埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2189|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员* N- X% T& g4 F; h9 u
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
/ x9 O! i( Z) i$ x+ a" x0 o; U4 Z5 e; I
4 _' Q0 j! D& aEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.8 W( d% |1 y* }& D1 R+ S3 z

6 Z  h) a! O: i8 T& M5 I# hMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
# g+ [) a0 A4 f
8 y: r" P1 @* S8 p( ~) [1 jThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
0 u2 B' K+ H" T
% C7 x. m# `" F7 N# I, @8 yDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.' a+ a6 F* o8 u5 I7 ^! r: o7 v0 Z
  L" G8 D1 T6 P3 b3 M
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives., }  X3 V/ D( T5 D6 u

% ^4 y3 S/ a" u! qDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
( a# e" b( u' ?$ I. j  L* h# @8 H: `5 `1 X
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.% ~2 H! s2 [% _$ ^5 e1 q

. R- ~& ]  j: n! jPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.& s( m, G6 L3 k
3 e& b, H" D% {' b0 ?  a
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-26 00:25 , Processed in 0.324970 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表