 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ! f% g P6 \' [: g' c+ T& x
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!0 C- n* {. E0 l( E# A+ I+ s
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
8 b& L1 N( Z2 Z9 l3 u* s. D* I% u$ v
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。; u2 \& l2 U$ K, T0 K, H, X' l
: t; y0 {$ u/ I% n. f' T5 m安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
" M5 u- @& ?* k% v* ?) ]" L' [% [3 i O& l4 B4 c3 W
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
( q, N" u! Y( Y' g/ z2 T
+ N$ Z L/ R: l0 f另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
& K" l( M+ H4 ?0 O5 r! U+ W8 w' D& @+ n# Y; l
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):& M1 }, J' I3 Z3 i
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
( V9 ]0 f! W( ?; i& \' I, o" \. ?
% |8 I7 }8 V& n/ n5 n& x. `Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
3 N8 E( v+ W$ n3 R H, z! A% v9 D, a6 C
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
7 P7 g7 V) ^0 E$ D8 ?4 g4 @- Z) C
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|