 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
7 v& ~. c2 u0 p$ t楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
- o" ~: b7 E5 dcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
" p' @ `! f9 d8 u( K Q, C9 m- k, s! e; w- t
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。- S! H/ n7 _( |" R
8 K7 ]$ q; l- q, W W安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
$ C; f5 W- r, y% y' ] O8 j G: L6 L6 G
8 S$ l! i$ K( h, F% p6 D不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?2 e: R4 p4 o# u& X% C5 V' S9 ~/ U
b8 i/ f: W" Y; q& I$ V* f" Y
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。6 @6 |% y" H* \
- b9 v3 s! v/ f" K/ E
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):! c: w& w2 S# h! E
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
. O) o/ w" J8 j4 G2 K1 c/ |7 j! k
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"., L! W- K; y5 o7 a
# J0 T* t/ D6 J3 z h; @, KBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
8 y" c4 I, Z. a( ]+ K7 v, K; v o* n+ ~- j* P
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|