 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ' Y b$ a& v. k# ?+ c
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!- N- l. m7 D" H" f8 @
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... % c9 D M0 I9 a [, y$ O( E
7 C. h1 X0 Q0 w: L$ O$ e您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。1 | F# S# J' e! z& N* ?- J6 X; A
/ s# E1 e {4 H- n) k- K
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
3 d0 [; c1 j6 M' Q5 Y- b! `( I9 D7 ^
3 ?& \$ B/ i3 D q不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
$ @- G$ }, v* y c# z$ y% {0 q `+ V! ^ u
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
! O- q+ j5 S0 }$ U! i% R
7 c$ l; U4 v" y, |6 `关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):9 e U2 ?7 L7 X
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
# y$ [: f' P& K' T* W8 \2 ^9 D/ s' C- J1 f/ Y
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"." c/ n! F" N; ?0 S
; [6 v$ w9 _4 t
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.2 {: F+ J& l: L# Q2 M9 i1 P
. n' u7 U/ P/ G o
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|