 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员( X& E: R8 a4 E- y, I$ T% d" X
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
9 w2 {7 H7 W* `# H/ J/ q. q) |# c7 j1 [1 X u( I
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.% n! T5 A" e- {- c) w" c
. |# B: e4 s2 T- W- b* N5 ^4 ?Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
3 O* |+ R& s$ i7 ~9 q
8 |/ E. ^! W: X. T5 XThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.5 m& y! i7 }/ }$ _
3 N5 E) Z0 x) Y1 @Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.6 ]5 V$ [! C b1 v
) a. d: }( [5 Q( X! Y E9 V7 YDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
2 l( h% p0 z7 F) u) \- r( R" B+ L. p. R1 e1 M _
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
9 S& R' q# p, i" ]( {# [1 D5 B5 E
9 e' h4 I% h6 XDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
4 T* W; v, w& N
* {- K+ ]* p. J4 C7 D7 s B. _& ]& v/ VPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.0 z; M+ w% h2 q1 Y+ r) _ e# G
0 X% X, s+ _3 y: P0 ?( MDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|