 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员9 m5 l& |" l) U0 ~4 z% q2 h0 D
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
- n% |2 f* R* b4 O2 @$ m1 e/ r6 J/ p
/ M* `$ |1 x' c5 j# m& @! ?9 ]EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
* [( [4 t9 e8 q9 b8 }' }, p+ N0 \6 J# r4 i; y! m# k |
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
# b2 R% g3 v( y9 z+ A
; M7 w( h5 q; v& `6 i& lThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
9 {1 {4 i3 g+ e+ K
6 M) S8 S% j' a7 u. y5 c1 A7 |; RDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.) T, K1 p: y/ r' h
9 i8 h q" `/ z5 E# LDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.1 A: U, E) C/ L- g! i: _% z
# \" X5 t& `* s/ y
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.. o; o0 Y9 `% y
- N" Z9 N0 T) c5 O% I
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.2 g# M+ w! ]- Q% g
0 _/ `) w; E8 m2 cPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
4 x- W0 l" l! R3 F8 Z
- J. U7 ~- ^. x( P1 ?3 s! @Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|