 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员 R- q6 E- P. V% V* G8 ~/ L
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs' L# ~- e& N1 g% C* B* S, {0 U+ ^, s0 c
. v) {' X8 F9 ~" g# a G1 D
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.8 S) y, n' G; c3 @
! `/ C' v$ ~# V8 QMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
# c$ F# h' N1 R* Z4 g
% A' t5 a) Q% H" ?8 `& YThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
' u6 L' G; y2 i, O3 G' |! F% z0 A. i: b+ l- T8 P" _' d5 g
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.4 Q0 h. ^5 q% [) G
. t. @! y: t' a, s& UDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
) a- ]( {9 \' _6 B0 c) {
) g& B$ t0 | m _2 z' }2 M; c" i( yDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.5 z$ R6 E0 }* j/ i& D
! o* X2 }. F/ {$ o$ k" ^/ fDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.: ?) ~/ }# z* p1 [9 J+ z* N& _
0 G. i" {& R& h; J# w0 TPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.2 f& b3 {% a& g! a& w
$ j9 Z3 T8 Y3 [ \ L+ l
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|