埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2255|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
9 J: m' Q8 E- ~4 E  h# H, [Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs7 M1 l3 l6 e! b' K; R; k  `
9 {  y& B; T. K
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
8 {( q" ~7 O8 v7 ]% F/ w/ F+ g7 x" d9 e( Y, P
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. ( Y# ?8 d) O8 v) \3 d

0 R7 Z: q0 E% y0 ~" wThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.6 a% H, C* G% ]( s4 h) u

! [# H, e2 M& I$ I1 W' J" k% j# PDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
; T& }+ r) e' Q4 K+ B+ V* }3 `# Y! w$ m2 N
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
  D" ?$ J1 e; \5 S8 R$ F( G, O* m& o2 x8 t
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.# `! n0 Q/ I1 [1 U; ?
. e, X+ [9 p+ [$ Q  H
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.9 L6 |3 F8 A0 R9 s
5 {  z0 d" f, _* J, @% g  C! ?
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.1 @" f+ z, h" k- j! U8 i

6 k1 Z7 l+ `( H1 eDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-10 02:30 , Processed in 0.119099 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表