 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员" R% e7 a/ I7 O/ ^# O1 k* N2 [
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
3 y# R4 h+ m1 v5 Y* H( k1 H2 |% @5 o8 |% s* n6 y( X
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
5 l2 W+ ]. c) ]7 V i. y" k* Y$ N6 ~: G; U
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. ; T' o& M2 K) \& X( |5 L1 r
8 G- ~! N8 [! b4 C8 k5 O" p4 `6 ]The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
0 N& }. q5 n3 ?: D
: v6 w# D/ m( J. l! j4 N: IDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.7 o6 `# @9 ?7 a) m3 L' k+ v& K
- o0 a% m) V+ [, q B0 ~
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
' z2 R# p5 b4 o+ j1 ?6 v; e5 D
( \% u7 a5 Q8 `! l, n. j2 nDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
- J5 {5 g7 ?- r$ U0 N( A' Q
/ w0 e& h( i! G8 Q8 j6 @Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
0 Z$ l* j2 E5 i3 R. W. Y; K3 `8 d9 \5 |) Y6 t6 [* q; S, {, F" s
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
3 f$ I e: D. j1 J2 M
, r1 m% m7 B: V! H* yDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|