( r+ N* P$ J& B
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
; \& x2 B' d1 j3 GMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
& d, ~) I1 R9 N7 r( H2 bGrant Bishop, Economist
9 P7 e5 }% `# x: @416-982-8063% Z( _8 r# x* k! o# V( N
Pascal Gauthier, Economist' E2 o0 O) K0 `3 ^, O( F
416-944-57304 k) J* t, \! w$ q; b, X
Y8 H% x- Q7 h g
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|