 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员4 a) [% i$ h# {/ \9 }( z- ^2 e) x% `
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
. c8 U8 r; C3 d6 S/ j9 o2 P
7 W! j8 F$ U' \. r8 f/ zEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday. R" q- v7 r+ c2 i8 g
6 O6 u' m2 E* `/ g# P
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 1 w5 m* L& U. M
0 j G+ `1 `3 ~) b& `! I
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
, O3 x5 H* L" x: y; z. ^( x/ r! d+ X; x5 `& o4 R8 o4 f
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.& S) Z8 B/ u+ H7 c7 H: X3 M
$ u; p0 J, P$ q+ s/ s
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
" s/ @0 q6 D) h. O+ _( L* ~
9 m8 x T4 N) M2 X* v2 QDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.. Z# k ~0 f' U/ K
# L4 V' H) p* r+ \7 z1 V
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
: x) L3 u7 a) C* X( S: L* E. l3 F* l/ M$ e
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
* m6 J6 l3 ]; }4 J! L6 O8 T0 c2 B' C9 |% j) [
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|