 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 7 z- t- J, A" {' s5 {8 H
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
7 }+ o/ \1 z8 P' v8 t8 j4 [corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
5 o# j! ]2 V& W P9 a2 T$ }7 c+ }7 w* J
+ Z1 X9 `, [6 s/ ?您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
$ d9 P& ]7 ^% g
X4 p; q% b. O t( C' \2 ?5 }& o5 Q2 Y安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.4 s% M2 W6 Q% d; Y, q) d
: e6 i. v( D- U& S不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?3 u$ y5 ]& v+ g0 f& ?" F* m M
* ?1 E2 h( R+ N% u9 [: B# w
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。+ j p; j3 J. v Y' w$ x. [2 A
5 c7 I- _4 p. i2 G/ a关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
/ g4 E* T9 |4 |% K% sYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.% ~; q' n+ B, \" X, z% g
. }, ^& w5 D+ U& TOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".; g. [% C' d+ D. M8 R q, L6 T
7 P5 ~' ~* V: c) w- D8 L
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
8 }% z( ]3 e0 t9 R) a8 f1 m2 s6 x# }
& m. d0 R+ W, A6 `1 X% z[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|