 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
3 L% O) b+ z9 ^& B2 e3 |楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!% @; e; S0 w7 V- e
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
* [- a/ P, Y$ y. _* x
" @6 N' s) ]3 H* Q) ~8 k9 s您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。 y2 L# [$ C9 {, J# i4 s
j/ Z4 C$ `8 l
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless., A) }5 m% A ]
2 v$ |( F& M6 V6 @" h- d/ b- c( t' G不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?9 p& G' E s. P0 R7 b- K( X
4 ?& e) W4 o( m: K) V0 m另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
+ k" f8 X# ~7 A* E3 ?: V5 l, s8 y3 ~4 }$ h6 q+ v
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
* I% r/ p' Q1 | v* v& V% d) I( f7 P+ mYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
9 Q. X& _- n" |# k! |1 p: O8 e
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
2 v X5 b; }8 u w+ ]6 z0 o6 X, x
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.4 m6 }1 [# e. O3 V9 e9 P. x
# V) v6 D) O2 ^) d[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|