埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2115|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
3 ^) g+ r3 }4 yDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
, Z( P- d; |+ h! l
* f4 m' k7 E0 \) S6 NEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.- ]2 A# @0 v. t% W( B
6 }* R  d/ P$ X% x# h4 Z4 H
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
7 |  N) i  p3 n( @6 a+ c6 A5 s6 W: G* S4 K& f& C0 i( P
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
6 E+ j; [+ o& r% r) c' z9 w0 g" D! H) b1 c. m6 H+ |8 p& \' u
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
$ J7 z7 @+ P: {: y5 z  o
  Q) R4 P2 k+ oDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.1 T' p( U* L1 p* ?

2 V, q  U7 a5 t0 A6 m6 G$ eDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.; t; x& x. C% Z% H* _
5 z% d6 i3 ?: Z! Z5 Q6 a
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
. q' y9 Z  Y; D# j9 s
9 |& R+ L9 I" O' G/ ]Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
+ R4 h" I0 [" S, C9 x+ b$ `
  P6 z% E8 c1 ^' M  {  [0 WDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-12 04:46 , Processed in 0.107981 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表