 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
6 [4 C' O; o9 S% `9 u- mDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs: b% o+ u |) O/ \4 @0 l' U0 d) T
$ Y8 U! b: Z; _EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.2 a$ b/ ?9 R- d
0 @1 p" V' u' v& y' c- j4 U# q# k$ WMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. ; a) d5 z4 s- f. L8 a* h
$ C+ r* J4 J& Y/ S$ ~- W. BThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
0 {6 l5 j8 e% k1 u- D- g( `
% [) e" o9 K& Q2 E4 ADow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
# J. H- v) X; ?8 H: _7 O
' d9 b9 C, h) R6 c) eDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.2 c* c" ?+ p0 W6 G7 P6 I
# `7 x2 c Q M6 n0 f) XDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.+ Y7 b; O0 U1 }1 f; }* A# _4 v5 t
8 H- [) |- F/ IDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
7 x% B& W) {& e8 y h
+ |; { T7 w% A' C8 G6 pPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
1 q# ?. {" d) R9 i
4 j: g* |$ z, t3 K7 C% v- VDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|