 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员' a( O2 i4 N0 g5 ^0 A9 o/ u' [
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs8 f" E- b5 k g( ^" u. P, {
, n- ~, ]* z u4 M$ K2 Y% g0 A
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
$ |! i; d: t2 M. y, R8 |! o5 N1 B
+ B) R& z8 I% I( B# rMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. / P. n" b! n0 T
3 m9 H8 K& c. ]& u% r
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.& `; g5 R( W/ Q% `. w
4 A. m: X7 w' W6 W
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
1 y& f1 C4 ^+ V: A( d' b* e& J9 b
& D3 f. D& a3 C0 @* ?Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.) i! `% @9 {4 q7 W2 Q
4 m& Z1 |. @7 r n+ N( r
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
* p" b+ Q( y; a$ R5 d! |/ _' o: F9 u0 o7 o, O. M4 q2 U
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
3 D! C( V B$ y/ e3 _4 Z
$ H& s; _( r& n2 d# p! L2 M- S9 bPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
1 Z, \3 J. O6 T1 p8 J' N6 U; r& |+ I& P8 [# O* _
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|