 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ( o* A7 D7 ~. ~! } t w
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
7 \5 a, {3 s Y; L3 ^- e- N& n, ?' fcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... $ k! l/ R+ I" e6 G2 E6 [. A" Z) n
1 C+ [4 |4 ~6 ?+ c5 q您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。' a8 N3 f% y$ e- q- \( T2 r3 ], {
& q% D# u9 x1 |
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.- e- p4 X9 s8 y- I
I: {3 m" D: M$ }# ^# b; C$ l不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
+ L& Z# |! c H9 d, I$ F+ A7 D' R: E
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。; x; d; A. M5 C2 @
# W% Z- ?% v* u* U, R
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):+ z& i2 }% A* _/ l6 \8 N
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
, R( u+ D( K/ Z' Z0 p: v) X! H! v- R9 w4 s, }
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".; j+ L, Z7 O& T/ E
) W2 g* o" ^/ h- o9 Z# F2 a6 cBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
2 b+ x$ I/ s/ f3 m
& R% T; h6 n- Z- Z3 E: F/ z[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|