 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 " Y- p* D9 e' O0 {. u
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!2 d8 q$ s1 Y* Q, e+ H
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
1 b' j+ L+ t9 A0 M/ F+ E: o; w0 o/ v( R9 T' B+ j
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
# C$ Q- k8 h0 S+ ~% W) r. \
3 h2 B8 Q3 C1 s7 o& Y安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.% X1 @7 t( K! U# @
" ^( {% ?; L6 ?; A2 \) d' G不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?" _4 k P1 O: P, i4 {: p A
$ c4 L; D' K% }. A7 E; G- P1 q
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。& ]0 C, A/ U- c7 W; @
9 v' E4 E5 B% h2 G, Q; L关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
) X. e- L% \, C1 N6 R hYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.2 s6 @2 r: U8 k. ?/ m$ x
+ D2 f0 k7 \% @8 n6 V
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".% h, a0 u8 l7 B0 }" H: E
. a0 I3 K! f% ?- g* L
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
) X& @ D5 I' i: d+ Q
$ Z K4 {) s/ D6 j[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|