 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
1 K- B6 D' ^# \! a. K- Z* n3 FDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs8 `2 [4 ^' E' }# s
' {0 l% I4 B& g( Q! [5 k) ZEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.: z9 B) _ ?6 C2 n: b0 |- G3 c
# v! _& z& A5 p- U) Y( b0 Z2 {Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
% K0 O1 z( J1 }$ C* z0 l4 x4 N: Q$ q8 \( w& D
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.2 `* q8 q1 }0 S- k8 T; {
$ S2 r6 [2 E0 ^( X3 J
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.6 P5 |* y, C2 S, B, }2 ~4 c) ]
h; K1 W0 @; B: \0 g1 c1 E! r, u+ V
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.* O- a4 S4 y7 y: j) f
7 F8 g- C5 e& {Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
- G/ j( P4 I ]) Y4 }2 y6 f0 p3 A# i: V
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.# j4 O- `; f: I7 a& ~4 h! k/ O- U+ ^
3 M. ]0 X5 Y! c( G+ [& B9 LPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.: H+ A' ?8 ?+ Y' `# D, B, u
" `' Q0 x u0 ~0 r6 A5 a
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|