 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员% k& e9 X* |' n3 a" f6 V( m+ R
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
6 L# @- I' C& c2 y t
+ J3 m- h! n1 `+ \EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
1 ?# h7 T0 c8 n0 |8 h
* T0 l9 @1 f9 ?) MMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
% L' n6 I' K5 `6 w
+ ~) _' L, X0 w" j: ^) u4 z7 v( kThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.! p" r9 f: W# K7 W% O& P# U
3 `- d$ X2 I" w( m H
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.2 u) S7 c! i V& f* v1 b
. K% J0 c3 }: `; }" c; }
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.( |6 b+ C: I4 [, v7 m7 B
, m3 g4 R( i9 l4 O. W/ q
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
, P, n: `2 i3 M
" e; m5 ?6 p" N# h& w. L* L8 |0 H4 WDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction." ^! X+ q C+ x3 |! q x6 u
& p) M* {# B6 n' v+ Y5 @6 w6 o# e
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
8 ]' |. `+ Y# X2 v
% u+ I4 x7 K& Q: Y' `Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|