埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2158|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
; \/ F  E: m( _6 PDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
# F' G' t/ h6 D/ n6 I" y1 C; W2 r) k$ ]7 _5 d2 p
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
2 Y. |: V  W, E% q) g/ D! N7 A3 d; ?! k  ~' o+ K+ h6 E
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. & e( S5 K  n7 e+ m

7 g; h: ?/ w: ~# ?- NThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.0 E. ^+ P( g% z; P5 U

: z+ x7 w. n! V9 q* h. b* {/ J2 u9 eDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.3 u. N. w1 g" h2 [2 V& {

) \* K( q2 d4 s/ s0 c2 FDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
, m2 {# w  q! T1 q7 C' A: u% T
1 \! d0 D% ~- n9 [Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
# U8 @  V6 a+ m7 e( R. P- Y) @: |& f5 q
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.: S) p9 d1 T" B  L& h+ E( x

; w! Z; u* w1 d  fPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
3 N9 C3 x( f; c# d+ [9 E" {& o+ z
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-4 22:47 , Processed in 0.133471 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表