埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2113|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员2 Z- G9 \6 G8 y* i# ?" I' B) Z
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs+ c% ~. ?# D% o. T4 O- r

4 W, g+ l, n. u" M! m6 E  HEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
/ |0 i. R% v$ Q" d
7 G' n; K& n% C0 M( wMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
5 F5 ~; `7 h: f6 {0 [2 k0 o0 w- |  X
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.$ W* Z& p5 g1 V1 u/ N% V

# D! e8 Q/ s# `  xDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
+ S' a2 B' c/ f0 W# X
! {4 a# n+ u2 i, J+ eDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.( m* }% h& Z! P$ y: x

' f7 `* @# S- \4 {5 dDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
+ k3 H: l+ V& y& H0 t5 z% d% i& Z% y2 u
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
5 q  }: }# p0 L& q& _  i; q2 z: T1 y! g8 f7 s; O& d) y! P/ i
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.+ i$ \4 G$ a# e- h) t  b+ q

; |7 s3 v( C1 u7 ^/ lDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
理袁律师事务所
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-8 07:10 , Processed in 0.162072 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表