埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2173|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
, |/ k- m: ^* r7 oDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs/ `1 U  Q, y2 F' Q8 S9 M+ n
" b: x0 b9 f( [; N3 H
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.$ L2 a! k" b' g; o% I
3 ?% T9 G# V" H9 p. s
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
* \% Z+ @4 J1 N
3 h" Y) {9 z8 Z3 e5 U4 X' @The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said., H/ v$ U4 A/ u- c9 d

& K) F0 l3 |& xDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.# v9 q4 S/ K8 s/ m- J/ F

( w( J7 e- c9 gDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
  x' Z) ^/ Y" E0 x) m; i8 }+ |0 c/ d) M5 j* w
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
' ~. b- j( G3 a- W2 C6 j' d
: u; ?2 _6 y4 @) s+ U6 t, c6 yDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.' \9 [9 i: }! h1 J7 i6 }% Q

  q: t$ ^/ ~& K* e+ |% P3 SPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
% U2 a* x$ ]: S# z% q$ M
' C1 [, v! k% z, J( K2 \Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-16 00:46 , Processed in 0.246385 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表