埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2107|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员  I& t3 ]! m, p
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
1 e! O- [* U! U! h  h
: A4 ^+ u5 n# c3 u% GEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.+ n) }+ R# F0 m6 ]  t
, t! R& Z  g7 b, v% ~( P8 q
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. ; u7 |' p2 w- g8 a  j6 c
* F5 m/ _$ t% A1 A# s& y
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.+ P0 R4 r* G! c- z$ o  C  z; h

2 S' r3 n# F% J1 uDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.9 C1 @  H# O" n( n  v
0 u% H8 `) l6 _
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.1 n1 D0 @. o: i% c* \5 b
" A* C! _' q1 }
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.6 w8 h$ s! m; K% ~+ g1 P  i4 U
% Y' g7 r$ v' j7 w, D4 W
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
6 P) W* g) M% u% K
+ k  @% D2 a$ Y, P% h6 yPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
5 D& ~" ]3 l* n0 o4 N5 H1 I7 r5 |0 a  ]9 d4 ]% D/ ~& E8 s
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-26 01:25 , Processed in 0.065215 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表