 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员/ F3 J% u6 T0 Y2 d+ S/ i
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs( j7 n; _# m4 C! N! s( D
) `) N, w6 }2 D b/ {+ [5 m
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday. A% P, p! I/ s6 j7 y
9 o: l$ E2 e- f
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
0 k7 [) l6 O4 |
. J/ S4 T, G5 r0 ^' S. eThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
- z# x% w- x, i3 V9 m
2 e2 l4 q0 \. |; J9 j; }Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
! T% C8 _: i& g7 e2 [% R# {3 I E- a+ v, u, v* d8 F
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
$ c) u5 Z9 f. q' A9 d) @+ V
, L; f6 S8 z. l( W1 z% V2 B2 ^Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.7 z9 |' W1 K D3 q {$ n
/ P& Z6 `! _' J% e- o9 k) y# [
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.' [0 T. p) |( o: c' x
" s3 d% {! D$ N* ^/ wPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
) V1 Z4 {8 q( j; W9 _7 H/ n! a$ o J+ a, q: y& n* q" T5 f1 X: ]
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|