 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员- {" F/ L. h8 V7 t
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs! ~1 k2 ^ e! h0 O
( B* H" n$ n3 F0 `3 h! v4 {7 vEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.* x3 W4 c) t y
* u7 w# L& t6 b4 y: | q# Q* @" E$ x
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
" s8 T7 `8 a" U& q2 Q! u% G
- l- a; V1 B6 Q1 b; N. C! DThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.6 H0 I' p% a. ?" G+ R9 o8 ]
$ H1 Q0 e% r5 F/ L5 f) m) w
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
3 G4 l" I) }% n! w+ {
1 R, L- R! x! g" {* d2 ADow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.& O0 ~! v% C7 q) ^
) i |7 H; y1 O7 l* f* S$ e$ f, p- ZDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.5 ]$ A) K- S8 K7 g9 v3 R' O% H
3 ^7 o& B9 Y' J: ]; e- c1 H3 RDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.$ H( y, f9 Y/ L* y9 @# {1 r
3 u7 M6 n5 I' t# @+ ?3 X) w5 G
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday." j# L* I5 U: B/ X5 t! W% o
" B8 ^. u! _* @
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|