 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
8 b, I& V9 m4 U0 K' u& D3 |楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
0 E2 B: C8 g( Y) L! ]! L: w3 @corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... / _5 C: X/ o2 v1 P& Z
" d) ?( U- ^& k, ?* m2 S y. Y您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
1 {0 d& \( Q4 ~0 N6 j9 C0 D0 @: A! i! D/ v1 N9 o
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.- d+ j" T; X, n5 Q5 H9 d0 i
* ~1 _$ a: P7 t不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
; r; C+ w% ]4 m$ I; G5 D' m- l- B+ v9 M! F$ ~" _) l5 W# e
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。 a' N7 K* V. A- e4 ?3 u x0 w: m
0 K; n4 G3 s8 v' \1 D9 ^3 b; y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
: E0 _2 U$ L/ xYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
" u" ]1 r0 ?6 \: z5 L
0 ~1 @( e+ i) J A, ]Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".6 N+ A/ ^' G9 `
* Y6 J- P$ V7 t" j- u- Q
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.2 H v- G' F7 Y- G5 |
! w. J1 p' r3 ~3 {+ @) p n$ ^- f[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|