 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员7 e. R* H" ]# h5 a1 D5 r
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
4 S8 |0 C/ Z7 W, [" J
. u9 w* r6 g6 ~EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.+ N+ o7 c9 a2 ^6 T0 [2 g9 e
1 }% ], r6 h' o8 k' ~ w$ Y
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
7 J9 A/ ^1 B( V+ }, S3 e
' i9 j" i6 k( F9 A, RThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.' m* `; Y. _/ |2 [
7 e* f0 b2 F. A4 PDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.7 m5 `; C" J `$ x2 O( x
4 H5 P# R0 W# j3 x( M7 G
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.1 E4 e; C) [: d# n& Y5 O: Y
" ^) A$ Q) ?1 _- U
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
3 A: q \$ G! ^! i# N4 j
4 X0 N9 S9 u' v# b: w) r; |2 DDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.9 \, Q! s) `" A3 q5 E1 X6 x7 |0 b
+ \( @3 m; {! Z1 APhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.( G( C/ }" T3 |: g1 |" k
) J" H9 F- s+ ?% L6 Z) R! DDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|