 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
+ Y8 ~0 T, _4 }2 Z/ c( t- Y/ SDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
# h; u5 E8 P: V' X8 p* E3 J. k9 r
7 h9 E6 n6 E0 iEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
3 ?6 `+ a( q3 m3 i# V- i2 s% K8 k
0 Z+ h8 S9 H* o4 l$ TMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
/ V x# X1 Y) R. C4 G4 X4 m, _
s% ~5 t; B) U, D* h+ dThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
. H& v+ ]7 @0 J: z$ C4 |3 t {; v& T ^: w
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.7 _0 y: P( @7 e! c
4 A/ s4 R" F; e. e) K, wDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
8 ^7 `, d; m' }3 s9 j/ v; ~6 y
' y& p( Y- B! M" aDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
/ ]! @0 `6 c$ W ^3 b9 C- r( b6 U( T9 b1 F# C2 }
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.# L' ~- @4 u/ u/ X& J8 T/ h
' o1 W, C7 C( M5 o( vPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.' N/ c( [$ f: p& \. G
* b( u3 |, Z. H6 V# _
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|