埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2125|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
+ B! Q, E: h& L5 PDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
/ m7 u) F1 f' F0 _+ ~1 G8 L* g+ N" L/ N" a/ B% O+ j2 h
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
: M3 ~! y3 a2 }) v/ l( I% A! a$ y% \; |
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 6 l) \3 s. A! }5 N0 H

; d' V! y$ u" n8 iThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.) k# D* ]4 G0 W  ~! R

1 w- I* e9 _) I; K. P5 }& yDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
; |. Y: Q- M; }0 u/ G( _6 W# i2 b% B: K( N
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
' n. |! O# S" {3 _. q& b: h" S
& f* s& b: i' B- g/ I' oDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.3 h# y* M) [1 i' X9 F

) V9 F. g. s2 v* w  @Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.' y" B, S5 {0 }5 k: k: F* D$ B

8 K8 d, q0 Q. j1 u7 v9 |4 U% {Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
. g6 R0 m1 H' z7 R3 ~' c4 [* r1 e, B& V; s
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-22 08:45 , Processed in 0.091750 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表