 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 * O4 n1 B* H2 x- S
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!6 h0 O: i1 ?! p* k4 @0 W$ \" x- a9 Q
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
; b5 y$ }; m( ^: |4 \: Z4 V. p _+ J& F1 i" k; m( \7 d3 |5 b
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
* v. f: {7 i4 z8 v& i4 z4 P2 G }
: b( g" ^: q' A, {; W9 b1 c' B安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
) o# D" q5 V- j: Z" G, k! L: F: d8 M$ Y2 `
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?8 Z1 ]5 s: r) b8 E$ }/ o
/ x; `( O( ^& F0 D5 o% v另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
' W' O9 G9 O' x0 a& Q. p' v% z) X" f2 g& L6 j
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
- b5 y. i* {2 M% d+ Q8 T7 WYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
/ e6 @/ f6 M4 e2 T2 T
4 ?9 H7 c7 _8 AOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".- P" m' D; A, d. D/ S% g6 S
! |# N! P8 T( J+ K/ L" T8 oBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.5 X9 T" x6 V: d' K8 J
4 r! e% u( a& g5 M8 l[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|