原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: " H) y' i8 E- z7 Q- e1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行.- q7 O8 `+ ]3 n7 b S3 o2 p6 ^# U
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了.4 q2 f/ `+ h0 S' E
- C" m3 m9 U5 i A) P; O
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. ' @( K/ o) j. Y, l) W. y + }2 k8 i# R* C# N[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20054 k E6 m( ~3 t! M$ V
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"2 W. R: v& l9 L! f) A
/ V; u u1 ]" `! n5 o"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."% j. ^; I8 O7 V4 x
7 m4 K# b/ |$ @' N& b6 \
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。1 S$ B7 t+ q. ^0 p2 M9 {4 ^3 ]$ f1 m
) h# t6 U" D, b- M+ R
/ v1 ]8 n6 S3 i9 F) \
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: & x+ X K/ ^2 W5 ^8 `+ i1 w, [Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 * t9 C! `& k7 |The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"; c3 z% ^' \$ y1 J( k6 K) o
: c9 I, S" C- n6 `
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
9 t. }' R$ K/ G1 s3 D& F+ h: |# KDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.