 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
& @7 b. k4 M" d% [4 |Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
1 h) K! i2 n% E) Z3 D1 n2 E# R7 r0 H7 J$ E$ M/ O1 u1 X* w$ ^ |
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
; A$ t. z& J2 Y3 d, @0 Z* I2 ]# h6 p5 j" z O9 ^
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 4 n6 x L7 X4 ^& y7 M* s1 \
* e. S% E$ y3 b M0 ]0 OThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.( A- Q1 g% C7 K% _" ~2 ~0 l( d
$ T6 s( `1 l. w6 c* I/ L0 V v" u' r
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer." }3 Z5 m; W a! W4 D% \
2 j7 i) d- O {
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
3 q+ C4 \2 Q$ t; t6 R
) Z% H, T7 }2 h$ b. C. ?+ WDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
* d6 s% [7 a$ ?# T
0 O- E7 u! z8 g3 m- @* i' C7 \Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.+ m4 H$ A2 X0 _& l7 V7 e% n8 n
. d2 J6 Z/ X5 _ d+ p3 J; A0 d" u
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.* |% Z8 @7 O: K3 k6 o
, q8 l' u& _4 s# D1 [
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|