 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
+ K* z! N" d" w2 V6 ?5 pDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
# ~8 v. C" j- Z; Y/ `2 p- z
) V5 J1 |5 F& k( y: hEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.& U) C% w/ a( ]) n% v4 x
" U# k- O$ M3 I, y7 E8 q% Y
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
; f5 s& p: I. \' O) }/ A; ~7 u2 n5 F5 {0 E7 \
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
& o7 V; U* O% q7 F8 z. M
/ t4 L+ t( {0 ?& mDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.6 c' N6 P) k; f4 s2 P
- |! `: c a& Q( k% V) |2 Q1 ]Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.% u ?) v" r n9 Z3 D: ?5 c
0 w! O; k* q9 P% H& i
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
, i8 u# u q# u, X q! ~8 @9 f4 _$ E6 M7 ~$ O; M7 g3 o
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.' E. A2 M5 Y( ^5 H- L. \$ H$ Z
' o* t2 _* o9 \: zPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.. e4 l! @" u0 f( ~( B) @
9 p+ }8 v. v, `7 M
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|