埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2365|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员# {0 ?' D9 W. @. z/ b6 l
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
# N* ?+ I- `: d# h: c; x# M$ B  Y6 q* ~. E4 L2 }
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.( ^9 I  e3 d! n( e2 Y8 O, ?
  A  u7 V% O0 C
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
  A, r. L5 C" u7 j
1 v& P# [( {' ^' o' `The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.9 O& |" V$ I! s2 q
7 j* I- I7 n3 ]1 I* @  j. ~
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer./ z4 i  S+ t, d8 d. \

1 u3 U) V4 {% w5 p, \6 QDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
" i' S- k/ O, v- r9 @9 K  ]
& K: k& k  T* X6 a' V* v1 J  ?+ ?Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.6 _4 O0 G' [# F) K3 j* v
1 b! I) _( _1 G+ J
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
/ z3 ?* K# x, r- B: H8 U4 ]# \$ X* e& Z' Q# z' c9 o# [+ S5 v
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday." H# |! G& d/ j8 U% J. G
9 f" l3 e' L+ f3 x8 U+ J
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
理袁律师事务所
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-9-2 08:02 , Processed in 1.312224 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表