 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
2 s) b1 m6 C+ x3 P4 ^. j( PDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs4 u3 _# j" ?* _* ]5 C9 E
- Z$ _/ m; r! C4 J1 k" {
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.* W0 n1 x- V' O& Q7 K) q" F' e& |
! F% \' }5 L+ c. q( [Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
; G7 L) c% _- C! ^ X$ J# e. _' J1 Z: z7 d& ?6 d4 e8 w X
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
$ q7 r9 n$ Q1 B. M) h2 V: _: m7 Q7 @( H, u% k
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.4 b, @ H8 {4 s/ [8 U
' R3 Z( _' V) T
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.$ E4 ~3 x/ n. G( c) t- b# u) M
# h% z) ^* y) t: |6 [4 z' f6 j }
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.* R7 P, P ^+ K6 e3 @: ?; x
9 ^; y. `7 |& U* A" Z3 m+ fDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
4 m6 O( ^' T" H3 ]$ _& M% w2 R3 ~ p- }: ^8 x5 E" Z& a# E
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
* d/ J3 C7 X, E# e, i
1 \& L. v: H" m# \: b4 PDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|